AzTrials
AzTrials

Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisPhase 2SPIRITNCT03573505

An Efficacy and Safety Study of BG00011 in Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

A Phase 2 study testing BG00011 in people with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, run by Biogen at 90 sites in 17 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BG00011 compared with placebo in participants with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). The secondary objectives of this study are: to evaluate the efficacy of BG00011 compared with placebo in participants with IPF as determined by change in percent… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
What is being tested?
BG00011
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
109 participants
Where
90 sitesin 17 countries
Study dates
24 Sep 2018to 14 Nov 2019
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female subjects must be surgically sterile, postmenopausal (minimum 1 year without menses), or agree to use 1 or more forms of highly effective contraception from the time of signing of the informed consent form (ICF) until 3 months after the last injection of study medication. Male subjects must also agree to use 1 or more forms of highly effective contraception for either themselves or their partners from signing of ICF until 4 months after last injection of study medication.
  • IPF diagnosed based on modified ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT IPF guideline for diagnosis and management, within 3 years of Screening.
  • Combination of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) pattern and, if one has been obtained, surgical lung biopsy pattern, consistent with diagnosis of IPF.
  • Carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLco) (corrected for hemoglobin): 30% to 79% predicted of normal at Screening, with no clinically significant deterioration between the Screening Visit and randomization, as determined by the Investigator.
  • Forced (expiratory) vital capacity (FVC) ≥50% predicted of normal at Screening, with no clinically significant deterioration between the Screening Visit and randomization, as determined by the Investigator.
  • If a subject is taking nintedanib or pirfenidone, they must be on a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to randomization.

Who cannot join

  • Unable to perform pulmonary functional tests (PFTs) or undergo HRCT procedure.
  • Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) <90% at rest (if on oxygen supplementation, must be ≤2 L/min at rest).
  • Airway obstruction (i.e., prebronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7) or evidence of a bronchodilator response as defined by an absolute increase of ≥12% and an increase of ≥200 milliliters (mL) in FEV1 or FVC, or both, after bronchodilator use, compared with the values before bronchodilator use at Screening.
  • End-stage fibrotic disease likely requiring organ transplantation within 12 months, or if the subject has initiated active evaluation for organ transplantation.
  • The extent of emphysema in the lungs exceeds fibrosis, based on central review of HRCT scans.
  • Body weight <60 kg at Screening.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • History of or ongoing malignant disease, including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, with the exception of basal cell carcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, and carcinoma in situ of the cervix that have been completely excised and considered cured >2 years prior to Screening.
  • Significant cardiac disease (e.g., New York Heart Association Class 3 or 4; myocardial infarction within the past 6 months; unstable angina; coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft within the past 6 months; uncontrolled atrial or ventricular cardiac arrhythmias; or pulmonary hypertension requiring pharmacologic treatment).
  • Clinical diagnosis of any connective tissue disease (including but not limited to scleroderma, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis) or a diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features as determined by the Investigator.
  • Other disease that may interfere with testing procedures or, in the judgment of the Investigator, may interfere with study participation or may put the patient at risk when participating in this study.
  • Other unspecified reasons that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Biogen, make the subject unsuitable for enrollment.
  • NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

90 sites in 17 countries.

90 sites in 17 countries

United States26 sites
  • Research Site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Research Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Research Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Research Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Research Site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • Research Site

    Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017

  • Research Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Research Site

    Falls Church, Virginia, 22042

  • Reserach Site

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Research Site

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

  • Research Site

    Kansas City, Missouri, 66160

  • Research Site

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

  • Research Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • Research Site

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • Research Site

    Miami, Florida, 33125

  • Research Site

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407

  • Research Site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Research Site

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06510-3221

  • Research Site

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Research Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85006

  • Research Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85013

  • Research Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Research Site

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02903

  • Research Site

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Research Site

    Seattle, Washington, 98195

  • Research Site

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

Other trials in United States

Australia10 sites
  • Research Site

    Chermside, Queensland, 4032

  • Research Site

    Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010

  • Research Site

    Frankston, Victoria, 3939

  • Research Site

    Heidelberg, 3084

  • Research Site

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3004

  • Research Site

    Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150

  • Research Site

    New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305

  • Research Site

    Newtown, New South Wales, 2042

  • Research Site

    Nundah, Queensland, 4012

  • Research Site

    Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102

Other trials in Australia

United Kingdom8 sites
  • Research Site

    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0AY

  • Research Site

    Edinburgh, Lothian Region, EH4 2XU

  • Research Site

    Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW

  • Research Site

    Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF

  • Research Site

    Liverpool, Merseyside, L9 7AL

  • Research Site

    London, Greater London, SW3 6NP

  • Research Site

    London, Greater London, W12 0HS

  • Research Site

    Newcastle, Tyne & Wear, NE1 4LP

Other trials in United Kingdom

Spain6 sites
  • Research Site

    Barcelona, 08006

  • Research Site

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Research Site

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 28006

  • Research Site

    Seville, 41013

  • Research Site

    Valencia, 46014

Other trials in Spain

France5 sites
  • Research Site

    Bobigny, Seine Saint Denis, 93009

  • Research Site

    Bron, Rhone, 69677

  • Research Site

    Montpellier, Herault, 34295

  • Research Site

    Paris, Paris, 75877

  • Research Site

    Rennes, Ille Et Vilaine, 35033

Other trials in France

Italy5 sites
  • Research Site

    Catania, 95123

  • Research Site

    Forlì, Cesena, 47100

  • Research Site

    Milan, 20123

  • Research Site

    Roma, 00168

  • Research Site

    Siena, 53100

Other trials in Italy

Czechia4 sites
  • Research Site

    Olomouc, 775 20

  • Research Site

    Plzen Bory, 305 99

  • Research Site

    Prague, 140 59

  • Research Site

    Prague, 180 01

Other trials in Czechia

Israel4 sites
  • Research Site

    Haifa, 34362

  • Research Site

    Jerusalem, 91120

  • Research Site

    Kfar Saba, 4428164

  • Research Site

    Petah Tikva, 49100

Other trials in Israel

Russia4 sites
  • Research Site

    Kazan', 420103

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197022

  • Research Site

    Yaroslavl, 150003

  • Research Site

    Yekaterinburg, 620039

Other trials in Russia

Belgium3 sites
  • Research Site

    Brussels, 1070

  • Research Site

    Leuven, 3000

  • Research Site

    Yvoir, 5530

Other trials in Belgium

Netherlands3 sites
  • Research Site

    Amsterdam, 1091 AC

  • Research Site

    Nieuwegein, 3435 CM

  • Research Site

    Rotterdam, 3015 CE

Other trials in Netherlands

South Korea3 sites
  • Research Site

    Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 05505

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 3080

Other trials in South Korea

Argentina2 sites
  • Research Site

    Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, B7600FZ

  • Research Site

    San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, 4000

Other trials in Argentina

Denmark2 sites
  • Research Site

    Aarhus C, 8000

  • Research Site

    Hellerup, 2900

Other trials in Denmark

Greece2 sites
  • Research Site

    Heraklion, 71110

  • Research Site

    Larissa, 41110

Other trials in Greece

Poland2 sites
  • Research Site

    Gdansk, 80-952

  • Research Site

    Warsaw, 01-138

Other trials in Poland

Chile1 site
  • Research Site

    Talca, 3465586

Other trials in Chile

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BG00011 in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BG00011 compared with placebo in participants with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). The secondary objectives of this study are: to evaluate the efficacy of BG00011 compared with placebo in participants with IPF as determined by change in percent predicted forced (expiratory) vital capacity (FVC); to assess progression-free survival in participants who receive BG00011 compared with placebo; to assess the occurrence of IPF exacerbation in participants who receive BG00011 compared with placebo; to assess the incidence of absolute decline in FVC ≥10% in participants who receive BG00011 compared with placebo; to assess the time to death or lung transplantation in participants who receive BG00011 compared with placebo, and the transplant-free survival rate at Week 26 and Week 52; to assess the time to non-elective hospitalizations in participants who receive BG00011 compared with placebo; to assess additional pulmonary function test (PFT) findings in participants who receive BG00011 compared with placebo; To assess performance on the 6 minute walk test (6MWT) in participants who receive BG00011 compared with placebo; to evaluate the safety and tolerability of BG00011; and to evaluate the serum concentration of BG00011.

Being tested
BG00011, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BG00011Drug

    Administered as specified in the treatment arm.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Administered as specified in the treatment arm.

Study groups in NCT03573505
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BG00011ExperimentalParticipants will receive BG00011 56 mg once weekly by subcutaneous (SC) injection for 52 weeks.
Receives: Drug: BG00011
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo once weekly by (SC) injection for 52 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Forced (Expiratory) Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52

    FVC is the total amount of air exhaled during the forced expiratory volume test that is measured during spirometry and is the most important measurement of lung function. This test requires participant to breath into a tube connected to a machine that measures the amount of air that can be moved in and out of the lungs. Change from baseline is defined as post-baseline value minus baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates decline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Change From Baseline in FVC, Expressed in Percent Predicted at Week 52

    FVC is the total amount of air exhaled during the forced expiratory volume test that is measured during spirometry and is the most important measurement of lung function. This test requires participant to breath into a tube connected to a machine that measures the amount of air that can be moved in and out of the lungs after taking an inhaled bronchodilator medicine which is used to dilate participant's bronchial (breathing) tubes. Percent predicted FVC (in %, here FVC was measured in litres) = [(observed FVC)/(predicted FVC)]*100. Change from baseline is defined as post-baseline value minus baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates decline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  2. Time to Progression

    Time to progression is defined by a composite endpoint, including any of the following events: Absolute decline of 10% predicted in FVC (FVC percent predicted (baseline) - FVC percent predicted (progression) ≥10%); Non-elective hospitalization for respiratory events; Lung transplantation or death. The earliest time to meet at least 1 composite criterion was calculated.

    Measured: Up to Week 60 (End of Study)

  3. Time to First Acute Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Exacerbation

    Time to first acute IPF exacerbation is defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of acute IPF exacerbation. Acute IPF exacerbation is defined as a clinically significant deterioration of unidentifiable cause in a participant with underlying IPF. The diagnostic criteria for IPF used in this study were derived from evidence-based guidelines developed by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/Latin American Thoracic Association (ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT) joint task force for the diagnosis and management of IPF. Participants were assessed according to the modified 2007 diagnostic criteria for acute IPF exacerbation.

    Measured: Up to Early Termination Visit (Up to Week 52)

  4. Number of Participants With at Least One Acute IPF Exacerbation

    Acute IPF exacerbation is defined as a clinically significant deterioration of unidentifiable cause in a participant with underlying IPF. The diagnostic criteria for IPF used in this study were derived from evidence-based guidelines developed by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/Latin American Thoracic Association (ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT) joint task force for the diagnosis and management of IPF. Participants were assessed according to the modified 2007 diagnostic criteria for acute IPF exacerbation.

    Measured: Up to Early Termination Visit (Up to Week 52)

  5. Number of IPF Exacerbations

    The IPF exacerbation is defined as a clinically significant deterioration of unidentifiable cause in a participant with underlying IPF. The diagnostic criteria for IPF used in this study were derived from evidence-based guidelines developed by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/Latin American Thoracic Association (ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT) joint task force for the diagnosis and management of IPF. Participants were assessed according to the modified 2007 diagnostic criteria for acute IPF exacerbation.

    Measured: Up to Early Termination Visit (Up to Week 52)

  6. Number of Participants With Absolute Decline of 10% Predicted in FVC

    FVC is the is the total amount of air exhaled during the forced expiratory volume test that is measured during spirometry and is the most important measurement of lung function. This test requires participant to breath into a tube connected to a machine that measures the amount of air that can be moved in and out of the lungs after taking an inhaled bronchodilator medicine which is used to dilate participant's bronchial (breathing) tubes. Absolute Decline of 10% = FVC percent predicted (baseline) - FVC percent predicted (progression) ≥10%.

    Measured: Up to Early Termination Visit (Up to Week 52)

  7. Time to Death or Lung Transplantation

    Time to Death or Lung Transplantation is defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any one of the event (death or lung transplantation).

    Measured: Up to Week 60 (End of Study)

  8. Time to All Non-elective Hospitalizations

    Time to all non-elective hospitalizations is defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of hospitalization which was not elected by the participant.

    Measured: Up to Week 60 (End of Study)

  9. Time to All Non-Elective Respiratory Hospitalizations

    Time to all non-elective respiratory hospitalizations is defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of hospitalization due to respiratory problems, which was not elected by the participant.

    Measured: Up to Week 60 (End of Study)

  10. Change From Baseline in Absolute FVC

    FVC is the total amount of air exhaled during the forced expiratory volume test that is measured during spirometry and is the most important measurement of lung function. This test requires participant to breath into a tube connected to a machine that measures the amount of air that can be moved in and out of the lungs after taking an inhaled bronchodilator medicine which is used to dilate participant's bronchial (breathing) tubes. Change from baseline is defined as post-baseline value minus baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates decline.

    Measured: Up to Week 44

  11. Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted FVC

    FVC is the total amount of air exhaled during the forced expiratory volume test that is measured during spirometry and is the most important measurement of lung function. This test requires participant to breath into a tube connected to a machine that measures the amount of air that can be moved in and out of the lungs after taking an inhaled bronchodilator medicine which is used to dilate participant's bronchial (breathing) tubes. Percent predicted FVC (in %) = [(observed FVC)/(predicted FVC)]*100. Change from baseline is defined as post-baseline value minus baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates decline.

    Measured: Up to Week 44

  12. Change From Baseline in Absolute Carbon Monoxide Diffusion Capacity (DLco)

    DLCO is a measurement of the ability of the lungs to transfer gases from the air to the blood. Evaluation of DLco was be performed by single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. DLCO was assessed in milliliters per minute per millimeter of mercury (mL/min/mmHg). Change from baseline is defined as post-baseline value minus baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates decline.

    Measured: Up to Early Termination Visit (Up to Week 52)

  13. Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Carbon Monoxide Diffusion Capacity (DLco)

    DLCO is a measurement of the ability of the lungs to transfer gases from the air to the blood. Evaluation of DLco was be performed by single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. Percent of predicted DLco (in %) = [(observed DLco)/(predicted DLco)]*100. Change from baseline is defined as post-baseline value minus baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates decline.

    Measured: Up to Early Termination Visit (Up to Week 52)

  14. Change From Baseline in Absolute Total Lung Capacity (TLC)

    Total lung capacity is the measure of lung volume was measured by full-body plethysmography. Change from baseline is defined as post-baseline value minus baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates decline.

    Measured: Up to Early Termination Visit (Up to Week 52)

  15. Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted TLC

    Total lung capacity is the measure of lung volume was measured by full-body plethysmography. Percent predicted TLC (in %) = [(observed TLC)/(predicted TLC)]*100. Change from baseline is defined as post-baseline value minus baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates decline.

    Measured: Up to Early Termination Visit (Up to Week 52)

  16. Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Parameters

    The 6MWT measures the distance (in meters), a participant is able to walk in 6 minutes. This test measures the distance a person can walk quickly on a flat, hard surface in 6 minutes and reflects an individual's ability to perform daily physical activities.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52

  17. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, requires inpatient hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability and/or results in a congenital anomaly.

    Measured: Up to Week 60 (End of Study)

  18. Number of Participants With Anti-BG00011 Antibodies in the Serum

    Measured: Up to Week 60 (End of Study)

  19. Concentration of BG00011 in the Serum

    Measured: Predose on Day 0, Day 5, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 26, Week 38, Week 52, and Safety Follow-up Visit (Up to Week 60)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jun 2018
  2. Study start24 Sep 2018
  3. Primary completion14 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion14 Nov 2019

Why it stopped: Study was stopped because of safety concerns.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
109 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03573505
Sponsor's protocol ID
203PF203
Other IDs
2017-003158-18, 2017
Acronym
SPIRIT
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
19 Jun 2018
Last updated
11 Dec 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Raghu G, Mouded M, Chambers DC, Martinez FJ, Richeldi L, Lancaster LH, Hamblin MJ, Gibson KF, Rosas IO, Prasse A, Zhao G, Serenko M, Novikov N, McCurley A, Bansal P, Stebbins C, Arefayene M, Ibebunjo S, Violette SM, Gallagher D, Behr J. A Phase IIb Randomized Clinical Study of an Anti-alphavbeta6 Monoclonal Antibody in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Nov 1;206(9):1128-1139. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202112-2824OC.

    PubMed 35771569
  • Shenderov K, Collins SL, Powell JD, Horton MR. Immune dysregulation as a driver of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2021 Jan 19;131(2):e143226. doi: 10.1172/JCI143226.

    PubMed 33463535

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing BG00011 in people with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, run by Biogen at 90 sites in 17 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 90 sites in United States, Australia, United Kingdom, Spain, France and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Nov 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Forced (Expiratory) Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52 (time frame: Baseline, Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03573505, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in