AzTrials
AzTrials

Splenectomy; StatusNCT03571399

A Nationwide Italian Survey on Asplenia

An observational study of Splenectomy; Status, run by Società Italiana Talassemie ed Emoglobinopatie.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Spleen is involved in several functions, such as the production of protective antibodies, the removal of unwanted particulate matter from the blood (eg bacteria) and also the storing of blood cells, especially white cells and platelets. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Splenectomy; Status
How many people
1,400 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Mar 2016to 28 Feb 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients diagnosed with of any type of asplenia (congenital, surgical and functional) will be included in the study.

Who may be able to join

  • Adult and pediatric patients affected by asplenia

Who cannot join

  • Medical history including all relevant clinical data required by the protocol not available

About this study

Official title: Mortality and Morbidity in a Large Cohort of Asplenic Patients: a Nationwide Survey From the Italian Network on Asplenia

Spleen is involved in several functions, such as the production of protective antibodies, the removal of unwanted particulate matter from the blood (eg bacteria) and also the storing of blood cells, especially white cells and platelets. Asplenia is a status due to spleen absence or dysfunction, which results from several rare diseases. Congenital Asplenia is a condition with absent or dysfunctional spleen, associated with other congenital abnormalities; functional asplenia is a status with present but dysfunctional spleen, related to many rare diseases, such as sickle cell disease, thalassemia, essential thrombocythaemia, lymphoproliferative diseases and splenectomy is the surgical removal of the spleen in order to treat a huge number of rare hematological and oncological diseases. So, asplenia is the final result of a numerous variety of rare disorders, and it leads to a high risk of infections and thrombotic events with significant mortality and morbidity. Antibiotic prophylaxis and specific vaccinations are recommended in this high risk population but adherence was shown to be very poor. A national register was demonstrated to improve population outcomes and reduce health care costs and facilitate research and public health purposes in this target population. In Europe very little experience exists in comprehensive national program for management of asplenia, and only in a restricted part of England and in Ireland surveys of post-splenectomized patients have been performed. In Italy no common policy of patient care has yet been developed, and management of asplenia is mainly case or locally directed.

Read the detailed description

People with asplenia have a high risk of serious infections, as the spleen is a reservoir of naive B and T cells and functions as a filter for antigens and capsulated bacteria in the blood. It also removes aged blood cells and Howell-Jolly's bodies from red blood cells.

The asplenia can be congenital, surgical and functional. Congenital asplenia is a condition associated with rare and poorly understood and studied syndromes. Surgical asplenia consists in the removal of the spleen for the management of some hematological or oncological diseases. Functional asplenia characterizes numerous hematological and non-hematological diseases; the most representative, among those hematological, is the sickle cell disease (SCD), among the non-hematological causes of functional asplenia, include several autoimmune diseases (e.g. Lupus, Sjogrens), inflammatory bowel disease (e.g. celiac disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative rectocolitis ) and infiltrative diseases (e.g. amyloidosis, sarcoidosis).

Infections are the leading cause of death in individuals with asplenia, especially in children under the age of five . It has been shown that the integrity of the splenic function is necessary for the development and survival of IgM memory cells, a population of memory B cells of IgM isotype. These interesting data would explain the increased susceptibility to invasive infections sustained by capsulated bacteria in subjects with anatomical or functional asplenia, especially in the first years of life, in which there is a physiological and transient IgM memory deficit, supporting the common knowledge that the spleen represents a particular immunological environment that is fundamental for the removal of polysaccharide antigens and for the optimal antibody response.

In asplenic subjects, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Hemophilus influenzae and Neisseria meningitidis are the germs that most frequently cause invasive infections, such as bacteremia, sepsis and meningitis; therefore it is clear that prevention and immediate and aggressive treatment are the cornerstone of the correct management of this group of patients. Recently the new 13-valent conjugate vaccine against pneumococcus has been introduced and it is believed that this is a new and more effective strategy to reduce the infectious risk in these subjects; however, specific data on the population of asplenic subjects are lacking.

Recent studies and reports have shown a greater incidence of thrombotic complications in asplenic subjects, even if the rate of thrombotic events seems to be different between the different pathologies underlying the condition of asplenia. In fact, a large number of thrombotic events have been observed in splenectomized subjects for hereditary spherocytosis, for thalassemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura and other hematological diseases but the pathophysiological basis of these complications, the possible preventive treatments are not yet known. effective and optimal management of thrombotic events. Furthermore, preliminary data suggest a different susceptibility to infectious and thrombotic complications in the different forms of asplenia. If this is confirmed, the indications for antibiotic and antithrombotic prophylaxis, the timing of monitoring and the more or less aggressive management of complications, could vary in the different forms of asplenia.

Moreover, in Italy there are no shared and homogeneous indications on the prevention and treatment of short and long-term complications related to the condition of asplenia and their knowledge is still very limited among the medical staff. It has been shown that countries that have adopted shared measures for the management of these patients have achieved an improvement in the prevention of complications, through an increase vaccination coverage even among adults and the continuous information on possible risks related to the clinical condition. In fact, it often happens that patients do not respond to regular follow-up missing vaccination recalls and reducing over time all information about their health. This occurrence was considered one of the major risk factors for the development of serious complications in asplenic individuals .

The aim of the study is to retrospectively and prospectively assess a relatively large population of patients with asplenia in order to identify the rate of mortality and morbidity (infectious and thrombotic complications) developed by asplenic patients during the observation period.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Identification of the causes of mortality and morbidity

    The infectious and the thrombotic complication developed by asplenic patients during the observation period will be assessed

    Measured: 10 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jun 2018
  2. Study start1 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2016
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
1,400 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03571399
Sponsor's protocol ID
Asplenia
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
7 Jun 2018
Last updated
28 Jun 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Quinn CT, Rogers ZR, Buchanan GR. Survival of children with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2004 Jun 1;103(11):4023-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-11-3758. Epub 2004 Feb 5.

    PubMed 14764527
  • Lee A, Thomas P, Cupidore L, Serjeant B, Serjeant G. Improved survival in homozygous sickle cell disease: lessons from a cohort study. BMJ. 1995 Dec 16;311(7020):1600-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7020.1600.

    PubMed 8555802
  • Gill FM, Sleeper LA, Weiner SJ, Brown AK, Bellevue R, Grover R, Pegelow CH, Vichinsky E. Clinical events in the first decade in a cohort of infants with sickle cell disease. Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease. Blood. 1995 Jul 15;86(2):776-83.

    PubMed 7606007
  • Kruetzmann S, Rosado MM, Weber H, Germing U, Tournilhac O, Peter HH, Berner R, Peters A, Boehm T, Plebani A, Quinti I, Carsetti R. Human immunoglobulin M memory B cells controlling Streptococcus pneumoniae infections are generated in the spleen. J Exp Med. 2003 Apr 7;197(7):939-45. doi: 10.1084/jem.20022020.

    PubMed 12682112
  • Sullivan JL, Ochs HD, Schiffman G, Hammerschlag MR, Miser J, Vichinsky E, Wedgwood RJ. Immune response after splenectomy. Lancet. 1978 Jan 28;1(8057):178-81. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90612-8.

    PubMed 74605
  • Pearson HA, Spencer RP, Cornelius EA. Functional asplenia in sickle-cell anemia. N Engl J Med. 1969 Oct 23;281(17):923-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196910232811703. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5811425
  • Hongeng S, Wilimas JA, Harris S, Day SW, Wang WC. Recurrent Streptococcus pneumoniae sepsis in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr. 1997 May;130(5):814-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)80026-1.

    PubMed 9152293
  • Casale M, Perrotta S. Splenectomy for hereditary spherocytosis: complete, partial or not at all? Expert Rev Hematol. 2011 Dec;4(6):627-35. doi: 10.1586/ehm.11.51.

    PubMed 22077527
  • Jais X, Ioos V, Jardim C, Sitbon O, Parent F, Hamid A, Fadel E, Dartevelle P, Simonneau G, Humbert M. Splenectomy and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Thorax. 2005 Dec;60(12):1031-4. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.038083. Epub 2005 Aug 5.

    PubMed 16085731
  • Waghorn DJ. Overwhelming infection in asplenic patients: current best practice preventive measures are not being followed. J Clin Pathol. 2001 Mar;54(3):214-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.3.214.

    PubMed 11253134
  • Hosea SW, Burch CG, Brown EJ, Berg RA, Frank MM. Impaired immune response of splenectomised patients to polyvalent pneumococcal vaccine. Lancet. 1981 Apr 11;1(8224):804-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92681-7.

    PubMed 6111673
  • Wright J, Thomas P, Serjeant GR. Septicemia caused by Salmonella infection: an overlooked complication of sickle cell disease. J Pediatr. 1997 Mar;130(3):394-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70201-4.

    PubMed 9063414
  • Taher AT, Musallam KM, Karimi M, El-Beshlawy A, Belhoul K, Daar S, Saned MS, El-Chafic AH, Fasulo MR, Cappellini MD. Overview on practices in thalassemia intermedia management aiming for lowering complication rates across a region of endemicity: the OPTIMAL CARE study. Blood. 2010 Mar 11;115(10):1886-92. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-09-243154. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

    PubMed 20032507

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Splenectomy; Status, run by Società Italiana Talassemie ed Emoglobinopatie.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Identification of the causes of mortality and morbidity (time frame: 10 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03571399, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in