StrokeNCT03571152
Efficacy of the Use of Educational Videos for Caregivers of Patients in Subacute Phase of Stroke
A study testing Educational videos in people with Stroke, run by Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia at 1 site in Peru.
Trial summary
Stroke is the second cause of death and third of disability in the adult population, By 2020 it is projected like the fourth cause of disability-adjusted life year (DALY) and by 2030 it is estimated that it will lead the global burden of morbidity from chronic noncommunicable diseases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Educational videos
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePeru
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2018to 10 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Familiar or known of patients in the subacute phase of ischemic stroke.
- Familiar or known of stable dependent patients with diagnosis of hemiplegia.
- Caregiver aged 18-65 years.
Who cannot join
- Caregiver with cognitive , severe auditory and/or visual problems.
- Caregiver of patients who do not collaborate due to their cognitive, neurological or psychiatric conditions.
- Caregiver of patients with comorbidities that affect mobility, such as other neurological disorders, orthopedic and/or traumatological alterations.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Stroke is the second cause of death and third of disability in the adult population, By 2020 it is projected like the fourth cause of disability-adjusted life year (DALY) and by 2030 it is estimated that it will lead the global burden of morbidity from chronic noncommunicable diseases. As a consequence of stroke, patients show a certain degree of dependence and spend most of their time with a caregiver, especially since the subacute phase of the stroke. 80% of patients who survive have motor problems. The proper care during the first three months will significantly improve until 95% the patient rehabilitation. Caregivers have reported the need for information about clinical, prevention and treatment of stroke, like information about specific tasks of patient care, mobilizations, exercises, etc. Therefore, it is necessary to train and educate the caregivers in physical aspects of care, recovery and secondary prevention. However, oversaturated health systems, insufficient number of specialists, social inequity, limited coverage and speed of access to health services are factors that make difficult to educate caregivers. Studies have demonstrated that the Information Technology applied to health is a promising solution to educate and empower the patient, carer and family. For instance, the use of educational videos to improve the level of practice or knowledge of patients with chronic pain and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This project aims to evaluate the efficacy of the use of educational videos for caregivers of patients in subacute phase of stroke through of the change of the level of practice, knowledge and satisfaction.
Read the detailed description
Sample size A sample size of 10 participants, it is possible to detect minimum differences of 10% to 20%, with standard deviations of 5% to 10%.
Statistical analysis plan The data collected will be entered into a database in Microsoft Excel, to be analyzed by the Epi Info statistical program. The qualitative variables will be analyzed by frequencies and percentages, the quantitative variables by arithmetic mean and standard deviation, some of them categorized for its interpretation. The bivariate analysis between two qualitative variables will be carried out using Fisher's exact test, the analysis between a qualitative variable and a quantitative one will be carried out through the Mann-Whitney U tests (non-normal distribution) and Student's t test (normal distribution). After the intervention, the level of practice and knowledge of the caregivers on the basic management of patients in the subacute phase of the stroke will generate a variable called "change of score", whose p-value should be less than 0.05.
Plan for missing data Due to the characteristics of the intervention, the investigators do not expect much loss to follow up patients after recruitment. However, all missing data will be reported as such.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Educational videos
- Keywords
- Caregivers, Educational videos, Subacute phase
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Educational videosOther
The level of practice and knowledge of the caregiver will be evaluated according to the video(s) corresponding to the session. Patient participation is expected for the evaluation of the caregiver's level of practice. After thirty minutes of use of the video, the level of practice and knowledge of the caregiver will be evaluated again for the same video. In each session this methodology will continue until the eighth video. At the end of all the videos, the level of satisfaction of the caregivers in relation to the videos will be evaluated.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Educational videos | Experimental | Subjects allocated in this arms will receive the educational videos. Receives: Other: Educational videos |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Practice level
We will use the "evaluation form of the practice level", a check list with items that the caregiver should perform for the 8 activities represented in the 8 videos, for each activity a minimum of 4 items and a maximum of 9 items will be evaluated. The number of items for each activity is summed, so the total number of items is 49. Therefore, the minimum score is 0% (the caregiver performed 0% of items) and the maximum score is 100% (the caregiver performed 100% of items). The higher percentage represents a better result. This instrument will be review for experts, so the number of items could change.
Measured: Before and after 30 minutes of watching each video the participant will be evaluated. This method will be used for the 8 videos developed. Therefore, there will be a change in the practice level.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Knowledge level
We will use the "evaluation form of the knowledge level", which was designed for the study, a questionnaire with one-answer questions related to 8 activities represented in the 8 videos, for each activity a minimum of 2 questions and a maximum of 4 questions will be evaluated. The number of questions for each activity is summed, so the total number of questions is 25. Therefore, the minimum score is 0% (the caregiver answered correctly 0% of questions) and the maximum score is 100% (the caregiver answered correctly 100% of questions). The higher percentage represents a better result. This instrument will be review for experts, so the number of questions could change.
Measured: Before and after 30 minutes of watching each video, the participant will be evaluated. This method will be used for the 8 videos developed. Therefore, there will be a change in the knowledge level.
Satisfaction level
We will use the "evaluation form of the satisfaction level", which was designed for the study, a questionnaire with 3 questions of Likert scale and 2 opened questions related to the 8 videos. Therefore, the results will be reported according to each question. This instrument will be review for experts, so this could change.
Measured: After of watching all the videos, the participant will be evaluated. Minimum 1 video and maximum 3 videos will be evaluated per day. Therefore, minimum 3 days and maximum 8 days will be needed. The days will not be necessarily followed.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2018
- Study start1 Sep 2018
- Primary completion2 Dec 2018
- Study completion10 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Pre-experimental study design The level of practice and knowledge of the caregiver will be evaluated according to the video(s) corresponding to the session. Patient participation is expected for the evaluation of the caregiver's level of practice. After thirty minutes of use of the video, the level of practice and knowledge of the caregiver will be evaluated again for the same video. In each session this methodology will continue until the eighth video. At the end of all the videos, the level of satisfaction of the caregivers in relation to the videos will be evaluated.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Claudia Sanchez, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
- Investigators
- Claudia M Sánchez Huamash, BSc, Principal investigator
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03571152
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SIDISI: 101781
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan description. No applicable.
Publications
Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24505342Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 May;76(5):399-405. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80567-2.
PubMed 7741608Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):281-99.
PubMed 15502272Karthikbabu S, Chakrapani M, Ganeshan S, Rakshith KC, Nafeez S, Prem V. A review on assessment and treatment of the trunk in stroke: A need or luxury. Neural Regen Res. 2012 Sep 5;7(25):1974-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.25.008.
PubMed 25624827Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L, Gollub S, Lai SM, Reker D, Perera S, Yates J, Koch V, Rigler S, Johnson D. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke. 2003 Sep;34(9):2173-80. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000083699.95351.F2. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
PubMed 12920254Di Monaco M, Trucco M, Di Monaco R, Tappero R, Cavanna A. The relationship between initial trunk control or postural balance and inpatient rehabilitation outcome after stroke: a prospective comparative study. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Jun;24(6):543-54. doi: 10.1177/0269215509353265.
PubMed 20511303Young ME, Lutz BJ, Creasy KR, Cox KJ, Martz C. A comprehensive assessment of family caregivers of stroke survivors during inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(22):1892-902. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.881565. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
PubMed 24467676
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of the Use of Educational Videos for Caregivers of Patients in Subacute Phase of Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03571152
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SIDISI: 101781
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Caregivers, Educational videos, Subacute phase
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stroke is the second cause of death and third of disability in the adult population, By 2020 it is projected like the fourth cause of disability-adjusted life year (DALY) and by 2030 it is estimated that it will lead the global burden of morbidity from chronic noncommunicable diseases. As a consequence of stroke, patients show a certain degree of dependence and spend most of their time with a caregiver, especially since the subacute phase of the stroke. 80% of patients who survive have motor problems. The proper care during the first three months will significantly improve until 95% the patient rehabilitation. Caregivers have reported the need for information about clinical, prevention and treatment of stroke, like information about specific tasks of patient care, mobilizations, exercises, etc. Therefore, it is necessary to train and educate the caregivers in physical aspects of care, recovery and secondary prevention. However, oversaturated health systems, insufficient number of specialists, social inequity, limited coverage and speed of access to health services are factors that make difficult to educate caregivers. Studies have demonstrated that the Information Technology applied to health is a promising solution to educate and empower the patient, carer and family. For instance, the use of educational videos to improve the level of practice or knowledge of patients with chronic pain and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This project aims to evaluate the efficacy of the use of educational videos for caregivers of patients in subacute phase of stroke through of the change of the level of practice, knowledge and satisfaction.
Detailed description
Sample size A sample size of 10 participants, it is possible to detect minimum differences of 10% to 20%, with standard deviations of 5% to 10%.
Statistical analysis plan The data collected will be entered into a database in Microsoft Excel, to be analyzed by the Epi Info statistical program. The qualitative variables will be analyzed by frequencies and percentages, the quantitative variables by arithmetic mean and standard deviation, some of them categorized for its interpretation. The bivariate analysis between two qualitative variables will be carried out using Fisher's exact test, the analysis between a qualitative variable and a quantitative one will be carried out through the Mann-Whitney U tests (non-normal distribution) and Student's t test (normal distribution). After the intervention, the level of practice and knowledge of the caregivers on the basic management of patients in the subacute phase of the stroke will generate a variable called "change of score", whose p-value should be less than 0.05.
Plan for missing data Due to the characteristics of the intervention, the investigators do not expect much loss to follow up patients after recruitment. However, all missing data will be reported as such.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Pre-experimental study design The level of practice and knowledge of the caregiver will be evaluated according to the video(s) corresponding to the session. Patient participation is expected for the evaluation of the caregiver's level of practice. After thirty minutes of use of the video, the level of practice and knowledge of the caregiver will be evaluated again for the same video. In each session this methodology will continue until the eighth video. At the end of all the videos, the level of satisfaction of the caregivers in relation to the videos will be evaluated.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Educational videos | Experimental | Other: Educational videosSubjects allocated in this arms will receive the educational videos. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Familiar or known of patients in the subacute phase of ischemic stroke.
- Familiar or known of stable dependent patients with diagnosis of hemiplegia.
- Caregiver aged 18-65 years.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Caregiver with cognitive , severe auditory and/or visual problems.
- Caregiver of patients who do not collaborate due to their cognitive, neurological or psychiatric conditions.
- Caregiver of patients with comorbidities that affect mobility, such as other neurological disorders, orthopedic and/or traumatological alterations.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Educational videosThe level of practice and knowledge of the caregiver will be evaluated according to the video(s) corresponding to the session. Patient participation is expected for the evaluation of the caregiver's level of practice. After thirty minutes of use of the video, the level of practice and knowledge of the caregiver will be evaluated again for the same video. In each session this methodology will continue until the eighth video. At the end of all the videos, the level of satisfaction of the caregivers in relation to the videos will be evaluated. | Other | Educational videos |
Primary outcome
Practice level
Time frame: Before and after 30 minutes of watching each video the participant will be evaluated. This method will be used for the 8 videos developed. Therefore, there will be a change in the practice level.
We will use the "evaluation form of the practice level", a check list with items that the caregiver should perform for the 8 activities represented in the 8 videos, for each activity a minimum of 4 items and a maximum of 9 items will be evaluated. The number of items for each activity is summed, so the total number of items is 49. Therefore, the minimum score is 0% (the caregiver performed 0% of items) and the maximum score is 100% (the caregiver performed 100% of items). The higher percentage represents a better result. This instrument will be review for experts, so the number of items could change.
2 secondary outcomes
Knowledge level
Time frame: Before and after 30 minutes of watching each video, the participant will be evaluated. This method will be used for the 8 videos developed. Therefore, there will be a change in the knowledge level.
Satisfaction level
Time frame: After of watching all the videos, the participant will be evaluated. Minimum 1 video and maximum 3 videos will be evaluated per day. Therefore, minimum 3 days and maximum 8 days will be needed. The days will not be necessarily followed.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2020.
- Background: PubMed 24505342Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 7741608Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 May;76(5):399-405. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80567-2.
- Background: PubMed 15502272Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):281-99.
- Background: PubMed 25624827Karthikbabu S, Chakrapani M, Ganeshan S, Rakshith KC, Nafeez S, Prem V. A review on assessment and treatment of the trunk in stroke: A need or luxury. Neural Regen Res. 2012 Sep 5;7(25):1974-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.25.008.
- Background: PubMed 12920254Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L, Gollub S, Lai SM, Reker D, Perera S, Yates J, Koch V, Rigler S, Johnson D. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke. 2003 Sep;34(9):2173-80. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000083699.95351.F2. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
- Background: PubMed 20511303Di Monaco M, Trucco M, Di Monaco R, Tappero R, Cavanna A. The relationship between initial trunk control or postural balance and inpatient rehabilitation outcome after stroke: a prospective comparative study. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Jun;24(6):543-54. doi: 10.1177/0269215509353265.
- Background: PubMed 24467676Young ME, Lutz BJ, Creasy KR, Cox KJ, Martz C. A comprehensive assessment of family caregivers of stroke survivors during inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(22):1892-902. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.881565. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
- The role of caregiver involvement in upper-limb treatment in individuals with subacute stroke.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan description. No applicable.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Claudia M Sánchez Huamash, BSc principal investigator
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Educational videos in people with Stroke, run by Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia at 1 site in Peru.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Peru. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Practice level (time frame: Before and after 30 minutes of watching each video the participant will be evaluated. This method will be used for the 8 videos developed. Therefore, there will be a change in the practice level.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03571152, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2020.