AzTrials
AzTrials

Esophageal Food ImpactionNCT03570567

CLEANS Technique for the Treatment of Esophageal Food Impaction

A study testing Piranha Treatment in people with Esophageal Food Impaction, run by Biomerics, LLC at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety, performance, and efficacy of a novel endoscopic technique for resolving esophageal food impactions by using a novel hollow suction catheter, Piranha GI Aspiration Catheter, to core out and suction food away from the center of an impaction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Esophageal Food Impaction
What is being tested?
Piranha Treatment
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2018to Sep 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Esophageal food impaction requiring endoscopic intervention.
  • Male or female.
  • Age 18-85.
  • Willing to participate and capable of understanding the clinical study procedure and giving informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Unable to tolerate an endoscopic procedure.
  • Has a condition that could lead to significant postoperative complications, including current infection, anticoagulant use (Note: this is a relative exclusion since these patients still may require endoscopic food clearance).
  • Enrolled in a concurrent clinical food impaction trial.
  • Inability to comply with the consent process (as determined by investigator).
  • Pregnant.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Robert Ganz, MD contact

612-871-1145

gastrodude@visi.com

Isaac Raijman, MD contact

713-795-4444

raijman.i@gmail.com

United States1 site
  • Abbott Northwestern Hospital

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407

    Robert Ganz, MD, 612-871-1145, gastrodude@visi.com

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Clinical Luminal Endoscopic Assessment of a Novel Suction (CLEANS) Technique for the Treatment of Esophageal Food Impaction

This clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety, performance, and efficacy of a novel endoscopic technique for resolving esophageal food impactions by using a novel hollow suction catheter, Piranha GI Aspiration Catheter, to core out and suction food away from the center of an impaction. This technique includes hollowing out the center of the impaction, thus reducing the volume of the food bolus in the center, allowing the food to collapse into the hollow center, and then allowing for spontaneous food passage into the stomach. The study design is based on the experience of the investigators and the general knowledge of the food impaction field. In addition, consideration was given to previous studies of endoscopic treatments for esophageal food impaction.

Read the detailed description

CLEANS Synopsis Protocol Number 001 Procedure/Device Endoscopy using a standard suction catheter Sponsor Biomerics Advanced Catheter Primary Objective The objective of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a novel coring/suctioning technique for esophageal food impactions using a suction catheter. Data obtained from this clinical trial will be used to support this technique for standard clinical use.

Proposed Use Esophageal food impactions. Study Design This is a single-arm, open label observational trial designed to assess the efficacy of a novel suction technique for the treatment of esophageal food impactions. The endoscopists performing the procedure are not blinded to the treatment.

Follow-Up Schedule There is no follow-up after the procedure. Number of Subjects/Sites 40 non-randomized subjects, 10 at 4 investigational sites.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Unable to tolerate an endoscopic procedure.
  2. Has a condition that could lead to significant postoperative complications, including current infection, anticoagulant use (Note: this is a relative exclusion since these patients still may require endoscopic food clearance).
  3. Enrolled in a concurrent clinical food impaction trial.
  4. Inability to comply with the consent process (as determined by investigator).
  5. Pregnant.

Statistical Methods Statistical Methods were developed based on the Safety Primary Endpoint.

A sample size of 40 (10 at each site) achieves 80% power to detect a safety non-inferiority difference of 0.1322 using a one-sided exact test with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05. These results assume a baseline adverse event proportion of 0.03. The non-inferiority difference is justified by the low risk nature of the procedure.

The sample size achieves 80% power to detect a performance non-inferiority difference of -0.1837 using a one-sided exact test with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05. These results assume a baseline bolus clearance proportion of 0.75. The non-inferiority difference is justified by the low risk nature of the procedure.

Efficacy/performance procedure time endpoint will be assessed with time distribution analysis and with linear regression techniques using clinician, site, type of impaction, cause, age, gender, and weight as factors. Other factors may be included.

Efficacy/performance secondary endpoints will be assessed with score distribution analysis and with linear regression techniques using clinician, site, type of impaction, cause, age, gender, and weight as factors. Other factors may be included.

Sample size requirements 40 patients, 10 patients at each site. Analysis cohorts All patients who undergo endoscopy for a food impaction. Safety Assessments Adverse events will be summarized by seriousness, severity, relationship to device and procedure and adverse event type.

Additional Analyses None intended at this time. Randomization Patients will not be randomized. Blinding Neither subjects nor endoscopists will be blinded to the study treatment.

Study Duration The study participation will end following the procedure.

Being tested
Piranha Treatment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Piranha TreatmentDevice

    The piranha device is used with an endoscope to breakup/dislodge the food bolus.

Study groups in NCT03570567
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Piranha TreatmentOtherThe food impaction will be treated using the Piranha endoscopic device.
Receives: Device: Piranha Treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Food Bolus Clearance

    The first primary endpoint will be to assess the complete food bolus clearance rate.

    Measured: During procedure

  2. Time to Clearance

    The second will be time to complete clearance.

    Measured: During procedure

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Ease of Use

    Ease of use of the technique as assessed on a 5-point visually continuous scale.

    Measured: Immediately following procedure

  2. Satisfaction

    Overall satisfaction with the technique assessed on a 5-point visually continuous scale.

    Measured: Immediately following procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jun 2018
  2. Study startJun 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03570567
Sponsor's protocol ID
M015-3-01
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
18 Jun 2018
Last updated
27 Jun 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Piranha Treatment in people with Esophageal Food Impaction, run by Biomerics, LLC at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Robert Ganz, MD (612-871-1145, gastrodude@visi.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Food Bolus Clearance (time frame: During procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in