Neck PainNCT03563079
Effects of Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) on Pain and Disability in Individuals With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain.
A study testing Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Manual Myofascial Release in people with Neck Pain and Myofascial Pain Syndrome, run by Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre at 2 sites in Brazil.
Trial summary
INTRODUCTION: Cervical pain is a very common clinical condition in the world population, and can affect 70% of people at some point in life. Many of these conditions arise from musculoskeletal disorders, which may be caused by myofascial dysfunctions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neck Pain, Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Manual Myofascial Release
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesBrazil
- Study dates
- 30 Apr 2018to 10 May 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- people presenting as main complaint chronic neck pain, manifested for at least twelve weeks, without irradiation to the upper limbs distally to the shoulders.
- presenting scales scores (NSP) above 3 and NDI above 30%.
Who cannot join
- Individuals who are positive in the Spurling test, indicating Cervical Radiculopathy,
- Some severe clinical condition (such as fracture, neoplasia or systemic diseases); --
- history of previous surgery in the neck or thoracic spine;
- injury of whiplash trauma in the six months prior to evaluation;
- diagnosis of cervical stenosis;
- diagnosis of myelopathy;
Show all 17Show fewer
- pregnancy;
- signs and symptoms of moderate to severe temporomandibular dysfunction,
- neck hematoma,
- neck scarring,
- severe osteoporosis,
- open lesions or recent neck fractures,
- generalized infections,
- coagulation disorders,
- acute inflammatory conditions,
- fever.
- Also excluded are patients who have undergone physical therapy or massage up to one month prior to the evaluation.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Brazil2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Federal university of health sciences of porto alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90050-170
Raffaele C Greco, +5551992033035, cunhagreco@yahoo.com.br
Raffaele C Greco
- Recruiting
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90050-170
Francisco Araujo, Pt, +55 5192581467, franciscoxaraujo@gmail.com
Francisco De Araujo, Pt
About this study
Official title: Effects of Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) on Pain and Disability in Individuals With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
INTRODUCTION: Cervical pain is a very common clinical condition in the world population, and can affect 70% of people at some point in life. Many of these conditions arise from musculoskeletal disorders, which may be caused by myofascial dysfunctions. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) may be an important therapeutic tool as a means of treatment under these conditions. PURPOSE: To verify the effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) on pain, disability and range of motion (ROM) in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain. DESIGN: Randomized Clinical Trial. METHODS: The sample will consist of 46 volunteers with non-specific chronic neck pain of both sexes, aged between 18 and 60 years, who presented pain for at least 12 weeks, without irradiation to the upper limbs distally to the shoulders. Of these, those that are not excluded, will be allocated randomly in one of the two groups present: Experimental Group (GE) - IASTM in the neck and Control Group (CG) - Manual myofascial release in the neck region. A blinded evaluator will be assigned to conduct the evaluation process for both groups. DESPECTS: The outcomes will be neck pain, neck disability and range of motion of the neck.
Read the detailed description
- To verify the effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) on pain, disability and ROM in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain.
- Characterization of individuals with chronic nonspecific neck pain. To describe and compare, at the pre-intervention, post-intervention moments in a 3-week follow-up period, the intensity of neck pain using the numerical pain scale (NPS); the self - perception of disability using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and range of motion (ROM) of the neck - flexion, extension, rotations and right and left slopes through a pendulum flexometer.
- Randomized unicentric clinical trial of longitudinal cut according to the standardization proposed by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials - CONSORT statement
- The sample will be composed of 46 volunteers with chronic nonspecific neck pain.
- The subjects will be recruited through digital ads in the main social networks, as well as coming from the Physiotherapy service in a clinic in the city of Viamão / RS. An online form will be completed by the interested parties, which will include the eligibility criteria for participation in the study. Only the subjects that follow the criteria will be allocated to carry out the study.
- Conditions
- Neck Pain, Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- Being tested
- Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization, Manual Myofascial Release
- Keywords
- Handling, Musculoskeletal, Tissue, Subcutaneous, Myofascial Release, Instrument-Mobilized Soft Tissue Mobilization
- Medical subject headings
- Neck Pain, Myofascial Pain Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue MobilizationOther
Also called IASTM
Soft Tissue Mobilization
Manual Myofascial ReleaseOther
Myofascial Release Technique
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| trial group | Experimental | The treatment will be performed using two pieces of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) stainless steel in the neck, bilaterally, which comprise the following muscles: Upper Trapezius, Splenius, scalenes and Sternocleidomastoid. An established time of 3 minutes will be used in each region, using an angle of 30 to 60º with the instrument. As it is observed, through the instrument, regions of greater adhesion, the researcher will use most of this time to release this condition. Receives: Other: Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization |
| group control | Active comparator | Treatment will be performed using manual Myofascial Release techniques. Release the upper Trapezius muscle bilaterally, sliding using roller with the dorsum of the fingers and ending with myofascial release. Sternocleidomastoid, sliding using roller with the dorsum of the fingers, ending with myofascial release. Afterwards the release of the scalenes muscles will be performed, with the fingers sliding and ending with the myofascial release. Soon afterwards techniques will be performed for the Splenius muscles, using finger slips and ending with posterior cervicothoracic release. The same time of 3 min will be used for the treatment bilaterally in each region. Receives: Other: Manual Myofascial Release |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of pain
the numerical scale of pain will be used. The Numerical Scale consists of a ruler divided into equal parts, numbered successively from 0 to 10. The study participant is meant to make the equivalence between the intensity of his pain and a numerical classification, where 0 corresponds to the classification "No Pain" and 10 to the classification "Maximum Pain" (pain of maximum intensity imaginable), that is, the higher the number the worse the score.
Measured: assessment at baseline and its change in 1-week and 3-month follow-up
Disability of the neck
Neck disability index. The Neck Disability Index is used to assess the functional capacity of the neck. Is composed of 10 questions regarding activities and pain. Items are organized by type of activity and followed by six different statements expressing progressive functional capacity levels. The NDI score consists of the sum of the points, from 0 to 5 of each of the 10 questions, totaling a maximum of 50 points. O value can be expressed as a percentage, on a scale of 0% (no disability) to 100% (complete disability). The score total is divided by the number of questions answered multiplied by number 5. The higher the score, the greater the patient's disability.
Measured: assessment at baseline and its change in 1-week and 3-month follow-up
Range of motion
For measurement, an angular flexometer
Measured: assessment at baseline and its change in 1-week and 3-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (1)
characterization of the sample
quiz
Measured: baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jun 2018
- Study start30 Apr 2018
- Primary completion20 Apr 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion10 May 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized clinical trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Francisco Xavier de Araujo, Pt, Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03563079
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FAraujo
- Status last verified
- Jun 2018
- First submitted
- 25 May 2018
- Last updated
- 21 Jun 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jun 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) on Pain and Disability in Individuals With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03563079
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FAraujo
- Conditions
- Neck Pain, Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- Keywords
- Handling, Musculoskeletal, Tissue, Subcutaneous, Myofascial Release, Instrument-Mobilized Soft Tissue Mobilization
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Apr 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 May 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
INTRODUCTION: Cervical pain is a very common clinical condition in the world population, and can affect 70% of people at some point in life. Many of these conditions arise from musculoskeletal disorders, which may be caused by myofascial dysfunctions. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) may be an important therapeutic tool as a means of treatment under these conditions. PURPOSE: To verify the effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) on pain, disability and range of motion (ROM) in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain. DESIGN: Randomized Clinical Trial. METHODS: The sample will consist of 46 volunteers with non-specific chronic neck pain of both sexes, aged between 18 and 60 years, who presented pain for at least 12 weeks, without irradiation to the upper limbs distally to the shoulders. Of these, those that are not excluded, will be allocated randomly in one of the two groups present: Experimental Group (GE) - IASTM in the neck and Control Group (CG) - Manual myofascial release in the neck region. A blinded evaluator will be assigned to conduct the evaluation process for both groups. DESPECTS: The outcomes will be neck pain, neck disability and range of motion of the neck.
Detailed description
- To verify the effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) on pain, disability and ROM in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain.
- Characterization of individuals with chronic nonspecific neck pain. To describe and compare, at the pre-intervention, post-intervention moments in a 3-week follow-up period, the intensity of neck pain using the numerical pain scale (NPS); the self - perception of disability using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and range of motion (ROM) of the neck - flexion, extension, rotations and right and left slopes through a pendulum flexometer.
- Randomized unicentric clinical trial of longitudinal cut according to the standardization proposed by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials - CONSORT statement
- The sample will be composed of 46 volunteers with chronic nonspecific neck pain.
- The subjects will be recruited through digital ads in the main social networks, as well as coming from the Physiotherapy service in a clinic in the city of Viamão / RS. An online form will be completed by the interested parties, which will include the eligibility criteria for participation in the study. Only the subjects that follow the criteria will be allocated to carry out the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| trial group | Experimental | Other: Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue MobilizationThe treatment will be performed using two pieces of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) stainless steel in the neck, bilaterally, which comprise the following muscles: Upper Trapezius, Splenius, scalenes and Sternocleidomastoid. An established time of 3 minutes will be used in each region, using an angle of 30 to 60º with the instrument. As it is observed, through the instrument, regions of greater adhesion, the researcher will use most of this time to release this condition. |
| group control | Active comparator | Other: Manual Myofascial ReleaseTreatment will be performed using manual Myofascial Release techniques. Release the upper Trapezius muscle bilaterally, sliding using roller with the dorsum of the fingers and ending with myofascial release. Sternocleidomastoid, sliding using roller with the dorsum of the fingers, ending with myofascial release. Afterwards the release of the scalenes muscles will be performed, with the fingers sliding and ending with the myofascial release. Soon afterwards techniques will be performed for the Splenius muscles, using finger slips and ending with posterior cervicothoracic release. The same time of 3 min will be used for the treatment bilaterally in each region. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- people presenting as main complaint chronic neck pain, manifested for at least twelve weeks, without irradiation to the upper limbs distally to the shoulders.
- presenting scales scores (NSP) above 3 and NDI above 30%.
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Individuals who are positive in the Spurling test, indicating Cervical Radiculopathy,
- Some severe clinical condition (such as fracture, neoplasia or systemic diseases); --
- history of previous surgery in the neck or thoracic spine;
- injury of whiplash trauma in the six months prior to evaluation;
- diagnosis of cervical stenosis;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue MobilizationAlso: IASTMSoft Tissue Mobilization | Other | trial group |
| Manual Myofascial ReleaseMyofascial Release Technique | Other | group control |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of pain
Time frame: assessment at baseline and its change in 1-week and 3-month follow-up
the numerical scale of pain will be used. The Numerical Scale consists of a ruler divided into equal parts, numbered successively from 0 to 10. The study participant is meant to make the equivalence between the intensity of his pain and a numerical classification, where 0 corresponds to the classification "No Pain" and 10 to the classification "Maximum Pain" (pain of maximum intensity imaginable), that is, the higher the number the worse the score.
Disability of the neck
Time frame: assessment at baseline and its change in 1-week and 3-month follow-up
Neck disability index. The Neck Disability Index is used to assess the functional capacity of the neck. Is composed of 10 questions regarding activities and pain. Items are organized by type of activity and followed by six different statements expressing progressive functional capacity levels. The NDI score consists of the sum of the points, from 0 to 5 of each of the 10 questions, totaling a maximum of 50 points. O value can be expressed as a percentage, on a scale of 0% (no disability) to 100% (complete disability). The score total is divided by the number of questions answered multiplied by number 5. The higher the score, the greater the patient's disability.
Range of motion
Time frame: assessment at baseline and its change in 1-week and 3-month follow-up
For measurement, an angular flexometer
1 secondary outcome
characterization of the sample
Time frame: baseline
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jun 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Strain Counter Strain and Conventional Stretching in School-aged Children With Mechanical Neck Pain Due to Prolong Screen Use
Mechanical Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Alexander Technique Versus Feldenkrais Somatic Training in Patients With Text Neck Syndrome
Text Neck Syndrome
Recruiting
Longitudinal Stripping Massage vs. Percussion Device for Neck Pain: Ultrasound Study.
Chronic Neck Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Federal university of health sciences of porto alegre
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Brazil
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Manual Myofascial Release in people with Neck Pain and Myofascial Pain Syndrome, run by Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre at 2 sites in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of pain (time frame: assessment at baseline and its change in 1-week and 3-month follow-up). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2018.