AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationAliveCorNCT03557034

A Fib Clinic of the Future Using KardiaPro Platform for Chronic Care of Patients With AF After Ablation Procedure

A study testing Kardia Monitoring in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pulmonary vein isolation is a widely used strategy for the treatment of patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation. After successful pulmonary vein isolation (no atrial fibrillation on transtelephonic rhythm recordings for 3 months following ablation), heart rhythm is not routinely monitored. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Kardia Monitoring
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
27 Jun 2018to 15 Aug 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18-85 years old
  • Have smartphone with data plan
  • History of AF (paroxysmal or persistent)
  • In sinus rhythm at the 3-4 month post-procedure visit and no evidence of AF during the interval starting after the 3 week blanking period and ending at the appointment time.
  • On Anticoagulation if CHADS VASC score is ≥ 1 and will continue to be on anticoagulation or CHADS VASC of Zero
  • Willing to follow up with their Cleveland Clinic electrophysiologist in 6 months

Who cannot join

  • Patients without smartphone
  • Unwilling to provide consent
  • Unwilling to follow up in 6 months
  • CHADS VASC ≥ 1 and anticoagulation will be stopped
  • Presence of a cardiac implantable electronic device
  • If the primary electrophysiologist decides the patient still needs monitoring through traditional monitors due to any reason

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

Other trials in United States

About this study

Pulmonary vein isolation is a widely used strategy for the treatment of patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation. After successful pulmonary vein isolation (no atrial fibrillation on transtelephonic rhythm recordings for 3 months following ablation), heart rhythm is not routinely monitored. The goal of this study is to determine whether the Kardia Mobile device detects AF at a different rate compared to our standard of care. The study also hopes to understand how this Kardia Mobile device and Kardia Pro platform affect health care utilization and patient anxiety.

Read the detailed description

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a widely used strategy for the treatment of patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). After ablation, patients are usually discharged with transtelephonic monitor. Patients are encouraged to send their electrophysiologist transmissions of their heart rhythm at least once a week or anytime they have symptoms. After 3-4 months of remote monitoring, patients come for their first visit after the ablation. At this visit, the electrophysiologist reviews the heart rhythm transmissions since the ablation and based on the findings, decisions are made regarding anticoagulation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy. If all transmissions show sinus rhythm and the patient is doing well, he or she is normally followed clinically based on symptoms without any rhythm monitors. Usually, these patients follow up in another 6 months with an ECG at the time of the visit with the caring electrophysiologist. During these 6 months, patients might experience palpitations or recurrent arrhythmias. These episodes usually trigger phone encounters with the provider and this can trigger additional testing. Sometimes it might lead to clinic or emergency room encounters.

Kardia Mobile is an FDA approved device that allows one lead ECG recording for 30 seconds using the patient's smart phone. The device has a built-in algorithm that detects AF. KardiaPro is a secure platform that allows the physician to access the patient's recording at any time. The platform can also be programmed to send a notification to the healthcare provider if AF is detected by the software. The goal of our study is to determine whether detection of AF with Kardia Mobile is different than the current standard approach and to assess the value of using Kardia Mobile and the KardiaPro platform in decreasing health care utilization and reducing patient anxiety following AF ablation.

Being tested
Kardia Monitoring
Keywords
pulmonary vein isolation, atrial fibrillation, remote monitoring, heart rhythm monitor
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Kardia MonitoringDevice

    Kardia Mobile is an FDA approved device that allows one lead ECG recording for 30 seconds using the patient's smart phone. The device has a built-in algorithm that detects AF. KardiaPro is a secure platform that allows the physician to access the patient's recording at any time. The platform can also be programmed to send a notification to the healthcare provider if AF is detected by the software.

Study groups in NCT03557034
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of Care MonitoringNo interventionStandard of Care
Kardia MonitoringExperimentalKardia Mobile/Kardia Pro
Receives: Device: Kardia Monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Atrial Fibrillation Detection

    This outcome will measure the time between the ablation procedure (time zero) and the time of first detected atrial fibrillation heart rhythm.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Successful AF Ablation

    Number (%) participants with Afib detected after ablation and during the study period.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Number of Atrial Fibrillation Episodes Detected

    Number of abnormal reading using Kardia Mobile after ablation

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Average Number of Clinical Encounters After Successful Ablation

    Average number of phone encounters within 6 months after successful ablation

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Number of Participants Using Alternative Monitoring Devices After Successful Ablation

    Additional ECGs and ambulatory heart rhythm monitoring used (Holter, Ziopatch) during the follow up interval

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Change in Level of Anxiety From the Date of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation to the End of Study Period

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 is a scale to measure the severity of anxiety. It consists of asking patients to respond to a simple questionnaire and each answer is assigned a point based on the frequency of a given symptom (0=Not at all, 1=Several days, 2= More than half the days, 3=Nearly everyday). Total scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety severity. A total score of 5-9 indicates mild anxiety, 10-14 moderate anxiety, and >15 severe anxiety.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jun 2018
  2. Study start27 Jun 2018
  3. Primary completion21 Feb 2020
  4. Study completion15 Aug 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03557034
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-444
Acronym
AliveCor
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
4 Jun 2018
Last updated
15 Jul 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Kardia Monitoring in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jul 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Atrial Fibrillation Detection (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in