AzTrials
AzTrials

Hearing LossNCT03554577

Assessment of Novel Sound Changing Principles in Hearing Instruments to Determine Their Application - 2018_12

A study testing Hearing Aid without NR, Hearing Aid with NR_A and Hearing Aid with NR_B in people with Hearing Loss, run by Sonova AG at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A methodical evaluation of novel sound changing principles in CE-labelled Sonova brand hearing instruments (e.g. Phonak hearing instruments) is intended to be conducted on hearing impaired participants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
Conditions the study is for
Hearing Loss
What is being tested?
Hearing Aid without NR, Hearing Aid with NR_A and Hearing Aid with NR_B
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
28 May 2018to 2 Oct 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy outer ear (without previous surgical procedures)
  • Ability to fill in a questionnaire conscientiously
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications to the MD in this study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational product
  • Limited mobility and not in the position to attend weekly appointments
  • Limited ability to describe listening impressions/experiences and the use of the hearing aid
  • Inability to produce a reliable hearing test result
  • Massively limited dexterity
  • Known psychological problems
  • Known central hearing disorders
  • colour blinded

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Sonova AG

    Stäfa, 8712

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Assessment of Novel Sound Changing Principles in Hearing Instruments to Determine Their Application

A methodical evaluation of novel sound changing principles in CE-labelled Sonova brand hearing instruments (e.g. Phonak hearing instruments) is intended to be conducted on hearing impaired participants. These sound changing principles are enabled by respective hearing instrument technologies and hearing instrument algorithms. The aim of the study is to investigate and asses strength and weaknesses of these novel sound changing principles in terms of hearing performance to determine their application in hearing instruments (Phase of development). Both, objective laboratory measurements as well as subjective evaluations in real life environment will be carried out. This will be a controlled, single blinded and randomised active comparator clinical evaluation which will be conducted mono centric at Sonova AG Headquarter based in Stäfa

Conditions
Hearing Loss
Being tested
Hearing Aid without NR, Hearing Aid with NR_A, Hearing Aid with NR_B, Hearing Aid with NR_C
Medical subject headings
Hearing Loss

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hearing Aid without NRDevice

    Also called NR: Noise Reduction

    Each participant will be fitted with the 4 different Noise Reduction (Sound Changing) principles on the same hearing aid, saved to 4 manual programs.

    Noise Reduction principle is a sound processing algorithm to remove noise from a speech signal to improve the speech intelligibility and comfort. The experimental conditions vary in their parametrization to result in different degrees of noise suppression and good speech quality.

  • Hearing Aid with NR_ADevice

    Also called NR_A: Noise Reduction principle A

    Each participant will be fitted with the 4 different Noise Reduction (Sound Changing) principles on the same hearing aid, saved to 4 manual programs.

    Noise Reduction principle is a sound processing algorithm to remove noise from a speech signal to improve the speech intelligibility and comfort. The experimental conditions vary in their parametrization to result in different degrees of noise suppression and good speech quality.

  • Hearing Aid with NR_BDevice

    Also called NR_B: Noise Reduction principle B

    Each participant will be fitted with the 4 different Noise Reduction (Sound Changing) principles on the same hearing aid, saved to 4 manual programs.

    Noise Reduction principle is a sound processing algorithm to remove noise from a speech signal to improve the speech intelligibility and comfort. The experimental conditions vary in their parametrization to result in different degrees of noise suppression and good speech quality.

  • Hearing Aid with NR_CDevice

    Also called NR_C: Noise Reduction principle C

    Each participant will be fitted with the 4 different Noise Reduction (Sound Changing) principles on the same hearing aid, saved to 4 manual programs.

    Noise Reduction principle is a sound processing algorithm to remove noise from a speech signal to improve the speech intelligibility and comfort. The experimental conditions vary in their parametrization to result in different degrees of noise suppression and good speech quality.

Study groups in NCT03554577
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hearing Aid without NRActive comparatorHearing Aid without Noise Reduction (NR) serves as reference condition.
Receives: Device: Hearing Aid without NR
Hearing Aid with NR_AExperimentalNR_A: Noise Reduction principle A
Receives: Device: Hearing Aid with NR_A
Hearing Aid with NR_BExperimentalNR_B: Noise Reduction principle B.
Receives: Device: Hearing Aid with NR_B
Hearing Aid with NR_CExperimentalNR_C: Noise Reduction principle C.
Receives: Device: Hearing Aid with NR_C

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sound quality ratings

    The sound quality ratings will be assessed with the aid of a Multi-Stimulus Test. The data, serving as the primary outcome measure, are collected in the laboratory and will use a continuous rating scale. The scale ranges from 0 "very bad" to 100 "very good" in increments of 1.

    Measured: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Oldenburg sentence test in noise

    The data, serving as secondary outcome is a Signal to noise ratio (SNR) in decibel (dB) where a 50% speech reception threshold is reached. This outcome measurement will be carried out in the laboratory.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Oldenburg sentence test & manual tracking task

    A dual task paradigm will be used in which the Oldenburg Sentence test in noise will be administered as a primary task, and the subject will manually track a point on a computerised elliptical track as a secondary task. The aim is to recall as many words from the presented sentence at a predefined SNR and track the point as accurately as possible at the same time. The SNR is set as the level at which a subject reaches a speech reception threshold of 80-90%. The data derived, serving as a secondary outcome measure, are a [%] of time on target and distance error from the target.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  3. Adaptive Categorial Listening Effort Scaling (ACALES)

    The ACALES procedure determines self-reported individual listening effort on a scale from "extreme effort" to "no effort" within a signal-to-noise ratio range that corresponds to individual subject perceptions.

    The data, serving as a secondary outcome, are a set of points on a categorial scale (subjectively perceived listening effort) as a function of different SNRs.

    Measured: 2 weeks

  4. Self-report form

    A qualitative questionnaire with predefined questions and comment sections to gather information on individual perceptions regarding the comparison of two different hearing programs during different laboratory-based acoustic scenes. For details of the hearing aid settings, see study arms. The data collected from this questionnaire are scores on a continuous rating scale ranging from "hearing program A is much worse than hearing program B" to "hearing program B is much better than hearing program A" and any subjective comments given.

    Measured: One week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jun 2018
  2. Study start28 May 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2018
  4. Study completion2 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Each participant will be treated with each sound changing principle (Noise Reduction principle (NR)) in a randomized order.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
15 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03554577
Sponsor's protocol ID
Sonova2018_12
Status last verified
Nov 2018
First submitted
7 May 2018
Last updated
16 Nov 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hearing Aid without NR, Hearing Aid with NR_A and Hearing Aid with NR_B in people with Hearing Loss, run by Sonova AG at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sound quality ratings (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Nov 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in