AzTrials
AzTrials

Gall Stones, Common Bile DuctNCT03530241

Fluorescent Cholangiography and Bile Duct Stones

A study testing Presence of bile duct stones and Non-presence of bile duct stones in people with Gall Stones, Common Bile Duct, run by Hvidovre University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background. X-ray cholangiography has a high sensitivity and specificity of detecting bile duct stones and is the gold standard. There are no studies describing the sensitivity and specificity of IFC for bile duct stone detection. Research question. What is the sensitivity of IFC to visualize bile duct stones? Method. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gall Stones, Common Bile Duct
What is being tested?
Presence of bile duct stones and Non-presence of bile duct stones
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
25 Mar 2019to 1 Aug 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients suspected of having bile duct stones by either blood samples, MRCP or medical history (see definitions)
  • Patient age ≥ 18 years
  • Preoperative MRCP
  • Operation performed by a project surgeon

Who cannot join

  • Open cholecystectomy (including conversion from laparoscopic to open)
  • Acute cholecytitis or cholangitis
  • Pancreatitis
  • Iodine or indocyanine green allergy
  • Liver or renal insufficiency
  • Thyrotoxicosis
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Cholecystectomy not the primary surgical procedure
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Legally incompetent for any reason
  • Withdrawal of inclusion consent at any time

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Hvidovre University Hospital

    Holte, Danmark, 2840

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Sensitivity and Specificity of Fluorescent Cholangiography to Detect Bile Duct Stones in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background. X-ray cholangiography has a high sensitivity and specificity of detecting bile duct stones and is the gold standard. There are no studies describing the sensitivity and specificity of IFC for bile duct stone detection.

Research question. What is the sensitivity of IFC to visualize bile duct stones? Method. Prospective study with 40 patients undergoing planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy with preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) (gold standard) and intraoperative IFC, X-ray cholangiography and choledochuscopy in that order.

Primary outcome. Sensitivity of visualization of bile duct stone by fluorescent cholangiography and secondary outcome is visualization of anatomy.

Being tested
Presence of bile duct stones, Non-presence of bile duct stones
Keywords
fluorescence, cholangiography, cholecystectomy, laparoscopic
Medical subject headings
Gallstones

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Presence of bile duct stonesDiagnostic test

    MRCP verified gall stones in the bile ducts

  • Non-presence of bile duct stonesDiagnostic test

    MRCP without bile duct stones

Study groups in NCT03530241
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MRCP positiveExperimentalNot described
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Presence of bile duct stones
MRCP negativeActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Non-presence of bile duct stones

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity and specificity

    Sensitivity and specificity of visualization of bile duct stones by intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography

    Measured: 120mins

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Visualization

    Visualization of the extrahepatic bile ducts

    Measured: 120mins

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 May 2018
  2. Study start25 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2023 (estimated)

Why it stopped: No funding

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03530241
Sponsor's protocol ID
IFC4
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
8 May 2018
Last updated
28 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Presence of bile duct stones and Non-presence of bile duct stones in people with Gall Stones, Common Bile Duct, run by Hvidovre University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity and specificity (time frame: 120mins). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in