Pediatric ALLNCT03528954
Propofol to Reduce the Incidence of Postanesthetic Emergence Agitation in Pediatric Patients Under General Anesthesia
A study testing Propofol in people with Pediatric ALL, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.
Trial summary
This study aimed to know the effectivity of 0.5 mg/kg propofol in the end of anesthesia to reduce the incidence of postanesthetic emergence agitation in pediatric patients under general inhalation anesthesia Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 5 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric ALL
- What is being tested?
- Propofol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndonesia
- Study dates
- 31 May 2018to 31 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 5 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patient undergoing non-emergency surgery with general anesthesia
- Patient using sevoflurane as anesthetic agent
- Patient aged 1 - 5 years old
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 - 2
- Patient family signed the informed consent to be included in the study
Who cannot join
- Patient that will undergo ophthalmologic and otorhinolaryngologic surgery
- Patient that will require post operation stay in Intensive Care Unit
- Patient with psychological and neurological problem
- Patient with developmental delay
- Patient using sedative drugs
- Patient with allergy to propofol
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patient or patient family with history of malignant hyperthermia
- Patient with difficulty on intubation and ventilation
- Patient with cardiovascular disease
- Patient with hemodynamic instability
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Indonesia1 site
Cipto Mangunkusumo Cental National Hospital
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, 10430
About this study
Official title: Effectivity of 0.5 mg/kg Propofol in the End of Anesthesia to Reduce the Incidence of Postanesthetic Emergence Agitation in Pediatric Patients Under General Inhalation Anesthesia
This study aimed to know the effectivity of 0.5 mg/kg propofol in the end of anesthesia to reduce the incidence of postanesthetic emergence agitation in pediatric patients under general inhalation anesthesia
Read the detailed description
Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study and randomized into two groups; propofol and control. Non-invasive blood pressure monitor, electrocardiogram (ECG), pulse-oxymetry, and capnograph were set on the subjects in the operation room. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia will use sevoflurane. Mechanical ventilation will be given to maintaining end-tidal carbon dioxide 35 to 40 mmHg. After surgery, patient will be given intravenously 15mg/kg acetaminophen, 0.05mg/kg neostigmine, and 0.02 mg/kg atropine. Patient will also be given propofol 0.5 mg/kg on propofol group while no propofol will be given on control group. 30 minutes after patient was admitted to post-anesthesia care unit, patient will be evaluated for emergence agitation using Aono scale and Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale. The incidence of emergence agitation, hypotension, and desaturation will be treated accordingly.
- Conditions
- Pediatric ALL
- Being tested
- Propofol
- Keywords
- Emergence agitation, Propofol, General anesthesia
- Medical subject headings
- Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, Emergence Delirium
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PropofolDrug
Those who received intravenous propofol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Propofol | Active comparator | Received intravenous 0.5mg/kg propofol Receives: Drug: Propofol |
| Control | No intervention | Do not received intravenous 0.5 mg/kg propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of emergence agitation
Evaluated using Aono scale and Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale. Patients with ≥3 on Aono scale AND ≥10 on PAED scale are diagnosed as emergence agitation
Measured: 30 minutes after being admitted to post anesthesia care unit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 May 2018
- Study start31 May 2018
- Primary completion31 Aug 2018
- Study completion31 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (24)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pediatric ALLStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitas IndonesiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitas Indonesia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andi Ade Wijaya Ramlan, Universitas Indonesia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03528954
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IndonesiaUAnes022
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 27 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
van Hoff SL, O'Neill ES, Cohen LC, Collins BA. Does a prophylactic dose of propofol reduce emergence agitation in children receiving anesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Jul;25(7):668-76. doi: 10.1111/pan.12669. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
PubMed 25917689Costi D, Ellwood J, Wallace A, Ahmed S, Waring L, Cyna A. Transition to propofol after sevoflurane anesthesia to prevent emergence agitation: a randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 May;25(5):517-23. doi: 10.1111/pan.12617. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
PubMed 25586124Jiang S, Liu J, Li M, Ji W, Liang J. The efficacy of propofol on emergence agitation--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Nov;59(10):1232-45. doi: 10.1111/aas.12586. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
PubMed 26251008Aouad MT, Yazbeck-Karam VG, Nasr VG, El-Khatib MF, Kanazi GE, Bleik JH. A single dose of propofol at the end of surgery for the prevention of emergence agitation in children undergoing strabismus surgery during sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2007 Nov;107(5):733-8. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000287009.46896.a7.
PubMed 18073548Dahmani S, Stany I, Brasher C, Lejeune C, Bruneau B, Wood C, Nivoche Y, Constant I, Murat I. Pharmacological prevention of sevoflurane- and desflurane-related emergence agitation in children: a meta-analysis of published studies. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):216-23. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep376. Epub 2010 Jan 3.
PubMed 20047899Huett C, Baehner T, Erdfelder F, Hoehne C, Bode C, Hoeft A, Ellerkmann RK. Prevention and Therapy of Pediatric Emergence Delirium: A National Survey. Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Apr;19(2):147-153. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0212-x.
PubMed 28130755Kanaya A, Kuratani N, Satoh D, Kurosawa S. Lower incidence of emergence agitation in children after propofol anesthesia compared with sevoflurane: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth. 2014 Feb;28(1):4-11. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1656-y. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
PubMed 23800983Moore AD, Anghelescu DL. Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Anesthesia. Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Feb;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s40272-016-0201-5.
PubMed 27798810Kanaya A. Emergence agitation in children: risk factors, prevention, and treatment. J Anesth. 2016 Apr;30(2):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2098-5. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
PubMed 26601849Chidambaran V, Costandi A, D'Mello A. Propofol: a review of its role in pediatric anesthesia and sedation. CNS Drugs. 2015 Jul;29(7):543-63. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0259-6.
PubMed 26290263Ali MA, Abdellatif AA. Prevention of sevoflurane related emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy: A comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;7(3):296-300. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.115363.
PubMed 24015133Makkar JK, Bhatia N, Bala I, Dwivedi D, Singh PM. A comparison of single dose dexmedetomidine with propofol for the prevention of emergence delirium after desflurane anaesthesia in children. Anaesthesia. 2016 Jan;71(1):50-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.13230. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
PubMed 26444149Silva LM, Braz LG, Modolo NS. Emergence agitation in pediatric anesthesia: current features. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008 Mar-Apr;84(2):107-13. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1763.
PubMed 18372935Smith HA, Fuchs DC, Pandharipande PP, Barr FE, Ely EW. Delirium: an emerging frontier in the management of critically ill children. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Dec;29(4):729-50. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.09.011.
PubMed 22078920Maldonado JR. Neuropathogenesis of delirium: review of current etiologic theories and common pathways. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;21(12):1190-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.09.005.
PubMed 24206937
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectivity of 0.5 mg/kg Propofol in the End of Anesthesia to Reduce the Incidence of Postanesthetic Emergence Agitation in Pediatric Patients Under General Inhalation Anesthesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03528954
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IndonesiaUAnes022
- Conditions
- Pediatric ALL
- Keywords
- Emergence agitation, Propofol, General anesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitas IndonesiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 May 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 May 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aimed to know the effectivity of 0.5 mg/kg propofol in the end of anesthesia to reduce the incidence of postanesthetic emergence agitation in pediatric patients under general inhalation anesthesia
Detailed description
Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study and randomized into two groups; propofol and control. Non-invasive blood pressure monitor, electrocardiogram (ECG), pulse-oxymetry, and capnograph were set on the subjects in the operation room. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia will use sevoflurane. Mechanical ventilation will be given to maintaining end-tidal carbon dioxide 35 to 40 mmHg. After surgery, patient will be given intravenously 15mg/kg acetaminophen, 0.05mg/kg neostigmine, and 0.02 mg/kg atropine. Patient will also be given propofol 0.5 mg/kg on propofol group while no propofol will be given on control group. 30 minutes after patient was admitted to post-anesthesia care unit, patient will be evaluated for emergence agitation using Aono scale and Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale. The incidence of emergence agitation, hypotension, and desaturation will be treated accordingly.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Propofol | Active comparator | Drug: PropofolReceived intravenous 0.5mg/kg propofol |
| Control | No intervention | –Do not received intravenous 0.5 mg/kg propofol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 5 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient undergoing non-emergency surgery with general anesthesia
- Patient using sevoflurane as anesthetic agent
- Patient aged 1 - 5 years old
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 - 2
- Patient family signed the informed consent to be included in the study
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patient that will undergo ophthalmologic and otorhinolaryngologic surgery
- Patient that will require post operation stay in Intensive Care Unit
- Patient with psychological and neurological problem
- Patient with developmental delay
- Patient using sedative drugs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PropofolThose who received intravenous propofol | Drug | Propofol |
Primary outcome
Incidence of emergence agitation
Time frame: 30 minutes after being admitted to post anesthesia care unit
Evaluated using Aono scale and Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale. Patients with ≥3 on Aono scale AND ≥10 on PAED scale are diagnosed as emergence agitation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2019.
- Background: PubMed 25917689van Hoff SL, O'Neill ES, Cohen LC, Collins BA. Does a prophylactic dose of propofol reduce emergence agitation in children receiving anesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Jul;25(7):668-76. doi: 10.1111/pan.12669. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
- Background: PubMed 25586124Costi D, Ellwood J, Wallace A, Ahmed S, Waring L, Cyna A. Transition to propofol after sevoflurane anesthesia to prevent emergence agitation: a randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 May;25(5):517-23. doi: 10.1111/pan.12617. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
- Background: PubMed 26251008Jiang S, Liu J, Li M, Ji W, Liang J. The efficacy of propofol on emergence agitation--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Nov;59(10):1232-45. doi: 10.1111/aas.12586. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
- Background: PubMed 18073548Aouad MT, Yazbeck-Karam VG, Nasr VG, El-Khatib MF, Kanazi GE, Bleik JH. A single dose of propofol at the end of surgery for the prevention of emergence agitation in children undergoing strabismus surgery during sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2007 Nov;107(5):733-8. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000287009.46896.a7.
- Background: PubMed 20047899Dahmani S, Stany I, Brasher C, Lejeune C, Bruneau B, Wood C, Nivoche Y, Constant I, Murat I. Pharmacological prevention of sevoflurane- and desflurane-related emergence agitation in children: a meta-analysis of published studies. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):216-23. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep376. Epub 2010 Jan 3.
- Background: PubMed 28130755Huett C, Baehner T, Erdfelder F, Hoehne C, Bode C, Hoeft A, Ellerkmann RK. Prevention and Therapy of Pediatric Emergence Delirium: A National Survey. Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Apr;19(2):147-153. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0212-x.
- Background: PubMed 23800983Kanaya A, Kuratani N, Satoh D, Kurosawa S. Lower incidence of emergence agitation in children after propofol anesthesia compared with sevoflurane: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth. 2014 Feb;28(1):4-11. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1656-y. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
- Background: PubMed 27798810Moore AD, Anghelescu DL. Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Anesthesia. Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Feb;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s40272-016-0201-5.
- Background: PubMed 26601849Kanaya A. Emergence agitation in children: risk factors, prevention, and treatment. J Anesth. 2016 Apr;30(2):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2098-5. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
- Background: PubMed 26290263Chidambaran V, Costandi A, D'Mello A. Propofol: a review of its role in pediatric anesthesia and sedation. CNS Drugs. 2015 Jul;29(7):543-63. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0259-6.
- Background: PubMed 24015133Ali MA, Abdellatif AA. Prevention of sevoflurane related emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy: A comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;7(3):296-300. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.115363.
- Background: PubMed 26444149Makkar JK, Bhatia N, Bala I, Dwivedi D, Singh PM. A comparison of single dose dexmedetomidine with propofol for the prevention of emergence delirium after desflurane anaesthesia in children. Anaesthesia. 2016 Jan;71(1):50-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.13230. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Pediatric ALL
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Atrasentan in Pediatric Patients With Primary IgAN
Berger Disease, Bergers Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Risdiplam Administered as an Early Intervention in Pediatric Participants With Spinal Muscular Atrophy After Gene Therapy
Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Learn About a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine in Children at High Risk of RSV Disease
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Propofol in people with Pediatric ALL, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Indonesia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of emergence agitation (time frame: 30 minutes after being admitted to post anesthesia care unit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03528954, which also lists 24 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2019.