Pancreatic CancerNCT03524677
Mutation of K-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and TP53 in Pancreatic Cancer: Role of Liquid Biopsy in Preoperative Diagnosis
An observational study of Pancreatic Cancer, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 3 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Pancreatic cancers represent a challenge for the multidisciplinal team. A patient-tailored treatment plan requires an accurate preoperative staging. Currently more than 40% of patient taken to the OR are actually unresectable and another 40% will shortly recur with dismal prognosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Liquid Biopsy
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 23 Jan 2019to Jan 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients affected by non metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Who may be able to join
- Non metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Who cannot join
- <18y
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 2 countries.
3 sites in 2 countries
Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli
Roma, 00168
Giuseppe Bianco, MD, bianco.g@live.com
- Recruiting
AOU Sant'Andrea - UOC Chirurgia Generale
Roma, 00189
Francesco D'Angelo, MD, PhD, +390633775632, francesco.dangelo@uniroma1.it
Laura Antolino, MD, +390633775634, laura.antolino@uniroma1.it
Ireland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
St Vincent university Hospital
Dublin
Andrea Kazemi Nava, MD, andreakazeminava@gmail.com
About this study
Pancreatic cancers represent a challenge for the multidisciplinal team. A patient-tailored treatment plan requires an accurate preoperative staging. Currently more than 40% of patient taken to the OR are actually unresectable and another 40% will shortly recur with dismal prognosis.
Among patients that meet upfront surgery some would have benefit of a neoadjuvant treatment and vice versa. Accuracy of preoperative staging is of primary importance in treatment decisional making. Due to its location, invasive preoperative diagnostic tests on pancreatic cancer are expensive and risky. Liquid biopsy provides a non-invasive signature of the tumor. Analyzing mutations on cell-free nucleic acids gives translational information on tumor biology and therefore on its clinic-pathological features and likely on its progression. This study would be the first -in our knowledge- analyzing the relationship of a pattern of 4 major genes involved in pancreatic cancer progression on liquid biopsy and the time to recurrence and T-stage, with particular attention to vascular invasion. A properly staged patient provides a better resource allocation, an optimal treatment plan and improves patient's outcomes.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is the 4th cancer-related cause of death in Western countries and it is expected to become the 2nd leading cause of death by 2030 [1]. Approximately 80% of patients are unresectable at diagnosis [2] including a 41.4% of patients found unresectable at exploratory laparoscopy/tomy [3]. Moreover up to 38% of eventually resected patients will need a vascular resection in order to achieve a radical pancreatectomy [4], just over half of which because of a histological invasion [2]. Last but not least, successfully resected patients will recur within 12 months in more than 40% of cases with dismal prognosis [5]. Those early recurrent patients will show local spread or metastatic disease within 12 months with a post-recurrence survival and overall survival more than halved compared to patients recurring beyond one year from resection [5]. Laparotomy may be therefore useless in such patients. In this setting neoadjuvant treatment plays a key-role. It has the potential advantages to deliver systemic therapy to all patients with an increased efficacy of radio- and chemotherapies distributed in a virgin field, identify patients with aggressive tumor biology that could recur shortly after surgery and thus would not benefit form an operation. Moreover neoadjuvant therapy could downstage the tumor avoiding major vessels resections, decrease positive margins resections and decrease post-operative pancreatic fistulas [6]. Unfortunately imaging is no longer reliable in predicting resectability after neoadjuvant treatment [7]. The total mean direct cost of a patient with a resectable disease is $134,700, while for metastatic or unresectable patients this cost is $49,000-65,300 [8]. A properly staged patient provides a better resource allocation.
Liquid biopsy provides an non-invasive signature of the tumor, it is based circulating genetic material coming from cellular turnover and thus especially from the tumor [9]. Analyzing mutations on cell-free nucleic acids gives translational information on tumor biology and therefore on its clinico-pathological features and likely on its progression. Pancreatic cancer progression has long been studied. What is clear is that activating K-RAS mutations are an early event in most lesions, followed by inactivating mutations in CDKN2A, TP53 and SMAD4 [10]. Those 4 mountain genes are predictive of progression pattern in an autoptic study: patients with 2 or less genes mutations were more likely to develop oligometastatic failure and to harbor earlier disease stage at diagnosis compared to those with 3 or more mutated genes [11]. K-RAS mutations have been associated to a worse overall survival in particular when found in peripheral blood by liquid biopsy [12]. CDKN2A mutations have been associated to lymphatic invasion and widespread metastatic recurrence [13]. TP53 mutations have been associated to poor differentiation and locoregional recurrence [13]. Finally SMAD4 mutations have been associated to portal vein invasion, perineural invasion and lymph vessel invasion [14]. Besides evidences on those mountain genes there is a growing body of evidence of several stage and prognosis predictors: MET protein over expression significantly correlated with increased TNM stage and worsened survival [15]; EDIL3 expression was significantly up-regulated in PDAC in both cell lines and clinical specimens and correlated with patients' TNM stage, T classification and overall survival times [16]; BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation predict significantly shorter disease-free and overall survival [17]; High RAB27A expression was significantly associated with vascular invasion and tumor stage [18].
Those data have been validated on samples of the tumor and thus usually on specimens since only 53,3% of ultrasound guided biopsies provides enough material for histopathology and/or immunohistochemistry [19]. Recent evidences show that pancreatic cancer is one of the 4 cancers, along with colorectal, gastroesophageal and breast cancer, in which detectable ctDNA levels are present either in localized either in metastatic stages [20]. As seen in previous studies, the concordance between plasma and primary tumor mutations is as high as 100% in pancreatic cancer [9, 21].
The study of those mutations on liquid biopsy would provide non-invasive informations on preoperative staging and pattern progression and therefore a more accurate therapeutic planning.
AIM OF THE PROJECT This study is a pilot study. Genomic data will be described along with the clinical features of the disease for each patient.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship of mutations of the main genes responsible for pancreatic cancer progression (K-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and TP53) along with others related to stage and prognosis (MET, BRCA1/BRCA2, EDIL3 and RAB27A) detected on peripheral blood and time to progression and vascular invasion in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Other outcomes of interest will be clinicopathological and operative features such as operative time, type of vascular resection, clinical stage, pathological T-, N- and M-stage, margin status and overall-survival.
MATERIALS AND METHOD Patients with non-metastatic PaC undergoing pancreatic resection will be enrolled from surgery departments of a multi center international web. Blood samples in EDTA will be centrifugated at 2300 rpm for 10min twice. Liquid biopsies will be preoperatively collected and stored at -80°. An protected anonymous multi parametric database will be filled with all relevant patient's and disease's informations (sex, birth date, comorbidities, BMI, lab tests, imaging clinical stage, operation time, operation type, ICU stay, Dindo-Clavien post-operative morbidity, pathological stage, TNM, Grading, ajcc 8th stage, perineural, vascular and lymphatic invasion, resection margins, disease free survival, overall survival) and K-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4, TP53, MET, BRCA1/BRCA2, RAB27A and EDIL3 somatic genetic mutations on liquid biopsy with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS).
Recruitment will be multicentric: AOU sant'andrea di Roma, Policlinico Universitario Gemelli di Roma, St Vincent University Hospital Dublino, Policlinico Universitario di Modena.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Assessment of relationship among gene mutations and vascular invasion will be performed by means of logistic regression models. An overall score will be prepared based on rounding of estimated log-odds ratios and its performance evaluated by means of ROC curves and C-statistic.
An evaluation of the conditional association will also be performed by means of multivariable logistic regression models, which will be selected by minimizing the Akaike Information Criterion.
To assess secondary outcomes we will also use Cox regression models in a similar fashion.
To the best of our knowledge, there is information in the literature regarding the frequency of vascular invasion in pancreatectomies with vascular resection (56.7%), and about mutations of the genes of interest in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (the lowest mutated allele frequency being 30% for CDKN2A). Since there is no previous hypothesis on the relationship among genes and vascular invasion, and since this study simply involves the analysis of a small amount of blood posing no additional risk for the patient, we decided to perform a pilot study based on 50 patients. A fully planned and adequately powered study will be then conducted on the basis of the results of this pilot study. The sample size of 50 is deemed small enough (considering, as stated, the no additional risk and no use of invasive techniques) but large enough to guarantee that the final contingency table is not sparse. All analyses will be conducted with the R software.
CONCLUSIONS Non-metastatic PaC represent a challenge in staging and prognosis definition. A patient tailored treatment requires an accurate preoperative staging. Up to now more than 40% of patients thought to be resectable exit the operating room unresected and another 40% of resected patients recur within one year. Among patients who are offered a surgery, some would benefit of a neoadjuvant treatment and some others of palliative treatments. This is why a reliable preoperative staging is essential in therapeutic decisional making. Invasive diagnostic tests of the pancreas are expensive and risky due to its central retroperitoneal location. Liquid biopsy offers a non invasive tumor characterization. This study will be the first analyzing the relationship of the four major genes, along with 5 other prognostic genes, involved in pancreatic cancer genesis and progression and T stage with special attention to early recurrence and vascular invasion, by liquid biopsy. This will result in a better resource allocation, treatment planning and patients outcomes.
REFERENCES
- Cancer Res. 2014; 74: 2913-2921
- Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):2028-37
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 6;7:CD009323
- J Gastrointest Surg 2004 Dec;8(8):935-49
- Ann Surg 2018 Mar 23 Epub ahead of print.
- J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Aug;6(4):418-29.
- Ann Surg. 2017 Dec 7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002600. [Epub ahead of print]
- Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5132-9
- Science 2018 Feb 23:359(6378):926-930.
- Oncogene. 2013 Nov 7;32(45):5253-60.
- Clin Cancer Res 2012 Nov 15;18(22):6229-47.
- Cancer 2015 Jul 1;121(13):2271-80.
- Ann Surg 2013 Aug;258(2):336-46.
- Pancreas 2015 May;44(4):660-4.
- World J Gastroenterol 2014 Jul 14;20(26):8458-70.
- Oncotarget 2016 Jan 26;7(4):4226-40.
- J Am Coll Surg 2018 Apr;226(4):630-637.
- Med Oncol (2015) 32:372.
- Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Oct;84(4):670-8.
- Sci Transl Med 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra24.
- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017 Sep 19;114(38):10202-10207.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Being tested
- Liquid Biopsy
- Keywords
- pancreatic cancer, liquid biopsy, vascular invasion, early recurrence
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Liquid BiopsyDiagnostic test
K-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and TP53 mutation on circulating cfDNA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Non metastatic pancreatic cancer | patients with biopsy or fnac proven ductal adenocarcinoma without any systemic metastatic spread at preoperative imaging Receives: Diagnostic Test: Liquid Biopsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Vascular Invasion
Presence of venous and/or arterial invasion
Measured: within one month from recruiting
Early recurrence
local or systemic recurrence after resection
Measured: within 12 months from resection
Secondary outcomes (3)
Overall Survival
Time to death
Measured: 3 years follow up
Disease free survival
Time to relapse
Measured: 3 years follow up
N stage
Presence of locoregional nodes' metastasis
Measured: within one month from recruiting
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 May 2018
- Study start23 Jan 2019
- Primary completionNov 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Roma La SapienzaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Roma La Sapienza
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Laura Antolino, University of Roma La Sapienza
- Investigators
- Giovanni Ramacciato, MD, FACS, Study chair, Sapieza University of Rome (IT)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03524677
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17_D'Angelo
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 2 May 2018
- Last updated
- 25 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mutation of K-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and TP53 in Pancreatic Cancer: Role of Liquid Biopsy in Preoperative Diagnosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03524677
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17_D'Angelo
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Keywords
- pancreatic cancer, liquid biopsy, vascular invasion, early recurrence
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Roma La SapienzaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana
- Study start
- 23 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 May 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pancreatic cancers represent a challenge for the multidisciplinal team. A patient-tailored treatment plan requires an accurate preoperative staging. Currently more than 40% of patient taken to the OR are actually unresectable and another 40% will shortly recur with dismal prognosis.
Among patients that meet upfront surgery some would have benefit of a neoadjuvant treatment and vice versa. Accuracy of preoperative staging is of primary importance in treatment decisional making. Due to its location, invasive preoperative diagnostic tests on pancreatic cancer are expensive and risky. Liquid biopsy provides a non-invasive signature of the tumor. Analyzing mutations on cell-free nucleic acids gives translational information on tumor biology and therefore on its clinic-pathological features and likely on its progression. This study would be the first -in our knowledge- analyzing the relationship of a pattern of 4 major genes involved in pancreatic cancer progression on liquid biopsy and the time to recurrence and T-stage, with particular attention to vascular invasion. A properly staged patient provides a better resource allocation, an optimal treatment plan and improves patient's outcomes.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is the 4th cancer-related cause of death in Western countries and it is expected to become the 2nd leading cause of death by 2030 [1]. Approximately 80% of patients are unresectable at diagnosis [2] including a 41.4% of patients found unresectable at exploratory laparoscopy/tomy [3]. Moreover up to 38% of eventually resected patients will need a vascular resection in order to achieve a radical pancreatectomy [4], just over half of which because of a histological invasion [2]. Last but not least, successfully resected patients will recur within 12 months in more than 40% of cases with dismal prognosis [5]. Those early recurrent patients will show local spread or metastatic disease within 12 months with a post-recurrence survival and overall survival more than halved compared to patients recurring beyond one year from resection [5]. Laparotomy may be therefore useless in such patients. In this setting neoadjuvant treatment plays a key-role. It has the potential advantages to deliver systemic therapy to all patients with an increased efficacy of radio- and chemotherapies distributed in a virgin field, identify patients with aggressive tumor biology that could recur shortly after surgery and thus would not benefit form an operation. Moreover neoadjuvant therapy could downstage the tumor avoiding major vessels resections, decrease positive margins resections and decrease post-operative pancreatic fistulas [6]. Unfortunately imaging is no longer reliable in predicting resectability after neoadjuvant treatment [7]. The total mean direct cost of a patient with a resectable disease is $134,700, while for metastatic or unresectable patients this cost is $49,000-65,300 [8]. A properly staged patient provides a better resource allocation.
Liquid biopsy provides an non-invasive signature of the tumor, it is based circulating genetic material coming from cellular turnover and thus especially from the tumor [9]. Analyzing mutations on cell-free nucleic acids gives translational information on tumor biology and therefore on its clinico-pathological features and likely on its progression. Pancreatic cancer progression has long been studied. What is clear is that activating K-RAS mutations are an early event in most lesions, followed by inactivating mutations in CDKN2A, TP53 and SMAD4 [10]. Those 4 mountain genes are predictive of progression pattern in an autoptic study: patients with 2 or less genes mutations were more likely to develop oligometastatic failure and to harbor earlier disease stage at diagnosis compared to those with 3 or more mutated genes [11]. K-RAS mutations have been associated to a worse overall survival in particular when found in peripheral blood by liquid biopsy [12]. CDKN2A mutations have been associated to lymphatic invasion and widespread metastatic recurrence [13]. TP53 mutations have been associated to poor differentiation and locoregional recurrence [13]. Finally SMAD4 mutations have been associated to portal vein invasion, perineural invasion and lymph vessel invasion [14]. Besides evidences on those mountain genes there is a growing body of evidence of several stage and prognosis predictors: MET protein over expression significantly correlated with increased TNM stage and worsened survival [15]; EDIL3 expression was significantly up-regulated in PDAC in both cell lines and clinical specimens and correlated with patients' TNM stage, T classification and overall survival times [16]; BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation predict significantly shorter disease-free and overall survival [17]; High RAB27A expression was significantly associated with vascular invasion and tumor stage [18].
Those data have been validated on samples of the tumor and thus usually on specimens since only 53,3% of ultrasound guided biopsies provides enough material for histopathology and/or immunohistochemistry [19]. Recent evidences show that pancreatic cancer is one of the 4 cancers, along with colorectal, gastroesophageal and breast cancer, in which detectable ctDNA levels are present either in localized either in metastatic stages [20]. As seen in previous studies, the concordance between plasma and primary tumor mutations is as high as 100% in pancreatic cancer [9, 21].
The study of those mutations on liquid biopsy would provide non-invasive informations on preoperative staging and pattern progression and therefore a more accurate therapeutic planning.
AIM OF THE PROJECT This study is a pilot study. Genomic data will be described along with the clinical features of the disease for each patient.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship of mutations of the main genes responsible for pancreatic cancer progression (K-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and TP53) along with others related to stage and prognosis (MET, BRCA1/BRCA2, EDIL3 and RAB27A) detected on peripheral blood and time to progression and vascular invasion in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Other outcomes of interest will be clinicopathological and operative features such as operative time, type of vascular resection, clinical stage, pathological T-, N- and M-stage, margin status and overall-survival.
MATERIALS AND METHOD Patients with non-metastatic PaC undergoing pancreatic resection will be enrolled from surgery departments of a multi center international web. Blood samples in EDTA will be centrifugated at 2300 rpm for 10min twice. Liquid biopsies will be preoperatively collected and stored at -80°. An protected anonymous multi parametric database will be filled with all relevant patient's and disease's informations (sex, birth date, comorbidities, BMI, lab tests, imaging clinical stage, operation time, operation type, ICU stay, Dindo-Clavien post-operative morbidity, pathological stage, TNM, Grading, ajcc 8th stage, perineural, vascular and lymphatic invasion, resection margins, disease free survival, overall survival) and K-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4, TP53, MET, BRCA1/BRCA2, RAB27A and EDIL3 somatic genetic mutations on liquid biopsy with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS).
Recruitment will be multicentric: AOU sant'andrea di Roma, Policlinico Universitario Gemelli di Roma, St Vincent University Hospital Dublino, Policlinico Universitario di Modena.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Assessment of relationship among gene mutations and vascular invasion will be performed by means of logistic regression models. An overall score will be prepared based on rounding of estimated log-odds ratios and its performance evaluated by means of ROC curves and C-statistic.
An evaluation of the conditional association will also be performed by means of multivariable logistic regression models, which will be selected by minimizing the Akaike Information Criterion.
To assess secondary outcomes we will also use Cox regression models in a similar fashion.
To the best of our knowledge, there is information in the literature regarding the frequency of vascular invasion in pancreatectomies with vascular resection (56.7%), and about mutations of the genes of interest in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (the lowest mutated allele frequency being 30% for CDKN2A). Since there is no previous hypothesis on the relationship among genes and vascular invasion, and since this study simply involves the analysis of a small amount of blood posing no additional risk for the patient, we decided to perform a pilot study based on 50 patients. A fully planned and adequately powered study will be then conducted on the basis of the results of this pilot study. The sample size of 50 is deemed small enough (considering, as stated, the no additional risk and no use of invasive techniques) but large enough to guarantee that the final contingency table is not sparse. All analyses will be conducted with the R software.
CONCLUSIONS Non-metastatic PaC represent a challenge in staging and prognosis definition. A patient tailored treatment requires an accurate preoperative staging. Up to now more than 40% of patients thought to be resectable exit the operating room unresected and another 40% of resected patients recur within one year. Among patients who are offered a surgery, some would benefit of a neoadjuvant treatment and some others of palliative treatments. This is why a reliable preoperative staging is essential in therapeutic decisional making. Invasive diagnostic tests of the pancreas are expensive and risky due to its central retroperitoneal location. Liquid biopsy offers a non invasive tumor characterization. This study will be the first analyzing the relationship of the four major genes, along with 5 other prognostic genes, involved in pancreatic cancer genesis and progression and T stage with special attention to early recurrence and vascular invasion, by liquid biopsy. This will result in a better resource allocation, treatment planning and patients outcomes.
REFERENCES
- Cancer Res. 2014; 74: 2913-2921
- Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):2028-37
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 6;7:CD009323
- J Gastrointest Surg 2004 Dec;8(8):935-49
- Ann Surg 2018 Mar 23 Epub ahead of print.
- J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Aug;6(4):418-29.
- Ann Surg. 2017 Dec 7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002600. [Epub ahead of print]
- Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5132-9
- Science 2018 Feb 23:359(6378):926-930.
- Oncogene. 2013 Nov 7;32(45):5253-60.
- Clin Cancer Res 2012 Nov 15;18(22):6229-47.
- Cancer 2015 Jul 1;121(13):2271-80.
- Ann Surg 2013 Aug;258(2):336-46.
- Pancreas 2015 May;44(4):660-4.
- World J Gastroenterol 2014 Jul 14;20(26):8458-70.
- Oncotarget 2016 Jan 26;7(4):4226-40.
- J Am Coll Surg 2018 Apr;226(4):630-637.
- Med Oncol (2015) 32:372.
- Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Oct;84(4):670-8.
- Sci Transl Med 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra24.
- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017 Sep 19;114(38):10202-10207.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Non metastatic pancreatic cancer | – | Diagnostic Test: Liquid Biopsypatients with biopsy or fnac proven ductal adenocarcinoma without any systemic metastatic spread at preoperative imaging |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients affected by non metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Non metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- <18y
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Liquid BiopsyK-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and TP53 mutation on circulating cfDNA | Diagnostic test | Non metastatic pancreatic cancer |
Primary outcome
Vascular Invasion
Time frame: within one month from recruiting
Presence of venous and/or arterial invasion
Early recurrence
Time frame: within 12 months from resection
local or systemic recurrence after resection
3 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival
Time frame: 3 years follow up
Disease free survival
Time frame: 3 years follow up
N stage
Time frame: within one month from recruiting
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jan 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pancreatic Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Giovanni Ramacciato, MD, FACS study chair
Sapieza University of Rome (IT)
3 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pancreatic Cancer, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 3 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Italy, Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Laura Antolino, MD, PhD stud (+393470409876, laura.antolino@uniroma1.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Vascular Invasion (time frame: within one month from recruiting). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2019.