AzTrials
AzTrials

KwashiorkorNCT03520621

The Role of Sulfur Amino Acids in Risk of Kwashiorkor

An observational study of Kwashiorkor, run by Tufts University at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This observational cross-sectional study is investigating if young children in populations with higher prevalence of kwashiorkor malnutrition have lower dietary sulfur amino acid intake than populations with lower prevalence of kwashiorkor, controlling for multiple potential confounding factors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 36 to 59 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Kwashiorkor
How many people
360 participants
Where
1 siteDemocratic Republic of the Congo
Study dates
1 Jun 2016to 2 Aug 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 36 to 59 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: The study population, both groups, live within a 3 mile by 3 mile square in rural eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Who may be able to join

  • resident of the selected population
  • in the appropriate age range

Who cannot join

  • caregiver reports the child has an illness that has required treatment for at least 6 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Democratic Republic of the Congo1 site
  • Restore Hope for Africa

    Goma, North Kivu

Other trials in Democratic Republic of the Congo

About this study

This observational cross-sectional study is investigating if young children in populations with higher prevalence of kwashiorkor malnutrition have lower dietary sulfur amino acid intake than populations with lower prevalence of kwashiorkor, controlling for multiple potential confounding factors. Intake is estimated through diet recalls during interviews with a child's caregiver, analysis of urine samples and analysis of food samples for their amino acid profiles.

Read the detailed description

Kwashiorkor is one of two categorizations of severe acute malnutrition, but its etiology remains unclear. Although kwashiorkor is found only where diets are low in quality protein, comparisons of total dietary protein of individual children with and without kwashiorkor has been inconclusive. This study aims to compare amino acid profiles of the diets, not just total protein.

Evidence has shown that children with kwashiorkor consistently have very low circulating levels of sulfur amino acids (cysteine and methionine). Typical staple foods in regions with endemic kwashiorkor are generally poor in sulfur amino acids and the signs characterizing kwashiorkor can plausibly be explained by a shortage of sulfur amino acids.

In eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, certain populations have chronically higher prevalence of kwashiorkor than neighboring populations with similar livelihoods, religion, environment, language and ethnicity. This study will compare these two populations to understand what differences between them may explain the difference in prevalence.

Conditions
Kwashiorkor
Being tested
No intervention
Keywords
sulfur amino acid
Medical subject headings
Kwashiorkor

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No interventionOther

    no intervention

Study groups in NCT03520621
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High Prevalence PopulationPrevalence of kwashiorkor (as diagnosed by bipedal pitting edema) is >2% among children 36 to 59 months old in the population, in Murambi/Malehe Health Area of eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo
Receives: Other: No intervention
Low Prevalence PopulationPrevalence of kwashiorkor (as diagnosed by bipedal pitting edema) is <2% among children 36 to 59 months old in the population, in Murambi/Malehe Health Area of eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo
Receives: Other: No intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Dietary sulfur amino acid

    mg of sulfur amino acid in the diet per kg of body weight

    Measured: one measure at one time point within three weeks of registration

  2. dietary sulfur amino acid above or below WHO estimated average requirement (EAR)

    the total sulfur amino acid in the diet will be calculated from a diet recall

    this will be a bivariate measure, "1" if the SAA in the diet is above or "0" if below the WHO/FAO requirement for sulfur amino acid intake of 17mg of sulfur amino acids per kg of body weight per day

    Measured: one measure at one time point within three weeks of registration

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. calories and protein in diet per kg of body weight

    intake of calories (kcal/kg body weight),

    digestibility adjusted protein - sum of (grams of protein per food item x digestibility of food item) per kg of body weight

    quality adjusted protein = digestibility adjusted protein in the diet x proportion of requirement of the limiting amino acid

    Measured: one measure at one time point within three weeks of registration

  2. urinary sulfate

    sulfate excreted in the urine, normalized to creatinine

    Measured: one measure at one time point within three weeks of registration

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 May 2018
  2. Study start1 Jun 2016
  3. Primary completion14 Aug 2016
  4. Study completion2 Aug 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
360 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03520621
Sponsor's protocol ID
1605004
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
17 Apr 2018
Last updated
11 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Kwashiorkor, run by Tufts University at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Dietary sulfur amino acid (time frame: one measure at one time point within three weeks of registration). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in