AzTrials
AzTrials

StressESRT-RNCT03518359

Enhanced Stress Resilience Training for Residents

A study testing Enhanced Stress Resilience Training (ESRT) in people with Stress and Mindfulness, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Burnout and overwhelming stress are growing issues in medicine and are associated with mental illness, performance deficits and diminished patient care. Among surgical trainees, high dispositional mindfulness decreases these risks by 75% or more, and formal mindfulness training has been shown feasible and acceptable. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stress, Mindfulness, Cognitive Change
What is being tested?
Enhanced Stress Resilience Training (ESRT)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Jun 2018to 30 Jun 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Any consented medical intern from Emergency Medecine, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, Family Practice, OBGYN and Surgery Depratments in-coming to University of California San Francisco in the study year.

Who cannot join

  • Current personal mindfulness practice, once a week or more frequent;
  • Use of medications with Central Nervous System effects;
  • Lifetime history of an organic mental illness;
  • Acute or chronic immune or inflammatory disorders;
  • Pregnancy;

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94143

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Enhanced Resilience Training to Improve Mental Health, Stress and Performance in Resident Physicians

Burnout and overwhelming stress are growing issues in medicine and are associated with mental illness, performance deficits and diminished patient care. Among surgical trainees, high dispositional mindfulness decreases these risks by 75% or more, and formal mindfulness training has been shown feasible and acceptable. In other high-stress populations formal mindfulness training has improved well-being, stress, cognition and performance, yet the ability of such training to mitigate stress and burnout across medical specialties, or to affect improvements in the cognition and performance of physicians, remains unknown. To address these gaps and thereby promote the wider adoption of contemplative practices within medical training, investigators have developed Enhanced Stress Resilience Training, a modified form of MBSR - streamlined, tailored and contextualized for physicians and trainees. Investigators propose to test Enhanced Stress Resilience Training (ESRT), versus active control and residency-as-usual, in surgical and non-surgical residents evaluated for well-being, cognition and performance changes at baseline, post-intervention and six-month follow-up.

Read the detailed description

Experiencing joy in the practice of medicine is by no means guaranteed. For many physicians, the unique bond with patients, the deep satisfaction of saving a life, and a profound sense of calling make the sacrifice and heartache worthwhile. In contrast, the growing prevalence of burnout, and mental distress is being linked to diminished physician performance, patient outcomes, and hospital economics. This suggests that demands are outstripping resources, thereby threatening the physician-patient bond and the societal pillar this represents.

Overwhelming stress without adequate coping skills has been posited to promote burnout and distress, and may promote performance deficits (from surgical errors to poor professionalism) by impairing cognition and self-regulation. In other high-stress/high-performance groups formal mindfulness training has been shown to enhance stress resilience, subjective well-being and performance. Nevertheless, quality research involving physicians, the effects of chronic stress on performance and the impact of mindfulness training in this context remains scarce, contributing to the slow adoption of mindfulness training into medical practice and residency.

To address these gaps, we first laid the groundwork: we conducted a national survey which showed high dispositional mindfulness in surgery residents reduced the risk of burnout and distress by 75% or more. We conducted a RCT of MBSR in surgery interns, demonstrating feasibility and acceptability of formal mindfulness training. Finally, we have developed an MBSR-based, streamlined curriculum tailored for physicians and trainees, Enhanced Stress Resilience Training (ESRT), which has been beta-tested in surgery faculty and mixed-level residents and refined in terms of logistics, dose and delivery. We have since disseminated our promising results, thereby allowing us access to a larger study population for our proposed RCT of ESRT in mixed-specialty interns as a means to improve well-being, cognition and performance.

While this study will likely not reach statistical power, it will absolutely allow for broader vetting of the curriculum, our current data acquisition and management methods, and the appropriateness of our outcome measures, paving the way for a high-quality, fully-powered MCT in the near future.

The significance of studying mindfulness mental training in medical and surgical trainees is two-fold. One, as a process-centered skill with demonstrated effects on psychological well-being, perceived stress, cognitive performance and physiologic health mindfulness presents a potential gateway mechanism for providing individuals with a 'universal tool' for challenges across all stages of medical training and practice. This includes burnout and errors which are looming issues, largely immutable for the last decade. Two, if feasibility and efficacy among medical and surgical trainees can be shown, the social clout of impacting such a high stress and high performance field is uniquely powerful and could further the dissemination of evidence-based mindfulness interventions to a remarkable degree. Finally, the resultant tendency for enhanced self-awareness and equipoise has been contagious in other settings, providing fuel for a greater culture change in medicine that is much-needed and holds great promise for patients and providers.

The innovation of this work is in bringing a mind-body intervention to bear not only on well-being but also on the fundamental cognitive processes believed to sub-serve performance, such as the impact of attention and working memory capacity on medical decision-making, and the impact of emotional regulation and self-awareness on professionalism and team work. The potential to improve both the operative and clinical environments as well as medical errors is unprecedented. Finally, a vetted, manualized curriculum specifically crafted for physicians could accelerate dissemination nationally.

Being tested
Enhanced Stress Resilience Training (ESRT), Active Control
Keywords
Residents, Stress, Well-being

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Enhanced Stress Resilience Training (ESRT)Behavioural

    Also called Modified MBSR

    ESRT involves six weekly 90-minute group classes and one 2 - 4 hour retreat. Classes focus on developing mindfulness skills (i.e. sustained attention, open monitoring, emotional regulation, meta-cognition) in the context of skills and concepts for managing stress, particularly in practicing medicine. Homework consists of 20 minutes per day of mindfulness exercises following guided meditation CDs or videos of movement-based practice, and practice will be reported periodically by text. A 3-hour outdoor retreat occurs at week six. The central exercises of ESRT are the body scan, sitting meditation, chi gong and yoga. For both arms, the weekly teaching sessions occur on a workday morning during protected time at Parnassus, Mission Bay or Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital campus.

  • Active ControlBehavioural

    Control group participants will meet for 6 weeks, 90 minutes each week, for classes focuses on stress management through rest and exercise, with equivalent protected time and small group bonding but without the use of contemplative practices. Topics will include the history of surgery, patient perspective, the physician personality, technical mastery, fallibility and limits, balancing compassion and detachment and knowing when not to operate. For daily practice, control participants will be asked to devote 20 min per day to stress management through rest and exercise again reported daily by text.

Study groups in NCT03518359
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mental Training for ResidentsExperimentalThe intervention will be the modified form of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR). For this study investigator named the experimental arm Enhanced Stress Resilience Training (ESRT).
Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Stress Resilience Training (ESRT)
Active ControlActive comparatorActive control that emphasizes externalized attention via the "shared reading and listening" model.
Receives: Behavioral: Active Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in executive function: National Institutes of Health Examiner battery

    Executive function as assessed via working memory capacity, cognitive control and executive composite components of the NIH EXAMINER battery.

    NIH EXAMINER Battery measures working memory, inhibition, set shifting, fluency, planning, insight, and social cognition and behavior. The EXAMINER battery software calculates the executive composite and factor scores in the R language.

    Measured: Baseline; post-intervention (9-10wk after baseline), 6 months follow-up.

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change in psychological well-being: Mental Health Continuum

    Mental Health Continuum Short Version consists of 14 items that were chosen as the most prototypical items representing the construct definition for each facet of well-being. 6-point Likert scale, from Never (0) to Every Day (5).

    Measured: Baseline; post-intervention (9-10wk after baseline), 6 months follow-up.

  2. Change in psychological well-being: Perceived Stress

    Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale: 10-items, 5-point Likert scale, 0-4. Stress is evaluated as continuous variable or as categorical variable, with high stress is score set at >20 for females and >18 for males.

    Measured: Baseline; post-intervention (9-10wk after baseline), 6 months follow-up.

  3. Change in psychological well-being: Burnout

    Burnout: 2-item Maslach Burnout Inventory, 7-point Likert scale, 0 to 6. High burnout present if either question scores ≥4.

    Measured: Baseline; post-intervention (9-10wk after baseline), 6 months follow-up.

  4. Change in psychological well-being: Anxiety

    Spielberger's State Trait Anxiety index, 4-point Likert, 1 to 4. High anxiety > 40.

    Measured: Baseline; post-intervention (9-10wk after baseline), 6 months follow-up.

  5. Change in psychological well-being: Depression

    Depression and Suicidal Ideation are assessed using the 9-item form of the Patient Health Questionnaire. 4-point Likert scale, 0 to 3 and a total score from 0 to 27 is calculated. Severe depression > 20.

    Measured: Baseline; post-intervention (9-10wk after baseline), 6 months follow-up.

  6. Change in psychological well-being: Mindfulness

    Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised. 4-point Likert scale, 1 to 4. High mindfulness ≥ 31.

    Measured: Baseline; post-intervention (9-10wk after baseline), 6 months follow-up.

  7. Change in psychological well-being: Alcohol Misuse

    The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions, 5-point Likert scale, 0 to 4. Misuse for females if score ≥ 3, for males if score ≥ 4.

    Measured: Baseline; post-intervention (9-10wk after baseline), 6 months follow-up.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2018
  2. Study start13 Jun 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2021
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized, partially-blinded.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03518359
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-24601
Acronym
ESRT-R
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
24 Apr 2018
Last updated
24 Feb 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Shanafelt TD, Hasan O, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, Satele D, Sloan J, West CP. Changes in Burnout and Satisfaction With Work-Life Balance in Physicians and the General US Working Population Between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Dec;90(12):1600-13. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.023.

    PubMed 26653297
  • Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps G, Russell T, Dyrbye L, Satele D, Collicott P, Novotny PJ, Sloan J, Freischlag J. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg. 2010 Jun;251(6):995-1000. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bfdab3.

    PubMed 19934755
  • Scheepers RA, Boerebach BC, Arah OA, Heineman MJ, Lombarts KM. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Physicians' Occupational Well-Being on the Quality of Patient Care. Int J Behav Med. 2015 Dec;22(6):683-98. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9473-3.

    PubMed 25733349
  • Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, Burstin HR, Cleary PD, Brennan TA. Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Feb;15(2):122-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02219.x.

    PubMed 10672116
  • DiMatteo MR, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, Ordway L, Kravitz RL, McGlynn EA, Kaplan S, Rogers WH. Physicians' characteristics influence patients' adherence to medical treatment: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Health Psychol. 1993 Mar;12(2):93-102. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.12.2.93.

    PubMed 8500445
  • Del Canale S, Louis DZ, Maio V, Wang X, Rossi G, Hojat M, Gonnella JS. The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Acad Med. 2012 Sep;87(9):1243-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182628fbf.

    PubMed 22836852
  • Sinsky CA, Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D, Tutty M, Shanafelt TD. Professional Satisfaction and the Career Plans of US Physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Nov;92(11):1625-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

    PubMed 29101932
  • Dyrbye LN, Trockel M, Frank E, Olson K, Linzer M, Lemaire J, Swensen S, Shanafelt T, Sinsky CA. Development of a Research Agenda to Identify Evidence-Based Strategies to Improve Physician Wellness and Reduce Burnout. Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 16;166(10):743-744. doi: 10.7326/M16-2956. Epub 2017 Apr 18. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28418518
  • Shirley ED, Sanders JO. Patient satisfaction: Implications and predictors of success. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 May 15;95(10):e69. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01048.

    PubMed 23677370
  • Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1713.

    PubMed 25384822
  • Campbell J, Prochazka AV, Yamashita T, Gopal R. Predictors of persistent burnout in internal medicine residents: a prospective cohort study. Acad Med. 2010 Oct;85(10):1630-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f0c4e7.

    PubMed 20881685
  • Center C, Davis M, Detre T, Ford DE, Hansbrough W, Hendin H, Laszlo J, Litts DA, Mann J, Mansky PA, Michels R, Miles SH, Proujansky R, Reynolds CF 3rd, Silverman MM. Confronting depression and suicide in physicians: a consensus statement. JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3161-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3161.

    PubMed 12813122
  • Karlamangla AS, Singer BH, McEwen BS, Rowe JW, Seeman TE. Allostatic load as a predictor of functional decline. MacArthur studies of successful aging. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Jul;55(7):696-710. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00399-2.

    PubMed 12160918
  • Arora S, Sevdalis N, Aggarwal R, Sirimanna P, Darzi A, Kneebone R. Stress impairs psychomotor performance in novice laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2588-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1013-2. Epub 2010 Mar 31.

    PubMed 20354878
  • Wetzel CM, Kneebone RL, Woloshynowych M, Nestel D, Moorthy K, Kidd J, Darzi A. The effects of stress on surgical performance. Am J Surg. 2006 Jan;191(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.034.

    PubMed 16399098

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Enhanced Stress Resilience Training (ESRT) in people with Stress and Mindfulness, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in executive function: National Institutes of Health Examiner battery (time frame: Baseline; post-intervention (9-10wk after baseline), 6 months follow-up.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03518359, which also lists 24 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in