Hemophilia ANCT03507582
Virtual Reality for Hemophilia
A study testing Virtual Reality Distraction in people with Hemophilia A and Hemophilia B, run by Nationwide Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Children with hemophilia are exposed to intravenous (IV) procedures that cause pain/anxiety and distraction methods can be employed to improve the patient experience. Three-dimensional virtual reality (VR) environments can reduce distress related to procedures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 19 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemophilia A, Hemophilia B
- What is being tested?
- Virtual Reality Distraction
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to 28 Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 19 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Provide signed and dated informed consent form
- Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
- Diagnosed with Hemophilia A or B
- Male or female, aged >6 years to <19 years
- Subject and caregiver able to understand and speak English
- Being seen for routine comprehensive hemophilia care visits during which an IV procedure is planned as standard of care.
Who cannot join
- Inability to use the VR equipment (ie visual, cognitive or hearing impairment that would preclude engagement with the VR environment)
- History of motion sickness as reported by patient or caregiver
- History of poorly controlled seizures as reported by patient or caregiver
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205
About this study
Official title: A Feasibility and Usability Study of a Nursing Orchestrated, Customized 3 Dimensional Virtual Reality Environment in Children With Hemophilia Undergoing Routine Intravenous Procedures
Children with hemophilia are exposed to intravenous (IV) procedures that cause pain/anxiety and distraction methods can be employed to improve the patient experience. Three-dimensional virtual reality (VR) environments can reduce distress related to procedures. To be utilized in a clinical setting, however, these devices must address infection control concerns and fit pediatric patients. Additionally, for use in hemophilia care, environments should encourage a subject to keep their hands/arms still to facilitate procedures. Nursing orchestration of the VR environment via an iPad dashboard has the potential to increase feasibility and acceptance by patients, families and providers of the VR experience without disrupting routine clinical care.
Read the detailed description
Patients with hemophilia A and B (HA/HB) are frequently treated with IV infusions of clotting factor concentrates to treat and prevent bleeding. Additionally they typically have at least yearly IV laboratory assessments. Pain and anxiety with needle related procedures particularly in children with hemophilia can lead to development of needle phobia, treatment avoidance and poor adherence to treatment regimens. Conventional virtual reality (VR) environments have been shown to reduce pain/anxiety in pediatric populations however in a clinical setting children with hemophilia have specific VR design needs that have not been addressed. Certain issues related to VR environments are related to the pediatric age range. These include the size and weight of VR headsets, the ease of donning and doffing headsets, and degree of engagement with VR environments. Hemophilia specific issues include the need for the VR experience to limit movement of the hands/arms to facilitate IV procedures, customization to prevent boredom/disengagement from repeated use and ability of clinical staff to trigger events via an orchestration dashboard that occur for the patients benefit at key times during IV procedures. Lastly, there are issues related to integration into a clinical setting. These include ability to integrate into clinical care without adversely affecting clinic flow, and infection control issues related to headset design.
- Conditions
- Hemophilia A, Hemophilia B
- Being tested
- Virtual Reality Distraction, Standard of Care Distraction
- Medical subject headings
- Hemophilia A, Hemophilia B
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Virtual Reality DistractionOther
This intervention consists of a disposable virtual reality headset which will enable the use of virtual reality in clinic through the commodity hardware iPod Touch. An additional piece of software on an iPad will allow clinical staff to act as an orchestrator and trigger events that occur for the patient's benefit in the virtual reality environment. The mechanism for the dashboard will be dashboard software running on an iPad tablet that will wirelessly communicate to the iPod Touch the patient is wearing. A study timer will be incorporated into the orchestration dashboard. The VAS/FACES scale will be incorporated into the iPad used for orchestration.
Standard of Care DistractionOther
This intervention consists of a two dimensional distraction (ie TV/tablet) as well as verbal distraction (ie singing/talking/music) will be allowed by caregivers, nurses and phlebotomy staff but will not qualified or quantified. IV procedures will proceed in Groups A and B. At the completion of the IV procedure the nurse orchestrator will stop the procedure timer. The Subject, Guardian and Nurse orchestrator will complete the Final VAS/FACES assessment on the iPad.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality Distraction | Active comparator | This intervention consists of a disposable virtual reality headset which will enable the use of virtual reality in clinic through the commodity hardware iPod Touch. An additional piece of software on an iPad will allow clinical staff to act as an orchestrator and trigger events that occur for the patient's benefit in the virtual reality environment. The mechanism for the dashboard will be dashboard software running on an iPad tablet that will wirelessly communicate to the iPod Touch the patient is wearing. A study timer will be incorporated into the orchestration dashboard. The VAS/FACES scale will be incorporated into the iPad used for orchestration. Receives: Other: Virtual Reality Distraction |
| Standard of Care Distraction | Active comparator | This intervention consists of a two dimensional distraction (ie TV/tablet) as well as verbal distraction (ie singing/talking/music) will be allowed by caregivers, nurses and phlebotomy staff but will not qualified or quantified. IV procedures will proceed in Groups A and B. At the completion of the IV procedure the nurse orchestrator will stop the procedure timer. The Subject, Guardian and Nurse orchestrator will complete the Final VAS/FACES assessment on the iPad. Receives: Other: Standard of Care Distraction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nurse Orchestrated Virtual Reality Distraction
The primary outcome of feasibility was assessed using a surrogate marker of feasibility which was duration of the IV procedure measured in minutes in both study arms. Procedure time was the length of time from the moment a patient was positioned for the procedure to the completion of the procedure. The study timer was incorporated in the study IPAD and timing was performed by the nurse orchestrator.
Measured: Twelve months
Standard of Care Distraction
The primary outcome of feasibility was assessed using a surrogate marker of feasibility which was duration of the IV procedure measured in minutes in both study arms. Procedure time was the length of time from the moment a patient was positioned for the procedure to the completion of the procedure. The study timer was incorporated in the study IPAD and timing was performed by the nurse orchestrator.
Measured: Twelve months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Effectiveness of the distraction technique
Both patient groups assessed the effectiveness of their distraction techniques following the procedure by using a Visual analogue/FACES scale answering 3 anchored questions. 1) "Did the distraction technique keep you/your child /your patient engaged?" The anchors were 0=It really kept them engaged and 100=It really did not keep them engaged. 2) "Do you think the distraction technique/s changed you/your child/your patient's nervousness/anxiety level during the IV procedure?" The anchor of 0=it decreased nervousness/anxiety a lot, 100=it increased nervousness/anxiety a lot. 3) "How did the distraction technique/s affect pain during your/your child/your patient's IV procedure?" With 0=it made pain a lot better, 100=it made pain a lot worse.
Measured: Twelve months
Usability and Likeability
For patients randomized to the VR arm, data on the use of the VR equipment was recorded by the nurse orchestrator at the end of each procedure. Data was categorized if the participant wore the VR equipment: 1) during the entire procedure, 2) part of the procedure or 3) only prior to the procedure. Participants were also asked to rate usability of the VR equipment, by using the VAS/FACES scale to answer "How easy was it for you/your child/your patient to use the VR equipment?" A score of 0 represented really easy to use and a score of 100 correlated with really hard to use. Lastly, participants were asked to use the VAS?FACES scale to answer a likeability question by "How much would you/your child/your patient like to use VR for future IV procedures?" A score of 0 equated to they would really like to use VR again and 100 meant they would really not like to use it again.
Measured: Twelve months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Apr 2018
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completion28 Dec 2016
- Study completion28 Dec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hemophilia AStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nationwide Children's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03507582
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB16-00403
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 13 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 25 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Dunn A, Patterson J, Biega CF, Grishchenko A, Luna J, Stanek JR, Strouse R. A Novel Clinician-Orchestrated Virtual Reality Platform for Distraction During Pediatric Intravenous Procedures in Children With Hemophilia: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2019 Jan 9;7(1):e10902. doi: 10.2196/10902.
PubMed 30626567
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Feasibility and Usability Study of a Nursing Orchestrated, Customized 3 Dimensional Virtual Reality Environment in Children With Hemophilia Undergoing Routine Intravenous Procedures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03507582
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB16-00403
- Conditions
- Hemophilia A, Hemophilia B
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nationwide Children's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Children with hemophilia are exposed to intravenous (IV) procedures that cause pain/anxiety and distraction methods can be employed to improve the patient experience. Three-dimensional virtual reality (VR) environments can reduce distress related to procedures. To be utilized in a clinical setting, however, these devices must address infection control concerns and fit pediatric patients. Additionally, for use in hemophilia care, environments should encourage a subject to keep their hands/arms still to facilitate procedures. Nursing orchestration of the VR environment via an iPad dashboard has the potential to increase feasibility and acceptance by patients, families and providers of the VR experience without disrupting routine clinical care.
Detailed description
Patients with hemophilia A and B (HA/HB) are frequently treated with IV infusions of clotting factor concentrates to treat and prevent bleeding. Additionally they typically have at least yearly IV laboratory assessments. Pain and anxiety with needle related procedures particularly in children with hemophilia can lead to development of needle phobia, treatment avoidance and poor adherence to treatment regimens. Conventional virtual reality (VR) environments have been shown to reduce pain/anxiety in pediatric populations however in a clinical setting children with hemophilia have specific VR design needs that have not been addressed. Certain issues related to VR environments are related to the pediatric age range. These include the size and weight of VR headsets, the ease of donning and doffing headsets, and degree of engagement with VR environments. Hemophilia specific issues include the need for the VR experience to limit movement of the hands/arms to facilitate IV procedures, customization to prevent boredom/disengagement from repeated use and ability of clinical staff to trigger events via an orchestration dashboard that occur for the patients benefit at key times during IV procedures. Lastly, there are issues related to integration into a clinical setting. These include ability to integrate into clinical care without adversely affecting clinic flow, and infection control issues related to headset design.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality Distraction | Active comparator | Other: Virtual Reality DistractionThis intervention consists of a disposable virtual reality headset which will enable the use of virtual reality in clinic through the commodity hardware iPod Touch. An additional piece of software on an iPad will allow clinical staff to act as an orchestrator and trigger events that occur for the patient's benefit in the virtual reality environment. The mechanism for the dashboard will be dashboard software running on an iPad tablet that will wirelessly communicate to the iPod Touch the patient is wearing. A study timer will be incorporated into the orchestration dashboard. The VAS/FACES scale will be incorporated into the iPad used for orchestration. |
| Standard of Care Distraction | Active comparator | Other: Standard of Care DistractionThis intervention consists of a two dimensional distraction (ie TV/tablet) as well as verbal distraction (ie singing/talking/music) will be allowed by caregivers, nurses and phlebotomy staff but will not qualified or quantified. IV procedures will proceed in Groups A and B. At the completion of the IV procedure the nurse orchestrator will stop the procedure timer. The Subject, Guardian and Nurse orchestrator will complete the Final VAS/FACES assessment on the iPad. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 19 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Provide signed and dated informed consent form
- Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
- Diagnosed with Hemophilia A or B
- Male or female, aged >6 years to <19 years
- Subject and caregiver able to understand and speak English
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Inability to use the VR equipment (ie visual, cognitive or hearing impairment that would preclude engagement with the VR environment)
- History of motion sickness as reported by patient or caregiver
- History of poorly controlled seizures as reported by patient or caregiver
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality DistractionThis intervention consists of a disposable virtual reality headset which will enable the use of virtual reality in clinic through the commodity hardware iPod Touch. An additional piece of software on an iPad will allow clinical staff to act as an orchestrator and trigger events that occur for the patient's benefit in the virtual reality environment. The mechanism for the dashboard will be dashboard software running on an iPad tablet that will wirelessly communicate to the iPod Touch the patient is wearing. A study timer will be incorporated into the orchestration dashboard. The VAS/FACES scale will be incorporated into the iPad used for orchestration. | Other | Virtual Reality Distraction |
| Standard of Care DistractionThis intervention consists of a two dimensional distraction (ie TV/tablet) as well as verbal distraction (ie singing/talking/music) will be allowed by caregivers, nurses and phlebotomy staff but will not qualified or quantified. IV procedures will proceed in Groups A and B. At the completion of the IV procedure the nurse orchestrator will stop the procedure timer. The Subject, Guardian and Nurse orchestrator will complete the Final VAS/FACES assessment on the iPad. | Other | Standard of Care Distraction |
Primary outcome
Nurse Orchestrated Virtual Reality Distraction
Time frame: Twelve months
The primary outcome of feasibility was assessed using a surrogate marker of feasibility which was duration of the IV procedure measured in minutes in both study arms. Procedure time was the length of time from the moment a patient was positioned for the procedure to the completion of the procedure. The study timer was incorporated in the study IPAD and timing was performed by the nurse orchestrator.
Standard of Care Distraction
Time frame: Twelve months
The primary outcome of feasibility was assessed using a surrogate marker of feasibility which was duration of the IV procedure measured in minutes in both study arms. Procedure time was the length of time from the moment a patient was positioned for the procedure to the completion of the procedure. The study timer was incorporated in the study IPAD and timing was performed by the nurse orchestrator.
2 secondary outcomes
Effectiveness of the distraction technique
Time frame: Twelve months
Usability and Likeability
Time frame: Twelve months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Apr 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30626567Dunn A, Patterson J, Biega CF, Grishchenko A, Luna J, Stanek JR, Strouse R. A Novel Clinician-Orchestrated Virtual Reality Platform for Distraction During Pediatric Intravenous Procedures in Children With Hemophilia: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2019 Jan 9;7(1):e10902. doi: 10.2196/10902.
Related trials for Hemophilia A
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Study to Describe Patient REal-world FitusiRan ExpeRience
Hemophilia A or B
RecruitingPhase 3
Open-Label Extension Study of Marstacimab in Hemophilia Participants With or Without Inhibitors
Hemophilia A, Hemophilia B
RecruitingObservational study
An Observational Study to Learn More About How Well Damoctocog Alfa Pegol Works in Previously Treated Children With Hemophilia A
Hemophilia A
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effects of NXT007 Compared to Factor VIII Prophylaxis in Participants With Hemophilia A
Hemophilia A
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study to Evaluate Overall Health, Physical Activity, and Joint Outcomes in Participants With Severe or Moderate Hemophilia A Without Factor VIII Inhibitors on Emicizumab Prophylaxis
Severe Hemophilia A, Moderate Hemophilia A
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Virtual Reality Distraction in people with Hemophilia A and Hemophilia B, run by Nationwide Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nurse Orchestrated Virtual Reality Distraction (time frame: Twelve months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03507582, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2018.