AzTrials
AzTrials

Groin InjuryPhase 2PETRANCT03496649

Pubalgia and Adductor Tendinopathies Refractory to Medical Treatment

A Phase 2 study testing Dysport 500 Unit Powder for Injection in people with Groin Injury and Tendinopathy, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pubalgia is a pain syndrome located in the groin area. This syndrome is mainly described in young male athletes and typically affect the superficial muscles defining the boundaries of the femoral triangle, i.e. gracilis, pectineus, adductor brevis and especially adductor longus, and less commonly the deep muscles. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Groin Injury, Tendinopathy
What is being tested?
Dysport 500 Unit Powder for Injection
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
4 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
2 May 2019to 1 Jan 2021
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female patient 18 to 65 years old
  • Patient with episode of adductor tendinopathy, refractory to appropriate medical treatment lasting 3 months
  • Tendinopathy confirmed by clinical investigation, echography and MRI.
  • Patient naïve to intramuscular botulinum toxin injections
  • Patient able to self-evaluate pain on a VAS
  • Intensity of exercise-induced pain > 5 on a VAS of 10
  • Patient able to provide a signed informed consent freely for the study protocol and data collection

Who cannot join

  • Subject participating or having participated in the last 3 months in another study which could interfere with the objective of the study
  • Neuralgia
  • Acute muscle injury
  • Progressive disease at the time of inclusion
  • Anticoagulant treatment: heparin administered with an electrical syringe or AVK therapy with effective doses
  • Exclusion criteria related to Dysport injection (botulinum toxin type A) :
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Known hypersensitivity to botulinum toxin type A or to any of the components in the formulation (20% human albumin solution, lactose monohydrate)
  • Subject with a significant deficit of clinical or subclinical neuromuscular transmission (myasthenia or Lambert-Eaton syndrome)
  • Treatment that directly or indirectly interferes with neuromuscular transmission (aminoglycosides, curare, anticholinesterase, aminoquinoline, cyclosporine, etc.)
  • Previous surgery with curarisation less than a month ago
  • History of neuromuscular disorders
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Women of child-bearing potential not using contraceptive methods during the study duration

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU de Bordeaux

    Bordeaux, 33076

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Feasability Study on the Use of Botulinum Toxin A in Primary Adductor Tendinopathies Refractory to Medical Treatment

Pubalgia is a pain syndrome located in the groin area. This syndrome is mainly described in young male athletes and typically affect the superficial muscles defining the boundaries of the femoral triangle, i.e. gracilis, pectineus, adductor brevis and especially adductor longus, and less commonly the deep muscles.

Clinically, the pain is located in the inner aspect of the thigh, where the tendons attach onto the pubic symphysis. It is usually unilateral, and sometimes associated with neuropathic pain suggestive of obturator nerve irritation.

Read more

There is no official recommendation or expert consensus on the management of pubalgia. However, a few protocols recommend a period of rest with Non-Inflammatory Anti-Steroidien Drugs (NSAIDs), icing and massages, as well as rehabilitation with passive stretching and muscle reinforcement.

The use of botulinum toxin type A could be an option in cases of treatment failure. However, a feasibility study must be performed beforehand, and if results are positive, a controlled study on a larger cohort could be conducted.

The major potential impact is a great effective pain relief for patients with neurological diseases.

Read the detailed description

The incidence of pubalgia in the literature varies, with large series reporting an incidence close to 5-10%, representing 15 to 18% of all injuries.

Recurrences are also common, affecting 30 to 35% of cases.

Once other differential diagnoses (such as spondylarthropathy, colorectal cancer, kidney disease…) have been ruled out, athletic pubalgia is typically divided into three main categories based on the site of the injury:

  • Abdominal wall, the most common form, representing 38 to 50% of all cases;
  • Pubic symphysis due to osteoarthropathy of the pubic bone caused by repetitive stress injury, accounting for 10 to 15% of all cases of pubalgia;
  • Adductor tendons, on which this study focuses, representing 22 to 38% of all cases of pubalgia, caused by repetitive tractions on the tendon insertions.

There is no official recommendation or expert consensus on the management of pubalgia. However, a few protocols recommend a period of rest with Non-Inflammatory Anti-Steroidien Drugs (NSAIDs), icing and massages, as well as rehabilitation with passive stretching and muscle reinforcement.

Neuromuscular reprogramming is then performed to stabilise the pelvis, followed by a progressive resumption of sporting activities, guided by the pain level.

Generally, 70 to 85% of patients are able to resume their sporting activities with this management protocol.

In 15 to 20% of cases of essential adductor tendinopathy, symptoms do not improve and the only currently validated solution is then a tenotomy, sometimes combined with partial tendon release in recurring cases.

Recent studies showed that the use of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) produces fairly positive results in chronic tendinopathies, such as epicondylitis. However, the efficacy of BTA injections in adductor tendinopathies has not been demonstrated consistently and a feasibility study must be conducted to address this question.

The hypothetical benefit of BTA in adductor tendinopathies is based on the toxin's known effects:

  1. a purely analgesic effect, which reduces pain in the injected area within a few days. This type of chronic tendinopathy does not involve inflammation. The pain in such cases is most likely due to the action of neurotransmitters such as substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). As BTA is known to inhibit the secretion of these neurotransmitters, this mechanism could explain the toxin's specific analgesic effect.
  2. a muscle relaxant effect due to its action on the motor endplate, which reaches its maximum 6 weeks after the injection, and lasts 3 to 6 months.

The resulting muscle relaxation helps improve healing of the damaged tendon, and provides sustained analgesia.

A series including 39 cases showed that botulinum toxin is effective on hip adductor muscles following total hip arthroplasty, providing reduced muscle contracture and improved hip mobility without side effects.

The use of botulinum toxin type A could be an option in cases of treatment failure. However, a feasibility study must be performed beforehand, and if results are positive, a study on a larger cohort could be conducted.

Being tested
Dysport 500 Unit Powder for Injection
Keywords
Primary Adductor tendinopathies, Pubalgia, Botulinum toxin type A
Medical subject headings
Tendinopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dysport 500 Unit Powder for InjectionDrug

    Dysport administered by intramuscular injection

Study groups in NCT03496649
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DysportExperimentalDysport administration by intramuscular injection Each patient will receive one dose of Dysport at Visit 1. At least 2 of the 4 muscles below will be injected, depending on which muscles are affected: 250 IU for the gracilis muscle 200 IU for the pectineus muscle 300 IU for the adductor longus muscle 200 IU for the adductor brevis muscle These injections will be uni or bilateral, it will depend on clinical diagnosis. If necessary, the 4 muscles will be injected with a maximum of 1500U Dysport. The total dose cannot exceed 1500 units.
Receives: Drug: Dysport 500 Unit Powder for Injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of patients with a pain reduction (VAS)

    Proportion of patients with a pain reduction of over 50% compared to baseline, as shown by the average pain intensity measured between D80 and D90 on a Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable).

    Pain intensity will be daily collected by the patient in his patient's diary.

    Measured: Between Day 80 and Day 90

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Exercise-induced pain intensity (VAS)

    Average intensity of exercise-induced pain evaluated daily by the patient on a VAS type numerical scale

    Measured: Daily between Day 0 and Day 90

  2. Pain relief

    Percentage of patients with over 50% pain relief compared to baseline

    Measured: On Day 30 and Day 90

  3. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)

    Percentage of patients with over 50% GAS objective reached

    Measured: On Day 30 and Day 90

  4. Blazina clinical classification system

    Improvement of at least 1 point on the Blazina clinical classification system in 50% of patients

    Measured: On Day 30 and Day 90

  5. Adductor strength

    Preservation or improvement of adductor strength measured with a dynamometer and resumption of sport activity (Tegner activity level scale) in 50% of patients

    Measured: On Day 30 and Day 90

  6. Cure rate based on patients' self-evaluation

    Percentage of patients with over 50% cure rate based on the patients' self-evaluation of the improvement of their condition

    Measured: On Day 30 and Day 90

  7. Cure rate based on physician's evaluation

    Percentage of patients with over 50% cure rate based on the physicians' evaluation of the patients' improvement

    Measured: On Day 30 and Day 90

  8. Treatment

    Percentage of patients not asking for further treatment

    Measured: On Day 30 and Day 90

  9. Pain diary

    Determination of a break point on the pain intensity graph plotted by the physician, based on the pain diary completed by the patient.

    Measured: On Day 30 and Day 90

  10. HAGOS self-reported questionnaire

    Improvement on the 6 dimensions of the HAGOS self-reported questionnaire

    Measured: On Day 30 and Day 90

  11. Tolerance

    Tolerance evaluation: description and frequency of adverse effects.

    Measured: Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, Day 90

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Apr 2018
  2. Study start2 May 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2021
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2021

Why it stopped: target number of patient not reached and lost of financial supplies

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
4 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03496649
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHUBX2014/21
Acronym
PETRA
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
3 Aug 2017
Last updated
24 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Any exploitation of the data by Ipsen or for another research will be submitted to the preliminary agreement of CHU de Bordeaux and, in case of agreement, of a negotiated contract between the parties.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Dysport 500 Unit Powder for Injection in people with Groin Injury and Tendinopathy, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: target number of patient not reached and lost of financial supplies). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of patients with a pain reduction (VAS) (time frame: Between Day 80 and Day 90). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in