AzTrials
AzTrials

Septic ShockBIOCHECKNCT03472079

TIMP2*IGFBP7 and Transient AKI

An observational study of Septic Shock, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit have a high risk to develop acute kidney injury (AKI) and AKI is an independent risk factor of mortality. Given the absence of validated pharmacological treatments for limiting the progression of AKI or for accelerating recovery from AKI, early intervention and the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Septic Shock
How many people
77 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
5 Nov 2018to 5 Nov 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: univariate comparison between the 2 groups (transient and persistent AKI) using Mann Whithney test or Chi square test. ROC curve analysis to determine the best threshold of TIMP2*IGFBP7 groups to distinguish the 2 groups.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 or over
  • Inclusion criteria: septic shock (according to Bone's criteria) within 4 hours following the introduction of catecholamines, AKI defined by KDIGO≥1, social security coverage, measurement of the urine concentration of TIMP2*IGFBP7 within the 4 hours following the introduction of catecholamines, patients admitted for a septic shock between 1st January 2014 and 1st January 2017 in the medical ICU of Amiens university hospital France, medical ICU of Montpellier university hospital France and ICU Melun hospital, France

Who cannot join

  • Need for immediate renal replacement therapy, anuria, chronic renal failure (stage 4 or 5 with GFR<30ml/min), obstructive AKI, pregnancy, cardiac arrest during the same hospitalization, life expectancy<48 hours, Child C Cirrhosis, prior occurrence of AKI during the current hospital stay, kidney transplantation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU Amiens-Picardie

    Amiens, 80000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Does the Urine Concentration of TIMP2*IGFBP7 Can Distinguish Patients Who Will Present Transient or Persistent Acute Kidney Injury During Septic Shock? A Retrospective Analysis. BIOCHECK

Patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit have a high risk to develop acute kidney injury (AKI) and AKI is an independent risk factor of mortality. Given the absence of validated pharmacological treatments for limiting the progression of AKI or for accelerating recovery from AKI, early intervention and the restoration of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in this context of septic shock might improve the patients' prognosis. One major challenge is to determine whether or not the AKI is reversible (return to normal function KDIGO 0 within 72 hours). In this retrospective study the investigators will analyze all patients admitted for a septic shock in three French ICUs between the 1st january 2014 and 01st January 2017 who developed an AKI (KDIGO ≥1) at admission and who had a determination of the urine concentration of TIMP2*IGFBP7 at admission. The investigators will determine the best threshold of TIMP2*IGFBP7 to distinguish the population of patients who will return to normal kidney function within 72 hours (KDIGO 0).

Read the detailed description

Background :

Patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit have a high risk to develop acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI is an independent risk factor of mortality. Given the absence of validated pharmacological treatments for limiting the progression of AKI or for accelerating recovery from AKI, early intervention and the restoration of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in this context of septic shock might improve the patients' prognosis. One major challenge is therefore how to determine whether or not the AKI is reversible. The best-studied biomarkers (NGAL and KIM 1) have little discriminant power in septic patients because of their poor specificity or unsuitable kinetics for very early diagnosis. The combination of urine assays for tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP2) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) has shown good diagnostic performance for the very early detection of the risk of developing AKI in the following 12 hrs. Urine levels of these two markers specifically reflect damage to kidney tubules. Moreover, the levels appear to be strongly correlated with the severity of tubule damage. Thus, one can reasonably hypothesize that measurement of these markers in the very early stages of septic shock might determine the presence and severity of kidney tubule damage. A threshold (yet to be defined) would help to differentiate between (i) transient, non-severe injury and (ii) injury that is already too severe to be reversible.

Purpose : to determine whether or not the urine concentration of TIMP2*IGFBP7 may distinguish patients with high risk of persistent or transient AKI during the early phase of septic shock.

Conditions
Septic Shock
Keywords
Acute kidney injury, Septic shock, TIMP2*IGFBP7
Medical subject headings
Shock, Septic, Acute Kidney Injury

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. KDIGO value

    : Transient AKI defined by the return to KDIGO 0 within the first 72 hours following the introduction of catecholamines

    Measured: return to KDIGO 0 within the first 72 hours following the introduction of catecholamines

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. need for renal replacement therapy

    need for renal replacement therapy within the first 72 hours following the introduction of catecholamines

    Measured: within the first 72 hours following the introduction of catecholamines

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2018
  2. Study start5 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion5 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion5 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
77 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03472079
Sponsor's protocol ID
PI2018_843_0013
Acronym
BIOCHECK
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
14 Mar 2018
Last updated
25 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Septic Shock, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

KDIGO value (time frame: return to KDIGO 0 within the first 72 hours following the introduction of catecholamines). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in