Acquired Brain InjuryTOPSNCT03450460
Ontario Brain Injury Association (OBIA) Peer Support Program
A study testing Peer support in people with Acquired Brain Injury, run by Toronto Rehabilitation Institute at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Most people with moderate or severe TBI have difficulty returning to their usual social roles and activities. The OBIA has developed a program where peers (other individuals living with TBI) coach or mentor those with more recent brain injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acquired Brain Injury
- What is being tested?
- Peer support
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 16 May 2018to 18 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Partner participants, including caregiver Partners,
- Community-based (i.e., no longer participating in a comprehensive rehabilitation program) individuals;
- Have a moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12) or have cared for (i.e., unpaid) an individual with moderate to severe TBI for at least one year;
- Are 18 years of age or older;
- Have participated in the OBIA Peer Support Program;
- Are fluent in English; and,
Show all 15Show fewer
- Are able to provide informed consent/have an available proxy who is able to provide informed consent.
- Mentor participants -Completed at least one partnership with the OBIA Peer Support Program
- Partner/Mentor participants
- Community-based (i.e., no longer participating in a comprehensive rehabilitation program);
- Have a moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale of 12 or less);
- Are 18 years of age or older;
- Are fluent in English; and,
- Are able to provide informed consent/have an available proxy who is able to provide informed consent.
- Note that Mentor participants may include newly-trained Mentors or Mentors that have already had previous mentorship experience with the OBIA Peer Support Program.
Who cannot join
- Partner participants, including caregiver Partners,
- -Individuals who are medically unstable or have active suicidal ideation
- For Phase 2 and 3
- Previously participated in the OBIA Peer Support Program or currently receiving peer support/self-management program elsewhere;
- Are medically unstable; and,
- Have active suicidal ideation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial on the Ontario Brain Injury Association Peer Support Program
Most people with moderate or severe TBI have difficulty returning to their usual social roles and activities. The OBIA has developed a program where peers (other individuals living with TBI) coach or mentor those with more recent brain injury. The objective of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of measuring the impact of the OBIA Peer Program on social participation and mood compared to a control group who have not received peer support yet.
The proposed study will involve three phases. It will begin with a qualitative component (stakeholder interviews), then a pilot RCT, and end with more interviews to explore the success of the study intervention. A qualitative descriptive approach will be used at these first and last phases of the study. In Phase 1, interviews will be conducted with approximately 15 participants including individuals with moderate to severe TBI, caregivers, Mentors, OBIA staff members, and health researchers. The proposed Phase 2 will be a clinical trial, conducted with 60 participants. These participants will be randomized to one of three groups: a twice a week Program (n=20), a once a week Program (n=20), or the wait list control group (n=20). For Phase 3, a sub group of approximately 25 participants from Phase 2 who participated in the OBIA Peer Support Program will be asked to participate in a one-on-one, telephone/Skype interview. A sub-group of Mentors will also be asked to participate in a one-on-one, telephone/Skype interview.
This research project will address the highest priority areas of "strategies to enhance social participation and community life (personal relationships)" and "psychological strategies to improve mood, depression, and irritability", as identified in the ONF's Request for Proposals on "Addressing Evidence Gaps in Moderate to Severe TBI Rehabilitation". The study will provide important results to inform a RCT (of appropriate size) on the impact of peer support on the social participation and mood of individuals with moderate to severe TBI. This study will then provide the best evidence to support the recommendation on "a peer-supported relationship model of intervention", and inform future versions of the INESSS-ONF Guideline.
Read the detailed description
Phase 1 - Understanding the Enablers, Barriers of Implementing the Trial Protocol
Specific Objective: To understand the perceived enablers and barriers of implementing the peer support trial protocol, including the perceived enablers and barriers to participant recruitment, retention, adherence, and data collection, of implementing the selected outcomes measures, and of participating in the trial, from the perspective of stakeholders (knowledge users) including individuals with moderate to severe TBI, caregivers, OBIA Peer Support Program Mentors, OBIA staff members who are a part of the Peer Support Program, health services and knowledge translation (KT) researchers with expertise in TBI, and methodologists with expertise in clinical trials; Hypothesis: A better understanding of the perceived enablers and barriers of implementing the peer support trial protocol will enhance the effectiveness of the intervention and feasibility of the trial in Phase 2 and results will be used to refine the research protocol for the RCT, if necessary.
Participants and recruitment: A purposive sampling of each of the different stakeholder groups will be used. The OBIA Peer Support Program Database will be used to recruit the Partners (including caregivers) and Mentors. On-line searches and/or the contacts of the Principal Investigators will be used to recruit the OBIA staff members and the researchers/methodologists. We will aim to recruit a total of 15 key informants for Phase 1. Individuals who are interested in participating in the study will contact the Research Coordinator via telephone or email to gain further information about the study. The eligibility criteria of all participants will be confirmed by the Research Coordinator. This process will be followed for all phases of the study.
Data collection: participants will take part in a one-on-one, semi-structured telephone/Skype interview lasting approximately 45-60 minutes. All interviews will be digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim for data analysis. During transcription, any identifying information will be removed and the participant will be assigned a coded identifier.
Data analysis: analysis will be conducted using inductive thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clark (2006). The analysis will assess the perceived enablers and barriers to participant recruitment, retention, adherence, and data collection, of implementing the selected outcomes measures, and of participating in the OBIA Peer Support Program and the trial itself. To facilitate the organization and analysis of the qualitative data, the Principal Investigator's/Research Coordinator's reflective notes from the interviews, as well as the transcripts, will be entered into NVivo v.11.
Phase 2 - Evaluating the Feasibility of the Trial Protocol, Conducting a (Pilot) Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial
Specific Objective: a) To evaluate the feasibility of participant recruitment and retention, data collection, as well as participant adherence to the OBIA Peer Support Program; b) To estimate effect sizes of the immediate impact of the twice/week versus once/week OBIA Peer Support Program compared to a wait list control group on social participation (primary outcome), mood, HRQoL, and self-efficacy (secondary outcomes); Hypotheses: a) It is expected that adequate (i.e., ≥75%) recruitment, retention and adherence to the OBIA Peer Support Program will be achieved; b) It is expected that the six-month OBIA Peer Support Program delivered twice weekly will lead to greater mean improvement, on measures of social participation, mood (i.e., depressive symptoms), HRQoL, and self-efficacy, than the same program delivered once weekly or a wait list control intervention (i.e., a dose response effect will be observed); c) It will be possible to estimate the magnitude of effect to allow the sample size calculation for a definitive trial; Significance: The results of the currently proposed research will support a future definitive RCT.
Participants and recruitment: eligible Partner participants will include community-based (i.e., no longer participating in a comprehensive rehabilitation program) individuals who have a moderate to severe TBI. Partners will be recruited via an online advertisement posted on the OBIA website as well as the websites of the 14 participating brain injury associations. Mentor participants may also be recruited from the OBIA Peer Support Program Database. We will aim to recruit a total of 60 Partners (i.e., n=20 participants per group) and 20-40 Mentors (those paired with partners in the intervention arm) for Phase 2.
Intervention and Control Groups: Participants in the intervention groups will take part in the OBIA Peer Support Group, receiving either twice a week (i.e., two 20-40 minute calls) or once a week (i.e., one 20-40 minute call) support. In keeping with an average duration of support, and for the purposes of the currently proposed study, the intervention duration will be 6 months. Participants in the control group will be assigned to a wait list. They will receive the OBIA Peer Support Program after the intervention group (i.e., after 6 months). This assignment does not represent a significant variation in the usual intake procedure, as the OBIA Peer Support Program already maintains a wait list (personal communication).
Sample Size, Randomization, and Blinding: since this is a feasibility study, a formal sample size calculation will not be performed. The recruitment of 20 participants in each arm of the trial is judged to be feasible and will produce a robust and useful amount of data. Partner participants who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and have provided informed consent to take part in the trial will be randomized to either the intervention (twice/week or once/week Program) or the wait list control groups. Mentors will be assigned to those randomized into the intervention arms by the OBIA Peer Support Program using their usual methods. A web-based randomization service with secure password protected login using random variable block-size will be used. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of the Partners and Mentors will not be possible. However, the processes of outcome assessment and data analysis will be blinded.
Data collection: baseline data including demographic and descriptive information (e.g., age, sex, severity of injury, marital status), as well as the following outcomes measures described below, will be captured prior to randomization: social participation using the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ); mood (i.e., depressive symptoms) using the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12); self-efficacy using the TBI Self-efficacy Questionnaire. Follow-up assessments for the outcome measures will occur at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Participants will have the option to complete their baseline demographic and descriptive information and outcome measures as well as their follow-up assessments themselves (i.e., paper-based and mailed back to the research team), by telephone, or on-line via Survey Monkey®.
Data analysis: Quantitative Component: baseline characteristics (e.g., age, sex, severity of injury, marital status, etc.) will be described and any differences between the three groups will be compared using means/medians and frequencies and proportions. As this is a feasibility study, and the ability to collect data is being tested, no data imputation will be performed to account for missing data. The feasibility of recruitment will be based on whether 60 participants (i.e., 20 participants in each arm of the trial) can be enrolled in the trial during the 6-month recruitment period. The number of individuals who provide informed consent per month will also be calculated. The feasibility of retention will be assessed by calculating the proportion of participants with complete data on each outcome measure at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. To evaluate participant adherence, the proportion of twice-weekly and weekly sessions attended by the participants will be calculated. The proportion of participants who withdraw from the intervention at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months will be calculated along with the reason(s) for withdrawing. The feasibility threshold will be set at >75% for recruitment, retention, and adherence (to the intervention). To evaluate changes between groups, the analysis plan will focus on mean change scores and confidence intervals (i.e., mixed-design analysis of variance model) for the outcome measures described above. Effect sizes will be calculated via Cohen d to reflect the impact of the OBIA Peer Support Program on social participation, mood, HRQoL, and self-efficacy.
UPDATE TO PHASE 2 AFTER COMPLETING PHASE 1
After the completion of the phase 1 study and prior to implementing the phase 2 pilot RCT, the following procedures were changed/finalized for the RCT: 1) the study will only include the once/week intervention arm and a wait-list control (participant recruitment expectations adjusted accordingly to 40 partners (20 per arm) and 20 mentors (to be matched with those in the intervention arm); 2) the trial length has been reduced from 6 months to 4 months, and data collection points now include baseline, 2 months, and 4 months; 3) The Short Form-20 Health Survey (SF-20) will replace the SF-12 outcome measures; and, 4) data collection will be done by telephone.
Phase 3 - Exploring the Impact and Acceptability of the OBIA Peer Support Program and the Trial Protocol
Specific Objective: To explore the impact and acceptability of the OBIA Peer Support Program and the trial itself from the perspective of Partners and Mentors; Hypothesis: It is expected that the OBIA Peer Support Program will be acceptable to both the Partners and Mentors and that an increased understanding of the OBIA Peer Support Program and the trial itself will be achieved; Significance: The results of Phase 3 will lead to an understanding of the "active ingredients" or mechanisms that are associated with improved outcomes and the impact of "dosage" of interactions. Furthermore, the results of Phase 3 will refine and improve future iterations of the OBIA Peer Support Program and the implementation of the definitive RCT.
Participants and recruitment: Purposive sampling will be used to recruit intervention group Partner participants in Phase 3 (e.g. to ensure participants with a range of severity of TBI), and all prticipating Mentors will be approached about participating in the interviews. Recruitment of participants will cease once data saturation has been achieved, which is the point when successive interviews become repetitive and no new responses or themes emerge. We will aim to recruit a total of 25 Partners and Mentors for Phase 3.
Data collection: participants will take part in a one-on-one, semi-structured telephone/Skype interview lasting approximately 45-60 minutes about their experience with the RCT. All interviews will be digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim for data analysis. During transcription, any identifying information will be removed and the participant will be assigned a coded identifier.
Analysis Plan: analysis will be conducted using inductive thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clark (2006) and will assess participants' experiences with the intervention and the trial protocol itself (i.e., the impact and acceptability of the program itself/intervention and the trial protocol itself). To facilitate the organization and analysis of the qualitative data, the Principal Investigator's/Research Coordinator's reflective notes from the interviews, as well as the transcripts, will be entered into NVivo v.11.
- Conditions
- Acquired Brain Injury
- Being tested
- Peer support
- Keywords
- peer support, feasibility trial, mixed methods
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Peer supportBehavioural
The Program matches volunteer Mentors and Partners for a series of one-to-one interactions that focus on the discussion and resolution of problems or issues (i.e., problem solving) related to one or several key topic areas including family and friends, resources, life changes or challenges, (health care) professionals, social/recreational activities, work/employment/training/volunteering, the brain injury itself, emotions or feelings, and other issues.27 Once the match is established, the Mentor and Partner communicate with one another primarily by telephone until the problems or issues are either resolved or a referral to another service is made (i.e., counselling or community support services). For some partnerships, communication by email or video conferencing is used.27 Most telephone calls last between 20 and 40 minutes (personal communication) and are held weekly.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1/week peer support | Experimental | These individuals with acquired brain injury will receive the Ontario Brain Injury Association Peer Support program once per week. Receives: Behavioral: Peer support |
| wait list control group | No intervention | These individuals with acquired brain injury will receive the Ontario Brain Injury Association Peer Support once the trial period is complete. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline Participation at 4 months
Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ)
Measured: Baseline to 4 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline Mood at 4 months
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Measured: Baseline to 4 months
Change from Health-related Quality of Life at 4 months
Short-Form-20 Health Survey
Measured: Baseline to 4 months
Change from Self-efficacy at 4 months
Traumatic Brain Injury Self-efficacy Questionnaire
Measured: Baseline to 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2018
- Study start16 May 2018
- Primary completion13 Feb 2020
- Study completion18 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acquired Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, Ontario Brain Injury Association
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sarah Munce, University Health Network, Toronto
- Investigators
- Sarah Munce, Principal investigator, Toronto Rehabilitation, University Health Network
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03450460
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TorontoRI
- Acronym
- TOPS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Munce SEP, Jaglal S, Kastner M, Nelson MLA, Salbach NM, Shepherd J, Sweet SN, Wilcock R, Thoms C, Bayley MT. Ontario Brain Injury Association Peer Support Program: a mixed methods protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e023367. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023367.
PubMed 30904839
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial on the Ontario Brain Injury Association Peer Support Program
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03450460
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TOPS / TorontoRI
- Conditions
- Acquired Brain Injury
- Keywords
- peer support, feasibility trial, mixed methods
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, Ontario Brain Injury Association
- Study start
- 16 May 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Most people with moderate or severe TBI have difficulty returning to their usual social roles and activities. The OBIA has developed a program where peers (other individuals living with TBI) coach or mentor those with more recent brain injury. The objective of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of measuring the impact of the OBIA Peer Program on social participation and mood compared to a control group who have not received peer support yet.
The proposed study will involve three phases. It will begin with a qualitative component (stakeholder interviews), then a pilot RCT, and end with more interviews to explore the success of the study intervention. A qualitative descriptive approach will be used at these first and last phases of the study. In Phase 1, interviews will be conducted with approximately 15 participants including individuals with moderate to severe TBI, caregivers, Mentors, OBIA staff members, and health researchers. The proposed Phase 2 will be a clinical trial, conducted with 60 participants. These participants will be randomized to one of three groups: a twice a week Program (n=20), a once a week Program (n=20), or the wait list control group (n=20). For Phase 3, a sub group of approximately 25 participants from Phase 2 who participated in the OBIA Peer Support Program will be asked to participate in a one-on-one, telephone/Skype interview. A sub-group of Mentors will also be asked to participate in a one-on-one, telephone/Skype interview.
This research project will address the highest priority areas of "strategies to enhance social participation and community life (personal relationships)" and "psychological strategies to improve mood, depression, and irritability", as identified in the ONF's Request for Proposals on "Addressing Evidence Gaps in Moderate to Severe TBI Rehabilitation". The study will provide important results to inform a RCT (of appropriate size) on the impact of peer support on the social participation and mood of individuals with moderate to severe TBI. This study will then provide the best evidence to support the recommendation on "a peer-supported relationship model of intervention", and inform future versions of the INESSS-ONF Guideline.
Detailed description
Phase 1 - Understanding the Enablers, Barriers of Implementing the Trial Protocol
Specific Objective: To understand the perceived enablers and barriers of implementing the peer support trial protocol, including the perceived enablers and barriers to participant recruitment, retention, adherence, and data collection, of implementing the selected outcomes measures, and of participating in the trial, from the perspective of stakeholders (knowledge users) including individuals with moderate to severe TBI, caregivers, OBIA Peer Support Program Mentors, OBIA staff members who are a part of the Peer Support Program, health services and knowledge translation (KT) researchers with expertise in TBI, and methodologists with expertise in clinical trials; Hypothesis: A better understanding of the perceived enablers and barriers of implementing the peer support trial protocol will enhance the effectiveness of the intervention and feasibility of the trial in Phase 2 and results will be used to refine the research protocol for the RCT, if necessary.
Participants and recruitment: A purposive sampling of each of the different stakeholder groups will be used. The OBIA Peer Support Program Database will be used to recruit the Partners (including caregivers) and Mentors. On-line searches and/or the contacts of the Principal Investigators will be used to recruit the OBIA staff members and the researchers/methodologists. We will aim to recruit a total of 15 key informants for Phase 1. Individuals who are interested in participating in the study will contact the Research Coordinator via telephone or email to gain further information about the study. The eligibility criteria of all participants will be confirmed by the Research Coordinator. This process will be followed for all phases of the study.
Data collection: participants will take part in a one-on-one, semi-structured telephone/Skype interview lasting approximately 45-60 minutes. All interviews will be digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim for data analysis. During transcription, any identifying information will be removed and the participant will be assigned a coded identifier.
Data analysis: analysis will be conducted using inductive thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clark (2006). The analysis will assess the perceived enablers and barriers to participant recruitment, retention, adherence, and data collection, of implementing the selected outcomes measures, and of participating in the OBIA Peer Support Program and the trial itself. To facilitate the organization and analysis of the qualitative data, the Principal Investigator's/Research Coordinator's reflective notes from the interviews, as well as the transcripts, will be entered into NVivo v.11.
Phase 2 - Evaluating the Feasibility of the Trial Protocol, Conducting a (Pilot) Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial
Specific Objective: a) To evaluate the feasibility of participant recruitment and retention, data collection, as well as participant adherence to the OBIA Peer Support Program; b) To estimate effect sizes of the immediate impact of the twice/week versus once/week OBIA Peer Support Program compared to a wait list control group on social participation (primary outcome), mood, HRQoL, and self-efficacy (secondary outcomes); Hypotheses: a) It is expected that adequate (i.e., ≥75%) recruitment, retention and adherence to the OBIA Peer Support Program will be achieved; b) It is expected that the six-month OBIA Peer Support Program delivered twice weekly will lead to greater mean improvement, on measures of social participation, mood (i.e., depressive symptoms), HRQoL, and self-efficacy, than the same program delivered once weekly or a wait list control intervention (i.e., a dose response effect will be observed); c) It will be possible to estimate the magnitude of effect to allow the sample size calculation for a definitive trial; Significance: The results of the currently proposed research will support a future definitive RCT.
Participants and recruitment: eligible Partner participants will include community-based (i.e., no longer participating in a comprehensive rehabilitation program) individuals who have a moderate to severe TBI. Partners will be recruited via an online advertisement posted on the OBIA website as well as the websites of the 14 participating brain injury associations. Mentor participants may also be recruited from the OBIA Peer Support Program Database. We will aim to recruit a total of 60 Partners (i.e., n=20 participants per group) and 20-40 Mentors (those paired with partners in the intervention arm) for Phase 2.
Intervention and Control Groups: Participants in the intervention groups will take part in the OBIA Peer Support Group, receiving either twice a week (i.e., two 20-40 minute calls) or once a week (i.e., one 20-40 minute call) support. In keeping with an average duration of support, and for the purposes of the currently proposed study, the intervention duration will be 6 months. Participants in the control group will be assigned to a wait list. They will receive the OBIA Peer Support Program after the intervention group (i.e., after 6 months). This assignment does not represent a significant variation in the usual intake procedure, as the OBIA Peer Support Program already maintains a wait list (personal communication).
Sample Size, Randomization, and Blinding: since this is a feasibility study, a formal sample size calculation will not be performed. The recruitment of 20 participants in each arm of the trial is judged to be feasible and will produce a robust and useful amount of data. Partner participants who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and have provided informed consent to take part in the trial will be randomized to either the intervention (twice/week or once/week Program) or the wait list control groups. Mentors will be assigned to those randomized into the intervention arms by the OBIA Peer Support Program using their usual methods. A web-based randomization service with secure password protected login using random variable block-size will be used. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of the Partners and Mentors will not be possible. However, the processes of outcome assessment and data analysis will be blinded.
Data collection: baseline data including demographic and descriptive information (e.g., age, sex, severity of injury, marital status), as well as the following outcomes measures described below, will be captured prior to randomization: social participation using the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ); mood (i.e., depressive symptoms) using the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12); self-efficacy using the TBI Self-efficacy Questionnaire. Follow-up assessments for the outcome measures will occur at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Participants will have the option to complete their baseline demographic and descriptive information and outcome measures as well as their follow-up assessments themselves (i.e., paper-based and mailed back to the research team), by telephone, or on-line via Survey Monkey®.
Data analysis: Quantitative Component: baseline characteristics (e.g., age, sex, severity of injury, marital status, etc.) will be described and any differences between the three groups will be compared using means/medians and frequencies and proportions. As this is a feasibility study, and the ability to collect data is being tested, no data imputation will be performed to account for missing data. The feasibility of recruitment will be based on whether 60 participants (i.e., 20 participants in each arm of the trial) can be enrolled in the trial during the 6-month recruitment period. The number of individuals who provide informed consent per month will also be calculated. The feasibility of retention will be assessed by calculating the proportion of participants with complete data on each outcome measure at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. To evaluate participant adherence, the proportion of twice-weekly and weekly sessions attended by the participants will be calculated. The proportion of participants who withdraw from the intervention at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months will be calculated along with the reason(s) for withdrawing. The feasibility threshold will be set at >75% for recruitment, retention, and adherence (to the intervention). To evaluate changes between groups, the analysis plan will focus on mean change scores and confidence intervals (i.e., mixed-design analysis of variance model) for the outcome measures described above. Effect sizes will be calculated via Cohen d to reflect the impact of the OBIA Peer Support Program on social participation, mood, HRQoL, and self-efficacy.
UPDATE TO PHASE 2 AFTER COMPLETING PHASE 1
After the completion of the phase 1 study and prior to implementing the phase 2 pilot RCT, the following procedures were changed/finalized for the RCT: 1) the study will only include the once/week intervention arm and a wait-list control (participant recruitment expectations adjusted accordingly to 40 partners (20 per arm) and 20 mentors (to be matched with those in the intervention arm); 2) the trial length has been reduced from 6 months to 4 months, and data collection points now include baseline, 2 months, and 4 months; 3) The Short Form-20 Health Survey (SF-20) will replace the SF-12 outcome measures; and, 4) data collection will be done by telephone.
Phase 3 - Exploring the Impact and Acceptability of the OBIA Peer Support Program and the Trial Protocol
Specific Objective: To explore the impact and acceptability of the OBIA Peer Support Program and the trial itself from the perspective of Partners and Mentors; Hypothesis: It is expected that the OBIA Peer Support Program will be acceptable to both the Partners and Mentors and that an increased understanding of the OBIA Peer Support Program and the trial itself will be achieved; Significance: The results of Phase 3 will lead to an understanding of the "active ingredients" or mechanisms that are associated with improved outcomes and the impact of "dosage" of interactions. Furthermore, the results of Phase 3 will refine and improve future iterations of the OBIA Peer Support Program and the implementation of the definitive RCT.
Participants and recruitment: Purposive sampling will be used to recruit intervention group Partner participants in Phase 3 (e.g. to ensure participants with a range of severity of TBI), and all prticipating Mentors will be approached about participating in the interviews. Recruitment of participants will cease once data saturation has been achieved, which is the point when successive interviews become repetitive and no new responses or themes emerge. We will aim to recruit a total of 25 Partners and Mentors for Phase 3.
Data collection: participants will take part in a one-on-one, semi-structured telephone/Skype interview lasting approximately 45-60 minutes about their experience with the RCT. All interviews will be digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim for data analysis. During transcription, any identifying information will be removed and the participant will be assigned a coded identifier.
Analysis Plan: analysis will be conducted using inductive thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clark (2006) and will assess participants' experiences with the intervention and the trial protocol itself (i.e., the impact and acceptability of the program itself/intervention and the trial protocol itself). To facilitate the organization and analysis of the qualitative data, the Principal Investigator's/Research Coordinator's reflective notes from the interviews, as well as the transcripts, will be entered into NVivo v.11.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1/week peer support | Experimental | Behavioral: Peer supportThese individuals with acquired brain injury will receive the Ontario Brain Injury Association Peer Support program once per week. |
| wait list control group | No intervention | –These individuals with acquired brain injury will receive the Ontario Brain Injury Association Peer Support once the trial period is complete. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Partner participants, including caregiver Partners,
- Community-based (i.e., no longer participating in a comprehensive rehabilitation program) individuals;
- Have a moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12) or have cared for (i.e., unpaid) an individual with moderate to severe TBI for at least one year;
- Are 18 years of age or older;
- Have participated in the OBIA Peer Support Program;
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Partner participants, including caregiver Partners,
- -Individuals who are medically unstable or have active suicidal ideation
- For Phase 2 and 3
- Previously participated in the OBIA Peer Support Program or currently receiving peer support/self-management program elsewhere;
- Are medically unstable; and,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Peer supportThe Program matches volunteer Mentors and Partners for a series of one-to-one interactions that focus on the discussion and resolution of problems or issues (i.e., problem solving) related to one or several key topic areas including family and friends, resources, life changes or challenges, (health care) professionals, social/recreational activities, work/employment/training/volunteering, the brain injury itself, emotions or feelings, and other issues.27 Once the match is established, the Mentor and Partner communicate with one another primarily by telephone until the problems or issues are either resolved or a referral to another service is made (i.e., counselling or community support services). For some partnerships, communication by email or video conferencing is used.27 Most telephone calls last between 20 and 40 minutes (personal communication) and are held weekly. | Behavioural | 1/week peer support |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline Participation at 4 months
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ)
3 secondary outcomes
Change from Baseline Mood at 4 months
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
Change from Health-related Quality of Life at 4 months
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
Change from Self-efficacy at 4 months
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30904839Munce SEP, Jaglal S, Kastner M, Nelson MLA, Salbach NM, Shepherd J, Sweet SN, Wilcock R, Thoms C, Bayley MT. Ontario Brain Injury Association Peer Support Program: a mixed methods protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e023367. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023367.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acquired Brain Injury
Recruiting
Amnioinfusion's Protective Effects on Respiratory and Longitudinal Pediatric Outcomes After Intrapartum Meconium Exposure
Neonatal Respiratory Distress Related Conditions, Meconium
RecruitingPhase 1
Rehabilitation Through Virtual Immersion & Integrated Exposure for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (ReVIVE for mTBI)
Traumatic Brain Injuries, TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
Recruiting
Feasibility and Acceptability of an LLM-based Chatbot for Family Caregivers: Evaluation Study
Caregivers
Recruiting
Minimal Sedation Versus Standard Continuous Sedation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Amnioinfusion for Chorioamnionitis: Targeting Neonatal Brain Injury Biomarkers
Chorioamnionitis Affecting Fetus or Newborn, Amnioinfusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sarah Munce principal investigator
Toronto Rehabilitation, University Health Network
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Peer support in people with Acquired Brain Injury, run by Toronto Rehabilitation Institute at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline Participation at 4 months (time frame: Baseline to 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03450460, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2020.