AzTrials
AzTrials

Parkinson DiseaseNCT03432338

Distribution of Non-Motor Symptoms in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease and Secondary Parkinsonism

An observational study of Parkinson Disease, run by Örjan Skogar.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

BACKGROUND: Non-Motor Symptoms (NMS) are frequent in patients with Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (IPD). Clinical expressions, postulated pathophysiological mechanisms and responsiveness to antiparkinson medication represent differences between IPD and secondary Parkinsonism (SP). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Parkinson Disease
What is being tested?
inquiries
How many people
208 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2016to 31 Jul 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Study population: Participants diagnosed with IPD or SP were recruited from routine care visits at outpatient departments at two medium-sized county hospitals in southern Sweden.

Who may be able to join

  • " Clinical diagnosis of Idiopathic Parkinson´s Disease " Clinical diagnosos of secondary parkinsonism " Healthy controls " Age >65 years " >1 year duration of disease after diagnose

Who cannot join

  • " Participation in other studies " Severe disease of psychiatric origin " Severe cognitive impairment

About this study

Official title: Distribution of Non-Motor Symptoms in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease and Secondary Parkinsonism A Controlled, Descriptive Cross-sectional Study Using Parkinson's Well-Being Map™

BACKGROUND:

Non-Motor Symptoms (NMS) are frequent in patients with Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (IPD). Clinical expressions, postulated pathophysiological mechanisms and responsiveness to antiparkinson medication represent differences between IPD and secondary Parkinsonism (SP).

Read more

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate NMS expressions in IPD, SP and a control group.

METHODS:

Diagnosis of SP was supported by comorbidity, radiological findings, type of onset, onset rate and progression, exposures for neuroleptics, and responsiveness to pharmacological antiparkinson therapy.

The participants were consecutively recruited at two outdoor patient clinics. The Well-Being Map™ for evaluation. These were completed by the participants at one point before visit. The controls consisted of non-Parkinsonian individuals, matched by age and gender.

Read the detailed description

Over the past decades knowledge of the natural history and progression of Parkinson´s disease (PD) has increased. Age at onset, time to troublesome complications are well described. Parallell to this, the society has been more and more aware of differences between gender in the expressions of diseases. Differences in self reported experiences are of great interest as this is tightly interconnected with Health Related Quality of Life, (HRQoL).

The incidence of PD rapidly increase over the age of 60 years (y) , with only 4% of the cases being under the age of 50 y. The rate for men 19.0 per 100,000, was 91% higher than that for women (9.9 per 100,000 )The age- and gender-adjusted rate per 100,000 was highest among Hispanics (16.6,non-Hispanic Whites ,Asians (11.3, and Blacks (10.2). These data suggest that the incidence of Parkinson's disease varies by race/ethnicity.

( ref. Van den Eeden 2003)

Nonmotor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease:

Of the nine domains in the validated NMSS (Chaudhuri, Martinez- Martin, Brown, et al., 2007), sexual dysfunction and mood changes have been commonly observed to have associations with specific gender. While sexual dysfunction has been commonly reported with a significantly higher proportion among men (Kova ́cs, Makkos, Aschermann, et al., 2016; Martinez-Martin, Falup Pecurariu, Odin, et al., 2012; Picillo, Amboni, Erro, et al., 2013; Solla, Cannas, Ibba, et al., 2012; Szewczyk- Krolikowski, Tomlinson, Nithi, et al., 2014), mood symptoms, which encompass loss of interest in surroundings, lack of motivation, feeling ner- vous, flat mood, and difficulty in experiencing pleasure, have been frequently reported among women in a higher proportion compared to men with PD (Guo, Song, Chen, et al., 2013; Martinez-Martin et al., 2012; Nicoletti, Vasta, Mostile, et al., 2017; Solla et al., 2012; Song, Gu, An, \& Chan, 2014).

It is well known that in the general population ( not specific parkinsonism ) in industrialized societies men die earlier than women but that women have poorer health than men. Differences discussed are differences in biological risks and acquired risks . But studies have revealed that the variations in health experiences depend on the particular symptom or condition in question and also according to the phase of the life cycle.

Already In an article by S.Macintyre et al from 1996 two large British surveys were examined and revealed a larger complexity than earlier studies had shown in the description of health surveys and differences between gender. These often described the consistency of reporting more illness , poorer self-evaluation of health and higher rates of psychosocial malaise in women than in men.

In this study more complex patterns of sex differences were shown for different symptoms reported. 'Worrying', 'nerves', 'always tired', 'headaches', 'constipation' and 'fainting or dizziness' showed the most consistent female excess. Sickness, nausea or stomach trouble were only dominating among 18 year old females and 'trouble with eyes' among 56-60 year olds in another large survey. In contrast, two symptoms, 'palpitations' and 'trouble with ears' show a male excess among middle aged. Female excess was only consistently found across the life span for the more psychological manifestations of distress, and was far less apparent for a number of physical symptoms and conditions.

Problems relating to reproduction will naturally show a female excess in the childbearing years, hormonal differences are apparent before and after the menopause.

Probably an oversimplification have been the fact in older sociological and epidemiological literature and over-generelization has become the norm.

There is a widely accepted belief that women use health services, particularly mental health services, more than men. Haavio-Manila has, however, reported that while women had higher psychiatric admission rates than men in Norway, in Finland and Sweden men had higher rates (Haavio-Manila E. Inequalities in health and gender. Soc. Sci. Med. 22, 141, 1986.) Why are more recent data more complex to understand than older studies in the field of gender differences? One possibility is that female/male differences in health have changed over time (in the same way that male/female differences in life expectancy may have changed over time (Macintyre S. Gender differences in longevity and health in Eastern and Western Europe. In Locating Health: Sociological and Historial Explanations (Edited by Platt S., Thomas H., Scott S. and Williams G.), pp. 57-74. Avebury, Aldershot, 1993.

If we are to make progress towards understanding to whether social, psychological or biological produce or maintain gender differences in health, it is important to pay attention to the social and historical context of the observations, and to take a more differentiated agespecific and condition-specific view of 'health' when examining differences between the sexes.

(Wingard D. L., Cohn B. A., Kaplan G. A., Cirillo P. M. and Cohen R. D. Sex differentials in morbidity and mortality risks examined by age and cause in the same cohort. Am. J. Epidemiol. 130, 601, 1989. )

National Quality Registers

A National Quality Registry contains individualised data concerning patient problems, medical interventions, and outcomes after treatment; within all healthcare production. It is annually monitored and approved for financial support by an Executive Committee.

Swedish Neuro Registries is a quality register with the aim of ensuring that neurological care is equitable and of high quality and to ensure treatment guidelines are being followed.

Swedish Neuro Registries are represented in all counties and all hospitals where neurological care is provided. It will be the base for national neurological research.

The registry started as an MS registry in 1996. In 2012, it became Swedish Neuro Registries with 8 diagnosis: Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Myasthenia Gravis , Narcolepsy, Epilepsy, Motor Neuron Disease, Inflammatory Polyneuropathy and Severe Neurovascular Headache. REFERENS:( http://kvalitetsregister.se/englishpages/findaregistry/registerarkivenglish/nationalqualityregistryforneurologicalcareneuroregpreviouslyswedishmsregistry.2283.html Today abou 5800 patients are registered within the PD registry, of which about 4600 with a diagnose of PD or related disorders such as parkinsonism, atypical PD etcetera.

Being tested
inquiries
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • inquiriesOther

    Inquires reported to clinician.

Study groups in NCT03432338
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
idiopathic parkinsonClassical Parkinson´s disease, idiopathic
Receives: Other: inquiries
secondary parkinsonismparkinsonism due to other reasons than idiopathic
Receives: Other: inquiries
controlspersona matched by age and gender, non parkinsonism
Receives: Other: inquiries

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence of selfreported motor and non-motor symptoms with The Parkinson´s Well-being map

    A graded check list presented in The Parkinson´s Well-BeingMap is used in the registration of self reported frequencies and self experienced strength of Motor and Non- Motor Symptoms in two different forms of parkinsonism and in a group of healthy controls.The experienced magnitude of suffering is visualized in a spider diagram reflecting the strength of each item on an ordinal scale from 0 to four.

    Primary outcome measure is to compare reported frequencies between groups.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Prevalence of combinations of reported motor and non-motor symptoms using

    Secondary outcome measures are to study commonly reported combinations of non-motor symptoms within the groups, with respect to gender and duration of disease.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Feb 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2016
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
208 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03432338
Sponsor's protocol ID
Dnr 2016/118-31
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
1 Sep 2017
Last updated
12 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Parkinson Disease, run by Örjan Skogar.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence of selfreported motor and non-motor symptoms with The Parkinson´s Well-being map (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in