AzTrials
AzTrials

Sickle Cell CrisisNCT03431285

Ketamine for Acute Painful Crisis in Sickle Cell Disease Patients

A study testing Morphine Group, Ketamine Group and standard IV hydration in people with Sickle Cell Crisis, run by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Investigators hypothesize that administration of ketamine for pain relief in sickle cell patients with vaso-occlusive crisis early on will lead to a more rapid improvement in pain score and less narcotic requirement. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Sickle Cell Crisis
What is being tested?
Morphine Group, Ketamine Group and standard IV hydration
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
278 participants
Where
1 siteSaudi Arabia
Study dates
1 Jan 2018to 1 Feb 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Known diagnosis of SCD based on sickle cell tests and hemoglobin electrophoresis.
  • Age 18 to 60 years
  • Acute onset of painful crises, defined as having an onset within 7 days

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Breast-feeding
  • Altered mental status
  • Body mass index greater than 40 kg/m2
  • Patients with significant neurological disease
  • Seizures
Show all 29Show fewer
  • Acute head injury
  • Acute eye injury
  • Patients with high intra-cranial tension
  • Patients with known psychiatric disorders
  • Patients with significant cardiac diseases
  • Arrhythmias
  • Patients with significant pulmonary diseases rather than acute chest syndrome
  • Patients with significant renal disease (BUN/creatinine ratio < 25)
  • Patients with significant hepatic disease (Child Pugh class B or C)
  • Patients with significant endocrine disease
  • Known allergy to phencyclidine derivatives
  • Known allergy to ketamine
  • Known allergy to morphine
  • Sepsis
  • Septic shock
  • Patients required circulatory support
  • Patients required ventilatory supports
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Drug abuse
  • Patients with chronic pain status unrelated to SCD
  • Patients receiving anti-convulsant medications
  • Patients receiving anti-psychiatric medications.
  • Patients with communication barriers.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Saudi Arabia1 site
  • Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

    Dammam, Eastern Province, 31952

Other trials in Saudi Arabia

About this study

Official title: Ketamine for Acute Painful Crisis in Sickle Cell Disease Patients: Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Investigators hypothesize that administration of ketamine for pain relief in sickle cell patients with vaso-occlusive crisis early on will lead to a more rapid improvement in pain score and less narcotic requirement.

Read the detailed description

Sickle cell disease is an inherited hematological disorder where the shape of red blood cells (RBC) is altered into a sickle-like cells resulting in red blood cell destruction and therefore anemia and other complications. It's a widely spread condition in African American population as well as the Southern and Eastern Provinces of Arabian Peninsula.

Acute painful episodes are a very common complication of the disease process, mainly thought to be a result of tissue ischemia due to occlusion of the microcirculation with clusters of sickled RBC(1). This usually involves long bones or spine but can involve other areas. Acute painful crises can also be precipitated by cold exposure, dehydration, infection, hypoxia, acidosis, hypercarbia, or in some cases it is not related to a specific trigger. This condition puts the patient in severe pain requiring multiple Emergency Department (ED) visits and sometimes admission to the hospital. Currently the mainstay of therapy for acute painful crises is hydration and IV analgesia (2). This makes pain control challenging for the emergency physician as management of acute painful crises requires multiple doses of intravenous (IV) opioids. A retrospective study of 19 patients and 57 visits showed that accumulative dose of IV morphine ranged between 4 milligram (mg) and 26.7 (0.05-0.5 mg/kg) during 70% of the visits. 50% of the patients were admitted after less than 3 hours of ED treatment, 28% of the discharged patients returned to the ED within 3 days (3). Also, as other chronic pain patients, sickle cell disease patients develop opioid induced hyperalgesia (OIH) leading to activation of N- methyl D Aspartate receptors (NMDA) (1).

The use of ketamine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, may have the potential to modulate the OIH through impaired sensitization of spinal neurons to nociceptive stimuli and may, therefore, impede development of and blunt neuropathic pain. Extensive search of literature databases showed few published reports and retrospective studies including few patients which have addressed the use of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute painful crises in sickle cell disease (SCD) (4-6). A retrospective study (5) included 5 children and adolescents received a low-dose ketamine infusion for the treatment of sickle cell-related pain demonstrated reduced pain scores in 40% of patients and significant reduction in opioid utilization in only 20% of patients. However, that report was retrospective in nature, non-powered, and included few patients. A recent Canadian retrospective study including 9 adult and adolescent patients demonstrated statistically significant reduced cumulative morphine consumption (146±16.5 mg/day vs. 112.±12.2 mg/day) and pain scores after adding intravenous ketamine in patients with painful sickle cell crises (7). Similarly, another American investigators reported decreased opioid consumption with infusing low-dose ketamine as an adjuvant analgesic in 30 patients presented with sickle cell disease with vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), that study was retrospective (2). Moreover, in year 2017, a prospective, randomized, double dummy trial was done comparing the adverse effects and analgesic efficacy of low-dose ketamine for acute pain in the ED either by single intravenous push or short infusion. This study shows that low-dose ketamine administered as short infusion is related with a significantly lower rates of feeling of unreality and sedation with no difference in analgesic efficacy in comparison to intravenous push (8)

To the best of investigator's knowledge, there is no large, prospective, comparative, controlled clinical trial investigated in the addition of low-dose ketamine in shortening the ER stays and improving the quality of analgesia in patients with VOC.

Sample Size

A data obtained from a pilot study included 10 patients who received either morphine or ketamine showed that the mean and SD of pain visual analogue score (VAS) at 1-hour following administering the study drug among patients presented with sickle-cell VOC were (Morphine 6.5 ± 3.41565, Ketamine: 1.6667 ± 1.52753).

An a priori power analysis indicated that a sample size of 220 patients is sufficiently large to detect a mean difference in the pain VAS of 1.5 that would have a clinical importance, with a type-I error of 0.05 and a power of 90%. Additional patients (20%) will be added for a final sample size of 264 patients to compensate for those dropping out during the study.

Interim Analysis

An independent safety committee will perform three interim analyses on information time 25% (55 patients), 50% (110 patients) and 75% (165 patients). Data evaluation at each interim analysis will be based on the alpha spending function concept, according to Lan and DeMets, and will employ O'Brien-Fleming Z-test boundaries, which are very conservative early in the trial. For the first interim analysis the efficacy stopping rule would require an extremely low P value (P< 0.000015). For the second interim analysis P< 0.003 will be taken as efficacy stopping rule. For the third interim analysis P< 0.02 will be taken as efficacy stopping rule. Investigators will be kept blind to the interim analysis results.

Being tested
Morphine Group, Ketamine Group, standard IV hydration
Medical subject headings
Vaso-Occlusive Crises

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Morphine GroupDrug

    Also called Control Group

    Patients will receive standard dose of morphine (0.1 mg/kg) in 100 ml normal saline infused over 30 min in addition to standard IV hydration.

  • Ketamine GroupDrug

    Also called Intervention Group

    Patients will receive low dose ketamine 0.3 mg/kg in 100ml N.S. infused over 30 min in addition to standard IV hydration

  • standard IV hydrationOther

    IV hydration as per our institutional protocol (Lactated Ringer's or NaCl 0.9% solution will be infused at a rate of 2-3 ml/kg/h)

Study groups in NCT03431285
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Morphine GroupActive comparatorPatients will receive standard dose of morphine (0.1 mg/kg) in 100 ml normal saline (NS) infused over 30 minutes in addition to standard IV hydration.
Receives: Drug: Morphine Group; Other: standard IV hydration
Ketamine GroupActive comparatorPatients will receive low dose ketamine 0.3 mg/kg in 100ml normal saline (NS) infused over 30 minutes in addition to standard IV hydration
Receives: Drug: Ketamine Group; Other: standard IV hydration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Scores

    Mean difference in the numerical pain rating scale score over 3 hours. Pain was measured on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain)

    Measured: NPRS will be recorded every 30 minutes for a maximum of 180 minutes.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Length of Stay in ED

    Described as time elapsed from the start of study medication to the readiness for hospital discharge.

    Measured: for 5 hours following admission to ED

  2. Cumulative Use of Opioid

    The cumulative use of opioid will be recorded during the ED stay

    Measured: for 3 hours following admission to the ED

  3. The Rate of Hospital Admission

    Number of admitted patients to the hospital after enrollment to study

    Measured: within 3 hours following study enrollment

  4. Drug-related Adverse Effects

    flushing, hypotension, altered mental status, itching, paresthesia, respiratory depression, dizziness, nausea, vomiting

    Measured: 3 hours following drug administration

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Feb 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion10 Jan 2019
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
278 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03431285
Sponsor's protocol ID
IR3- 2017-01- 192
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
7 Feb 2018
Last updated
28 May 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The study protocol, statistical plan, and results will be shared after publishing the manuscript. Currently, it is submitted and under peer review.

Publications

  • Alshahrani MS, Asonto LP, El Tahan MM, Al Sulaibikh AH, Al Faraj SZ, Al Mulhim AA, Al Abbad MF, Al Nahhash SA, Aldarweesh MN, Mahmoud AM, Almaghraby N, Al Jumaan MA, Al Junaid TO, Al Hawaj FM, AlKenany S, ElSayed OF, Abdelwahab HM, Moussa MM, Alossaimi BK, Alotaibi SK, AlMutairi TM, AlSulaiman DA, Al Shahrani SD, Alfaraj D, Alhazzani W. Study protocol for a randomized, blinded, controlled trial of ketamine for acute painful crisis of sickle cell disease. Trials. 2019 May 27;20(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3394-4.

    PubMed 31133061

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Morphine Group, Ketamine Group and standard IV hydration in people with Sickle Cell Crisis, run by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Scores (time frame: NPRS will be recorded every 30 minutes for a maximum of 180 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03431285, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in