Sickle Cell CrisisNCT03431285
Ketamine for Acute Painful Crisis in Sickle Cell Disease Patients
A study testing Morphine Group, Ketamine Group and standard IV hydration in people with Sickle Cell Crisis, run by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
Investigators hypothesize that administration of ketamine for pain relief in sickle cell patients with vaso-occlusive crisis early on will lead to a more rapid improvement in pain score and less narcotic requirement. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sickle Cell Crisis
- What is being tested?
- Morphine Group, Ketamine Group and standard IV hydration
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 278 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2018to 1 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Known diagnosis of SCD based on sickle cell tests and hemoglobin electrophoresis.
- Age 18 to 60 years
- Acute onset of painful crises, defined as having an onset within 7 days
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Breast-feeding
- Altered mental status
- Body mass index greater than 40 kg/m2
- Patients with significant neurological disease
- Seizures
Show all 29Show fewer
- Acute head injury
- Acute eye injury
- Patients with high intra-cranial tension
- Patients with known psychiatric disorders
- Patients with significant cardiac diseases
- Arrhythmias
- Patients with significant pulmonary diseases rather than acute chest syndrome
- Patients with significant renal disease (BUN/creatinine ratio < 25)
- Patients with significant hepatic disease (Child Pugh class B or C)
- Patients with significant endocrine disease
- Known allergy to phencyclidine derivatives
- Known allergy to ketamine
- Known allergy to morphine
- Sepsis
- Septic shock
- Patients required circulatory support
- Patients required ventilatory supports
- Alcohol abuse
- Drug abuse
- Patients with chronic pain status unrelated to SCD
- Patients receiving anti-convulsant medications
- Patients receiving anti-psychiatric medications.
- Patients with communication barriers.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Saudi Arabia1 site
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Dammam, Eastern Province, 31952
About this study
Official title: Ketamine for Acute Painful Crisis in Sickle Cell Disease Patients: Prospective Randomized Control Trial
Investigators hypothesize that administration of ketamine for pain relief in sickle cell patients with vaso-occlusive crisis early on will lead to a more rapid improvement in pain score and less narcotic requirement.
Read the detailed description
Sickle cell disease is an inherited hematological disorder where the shape of red blood cells (RBC) is altered into a sickle-like cells resulting in red blood cell destruction and therefore anemia and other complications. It's a widely spread condition in African American population as well as the Southern and Eastern Provinces of Arabian Peninsula.
Acute painful episodes are a very common complication of the disease process, mainly thought to be a result of tissue ischemia due to occlusion of the microcirculation with clusters of sickled RBC(1). This usually involves long bones or spine but can involve other areas. Acute painful crises can also be precipitated by cold exposure, dehydration, infection, hypoxia, acidosis, hypercarbia, or in some cases it is not related to a specific trigger. This condition puts the patient in severe pain requiring multiple Emergency Department (ED) visits and sometimes admission to the hospital. Currently the mainstay of therapy for acute painful crises is hydration and IV analgesia (2). This makes pain control challenging for the emergency physician as management of acute painful crises requires multiple doses of intravenous (IV) opioids. A retrospective study of 19 patients and 57 visits showed that accumulative dose of IV morphine ranged between 4 milligram (mg) and 26.7 (0.05-0.5 mg/kg) during 70% of the visits. 50% of the patients were admitted after less than 3 hours of ED treatment, 28% of the discharged patients returned to the ED within 3 days (3). Also, as other chronic pain patients, sickle cell disease patients develop opioid induced hyperalgesia (OIH) leading to activation of N- methyl D Aspartate receptors (NMDA) (1).
The use of ketamine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, may have the potential to modulate the OIH through impaired sensitization of spinal neurons to nociceptive stimuli and may, therefore, impede development of and blunt neuropathic pain. Extensive search of literature databases showed few published reports and retrospective studies including few patients which have addressed the use of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute painful crises in sickle cell disease (SCD) (4-6). A retrospective study (5) included 5 children and adolescents received a low-dose ketamine infusion for the treatment of sickle cell-related pain demonstrated reduced pain scores in 40% of patients and significant reduction in opioid utilization in only 20% of patients. However, that report was retrospective in nature, non-powered, and included few patients. A recent Canadian retrospective study including 9 adult and adolescent patients demonstrated statistically significant reduced cumulative morphine consumption (146±16.5 mg/day vs. 112.±12.2 mg/day) and pain scores after adding intravenous ketamine in patients with painful sickle cell crises (7). Similarly, another American investigators reported decreased opioid consumption with infusing low-dose ketamine as an adjuvant analgesic in 30 patients presented with sickle cell disease with vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), that study was retrospective (2). Moreover, in year 2017, a prospective, randomized, double dummy trial was done comparing the adverse effects and analgesic efficacy of low-dose ketamine for acute pain in the ED either by single intravenous push or short infusion. This study shows that low-dose ketamine administered as short infusion is related with a significantly lower rates of feeling of unreality and sedation with no difference in analgesic efficacy in comparison to intravenous push (8)
To the best of investigator's knowledge, there is no large, prospective, comparative, controlled clinical trial investigated in the addition of low-dose ketamine in shortening the ER stays and improving the quality of analgesia in patients with VOC.
Sample Size
A data obtained from a pilot study included 10 patients who received either morphine or ketamine showed that the mean and SD of pain visual analogue score (VAS) at 1-hour following administering the study drug among patients presented with sickle-cell VOC were (Morphine 6.5 ± 3.41565, Ketamine: 1.6667 ± 1.52753).
An a priori power analysis indicated that a sample size of 220 patients is sufficiently large to detect a mean difference in the pain VAS of 1.5 that would have a clinical importance, with a type-I error of 0.05 and a power of 90%. Additional patients (20%) will be added for a final sample size of 264 patients to compensate for those dropping out during the study.
Interim Analysis
An independent safety committee will perform three interim analyses on information time 25% (55 patients), 50% (110 patients) and 75% (165 patients). Data evaluation at each interim analysis will be based on the alpha spending function concept, according to Lan and DeMets, and will employ O'Brien-Fleming Z-test boundaries, which are very conservative early in the trial. For the first interim analysis the efficacy stopping rule would require an extremely low P value (P< 0.000015). For the second interim analysis P< 0.003 will be taken as efficacy stopping rule. For the third interim analysis P< 0.02 will be taken as efficacy stopping rule. Investigators will be kept blind to the interim analysis results.
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Crisis
- Being tested
- Morphine Group, Ketamine Group, standard IV hydration
- Medical subject headings
- Vaso-Occlusive Crises
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Morphine GroupDrug
Also called Control Group
Patients will receive standard dose of morphine (0.1 mg/kg) in 100 ml normal saline infused over 30 min in addition to standard IV hydration.
Ketamine GroupDrug
Also called Intervention Group
Patients will receive low dose ketamine 0.3 mg/kg in 100ml N.S. infused over 30 min in addition to standard IV hydration
standard IV hydrationOther
IV hydration as per our institutional protocol (Lactated Ringer's or NaCl 0.9% solution will be infused at a rate of 2-3 ml/kg/h)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Morphine Group | Active comparator | Patients will receive standard dose of morphine (0.1 mg/kg) in 100 ml normal saline (NS) infused over 30 minutes in addition to standard IV hydration. Receives: Drug: Morphine Group; Other: standard IV hydration |
| Ketamine Group | Active comparator | Patients will receive low dose ketamine 0.3 mg/kg in 100ml normal saline (NS) infused over 30 minutes in addition to standard IV hydration Receives: Drug: Ketamine Group; Other: standard IV hydration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Scores
Mean difference in the numerical pain rating scale score over 3 hours. Pain was measured on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain)
Measured: NPRS will be recorded every 30 minutes for a maximum of 180 minutes.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Length of Stay in ED
Described as time elapsed from the start of study medication to the readiness for hospital discharge.
Measured: for 5 hours following admission to ED
Cumulative Use of Opioid
The cumulative use of opioid will be recorded during the ED stay
Measured: for 3 hours following admission to the ED
The Rate of Hospital Admission
Number of admitted patients to the hospital after enrollment to study
Measured: within 3 hours following study enrollment
Drug-related Adverse Effects
flushing, hypotension, altered mental status, itching, paresthesia, respiratory depression, dizziness, nausea, vomiting
Measured: 3 hours following drug administration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2018
- Primary completion10 Jan 2019
- Study completion1 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sickle Cell CrisisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 278 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohammed Saeed Saad Alshahrani, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
- Investigators
- Mohammed SS Alshahrani, MD, Principal investigator, King Fahad Hospital of the University -Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University - (Dammam University)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03431285
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IR3- 2017-01- 192
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 28 May 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The study protocol, statistical plan, and results will be shared after publishing the manuscript. Currently, it is submitted and under peer review.
Publications
Alshahrani MS, Asonto LP, El Tahan MM, Al Sulaibikh AH, Al Faraj SZ, Al Mulhim AA, Al Abbad MF, Al Nahhash SA, Aldarweesh MN, Mahmoud AM, Almaghraby N, Al Jumaan MA, Al Junaid TO, Al Hawaj FM, AlKenany S, ElSayed OF, Abdelwahab HM, Moussa MM, Alossaimi BK, Alotaibi SK, AlMutairi TM, AlSulaiman DA, Al Shahrani SD, Alfaraj D, Alhazzani W. Study protocol for a randomized, blinded, controlled trial of ketamine for acute painful crisis of sickle cell disease. Trials. 2019 May 27;20(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3394-4.
PubMed 31133061
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ketamine for Acute Painful Crisis in Sickle Cell Disease Patients: Prospective Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03431285
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IR3- 2017-01- 192
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Crisis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 278 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 28 May 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Investigators hypothesize that administration of ketamine for pain relief in sickle cell patients with vaso-occlusive crisis early on will lead to a more rapid improvement in pain score and less narcotic requirement.
Detailed description
Sickle cell disease is an inherited hematological disorder where the shape of red blood cells (RBC) is altered into a sickle-like cells resulting in red blood cell destruction and therefore anemia and other complications. It's a widely spread condition in African American population as well as the Southern and Eastern Provinces of Arabian Peninsula.
Acute painful episodes are a very common complication of the disease process, mainly thought to be a result of tissue ischemia due to occlusion of the microcirculation with clusters of sickled RBC(1). This usually involves long bones or spine but can involve other areas. Acute painful crises can also be precipitated by cold exposure, dehydration, infection, hypoxia, acidosis, hypercarbia, or in some cases it is not related to a specific trigger. This condition puts the patient in severe pain requiring multiple Emergency Department (ED) visits and sometimes admission to the hospital. Currently the mainstay of therapy for acute painful crises is hydration and IV analgesia (2). This makes pain control challenging for the emergency physician as management of acute painful crises requires multiple doses of intravenous (IV) opioids. A retrospective study of 19 patients and 57 visits showed that accumulative dose of IV morphine ranged between 4 milligram (mg) and 26.7 (0.05-0.5 mg/kg) during 70% of the visits. 50% of the patients were admitted after less than 3 hours of ED treatment, 28% of the discharged patients returned to the ED within 3 days (3). Also, as other chronic pain patients, sickle cell disease patients develop opioid induced hyperalgesia (OIH) leading to activation of N- methyl D Aspartate receptors (NMDA) (1).
The use of ketamine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, may have the potential to modulate the OIH through impaired sensitization of spinal neurons to nociceptive stimuli and may, therefore, impede development of and blunt neuropathic pain. Extensive search of literature databases showed few published reports and retrospective studies including few patients which have addressed the use of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute painful crises in sickle cell disease (SCD) (4-6). A retrospective study (5) included 5 children and adolescents received a low-dose ketamine infusion for the treatment of sickle cell-related pain demonstrated reduced pain scores in 40% of patients and significant reduction in opioid utilization in only 20% of patients. However, that report was retrospective in nature, non-powered, and included few patients. A recent Canadian retrospective study including 9 adult and adolescent patients demonstrated statistically significant reduced cumulative morphine consumption (146±16.5 mg/day vs. 112.±12.2 mg/day) and pain scores after adding intravenous ketamine in patients with painful sickle cell crises (7). Similarly, another American investigators reported decreased opioid consumption with infusing low-dose ketamine as an adjuvant analgesic in 30 patients presented with sickle cell disease with vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), that study was retrospective (2). Moreover, in year 2017, a prospective, randomized, double dummy trial was done comparing the adverse effects and analgesic efficacy of low-dose ketamine for acute pain in the ED either by single intravenous push or short infusion. This study shows that low-dose ketamine administered as short infusion is related with a significantly lower rates of feeling of unreality and sedation with no difference in analgesic efficacy in comparison to intravenous push (8)
To the best of investigator's knowledge, there is no large, prospective, comparative, controlled clinical trial investigated in the addition of low-dose ketamine in shortening the ER stays and improving the quality of analgesia in patients with VOC.
Sample Size
A data obtained from a pilot study included 10 patients who received either morphine or ketamine showed that the mean and SD of pain visual analogue score (VAS) at 1-hour following administering the study drug among patients presented with sickle-cell VOC were (Morphine 6.5 ± 3.41565, Ketamine: 1.6667 ± 1.52753).
An a priori power analysis indicated that a sample size of 220 patients is sufficiently large to detect a mean difference in the pain VAS of 1.5 that would have a clinical importance, with a type-I error of 0.05 and a power of 90%. Additional patients (20%) will be added for a final sample size of 264 patients to compensate for those dropping out during the study.
Interim Analysis
An independent safety committee will perform three interim analyses on information time 25% (55 patients), 50% (110 patients) and 75% (165 patients). Data evaluation at each interim analysis will be based on the alpha spending function concept, according to Lan and DeMets, and will employ O'Brien-Fleming Z-test boundaries, which are very conservative early in the trial. For the first interim analysis the efficacy stopping rule would require an extremely low P value (P< 0.000015). For the second interim analysis P< 0.003 will be taken as efficacy stopping rule. For the third interim analysis P< 0.02 will be taken as efficacy stopping rule. Investigators will be kept blind to the interim analysis results.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Morphine Group | Active comparator | Drug: Morphine Group, Other: standard IV hydrationPatients will receive standard dose of morphine (0.1 mg/kg) in 100 ml normal saline (NS) infused over 30 minutes in addition to standard IV hydration. |
| Ketamine Group | Active comparator | Drug: Ketamine Group, Other: standard IV hydrationPatients will receive low dose ketamine 0.3 mg/kg in 100ml normal saline (NS) infused over 30 minutes in addition to standard IV hydration |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Known diagnosis of SCD based on sickle cell tests and hemoglobin electrophoresis.
- Age 18 to 60 years
- Acute onset of painful crises, defined as having an onset within 7 days
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Breast-feeding
- Altered mental status
- Body mass index greater than 40 kg/m2
- Patients with significant neurological disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Morphine GroupAlso: Control GroupPatients will receive standard dose of morphine (0.1 mg/kg) in 100 ml normal saline infused over 30 min in addition to standard IV hydration. | Drug | Morphine Group |
| Ketamine GroupAlso: Intervention GroupPatients will receive low dose ketamine 0.3 mg/kg in 100ml N.S. infused over 30 min in addition to standard IV hydration | Drug | Ketamine Group |
| standard IV hydrationIV hydration as per our institutional protocol (Lactated Ringer's or NaCl 0.9% solution will be infused at a rate of 2-3 ml/kg/h) | Other | Ketamine Group, Morphine Group |
Primary outcome
Pain Scores
Time frame: NPRS will be recorded every 30 minutes for a maximum of 180 minutes.
Mean difference in the numerical pain rating scale score over 3 hours. Pain was measured on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain)
4 secondary outcomes
Length of Stay in ED
Time frame: for 5 hours following admission to ED
Cumulative Use of Opioid
Time frame: for 3 hours following admission to the ED
The Rate of Hospital Admission
Time frame: within 3 hours following study enrollment
Drug-related Adverse Effects
Time frame: 3 hours following drug administration
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31133061Alshahrani MS, Asonto LP, El Tahan MM, Al Sulaibikh AH, Al Faraj SZ, Al Mulhim AA, Al Abbad MF, Al Nahhash SA, Aldarweesh MN, Mahmoud AM, Almaghraby N, Al Jumaan MA, Al Junaid TO, Al Hawaj FM, AlKenany S, ElSayed OF, Abdelwahab HM, Moussa MM, Alossaimi BK, Alotaibi SK, AlMutairi TM, AlSulaiman DA, Al Shahrani SD, Alfaraj D, Alhazzani W. Study protocol for a randomized, blinded, controlled trial of ketamine for acute painful crisis of sickle cell disease. Trials. 2019 May 27;20(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3394-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The study protocol, statistical plan, and results will be shared after publishing the manuscript. Currently, it is submitted and under peer review.
Related trials for Sickle Cell Crisis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Buprenorphine for the Management of Pain in Children With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety of Anumigilimab (CSL324) in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)
Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruiting
Hypoxic Red Blood Cells in Sickle Cell Anemia
Sickle Cell Anaemia, Sickle Cell Anemia Crisis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Investigating the Mechanistic Effects of Mitapivat in Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Anemia, Sickle Cell Thalassemia
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Sickle Cell Disease
Pain Crisis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohammed SS Alshahrani, MD principal investigator
King Fahad Hospital of the University -Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University - (Dammam University)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Morphine Group, Ketamine Group and standard IV hydration in people with Sickle Cell Crisis, run by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Scores (time frame: NPRS will be recorded every 30 minutes for a maximum of 180 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03431285, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2025.