AzTrials
AzTrials

Inferior Alveolar Nerve BlockNCT03428282

Pain and Anxiety Control During Traditional Mandibular Anesthesia in Children Using Distracting Tools

A study testing VR Box, Tablet Device and Anesthesia in people with Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block, run by Damascus University at 1 site in Syria.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two different audiovisual distraction techniques (Audio Video eyeglasses "VR BOX"/ Tablet) in the management of anxious pediatric patients during inferior alveolar nerve block Group A (Control group): IAN will be administrated with basic behavior guidance… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 10 years
Conditions the study is for
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
What is being tested?
VR Box, Tablet Device and Anesthesia
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
102 participants
Where
1 siteSyria
Study dates
15 May 2017to 15 Jul 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 10 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • age between 6 and 10 years.
  • no previous dental experience.
  • definitely positive or positive ratings of Frank scale.
  • Need of IAN block for any dental treatment.

Who cannot join

  • previous dental experience
  • systematic or mental disorders.
  • definitely negative or negative ratings of Frankel scale
  • Any contraindication for regional anesthesia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Syria1 site
  • Department of Peadodontics, University of Damascus Dental School

    Damascus, DM20AM18

Other trials in Syria

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Audio Visual Distraction Using Virtual Reality Eyeglasses Versus Tablet Device in Child Behavioral Management During Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two different audiovisual distraction techniques (Audio Video eyeglasses "VR BOX"/ Tablet) in the management of anxious pediatric patients during inferior alveolar nerve block

Group A (Control group): IAN will be administrated with basic behavior guidance techniques and without using any type of distraction aids.

Read more

Group B: IAN will be administrated with using AV eyeglasses "VR BOX" and wireless headphone.

Group C: IAN will be administrated with using tablet device and wireless headphone

All of the children who experienced an inferior alveolar block with/without distraction will be assessed by using a combination of measures: Wong-Baker FACES (self-report), pulse rate (physiological) and behavior (using FLACC behavior rating scale "external evaluator

Read the detailed description

This study will evaluate the effectiveness of two types of distraction aids that contain video using (tablet device or VR BOX eyeglasses) and audio distraction using wireless headphone. pain and anxiety will be evaluated during inferior alveolar nerve block using three behavioral scales, Wong-Baker FACES (self-report), pulse rate (physiological) and behavior (using FLACC behavior rating scale "external evaluator".

The first measure of heart pulse rate will be recorded directly when the patient seated comfortably on the dental chair, after anesthesia, the second heart pulse rate will be taken and the child patients will ask to choose a face that describe their status from one of the Wong Baker faces scale.

For each child patient, all of the body responses will be recorded during the whole procedure and then will be evaluated by an external assessor to determine the children behavioral score according to FLACC scale.

Being tested
VR Box, Tablet Device, Anesthesia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VR BoxProcedure or surgery

    Also called Virtual Reality Eyeglasses

    Distraction will be made during the injection of the drug using this method.

  • Tablet DeviceProcedure or surgery

    Distraction will be made during the injection of the drug using this method

  • AnesthesiaDrug

    Anesthesia will be obtained by injecting the drug into the oral mucosa before performing the dental treatment.

Study groups in NCT03428282
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VR BoxExperimentalInferior alveolar nerve block will be performed with the aid of VR box as a means of distracting patients' attention.
Receives: Procedure: VR Box
Tablet deviceExperimentalInferior alveolar nerve block will be performed with the aid of a tablet device as a means of distracting patients' attention.
Receives: Procedure: Tablet Device
AnesthesiaActive comparatorInferior alveolar nerve block will be performed in the normal manner without any specific intervention to distract patients' attention. Classic anesthesia will be applied.
Receives: Drug: Anesthesia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain levels

    using self-reported Wong-Baker FACES pain scale with 0 indicating 'no pain' and five indicating 'worst pain'.

    Measured: five minutes following the inferior alveolar nerve block injection.

  2. Anxiety levels

    This will be evaluated using the Face-Legs-Activity-Cry-Consolability (FLACC) scale employing an external evaluator in which all of the body responses will be recorded once the needle penetrate the oral tissue.

    (0 low anxiety and pain level - 10 high anxiety and pain level)

    Measured: Within the first minute of injecting the needle into the oral mucosa (oral tissues).

  3. Change in physiological pulse rate

    using Finger Pulse Oximeter

    Measured: (1) five minutes after the patient is seated comfortably on the dental chair, (2) five minutes following the injection of the anesthetic drug

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Feb 2018
  2. Study start15 May 2017
  3. Primary completion10 Feb 2018
  4. Study completion15 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
102 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03428282
Sponsor's protocol ID
UDDS-Pedo-03-2017
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
26 Dec 2017
Last updated
30 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Madhok M, Teele M. Evaluation of nonpharmacologic methods of pain and anxiety management for laceration repair in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):1321; author reply 1321-2. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1351. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16951038
  • Wang ZX, Sun LH, Chen AP. The efficacy of non-pharmacological methods of pain management in school-age children receiving venepuncture in a paediatric department: a randomized controlled trial of audiovisual distraction and routine psychological intervention. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008 Oct 4;138(39-40):579-84. doi: 10.4414/smw.2008.12224.

    PubMed 18853287
  • Al-Namankany A, Petrie A, Ashley P. Video modelling and reducing anxiety related to dental injections - a randomised clinical trial. Br Dent J. 2014 Jun;216(12):675-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.497.

    PubMed 24970519
  • El-Sharkawi HF, El-Housseiny AA, Aly AM. Effectiveness of new distraction technique on pain associated with injection of local anesthesia for children. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr;34(2):e35-8.

    PubMed 22583875
  • Hoge MA, Howard MR, Wallace DP, Allen KD. Use of video eyewear to manage distress in children during restorative dental treatment. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Sep-Oct;34(5):378-82.

    PubMed 23211912
  • Fakhruddin KS, Hisham EB, Gorduysus MO. Effectiveness of audiovisual distraction eyewear and computerized delivery of anesthesia during pulp therapy of primary molars in phobic child patients. Eur J Dent. 2015 Oct-Dec;9(4):470-475. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.172637.

    PubMed 26929683

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing VR Box, Tablet Device and Anesthesia in people with Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block, run by Damascus University at 1 site in Syria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Syria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain levels (time frame: five minutes following the inferior alveolar nerve block injection.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03428282, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in