First-time-in-Human (FTIH) Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Single (in Both Fed and Fasted States) or Repeat Doses of GSK3358699

Study at a glance

From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.

Official title

A Randomised, Double-blind (Sponsor Open), Placebo-controlled, Three Part Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Single (in Both Fed and Fasted States) or Repeat Doses of GSK3358699 in Healthy Male Participants

ClinicalTrials.gov ID

NCT03426995

Acronym / sponsor ID

207546

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Phase

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Recruitment status

TerminatedReason stopped: The trial was terminated for strategic reasons following the emergence of new data.

Enrolment

48 participants (actual)

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)

Study start

13 Mar 2018 (actual)

Primary completion

2 May 2019 (actual)

Study completion

2 May 2019 (actual)

First posted

9 Feb 2018 (actual)

Results

Posted 2 Dec 2020

Clinical summary

The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.

Study design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomised

Intervention model

Crossover

Masking

Double blind (participant, investigator)

Number of arms

8

Model description

Study will be conducted as Part A, B and C. Part A will consist of 2-interlocking cohorts, where each subject will receive maximum 2-single ascending oral doses of GSK3358699 and 1 dose of placebo, in Treatment Periods (TP) 1 to 3. In TP 4 subjects will receive GSK3358699, dose evaluated in TP (1 to 3) or placebo, with cantharidin induced blisters and either LPS or GM-CSF in vivo challenge. Part B will comprise of single cohort taking part in two-way cross over, with open label phase where each subject will receive single oral dose of GSK3358699 (based on Part A), under fed and fasted conditions in each TP. Part C will consist of 3 cohorts with multiple ascending doses, with every cohort having one repeat dose TP with 14 days of daily dosing of either GSK3358699 or placebo. Subjects on Day 14 will receive cantharidin induced blisters with either LPS or GM-CSF in vivo challenge. An optional, cohort 7 may be included for further dose evaluation of GSK3358699 or alternate dosing schedule.

Who may qualify

Ages

18 to 65 years

Sex

Male only

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

Age groups

Adult, Older adult

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Interventions

Primary outcome

1. Part A: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

   Time frame: Up to Day 193

   An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical events that may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed before. Safety Population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment.

2. Part B: Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs

   Time frame: Up to Day 30

   An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical events that may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed before.

3. Part C: Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs

   Time frame: Up to Day 49

   An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical events that may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed before.

4. Part A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

   Time frame: Up to Day 193

   Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. PCI ranges were <30 grams per liter (g/L) (albumin), <2 or >2.75 millimoles/L (mmol/L) (calcium), >1.3* upper limit of normal (ULN) mmol/L (creatinine), <3 or >9 mmol/L (glucose), <3 or >5.5 mmol/L (potassium), and <130 or >150 mmol/L (sodium). Participants were counted in worst case category that their value changes to (low, within range or no change or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in To within Range or No Change (NC) category. Participants were counted twice if participant had values that changed To Low and To High, so the percentages may not add to 100%.

5. Part A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

   Time frame: Up to Day 193

   Clinical chemistry parameters assessed were alanine aminotransferase(ALT)(<10 or >50 international units per liter[IU/L]),alkaline phosphatase(ALP)(<40 or >129 IU/L),aspartate aminotransferase(AST)(<0 or >37 IU/L),cholesterol(<2.3 or >4.9 mmol/L),direct bilirubin(DB)(<0 or >5 micromoles[mcmol]/L),high density lipoprotein (DL)(<0.9 or >1.5 mmol/L),C-reactive protein(CRP)(<0.0 or >5.0mg/liter),low DL(<0 or >3.0 mmol/L), total bilirubin (<0 or >20 mcmol/L),total protein(<63 or >83 grams/L),triglycerides(<0 or >2.3 mmol/L) and blood urea nitrogen(BUN)(<4.76 or >23.24 mg/deciliter).Participants were counted in worst case category that their value changes to (low, normal or high), unless there is NC in their category.Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged(e.g.,High to High) or whose value became normal, are recorded in "To Normal or NC" category.Participants were counted twice if participant had values that changed To Low and To High, so percentages may not add to 100%.

6. Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

   Time frame: Up to Day 30

   Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the chemistry parameters.

7. Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

   Time frame: Up to Day 30

   Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the chemistry parameters.

8. Part C: Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

   Time frame: Up to Day 28

   Blood samples were collected for analysis of chemistry parameters. PCI ranges were <30 g/L (albumin), <2 or >2.75 mmol/L (calcium), >1.3* ULN mmol/L (creatinine), <3 or >9 mmol/L (glucose), <3 or >5.5 mmol/L (potassium), and <130 or >150 mmol/L (sodium). Participants were counted in worst case category that their value changes to (low, within range or no change or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in To within Range or No Change category. Participants were counted twice if participant had values that changed To Low and To High, so the percentages may not add to 100%.

9. Part C: Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

   Time frame: Up to Day 28

   Clinical chemistry parameters assessed were ALT (<10 or >50 IU/L), ALP (<40 or >129 IU/L), AST (<0 or >37 IU/L), cholesterol (<2.3 or >4.9 mmol/L), DB (<0 or >5 mcmol/L), high DL (<0.9 or >1.5 mmol/L), CRP (<0.0 or >5.0 mg/liter), low DL (<0 or >3.0 mmol/L), total bilirubin (<0 or >20 mcmol/L), total protein (<63 or >83 grams/L), triglycerides (<0 or >2.3 mmol/L) and BUN (<4.76 or >23.24 mg/deciliter). Participants were counted in worst case category that their value changes to (low, normal or high), unless there is NC in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High) or whose value became normal, are recorded in "To Normal or NC" category. Participants were counted twice if participant had values that changed To Low and To High, so percentages may not add to 100%.

10. Part A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

    Time frame: Up to Day 193

    Blood samples collected for analysis of hematology parameters. PCI ranges were >0.54 proportion of red blood cells in blood (hematocrit), >180 grams/liter (hemoglobin), <0.8 *10^9 cells/L (lymphocyte count), <1.5 *10^9 cells/L (total absolute neutrophil count [ANC]), <100 or >550 *10^9 cells/L (platelet count), and <3 or >20*10^9 cells/L (white blood cell [WBC] count). Participants were counted in worst case category that their value changes to (low, within range or no change or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in To within Range or No Change category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed To Low and To High, so the percentages may not add to 100%.

11. Part A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

    Time frame: Up to Day 193

    Hematology parameters assessed were activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (<25 or >37 seconds), basophil count (<0.0 or >0.1*10^9 cells/L), eosinophil count (<0.0 or >0.4*10^9 cells/L), fibrinogen (<1.5 or >4.0 g/L), mean corpuscle hemoglobin (MCH) (<26.0 or >33.5 picogram), mean corpuscle volume (MCV) (<80 or >99 femtoliter), monocyte count (<0.2 or >1.0*10^9 cells/L), prothrombin time (PT) (<10 or >12 seconds), red blood cell (RBC) count (<4.4 or >5.8*10^12 cells/L) and reticulocyte count (<0.38 or >2.64 percentage of reticulocytes). Participants were counted in worst case category that their value changes to (low, normal or high), unless there is NC in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High) or whose value became normal, are recorded in "To Normal or NC" category. Participants were counted twice if participant had values that changed To Low and To High, so percentages may not add to 100%.

12. Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

    Time frame: Up to Day 30

    Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze hematology parameters.

13. Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

    Time frame: Up to Day 30

    Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze hematology parameters.

14. Part C: Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

    Time frame: Up to Day 28

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of hematology parameters. PCI ranges were >0.54 proportion of red blood cells in blood (hematocrit), >180 grams/liter (hemoglobin), <0.8*10^9 cells/L (lymphocyte count), <1.5*10^9 cells/L (total ANC), <100 or >550*10^9 cells/L (platelet count), and <3 or >20*10^9 cells/L (WBC count). Participants were counted in worst case category that their value changes to (low, within range or no change or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in To within Range or No Change category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed To Low and To High, so the percentages may not add to 100%.

15. Part C: Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

    Time frame: Up to Day 28

    Hematology parameters assessed were APTT (<25 or >37 seconds), basophil count (<0.0 or >0.1*10^9 cells/L), eosinophil count (<0.0 or >0.4*10^9 cells/L), fibrinogen (<1.5 or >4.0 g/L), MCH (<26.0 or >33.5 picogram), MCV (<80 or >99 femtoliter), monocyte count (<0.2 or >1.0*10^9 cells/L), PT (<10 or >12 seconds), RBC count (<4.4 or >5.8*10^12 cells/L) and reticulocyte count (<0.38 or >2.64 percentage of reticulocytes). Participants were counted in worst case category that their value changes to (low, normal or high), unless there is NC in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High) or whose value became normal, are recorded in "To Normal or NC" category. Participants were counted twice if participant had values that changed To Low and To High, so percentages may not add to 100%.

16. Part A: Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Parameters

    Time frame: Up to Day 193

    Urine samples were collected from participants for analyzing the following urine parameters: potential of hydrogen (pH) and glucose, protein, blood, ketones, bilirubin, urobilinogen, nitrite, leukocytes levels by dipstick. Urine samples showing any abnormality were sent for microscopic examination to detect the presence of RBC, WBC, cellular casts, granular casts, hyaline casts, and were counted as cells per high-power field (cells/HPF). Number of participants with abnormal urinalysis result by microscopic examination have been presented.

17. Part B: Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Parameters

    Time frame: Up to Day 30

    Urine samples were planned to be collected to analyze urine parameters.

18. Part C: Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Parameters

    Time frame: Up to Day 28

    Urine samples were collected from participants for analyzing the following urine parameters: pH and glucose, protein, blood, ketones, bilirubin, urobilinogen, nitrite, leukocytes levels by dipstick. Urine samples showing any abnormality were sent for microscopic examination to detect the presence of RBC, WBC, cellular casts, granular casts, hyaline casts, and were counted as cells/HPF. Number of participants with abnormal urinalysis result by microscopic examination have been presented.

19. Part A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

    Time frame: Up to Day 193

    Vital signs included systolic blood pressure(SBP), diastolic blood pressure(DBP), heart rate, respiratory rate and body temperature and were measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. PCI ranges were, SBP (millimeters of mercury [mmHg]): <85 (low) or >160 (high), DBP (mmHg): <45 (low) or >100 (high), heart rate (beats per minute): <40 (low) or >110 (high), respiration rate (breaths per minute): <11(low) or >20(high) and body temperature (degrees Celsius) <35.5 (low) or >38.0 (high). Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose vital signs value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the "To within Range or No Change" category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%.

20. Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

    Time frame: Up to Day 30

    Vital signs were planned to be measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest.

21. Part C: Number of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

    Time frame: Up to Day 49

    Vital signs included SBP, DBP, heart rate, respiratory rate and body temperature and were measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. PCI ranges were, SBP (mmHg): <85 (low) or >160 (high), DBP (mmHg): <45 (low) or >100 (high), heart rate (beats per minute): <40 (low) or >110 (high), respiration rate (breaths per minute): <11 (low) or >20 (high) and body temperature (degrees Celsius) <35.5 (low) or >38.0 (high). Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose vital signs value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the "To within Range or No Change" category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%.

22. Part A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

    Time frame: Up to Day 193

    Twelve lead ECGs were obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT, and QT interval corrected using the Fridericia's formula (QTcF) intervals. Abnormal findings were categorized as clinically significant (CS) and not clinically significant (NCS). Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Data for number of participants with worst case post-Baseline abnormal ECG findings have been presented.

23. Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal ECG Findings

    Time frame: Up to Day 30

    Twelve lead ECGs were planned to be performed to measure PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval and QTcF.

24. Part C: Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal ECG Findings

    Time frame: Up to Day 28

    Twelve lead ECGs were obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT, and QTcF intervals. Abnormal findings were categorized as clinically significant and not clinically significant. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Data for number of participants with worst case post-Baseline abnormal ECG findings have been presented.

Results and safety

Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…

Research links

• Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Dec 2020.
• Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
• Derived from this study: PubMed 34773923Brown JA, Bal J, Simeoni M, Williams P, Mander PK, Soden PE, Daga S, Fahy WA, Wong GK, Bloomer JC, Erwig L, Cui Y, Fernando D, Carnaghan H, Banham-Hall EJ, Hopkins S, Davis BG, Oliveira JJD, Prinjha RK. A randomized study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of GSK3358699, a mononuclear myeloid-targeted bromodomain and extra-terminal domain inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;88(5):2140-2155. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15137. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
• Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid

• Not yet recruitingPhase 2

  Platform Study of Targeted Therapies for Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

  Rheumatoid Arthritis

• Not yet recruiting

  Effects of Paraffin Wax Therapy and Dry Cupping on Pain and Wrist Function in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

  Rheumatic Arthritis

• RecruitingObservational study

  The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease

  Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland

• Not yet recruitingObservational study

  Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study

  Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

• Not yet recruiting

  MYTP01 for Immune-Mediated Diseases

  IgA Nephropathy, Kidney Transplant Recipients

Referral and contact

AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.

1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.