AzTrials
AzTrials

Hip FracturesNCT03422497

The Association of Sex With Guideline-based Perioperative Care in Hip Fracture Surgery

An observational study of Hip Fractures and Gender Bias, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators will use multilevel multivariable regression analysis to measure the association of sex with provision of guideline-based perioperative care for hip fracture surgery in Ontario. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hip Fractures, Gender Bias, Surgery
What is being tested?
Male sex and Female sex
How many people
50,000 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 2013to Mar 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Study population: Emergency hip fracture surgery patients

Who may be able to join

  • Non-elective hospital admission
  • Hip fracture diagnosis
  • Hip fracture surgery

Who cannot join

  • -None

About this study

Official title: The Association of Sex With Provision of Guideline-based Perioperative Care for Hip Fracture Surgery Patients: a Population-based Study

The investigators will use multilevel multivariable regression analysis to measure the association of sex with provision of guideline-based perioperative care for hip fracture surgery in Ontario.

Read the detailed description

In 2013, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Longterm Care published a 'Quality Based Procedures' guideline for care of hip fracture patients. The adjusted association of sex with receipt of 5 perioperative processes of care that can be accurately measured in health administrative data within this guideline will be investigated.

Being tested
Male sex, Female sex
Medical subject headings
Hip Fractures, Sexism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Male sexOther

    Male sex-as listed in the discharge abstract database

  • Female sexOther

    Male sex-as listed in the discharge abstract database

Study groups in NCT03422497
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Male hip fracture surgery patientsIndividuals 65 years or older admitted non-electively to hospital with a diagnosis of hip fracture who have surgery for their hip fracture and have male sex listed in their discharge abstract
Receives: Other: Male sex
Female hip fracture surgery patientsIndividuals 65 years or older admitted non-electively to hospital with a diagnosis of hip fracture who have surgery for their hip fracture and have female sex listed in their discharge abstract
Receives: Other: Female sex

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Perioperative geriatric medicine consult

    Physician billing code for perioperative, inpatient geriatric medicine consult or comprehensive assessment

    Measured: Hospital admission to date of discharge from hospital, or 365 days after admission, whichever came first

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Preoperative anesthesiology consult

    Physician billing code for preoperative, inpatient anesthesiology consult

    Measured: Hospital admission to date of surgery, or 365 days after admission, whichever came first

  2. Wait for surgery greater than 2 days

    Hospital admission to surgery wait for greater than 2 days

    Measured: Hospital admission to date of surgery, or 365 days after admission, whichever came first

  3. Perioperative regional analgesia

    Peripheral nerve block or epidural administered in the perioperative period, identified from physician billing data codes

    Measured: Hospital admission to 3 days after surgery

  4. Neuraxial anesthesia

    Spinal or epidural anesthesia, without concurrent general anesthesia, administered for the hip fracture surgery and identified from the discharge abstract database section which describes anesthesia techniques for surgery.

    Measured: Day of surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Feb 2018
  2. Study startMay 2013
  3. Primary completionMar 2016
  4. Study completionMar 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
50,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03422497
Sponsor's protocol ID
DM7
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
17 Jan 2018
Last updated
5 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Privacy policies in our institution preclude data sharing

Publications

  • Cho N, Boland L, McIsaac DI. The association of female sex with application of evidence-based practice recommendations for perioperative care in hip fracture surgery. CMAJ. 2019 Feb 11;191(6):E151-E158. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180564.

    PubMed 30745399

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hip Fractures and Gender Bias, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Perioperative geriatric medicine consult (time frame: Hospital admission to date of discharge from hospital, or 365 days after admission, whichever came first). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03422497, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in