Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract InfectionPhase 2NCT03418571
Evaluation of ALX-0171 in Japanese Children Hospitalized for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
A Phase 2 study testing ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg in people with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection, run by Ablynx, a Sanofi company at 25 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
This was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, Phase II study (NCT03418571) designed to support the selection of an optimal dose of inhaled ALX-0171 for further clinical development, taking ethnicity into consideration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 28 days to 2 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
- What is being tested?
- ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2018to 24 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 28 days to 2 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Main inclusion criteria:
- Subject was a Japanese male or female infant or young child aged 28 days to <2 years with gestational age ≥33 weeks at screening.
- Subject was of Japanese descent, i.e., born in Japan to Japanese parents and had Japanese maternal and paternal grandparents.
- Subject weighed between ≥3.0 kg and <15.0 kg at screening.
- Subject was otherwise healthy, but was hospitalized for and clinically diagnosed with RSV LRTI (bronchiolitis or broncho-pneumonia), i.e., showing typical clinical signs and symptoms such as tachypnea, wheezing, cough, crackles, use of accessory muscles and/or nasal flaring.
- Subject had a positive RSV diagnostic test within 4 days of screening.
- Subject was expected to have to stay in the hospital for at least 24 hours (according to the Investigator's judgment at screening).
- Symptoms likely related to RSV infection (i.e., the symptoms present needed to be probably linked to the current RSV infection according to Investigator's judgment) had appeared within 4 days of screening and were not yet improving at screening and randomization.
- Subject fulfilled at least two of the following RSV disease severity criteria at screening and randomization:
- Inadequate oral feeding that required feeding support (i.e., nasogastric tube or i.v. line),
- Inadequate oxygen saturation defined as:
- Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) <95% on room air, or
- Requiring oxygen supplementation to maintain adequate oxygen saturation with documented pre-supplementation value <95%
- Signs of respiratory distress defined as:
- Respiratory rate ≥50 breaths per minute in infants up to 12 months of age, and ≥40 breaths per minute in children above 12 months, and/ or
- Moderate or marked respiratory muscle retractions
- Subject had normal psychomotor development.
Others as defined in the protocol
Main exclusion criteria:
- Subject was known to have significant comorbidities including:
- Genetic disorders (e.g., trisomy 21, cystic fibrosis),
- Hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease (e.g., needing corrective therapy or inotropic support),
- Bronchopulmonary dysplasia,
- Any hereditary or acquired metabolic (bone) diseases,
- Hematologic or other malignancy.
- Subject was known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive. If the subject was <6 months of age, known HIV-positivity of the mother was also exclusionary.
- Subject was known to be immunocompromised.
- Subject had or was suspected to have an active, clinically relevant concurrent infection (e.g., bacterial pneumonia, urinary tract infection). Concurrent acute otitis media was not exclusionary.
- Subject had significant oral and/or maxillofacial malformations which would have prevented proper positioning of the face mask.
- Subject received invasive mechanical ventilation or non-invasive respiratory support (i.e., continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure) in the 4 weeks prior to screening.
- During the current admission, subject was initially hospitalized in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting and/or received invasive mechanical ventilation or non-invasive respiratory support (i.e., continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure).
- Subject was critically ill and/or was expected to require invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive respiratory support (i.e., continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure), or high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) at levels not enabling nebulization therapy according to the Investigator's judgment. High-flow oxygen, with a maximum flow of 2 L/kg/min, was permitted under the following conditions:
- used as Standard of Care outside ICU setting
- could be removed for study drug administration (Note: oxygen flow at 2 L/minute could be provided through the nebulizer)
- Subject had received 1 or more doses of palivizumab or treatment or prophylaxis with any RSV antiviral compound (e.g., ribavirin, i.v. immunoglobulin, or any investigational drug or vaccine for RSV [including subject's mother who had been vaccinated against RSV]) at any time prior to screening.
- Subject was required to continue or start systemic corticosteroid therapy. Subject on a maintenance therapy of inhaled corticosteroids could continue this treatment at the usual dose. Topical corticosteroids for skin disorders were permitted.
- Subject had clinically meaningful abnormalities on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), which according to the Investigor's judgement did not allow participation of the subject in the study. A 12-lead ECG performed within 4 days of screening was acceptable. If not available, the 12-lead ECG could be performed at the time of screening.
Others as defined in the protocol
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 1 country.
25 sites in 1 country
Japan25 sites
Investigator Site
Aoi-ku
Investigator Site
Asahikawa
Investigator Site
Fuchu-shi
Investigator site
Fukuyama-shi
Investigator Site
Funabashi
Investigator site
Gifu
Investigator Site
Isesaki
Investigator Site
Kawasaki
Investigator Site
Koga
Investigator Site
Kurashiki
Investigator Site
Kurume-shi
Investigator Site
Meguro-ku
Investigator Site
Minamiku
Investigator site
Nagano
Investigator Site
Ōmura
Investigator site
Saitama-shi
Investigator Site
Shimotsuke-shi
Investigator Site
Takatsuki
Investigator Site
Toshima-ku
Investigator Site
Toyohira
Investigator site
Ueda
Investigator site
Wako
Investigator Site
Yachiyo
Investigator site 1
Yokosuka
Investigator site 2
Yokosuka
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Multiple-dose Study of ALX-0171 Versus Placebo Along With Standard of Care in Japanese Infants and Young Children Hospitalized for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
This was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, Phase II study (NCT03418571) designed to support the selection of an optimal dose of inhaled ALX-0171 for further clinical development, taking ethnicity into consideration.
Based on the results of the Phase IIb dose-ranging study ALX0171-C201 (RESPIRE), the Sponsor decided to discontinue ALX-0171 development in infants and to early terminate the ALX0171-C203 study.
Read the detailed description
Four dose levels were planned to be evaluated in four consecutive cohorts consisting of Japanese infants and young children aged 28 days to <2 years with a gestational age ≥33 weeks who were hospitalized for and diagnosed with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI):
- Dose level 1: target dose of 1.5 mg/kg
- Dose level 2: target dose of 3.0 mg/kg
- Dose level 3: target dose of 6.0 mg/kg
- Dose level 4: target dose of 9.0 mg/kg
Each cohort was planned to consist of 15 subjects enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ALX-0171 or placebo, in an allocation ratio of 4:1 (N = 12 active versus N = 3 placebo per cohort).
Due to early termination of the trial, only enrollment of Cohort 1 could be completed as planned. For Cohort 2, only 1 subject was screened but did not meet the eligibility criteria and was considered a screen failure. Therefore, data were not available for treatment groups ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg, 6.0 mg/kg, and 9.0 mg/kg.
Of note, in line with applicable guidelines, an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) was assigned to monitor the study. Upon completing of Cohort 1, the IDMC reviewed the available unblinded safety data and unanimously recommended to continue the study with no changes to the protocol.
- Being tested
- ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg, Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kgBiological
ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg was administered via a single inhalation once daily for 3 consecutive days.
PlaceboOther
Placebo was administered via a single inhalation once daily for 3 consecutive days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety and Tolerability of Inhaled ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg as Measured by the Number of Subjects With at Least 1 Serious or Non-Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE).
Number of subjects reported with at least 1 serious or non-serious TEAEs in the ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg treatment group and placebo treatment group.
Measured: From the subject's first study drug administration until completion of the subject's last visit, an average of 4 weeks
Safety and Tolerability of Inhaled ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg as Measured by the Number of Serious and Non-serious TEAEs.
Number of serious and non-serious TEAEs reported in the ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg treatment group and placebo treatment group.
Measured: From the subject's first study drug administration until completion of the subject's last visit, an average of 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Feb 2018
- Study start1 Mar 2018
- Primary completion24 Oct 2018
- Study completion24 Oct 2018
Why it stopped: The Sponsor decided to discontinue ALX-0171 development (due to insufficient evidence of efficacy). As a result, the ALX0171-C203 study was early terminated.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ablynx, a Sanofi company
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Monitor, Study director, Ablynx NV
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03418571
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ALX0171-C203
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Multiple-dose Study of ALX-0171 Versus Placebo Along With Standard of Care in Japanese Infants and Young Children Hospitalized for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03418571
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALX0171-C203
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The Sponsor decided to discontinue ALX-0171 development (due to insufficient evidence of efficacy). As a result, the ALX0171-C203 study was early terminated.
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ablynx, a Sanofi companyIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, Phase II study (NCT03418571) designed to support the selection of an optimal dose of inhaled ALX-0171 for further clinical development, taking ethnicity into consideration.
Based on the results of the Phase IIb dose-ranging study ALX0171-C201 (RESPIRE), the Sponsor decided to discontinue ALX-0171 development in infants and to early terminate the ALX0171-C203 study.
Detailed description
Four dose levels were planned to be evaluated in four consecutive cohorts consisting of Japanese infants and young children aged 28 days to <2 years with a gestational age ≥33 weeks who were hospitalized for and diagnosed with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI):
- Dose level 1: target dose of 1.5 mg/kg
- Dose level 2: target dose of 3.0 mg/kg
- Dose level 3: target dose of 6.0 mg/kg
- Dose level 4: target dose of 9.0 mg/kg
Each cohort was planned to consist of 15 subjects enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ALX-0171 or placebo, in an allocation ratio of 4:1 (N = 12 active versus N = 3 placebo per cohort).
Due to early termination of the trial, only enrollment of Cohort 1 could be completed as planned. For Cohort 2, only 1 subject was screened but did not meet the eligibility criteria and was considered a screen failure. Therefore, data were not available for treatment groups ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg, 6.0 mg/kg, and 9.0 mg/kg.
Of note, in line with applicable guidelines, an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) was assigned to monitor the study. Upon completing of Cohort 1, the IDMC reviewed the available unblinded safety data and unanimously recommended to continue the study with no changes to the protocol.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg | Experimental | Biological: ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 28 days to 2 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kgALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg was administered via a single inhalation once daily for 3 consecutive days. | Biological | ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg |
| PlaceboPlacebo was administered via a single inhalation once daily for 3 consecutive days. | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Safety and Tolerability of Inhaled ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg as Measured by the Number of Subjects With at Least 1 Serious or Non-Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE).
Time frame: From the subject's first study drug administration until completion of the subject's last visit, an average of 4 weeks
Number of subjects reported with at least 1 serious or non-serious TEAEs in the ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg treatment group and placebo treatment group.
Safety and Tolerability of Inhaled ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg as Measured by the Number of Serious and Non-serious TEAEs.
Time frame: From the subject's first study drug administration until completion of the subject's last visit, an average of 4 weeks
Number of serious and non-serious TEAEs reported in the ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg treatment group and placebo treatment group.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Severe Pediatric Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections Occurring in the Era of Antiviral Prophylaxis
Children <24 Months Hospitalized for RSV-related Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Gut Microbiome and Immune Response in Severe RSV Infection in Vietnamese Infants
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection, Bronchiolitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessing the Burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection, Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Monitor study director
Ablynx NV
25 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg in people with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection, run by Ablynx, a Sanofi company at 25 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety and Tolerability of Inhaled ALX-0171 1.5 mg/kg as Measured by the Number of Subjects With at Least 1 Serious or Non-Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE). (time frame: From the subject's first study drug administration until completion of the subject's last visit, an average of 4 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.