UltrasoundNCT03416608
Patient Experiences of Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice
An observational study of Ultrasound and General Practice, run by Aalborg University at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
This study in part of a larger cohort study (clinical trials ID number: NCT03375333) that examine the use of ultrasound in general practice. In the present study patient experiences, with use of ultrasound in the consultation at the general practitioners office, will be explored through a questionnaire. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Ultrasound, General Practice
- How many people
- 579 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2018to 2 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study will take place in 20 different general practices in Denmark where the GPs use POC-US. The participating GPs will try to include all patients were they use POC-US in the consultation. Patients must provide written, informed consent before any study procedures occur (see Appendix 1 for sample Informed Consent Form). Only patients assigned to the GPs practice can participate in the study.
Who may be able to join
- All patients, who the GP intends to examine with POC-US.
- Exclusions criteria:
- Patient not willing or able to give informed consent
- Patients previously included in the study
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Research unit for general practice in Aalborg,department of clinical medicine Aalborg university
Aalborg, 9220
About this study
Official title: Patient Experiences of Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice: A Questionnaire Study
This study in part of a larger cohort study (clinical trials ID number: NCT03375333) that examine the use of ultrasound in general practice.
In the present study patient experiences, with use of ultrasound in the consultation at the general practitioners office, will be explored through a questionnaire.
Read the detailed description
This study is a Cross-sectional study, which is conducted as part of a larger cohort study: How Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POC-US) Affects the Diagnostic Process in General Practice. A prospective follow-up study. (Clinical trials registration number: NCT03375333)
Study setting:
The study will take place in 20 different general practices in Denmark where the general practitioners (GPs) use POC-US.
Interventions There is no intervention in this study. The registration in this study will reflect GPs routine daily use of POC-US not adding more examinations or in other ways influence on the treatment of patients.
Sample size Twenty general practitioners (GPs) are expected to use POC-US 2-3 times a day, and assuming a participation rate of 80%, there will be between 640-960 US scan during the study period of one month.
Recruitment All patients who consult the participating GP for conditions relevant for a POC-US examination will be offered to participate in the study. Patients are excluded if they do not wish to participate or if they are not able to give an informed consent.
Patients must provide written, informed consent before any study procedures occur. Only patients assigned to the GPs practice can participate in the study.
Data collection method After the consultation in the GP's office, patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire about their experience with POC-US in the consultation. The GPs will provide the patients with a unique ID-number and a link to an online questionnaire on the SurveyXact server. The patients will access the online questionnaire using this ID-number through Ipads or on a paper edition.
Baseline information regarding the participating GPs will be provided through the original study. Baseline questions about the patients will be part of the patient-questionnaire following the consultation.
The items in this questionnaire are generated from a qualitative interview study with GPs working in general practice and using POC-US. The items are the GPs expressed believes and concerns about how ultrasound was experienced by their patients.
This questionnaire is developed through the following steps:
- A first edition of the questionnaire is developed based on the results of a qualitative interview study with Danish GPs on their experiences on how ultrasound can be used in general practice.
- To test face validity, comprehension and wording of the questionnaire, pilot tests are done with laypeople and patients,using the "think-aloud" technique and cognitive interviewing. The pilot-tests are done in two geographical-separated clinics including five patients in each clinic. Adaptions and rephrasing follow after the results are compared.
- A validation test will include presenting the rephrased questions from the pilot-tests to 5 GPs, who use ultrasound, and asking them to compare the phrased questions to the original items from the qualitative interviews. Adaptions will follow.
- A final pilot-test will include interviews with patients, who have been ultrasound scanned in two other clinics using the "Think-aloud" technique. In this pilot-test the patients are presented to both a paper-version and an online-version of the questionnaire, to test functionality and feasibility. Pilot-tests and adaptions will continue until the questionnaire is completed without difficulties.
Retention Participant Retention GPs will be asked to register not-included patients, in whom POC-US was used during the study period, on a separate form and to declare the reason for the failed inclusion of the patient.
Participant Withdrawal Participating GPs and patients may withdraw from the study for any reason at any time.
Data management Data will be saved electronically in the SurveyXact server and on a server at Aalborg University and will only be accessed by the research group using passwords.
The Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg is the Data Controller. Each participating GP will be data processor and can only process data pursuant to an agreement with the data controller. A data processor agreements will be made between the Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg and each participating GP, between the Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg and Aalborg University, and between Aalborg University and SurveyXact according to the Danish Data Protection Agency recommendations.
The Key files identifying the patients will be safely stored at the GPs office and the research group will not have access to this information during the study.
Statistics The questionnaire data will be collected on an ordinal scale and reported descriptively using frequencies. The correlation between the GPs reported confidence in the tentative diagnosis on a numeric rating scale from 1-5 perceived at an ordinal scale and patients reported experience of ultrasound in the consultation will be compared using scatterplots and Goodman and Kruskal's gamma will be used to test association.
Data monitoring During the study period the research team will be able to observe if the GPs include patients in the study and make contact to the GPs who fail to include patients in order to help out with any difficulties.
Harms All adverse events occurring during the study will be registered.
Research ethics approval The studies are approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Committee of Multipractice Studies in General Practice in Denmark.
Consent or assent Prior to participation, patients will receive written and oral information and a written consent to participate will be obtained.
If a GP or a patient wished to redraw their consent to participate in the study, the GP will contact the research team and no further data will be collected.
Protocol amendments Will be declared and all editions and changes in the protocol will be saved.
Confidentiality All participating GPs have signed a confidentiality agreement.
Declaration of interest None
Access to data Only the Research team will have access to data.
- Conditions
- Ultrasound, General Practice
- Keywords
- ultrasound, patient experience, diagnostic test, general practice, family medicine
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Information
This domain will be explored through the following questions:
Were you informed about the purpose of the ultrasound examination? Were you informed about the difference between a specialist ultrasound and a GP ultrasound? Were you informed about the result of the ultrasound examination?
Measured: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Influence on the consultation
This domain will be explored through the following questions:
Did you think the ultrasound examination was a natural part of the consultation? Did you think the ultrasound examination was disruptive in the consultation? Did the ultrasound examination influence the relationship between the GP and you? Do you think ultrasound made a difference in the consultation?
Measured: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Diagnostic reassurance
This domain will be explored through the following questions:
Do you feel more thoroughly examined after the ultrasound examination? Do you have a better understanding of your health problem after the ultrasound examination? Do you feel more at ease after the ultrasound examination? Has your confidence in the GPs diagnosis changed after the ultrasound examination? Has the ultrasound examination changed your feeling of being taken seriously?
Measured: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Patient satisfaction
This domain will be explored through the following questions:
Was your overall experience with ultrasound in the GP's office positive or negative? Would you recommend ultrasound in the GPs office to others? Do you think ultrasound is a service improvement in the GP's office? Do you think ultrasound is a quality improvement in the GP's office?
Measured: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Secondary outcomes (2)
Associations between GP confidence in the diagnosis and patients sense of diagnostic reassurance
Association between GPs declared confidence in the tentative diagnosis after using ultrasound in the consultation (data from the original cohort expressed on a scale from increased confidence to decreased confidence) and patients' answers to the question "Has your confidence in the GPs diagnosis changed after the ultrasound examination?" expressed on a scale from decreased to increased confidence.
Measured: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Associations between GP confidence in the diagnosis and patients experience of improved care
Association between GPs declared confidence in the tentative diagnosis after using ultrasound in the consultation (expressed in the original cohort on a scale from increased confidence to decreased confidence) and patients' answers to the question "Do you feel more at ease after the ultrasound examination?" expressed on a scale from less at ease to more at ease.
Measured: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2018
- Study start15 Jan 2018
- Primary completion1 Sep 2018
- Study completion2 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for UltrasoundStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 579 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aalborg University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Camilla Aakjær Andersen, Aalborg University
- Investigators
- Martin Bach Jensen, Professor, GP, PhD, Study chair, Aalborg University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03416608
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GULD-patient questionnaire
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Andersen CA, Brodersen J, Rudbaek TR, Jensen MB. Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jun 18;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01459-z.
PubMed 34144701
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patient Experiences of Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice: A Questionnaire Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03416608
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GULD-patient questionnaire
- Conditions
- Ultrasound, General Practice
- Keywords
- ultrasound, patient experience, diagnostic test, general practice, family medicine
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 579 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aalborg UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study in part of a larger cohort study (clinical trials ID number: NCT03375333) that examine the use of ultrasound in general practice.
In the present study patient experiences, with use of ultrasound in the consultation at the general practitioners office, will be explored through a questionnaire.
Detailed description
This study is a Cross-sectional study, which is conducted as part of a larger cohort study: How Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POC-US) Affects the Diagnostic Process in General Practice. A prospective follow-up study. (Clinical trials registration number: NCT03375333)
Study setting:
The study will take place in 20 different general practices in Denmark where the general practitioners (GPs) use POC-US.
Interventions There is no intervention in this study. The registration in this study will reflect GPs routine daily use of POC-US not adding more examinations or in other ways influence on the treatment of patients.
Sample size Twenty general practitioners (GPs) are expected to use POC-US 2-3 times a day, and assuming a participation rate of 80%, there will be between 640-960 US scan during the study period of one month.
Recruitment All patients who consult the participating GP for conditions relevant for a POC-US examination will be offered to participate in the study. Patients are excluded if they do not wish to participate or if they are not able to give an informed consent.
Patients must provide written, informed consent before any study procedures occur. Only patients assigned to the GPs practice can participate in the study.
Data collection method After the consultation in the GP's office, patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire about their experience with POC-US in the consultation. The GPs will provide the patients with a unique ID-number and a link to an online questionnaire on the SurveyXact server. The patients will access the online questionnaire using this ID-number through Ipads or on a paper edition.
Baseline information regarding the participating GPs will be provided through the original study. Baseline questions about the patients will be part of the patient-questionnaire following the consultation.
The items in this questionnaire are generated from a qualitative interview study with GPs working in general practice and using POC-US. The items are the GPs expressed believes and concerns about how ultrasound was experienced by their patients.
This questionnaire is developed through the following steps:
- A first edition of the questionnaire is developed based on the results of a qualitative interview study with Danish GPs on their experiences on how ultrasound can be used in general practice.
- To test face validity, comprehension and wording of the questionnaire, pilot tests are done with laypeople and patients,using the "think-aloud" technique and cognitive interviewing. The pilot-tests are done in two geographical-separated clinics including five patients in each clinic. Adaptions and rephrasing follow after the results are compared.
- A validation test will include presenting the rephrased questions from the pilot-tests to 5 GPs, who use ultrasound, and asking them to compare the phrased questions to the original items from the qualitative interviews. Adaptions will follow.
- A final pilot-test will include interviews with patients, who have been ultrasound scanned in two other clinics using the "Think-aloud" technique. In this pilot-test the patients are presented to both a paper-version and an online-version of the questionnaire, to test functionality and feasibility. Pilot-tests and adaptions will continue until the questionnaire is completed without difficulties.
Retention Participant Retention GPs will be asked to register not-included patients, in whom POC-US was used during the study period, on a separate form and to declare the reason for the failed inclusion of the patient.
Participant Withdrawal Participating GPs and patients may withdraw from the study for any reason at any time.
Data management Data will be saved electronically in the SurveyXact server and on a server at Aalborg University and will only be accessed by the research group using passwords.
The Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg is the Data Controller. Each participating GP will be data processor and can only process data pursuant to an agreement with the data controller. A data processor agreements will be made between the Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg and each participating GP, between the Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg and Aalborg University, and between Aalborg University and SurveyXact according to the Danish Data Protection Agency recommendations.
The Key files identifying the patients will be safely stored at the GPs office and the research group will not have access to this information during the study.
Statistics The questionnaire data will be collected on an ordinal scale and reported descriptively using frequencies. The correlation between the GPs reported confidence in the tentative diagnosis on a numeric rating scale from 1-5 perceived at an ordinal scale and patients reported experience of ultrasound in the consultation will be compared using scatterplots and Goodman and Kruskal's gamma will be used to test association.
Data monitoring During the study period the research team will be able to observe if the GPs include patients in the study and make contact to the GPs who fail to include patients in order to help out with any difficulties.
Harms All adverse events occurring during the study will be registered.
Research ethics approval The studies are approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Committee of Multipractice Studies in General Practice in Denmark.
Consent or assent Prior to participation, patients will receive written and oral information and a written consent to participate will be obtained.
If a GP or a patient wished to redraw their consent to participate in the study, the GP will contact the research team and no further data will be collected.
Protocol amendments Will be declared and all editions and changes in the protocol will be saved.
Confidentiality All participating GPs have signed a confidentiality agreement.
Declaration of interest None
Access to data Only the Research team will have access to data.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study will take place in 20 different general practices in Denmark where the GPs use POC-US. The participating GPs will try to include all patients were they use POC-US in the consultation. Patients must provide written, informed consent before any study procedures occur (see Appendix 1 for sample Informed Consent Form). Only patients assigned to the GPs practice can participate in the study.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- All patients, who the GP intends to examine with POC-US.
- Patient not willing or able to give informed consent
- Patients previously included in the study
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Information
Time frame: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
This domain will be explored through the following questions: Were you informed about the purpose of the ultrasound examination? Were you informed about the difference between a specialist ultrasound and a GP ultrasound? Were you informed about the result of the ultrasound examination?
Influence on the consultation
Time frame: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
This domain will be explored through the following questions: Did you think the ultrasound examination was a natural part of the consultation? Did you think the ultrasound examination was disruptive in the consultation? Did the ultrasound examination influence the relationship between the GP and you? Do you think ultrasound made a difference in the consultation?
Diagnostic reassurance
Time frame: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
This domain will be explored through the following questions: Do you feel more thoroughly examined after the ultrasound examination? Do you have a better understanding of your health problem after the ultrasound examination? Do you feel more at ease after the ultrasound examination? Has your confidence in the GPs diagnosis changed after the ultrasound examination? Has the ultrasound examination changed your feeling of being taken seriously?
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
This domain will be explored through the following questions: Was your overall experience with ultrasound in the GP's office positive or negative? Would you recommend ultrasound in the GPs office to others? Do you think ultrasound is a service improvement in the GP's office? Do you think ultrasound is a quality improvement in the GP's office?
2 secondary outcomes
Associations between GP confidence in the diagnosis and patients sense of diagnostic reassurance
Time frame: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Associations between GP confidence in the diagnosis and patients experience of improved care
Time frame: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34144701Andersen CA, Brodersen J, Rudbaek TR, Jensen MB. Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jun 18;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01459-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Ultrasound
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Core Competencies in General Intensive Care Ultrasound (GenIUS): a Delphi Study
Critical Illness, Ultrasound
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Findings in a Pediatric Population
Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI), Lung Ultrasound
Recruiting
Ultrasound to Guide Treatment Decisions in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis According to a T2T Approach
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Ultrasound
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Role of Ultrasonographic Tracheal Measurements in Predicting Hypoxemia During Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
ENDOBRONCHIAL ULTRASOUND - TRANSBRONCHIAL NEEDLE ASPIRATION, Hypoxemia
RecruitingObservational study
Audit of Targeted Sentinel Node Biopsy (TSNB) in Patients With Limited Nodal Disease Undergoing Primary Surgery
Breast Cancer, Axillary Lymph Nodes Dissection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Martin Bach Jensen, Professor, GP, PhD study chair
Aalborg University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Ultrasound and General Practice, run by Aalborg University at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Information (time frame: assessed immediately after the ultrasound examination). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03416608, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.