Gastric CancerRECOMMENDNCT03413514
Real World Evidence for the Cycle of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer With Shared Decision Making
A study testing NACT, SDM and Surgery in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the maximal cycle of effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer, to determine what is the best cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer
- What is being tested?
- NACT, SDM and Surgery
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 3 Jan 2018to 3 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach
- Clinical cT2N+M0,or cT3-4a/N+M0 disease, confirmed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and abdominal computed tomography (CT) and MRI and laparoscopy.
- Receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinical
Who cannot join
- Contraindication for chemotherapy
- Contraindication for surgery
- Clinically apparent distant metastasis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Peking University Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142
Ziyu Li, M.D., 86-010-8819-6605, ligregory@outlook.com
Yinkui Wang, M.D., 86-010-8819-6598, wykchangfeng@163.com
About this study
Official title: A Non-Randomized,Single Center Study to Investigate the Real World Evidence for the Maximal Cycle of Effective Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer With Shared Decision Making
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the maximal cycle of effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer, to determine what is the best cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Read the detailed description
The study is a non-randomized clinical trial. The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Cancer Hospital. MRI and enhanced CT are used to evaluate the clinical response of the tumor. The primary endpoint is the maximal cycle of effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer.
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Being tested
- NACT, SDM, Surgery, ACT, Questionnaire
- Keywords
- shared decision making, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cycle, MRI, clinical response
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NACTDrug
SOX: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2,iv.,d1; S-1 60mg,po.,Bid,d1-14; Repeat every 21 days for n courses.(0<n<8)
SDMProcedure or surgery
Making the decision about the cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with shared decision making
SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Radical surgery with D2 lymph node dissection
ACTDrug
SOX: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2,iv.,d1; S-1 60mg,po.,Bid,d1-14; Repeat every 21 days for 8-n courses.(0<n<8)
QuestionnaireOther
MAPPIN'SDM questionnaire, the control performance card, the care questionnaire, the decisional conflict questionnaire, the decisional regret questionnaire, the questionnaire of the reason for stopping neoadjuvant chemotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| experiment group | Experimental | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT) are performed for locally advanced gastric cancer. The clinical response is evaluated by MRI and enhanced CT. The cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is decided by the doctor and the patents together with shared decision making(SDM). Radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection are performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy(ACT) are preformed after surgery. Questionnaires are preformed to evaluate the involvement emotion and reason for the decision of stopping neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Receives: Drug: NACT; Procedure: SDM; Procedure: Surgery; Drug: ACT; Other: Questionnaire |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
The cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy means the maximal cycle of effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The effective means no disease progress by image diagnosis
Measured: 18months
Secondary outcomes (12)
The clinical response rate
The clinical response is evaluated by CT/MRI according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)1.1
Measured: 18 months
The completion rate of perioperative chemotherapy
The completion rate of perioperative chemotherapy means the patient completed the 8 cycles of perioperative chemotherapy as planned (n cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 8-n cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy)
Measured: 18 months
The progressive disease rate
The progressive disease during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with shared decision making is is evaluated by CT/MRI according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)1.1
Measured: 18 months
The pathological response
The pathological response during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with shared decision making is evaluated according to the tumor regression grade of NCCN guideline.
Measured: 18 months
The pathological complete response
The pathological complete response is defined as ypT0N0M0
Measured: 18months
The adverse event of chemotherapy
The adverse event of chemotherapy is evaluated and recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.3
Measured: 18 months
Surgical morbidity
Surgical morbidity is defined as the events which occurs with-in postoperative 30 days, extension of hospitalization and re-hospitalization. It is necessary to evaluate the complication and if it occurs during the hospitalization, it is required to record complication name, date of on-set (postoperatively), grade on Clavien-Dindo Classification and treatment for complication.
Measured: 18 months
The 3-year progression-free survival
In terms of locally advanced gastric cancer, to evaluate the progression-free survival rate in gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection at postoperative 3 years
Measured: 48months
The cTNM,ycTNM,ypTNM stage
The cTNM stage, ycTNM stage and ypTNM stage is defined according to the 8th TNM stage.
Measured: 60months
The decisional conflicts
The decisional conflicts is evaluated by Decisional Conflict Scale
Measured: 12months
The decisional regrets
The decisional regrets is evaluated by Decision Regret Scale
Measured: 12months
The involvement of patients during the shared decision making
The involvement of patients during the shared decision making is evaluated by MAPPIN'SDM questionnaire
Measured: 12months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jan 2018
- Study start3 Jan 2018
- Primary completion3 Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion3 Jan 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ziyu Li, Peking University
- Investigators
- Ziyu Li, MD, Principal investigator, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteJiafu Ji, MD,PHD, Principal investigator, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03413514
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017YJZ51
- Acronym
- RECOMMEND
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 14 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
PubMed 25651787Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
PubMed 26808342Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24. No abstract available.
PubMed 27342689Yoshikawa T, Tanabe K, Nishikawa K, Ito Y, Matsui T, Kimura Y, Hirabayashi N, Mikata S, Iwahashi M, Fukushima R, Takiguchi N, Miyashiro I, Morita S, Miyashita Y, Tsuburaya A, Sakamoto J. Induction of a pathological complete response by four courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: early results of the randomized phase II COMPASS trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;21(1):213-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3055-x. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
PubMed 23838904Aoyama T, Nishikawa K, Fujitani K, Tanabe K, Ito S, Matsui T, Miki A, Nemoto H, Sakamaki K, Fukunaga T, Kimura Y, Hirabayashi N, Yoshikawa T. Early results of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two and four courses of cisplatin/S-1 and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1876-1881. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx236.
PubMed 28486692Schulz C, Kullmann F, Kunzmann V, Fuchs M, Geissler M, Vehling-Kaiser U, Stauder H, Wein A, Al-Batran SE, Kubin T, Schafer C, Stintzing S, Giessen C, Modest DP, Ridwelski K, Heinemann V. NeoFLOT: Multicenter phase II study of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or gastric adenocarcinoma-Very good response predominantly in patients with intestinal type tumors. Int J Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;137(3):678-85. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29403. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
PubMed 25530271Kane HL, Halpern MT, Squiers LB, Treiman KA, McCormack LA. Implementing and evaluating shared decision making in oncology practice. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Nov-Dec;64(6):377-88. doi: 10.3322/caac.21245. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
PubMed 25200391Fried TR. Shared Decision Making--Finding the Sweet Spot. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 14;374(2):104-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1510020. No abstract available.
PubMed 26760081
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Non-Randomized,Single Center Study to Investigate the Real World Evidence for the Maximal Cycle of Effective Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer With Shared Decision Making
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03413514
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RECOMMEND / 2017YJZ51
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Keywords
- shared decision making, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cycle, MRI, clinical response
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 3 Jan 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the maximal cycle of effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer, to determine what is the best cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Detailed description
The study is a non-randomized clinical trial. The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Cancer Hospital. MRI and enhanced CT are used to evaluate the clinical response of the tumor. The primary endpoint is the maximal cycle of effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| experiment group | Experimental | Drug: NACT, Procedure: SDM, Procedure: Surgery, Drug: ACT, Other: QuestionnaireNeoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT) are performed for locally advanced gastric cancer. The clinical response is evaluated by MRI and enhanced CT. The cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is decided by the doctor and the patents together with shared decision making(SDM). Radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection are performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy(ACT) are preformed after surgery. Questionnaires are preformed to evaluate the involvement emotion and reason for the decision of stopping neoadjuvant chemotherapy. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach
- Clinical cT2N+M0,or cT3-4a/N+M0 disease, confirmed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and abdominal computed tomography (CT) and MRI and laparoscopy.
- Receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinical
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Contraindication for chemotherapy
- Contraindication for surgery
- Clinically apparent distant metastasis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NACTSOX: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2,iv.,d1; S-1 60mg,po.,Bid,d1-14; Repeat every 21 days for n courses.(0<n<8) | Drug | experiment group |
| SDMMaking the decision about the cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with shared decision making | Procedure or surgery | experiment group |
| SurgeryRadical surgery with D2 lymph node dissection | Procedure or surgery | experiment group |
| ACTSOX: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2,iv.,d1; S-1 60mg,po.,Bid,d1-14; Repeat every 21 days for 8-n courses.(0<n<8) | Drug | experiment group |
| QuestionnaireMAPPIN'SDM questionnaire, the control performance card, the care questionnaire, the decisional conflict questionnaire, the decisional regret questionnaire, the questionnaire of the reason for stopping neoadjuvant chemotherapy | Other | experiment group |
Primary outcome
The cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Time frame: 18months
The cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy means the maximal cycle of effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The effective means no disease progress by image diagnosis
12 secondary outcomes
The clinical response rate
Time frame: 18 months
The completion rate of perioperative chemotherapy
Time frame: 18 months
The progressive disease rate
Time frame: 18 months
The pathological response
Time frame: 18 months
The pathological complete response
Time frame: 18months
The adverse event of chemotherapy
Time frame: 18 months
Surgical morbidity
Time frame: 18 months
The 3-year progression-free survival
Time frame: 48months
The cTNM,ycTNM,ypTNM stage
Time frame: 60months
The decisional conflicts
Time frame: 12months
The decisional regrets
Time frame: 12months
The involvement of patients during the shared decision making
Time frame: 12months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2018.
- Background: PubMed 25651787Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
- Background: PubMed 26808342Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
- Background: PubMed 27342689Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23838904Yoshikawa T, Tanabe K, Nishikawa K, Ito Y, Matsui T, Kimura Y, Hirabayashi N, Mikata S, Iwahashi M, Fukushima R, Takiguchi N, Miyashiro I, Morita S, Miyashita Y, Tsuburaya A, Sakamoto J. Induction of a pathological complete response by four courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: early results of the randomized phase II COMPASS trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;21(1):213-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3055-x. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
- Background: PubMed 28486692Aoyama T, Nishikawa K, Fujitani K, Tanabe K, Ito S, Matsui T, Miki A, Nemoto H, Sakamaki K, Fukunaga T, Kimura Y, Hirabayashi N, Yoshikawa T. Early results of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two and four courses of cisplatin/S-1 and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1876-1881. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx236.
- Background: PubMed 25530271Schulz C, Kullmann F, Kunzmann V, Fuchs M, Geissler M, Vehling-Kaiser U, Stauder H, Wein A, Al-Batran SE, Kubin T, Schafer C, Stintzing S, Giessen C, Modest DP, Ridwelski K, Heinemann V. NeoFLOT: Multicenter phase II study of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or gastric adenocarcinoma-Very good response predominantly in patients with intestinal type tumors. Int J Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;137(3):678-85. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29403. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
- Background: PubMed 25200391Kane HL, Halpern MT, Squiers LB, Treiman KA, McCormack LA. Implementing and evaluating shared decision making in oncology practice. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Nov-Dec;64(6):377-88. doi: 10.3322/caac.21245. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
- Background: PubMed 26760081Fried TR. Shared Decision Making--Finding the Sweet Spot. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 14;374(2):104-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1510020. No abstract available.
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
GK01 Cell Therapy in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (GC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Neoadjuvant-adjuvant Durvalumab and FLOT Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab in Chinese Patients With Resectable GC/GEJC.
Gastric, Esophagogastric Junction
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ziyu Li, MD principal investigator
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Jiafu Ji, MD,PHD principal investigator
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing NACT, SDM and Surgery in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ziyu Li, MD (86-010-8819-6605, ligregory@outlook.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (time frame: 18months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03413514, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2018.