AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaNCT03408327

The Application of Wearable Technology to Improve the Physical Activity Level of People With Chronic Mental Illness

A study testing Wearable technology, LINE group and Group activities in people with Schizophrenia and Physical Activity, run by Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The object is to develop a physical activity promotion program by applying social cognitive theory and wearable technology and evaluate its feasibility in people with MI Stage I: Accuracy, Acceptability, Feasibility. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 64 years
What is being tested?
Wearable technology, LINE group and Group activities
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
16 Mar 2018to 31 Jul 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • having a diagnosis of SMI (including schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder over one year) made by a psychiatrist on the basis of the criteria set Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, text-revision, DSM-V
  • living in the community and receiving community-based mental health rehabilitation services
  • having stable psychiatric conditions (i.e., primary psychiatric medications had not changed for more than two months)
  • being 20 to 64 years old
  • No obvious cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental Status Exam >24)
  • can follow the research process and sign the consent

Who cannot join

  • having a clinically significant physical condition making it unsafe to increase daily walking activity, such as severe coronary heart disease or musculoskeletal problems
  • according participants' self-statement, having following illness, including severe heart failure,myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD, poor glycemic control (i.e., dialysis, diabetic neuropathy or retinopathy) and lower extremity arthritis
  • uncontrolled hypertension with SBP> 160 mmHg or DBP> 110 mmHg
  • has significant cognitive impairment
  • unconscious or confused
  • already exercising regularly (i.e., doing moderate-intensity physical activities for 150 minutes each week)
  • participating in other intervention studies

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Kaohsiung Medical University

    Kaohsiung City, 80756

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: The Application of Wearable Technology to Improve the Physical Activity Level of People With Chronic Mental Illness- Accuracy, Acceptability, Feasibility and Effectiveness Analysis

The object is to develop a physical activity promotion program by applying social cognitive theory and wearable technology and evaluate its feasibility in people with MI

Stage I: Accuracy, Acceptability, Feasibility. Stage II: Effectiveness Analysis

In stage II, will conduct a single-blinded, randomized controlled study. 90 participants will be randomly assigned to experimental group or control group. The intervention for both groups will last for 12 weeks, with a 12-week of follow-up. The measurements include physical activity level, physical fitness, cognitive function and sleep quality, as well as the moderators of the effectiveness of program.

Read the detailed description

Background: The health condition of individuals with chronic mental illness (MI) is usually poorer than the general population. This health disparity may be related to their lower physical activity level. One of the critical issues in psychiatric rehabilitation is to develop a health promotion program which utilizes less clinical resources and results in long-term effectiveness. Compared with structure exercise, lifestyle physical activity might be one of the solutions. With the mobile technology and wearable technology becoming popular, mobile health (mHealth) emerges and has showed some preliminary effects on other population. The mHealth may be an innovative health promotion program for people with MI and deserves more research to examine the effectiveness.

Purpose: This study is (1) to examine the accuracy and acceptability of wearable technology in persons with MI; (2) to develop a physical activity promotion program by applying social cognitive theory and wearable technology and evaluate its feasibility in people with MI ; (3) to examine the effectiveness of the program on physical activity level and health outcomes ; and (4) to examine the moderators of the program's effectiveness.

Methods:

Stage I: completed (Accuracy, Acceptability, Feasibility) Stage II: (RCT) The investigators will conduct a single-blinded, randomized controlled study. 90 participants will be randomly assigned to experimental group or control group. The intervention for both groups will last for 12 weeks, with a 12-week of follow-up. The measurements include physical activity level, physical fitness, cognitive function and sleep quality, as well as the moderators of the effectiveness of program.

Contributions: The results of study will be one of the evidence-based health promotion programs for individuals with MI. With wearable technology and telecommunication technology, it makes possible to expand the health care services from traditional clinical settings to client's natural milieu, and to serve more people with MI by using less resources. The results of study may also form a much appreciated basis for future studies of mHealth on other heath behavior (e.g., healthy diet) or in other disability groups (e.g., stroke).

Being tested
Wearable technology, LINE group, Group activities, Health promotion manual
Keywords
Schizophrenia, Physical Activity, Health Promotion, Wearable Technology, Fitness Wristband, mobile health, mHealth
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia, Motor Activity, Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Wearable technologyDevice

    Fitness wristband \& APP

  • LINE groupBehavioural

    Promote social interaction

  • Group activitiesBehavioural

    Which was developed by applying social cognitive theory

  • Health promotion manualDevice

    Which was about general physical activity promotion content

Study groups in NCT03408327
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental groupExperimental1. Wearable technology (fitness wristband \& App) 2. 4 times group activities (2 hr / each times) 3. LINE group interaction 4. Reminder and feedback form researcher
Receives: Device: Wearable technology; Behavioral: LINE group; Behavioral: Group activities
Control groupActive comparator1. Wearable technology (fitness wristband + App) 2. Health promotion manual
Receives: Device: Wearable technology; Device: Health promotion manual

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Objective daily physical activity data

    Using the fitness wristband App to view the daily step counts.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Subjective daily physical activity data

    International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Taiwan(IPAQ-TW), it is a self-reported questionnaire to survey participants' physical activity data in pass 7 days. There are total seven questions to check the physical activity time in seven life domains, including work, housework, gardening, transportation , leisure, exercise and siting activity. After the survey, researcher will convert the data in to quantitative data in order to calculate participants' metabolic equivalent (MET·min).

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  2. Body composition

    Using Body Mass Index (BMI) as the measurement of body composition, which weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  3. Cardiorespiratory fitness

    Using 6-minute walk test (6MWT) as the measurement, which let the participant walk as far as possible over a total of six minutes on hard and flat floor. And researcher will measure the distance that participant walk in 6 minutes.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  4. Muscular strength

    Hand-grip dynamometer to test the muscular strength of upper limb.The participant holds the dynamometer in the hand to be tested, with the arm at right angles and the elbow by the side of the body. The units is in kg.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  5. Leg muscular strength and endurance

    Using 30-Second Sit to Stand Test. The participant will sit in the middle of the chair, and rise to a full standing position, then sit back down again. Repeat this for 30 seconds.And researcher will count the times.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  6. Balance and mobility

    The Timed Up and Go test (TUG). It measure the time that the participant takes to rise from a chair, walk eight foots, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  7. Attention and processing speed

    Symbol digit modalities test (SDMT), which makes the participant to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures as fast as possible in 90 seconds. The researcher will record the total, correct and wrong answer numbers.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  8. Verbal working memory

    Digit span test, which researcher will read a sequence of numerical digits, and the participant may to recall the sequence correctly. There are two part of this test, one is given forwards, other is backwards. these are in order to test the participant 's maximal memory span. Total scores is sum of forwards and backwards test, between 0 to 30.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  9. Cognitive flexibility

    Stroop color word test. In this test, the participant will read out the color of the word as fast as possible. Instead of read the word meaning. The scoring is the number of correct answer.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  10. Self-efficacy in exercise

    Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (SEES) is a self-report survey. It is used to evaluate the degree of participant's self-efficacy in exercise. There are total 9 descriptions, and participant will answer the degree of confidence (1-10 points). The scoring is used average as record, so the scale scores ranges is between 1 to 10. The higher values represent a better outcome.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  11. Attitude to exercise

    Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale (OEES) is a self-report survey. It is used to evaluate participant's attitude to exercise. There are total 9 descriptions, and participant will answer the degree of agreement. Statements are rated 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score is the sum of all nine items,so the scale scores ranges is between 9 to 45. The higher values represent a better outcome.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  12. Behavior of exercise goal setting

    Exercise Goal Setting Scale (EGS) is a self-report survey. It is used to evaluate participant's attitude to exercise. There are total 10 descriptions, and participant will answer the degree of agreement. Statements are rated 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). This scoring is used average as record, so the scale scores ranges is between 1 to 5. The higher values represent a better outcome.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  13. The situation encountered during exercise

    Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale (EBBS) is a self-report survey. It is used to evaluate 29 items of exercise benefits and 14 items of possible exercise barriers. There are total 43 descriptions, and participant will answer the degree of agreement. Statements are rated 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). When the Benefits Scale is used alone, the score range is between 29 and 116.The higher the score, the more positively the individual perceives exercise. On the other hand, when the Barriers Scale is used alone, scores range between 14 and 56. If used alone, the higher the score on the Barriers Scale, the greater the perception of barriers to exercise.

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

  14. The situation of social support

    Social Support and Exercise Survey (SSES) is a self-report survey. It is used to evaluate participant's exercise performance change from family and friends' influence. There are 13 items of behaviors that family or friends do during last 3 months, which might be benefits or barriers of participant exercise regularly, and participant will answer the degree of frequency. Statements are rated 1 (none) to 4 (very often).The survey should be scored differently for friends and family. Family Participation: sum items 1~6 and 10~13 (scores ranges is between 10 to 40. The higher values represent a better outcome.);Family Rewards and Punishment (an optional scale): sum items 7~9 (scores ranges is between 3 to 12. The lower values represent a better outcome.);Friend Participation: sum items 1~6 and 10~13 (scores ranges is between 10 to 40. The higher values represent a better outcome.).

    Measured: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jan 2018
  2. Study start16 Mar 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2020
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
We will conduct a single-blinded, randomized controlled study. Ninety participants will be randomly assigned to experimental group or control group. The intervention for both groups will last for 12 weeks, with a 12-week of follow-up.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03408327
Sponsor's protocol ID
KMUHIRB-SV(I)-20150091
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
1 Jan 2018
Last updated
6 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Wearable technology, LINE group and Group activities in people with Schizophrenia and Physical Activity, run by Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Objective daily physical activity data (time frame: Change from baseline outcome measure at 12 weeks (post-test),and at 24 weeks (follow-up test)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in