AzTrials
AzTrials

PregnancyNCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

A study testing Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol and Oral Misoprostol in people with Pregnancy and Labor, Induced, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Induction of labor is associated with increased cesarean delivery rates, particularly in women with an unfavorable cervix. Both pharmacologic and mechanical methods are utilized for cervical ripening and labor induction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Pregnancy, Labor, Induced
What is being tested?
Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol and Oral Misoprostol
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,227 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jan 2018to 13 May 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 37 weeks gestation or greater
  • Living, singleton fetus
  • No major fetal malformations
  • Cephalic presentation
  • No prior uterine scar
  • Intact fetal membranes
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Qualifies for prostaglandin administration according to current Parkland protocol
  • Have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os
  • Have an indication for induction or attempted induction of labor according to Parkland protocol

Who cannot join

  • latex allergy
  • non-reassuring fetal status
  • HIV
  • active herpes outbreak
  • Prior uterine scar
  • Contraindication to prostaglandins according to current Parkland protocol
  • Contraindication to vaginal delivery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Parkland Health and Hospital Systems

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Cluster Randomized Trial

Induction of labor is associated with increased cesarean delivery rates, particularly in women with an unfavorable cervix. Both pharmacologic and mechanical methods are utilized for cervical ripening and labor induction. Evidence on the safety and effectiveness of various mechanical and pharmacologic methods of cervical ripening and labor induction is abundant, and yet the majority of clinical trials evaluate time to delivery, rather than mode of delivery. This is a prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial to compare a standard method of induction at our institution (oral misoprostol) with an alternative, commonly used combination method of oral misoprostol and transcervical foley bulb in women with term pregnancies requiring induction of labor.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a transcervical foley catheter, in combination with the standard oral misoprostol regimen will result in a decreased primary cesarean delivery rate among women with a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters of less who require induction of labor at term. This study is not an FDA-regulated study: there is no intent to test the foley bulb under an FDA-regulated protocol. Likewise, there is no intent to submit the results of this study for a change in the labeling of the foley used for this study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and by the Office of Research Administration at Parkland Health and Hospital System.

This will be a prospective, cluster-randomized trial comparing two accepted methods of induction of labor at term among women who present for delivery at Parkland Hospital. Eligible participants will include nulliparous and multiparous women at 37 weeks gestation or greater, with a living, singleton fetus and no major fetal malformations, in cephalic presentation, with intact membranes, no prior uterine scar, who qualify for prostaglandin administration and who have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os. Patients with latex allergy, non-reassuring fetal status, HIV, active herpes outbreak, a prior uterine scar, or any contraindication to prostaglandins (including 4 or more painful contractions per 10 minutes prior to prostaglandin administration) will be excluded from participation in the study.

Computer-generated cluster randomization will occur on a weekly basis for all study participants, to either the combination method of foley bulb plus oral misoprostol regimen (study group) or to oral misoprostol alone regimen (control).

According to the randomization protocol each week, participants will be randomized to either the standard of care (oral misoprostol/control group) or standard of care plus foley bulb (study group). The study group will undergo placement of a 30 French foley catheter filled with 30-35cc sterile saline into the cervix in addition to the standard regimen of oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses, for patients who meet criteria for fetal well-being, and do not had more than 4 painful contractions in 10 minutes. Misoprostol will not be administered to patients who have progressed to active labor, defined as 4 centimeters cervical dilation. The control group will undergo induction with our current standard oral misoprostol protocol alone, administered as 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses. Both groups will receive oxytocin as indicated by current labor protocols at our institution.

The primary outcome will be the rate of vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes will include obstetric outcomes, maternal outcomes, and neonatal outcomes. Obstetric outcomes will include indication for induction, need for oxytocin, indication for cesarean delivery, time to active labor, time to delivery, labor analgesia, presence of chorioamnionitis, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, terbutaline use, tachysystole (defined as 6 or more contractions in 10 minutes or tetanic contraction of 120 seconds or longer) or hyperstimulation syndrome (defined as tachysystole accompanied by fetal heart rate decelerations). Maternal outcomes will include estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement, postpartum fever, uterine rupture, and unplanned hysterectomy. Neonatal outcomes will include umbilical cord blood pH, 5-minute APGAR score, intubation or ventilation in the delivery room, neonatal sepsis, and admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission.

Being tested
Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol, Oral Misoprostol
Keywords
Pregnancy, Labor Induction, Cervical Ripening

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Foley bulb plus Oral MisoprostolOther

    Although labeled "experimental" for comparison purposes, this is not an experimental intervention, as the method is a currently accepted standard of care for cervical ripening and labor induction in the United States.

  • Oral MisoprostolOther

    Patients will receive standard oral misoprostol 100mcg according to current Labor Induction Protocol.

Study groups in NCT03407625
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Foley bulb plus Oral MisoprostolExperimentalPatients will received initial transcervical foley bulb, followed by oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses.
Receives: Other: Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol
Oral MisoprostolActive comparatorPatients will receive oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses.
Receives: Other: Oral Misoprostol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Vaginal Delivery

    vaginal delivery at first induction

    Measured: at delivery

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Time to Delivery

    Time (in hours) from start of induction agent to delivery at first induction

    Measured: from start of induction agent to time of delivery

  2. Indication for Cesarean Delivery

    Among women delivered by cesarean, the indication for cesarean

    Measured: at delivery

  3. Dose of Oxytocin Given (mcg or mg)

    Total dose of oxytocin given for induction as calculated by volume infused, concentration of solution and rate of infusion

    Measured: at delivery

  4. Time With Foley Bulb in Place

    time (in hours) from insertion to removal or expulsion of foley bulb

    Measured: From time of documented insertion until the time of documented expulsion or removal, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 hours.

  5. Presence of Chorioamnionitis

    Intrapartum fever (temp equal or greater than 38C) with no other identified cause

    Measured: at delivery

  6. Use of Intravenous Analgesia During Labor

    Intravenous analgesia used between the start of induction and delivery

    Measured: at delivery

  7. Number of Participants Used Neuraxial Analgesia During Labor

    Regional or neuraxial analgesia (labor epidural or spinal) used between the start of induction and delivery

    Measured: from start of induction to delivery

  8. Number of Participants Used General Anesthesia for Delivery

    General anesthesia administered for delivery

    Measured: at delivery

  9. Number of Participants With Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid

    Identification of any meconium (green tinge) in the amniotic fluid before or during delivery by a healthcare provider's assessment of gross fluid color.

    Measured: At the time of rupture of membranes and at delivery

  10. Terbutaline Use

    Administration of terbutaline, a tocolytic agent, for tetanic contractions with or without fetal heart rate decelerations

    Measured: at delivery

  11. Number of Participants With Tachysystole

    6 or more contractions in 10 minutes or tetanic contraction of 120 seconds or longer

    Measured: at delivery

  12. Number of Participants With Uterine Hyperstimulation Syndrome

    Tachysystole accompanied by fetal heart rate decelerations

    Measured: at delivery

  13. Number of Participants With Excess Blood Loss

    Maternal excess blood loss is defined as >500ml for vaginal and >1000ml for cesarean delivery

    Measured: at delivery

  14. Number of Participants With Blood Transfusion

    administration of blood products related to delivery blood loss

    Measured: at delivery

  15. Number of Participants With Uterine Rupture

    spontaneous separation of myometrium in a previously intact, unscarred uterus

    Measured: at delivery

  16. Number of Participants With Unplanned Hysterectomy

    unplanned removal of the uterus following delivery of the fetus

    Measured: at discharge from the hospital following delivery

  17. Number of Participants With Postpartum Fever

    Fever recorded in the time after delivery but prior to discharge from the hospital, with clinical assessment of endometritis

    Measured: Following delivery and prior to discharge

  18. Number of Participants With Umbilical Cord Blood pH <7.0

    Arterial or venous cord blood pH defined as <7.0

    Measured: at delivery

  19. Number of Participants With an 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 4

    Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respirations - scored from 0 to 2 for each component, added to make a total score and used as an assessment of initial response to newborn resuscitation, lower scores associated with poor outcomes. Here defined as Apgar less than 4 at 5 minutes.

    Measured: 5 minutes after time of birth

  20. Number of Participants That Needed Mechanical Ventilation in Delivery Room (Yes/No)

    Intubation with mechanical support or control of neonatal breathing in delivery room

    Measured: at delivery

  21. Number of Participants Administered Neonatal Antibiotics and/or Neonatal Blood Cultures

    Administration of neonatal antibiotics and/or neonatal blood cultures

    Measured: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.

  22. Number of Participants With Neonatal Sepsis

    Neonatal bacteremia as defined by bacterial growth in blood cultures

    Measured: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.

  23. Number of Participants With NICU Admission Order

    Admission order to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) placed between the time of delivery and infant discharge

    Measured: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion13 May 2019
  4. Study completion13 May 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Cluster randomized trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,227 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03407625
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU 092016-026
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
28 Dec 2017
Last updated
4 Nov 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Adhikari EH, Nelson DB, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Foley Bulb Added to an Oral Misoprostol Induction Protocol: A Cluster Randomized Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;136(5):953-961. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004123.

    PubMed 33030881

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol and Oral Misoprostol in people with Pregnancy and Labor, Induced, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Nov 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Vaginal Delivery (time frame: at delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03407625, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in