CognitionNCT03397498
Computerized Cognitive Intervention in the Oldest-Old
A study testing CogniFit™ in people with Cognition and Dementia, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Little is known about preventive strategies with immediate public health impact for cognitive functioning in the oldest-old (OO). Cognitive training improves cognitive functioning in the young-old (YO; 60 to 84), yet has not been examined in the OO. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 80 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- CogniFit™
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 69 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Mar 2011to 16 Dec 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 80 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 80+
- Normal cognition by consensus conference, MMSE> 25th percentile norm, CDR=0
- Has computer with internet access that is capable of running the computerized cognitive training program.
- Willing to dedicate the necessary time to the project
Who cannot join
- Prior or current participation in another cognitive intervention study
- Medical disease that precludes consistent participation or that affects cognition
- Poor vision
- Poor hearing
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Jewish Home Lifecare
New York, New York, 10025
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinia
New York, New York, 10029
About this study
Official title: Computerized Cognitive Intervention in the Oldest-Old: A Feasibility Study
Little is known about preventive strategies with immediate public health impact for cognitive functioning in the oldest-old (OO). Cognitive training improves cognitive functioning in the young-old (YO; 60 to 84), yet has not been examined in the OO.
Clinical trials are needed to determine if computerized cognitive training is effective at preventing or delaying cognitive decline in the OO. In order to develop such trials, information regarding use of computers and internet by the OO, and the ability and interest in such a program, must be determined.
Read more
This study will examine the effects of a computerized cognitive training program, CogniFit™, with a "classic" computerized games program, on cognitive functioning in cognitively healthy OO subjects. Information regarding use of computers and internet by the OO will be collected. Interest in and ability to complete a computerized cognitive training program will be examined, along with the cognitive, demographic, biological, and lifestyle characteristics related to this interest and ability.
Efficacy of the CogniFit™ and games programs will be assessed immediately following the training and four months after completing the training. The researchers expect that those who use the CogniFit™ program will have greater improvements than those using the games program. Finally, the participants' characteristics related to the efficacy of the programs will be examined.
Subjects recruited for this project will include those already participating in several studies of aging and cognition at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Recruiting from this pool of subjects will provide this program with baseline information regarding numerous subject characteristics, including cognition, family history, lifestyle, and cardiovascular information.
This study will inform future large-scale clinical trials of computerized cognitive training programs in the elderly, as well as provide information regarding the efficacy of such training in the OO. In addition, the study will identify characteristics affecting efficacy of computerized training, and thus, may suggest mechanisms through which cognitive training improves cognitive functioning in the most senior citizens of our society.
Read the detailed description
Specific Aim 1- To estimate, in cognitively normal OO, rates of 1) computer and internet use, 2) willingness to participate in a computerized cognitive training program, 3) ability to comply with the program to its completion.
Specific Aim 1a- To explore the relationships of baseline global cognition, sociodemographic, ADL/IADL, lifestyle, and biological characteristics with willingness to participate in, and with completion of a computerized cognitive training program.
Specific aim 2 - To compare the effectiveness of the CogniFit. and games programs 2 months after initiation of the intervention (corresponding to the time to complete the intervention).
Specific aim 2a - To compare the effectiveness of the CogniFit. and games programs 6 months after initiation of intervention Specific aim 3- To explore the relevance of the wide range of already available sociodemographic, lifestyle, ADL/IADL, and biological characteristics of subjects with the differential effectiveness of the programs.
Results of this study will provide essential information for planning a large-scale trial of computerized cognitive training program for the OO.
The current lack of disease modifying treatment to delay onset of slow progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD), and the robust epidemiologic evidence suggesting modifiable protective life-style factors (eg. cognitive and physical activity have led to particular interest in life-style interventions that delay the onset or slow the progression of cognitive decline.
- Being tested
- CogniFit™, Control-games
- Keywords
- computerized cognitive training
- Medical subject headings
- Dementia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CogniFit™Behavioural
Also called Computerized cognitive training program
The program utilizes 21 tasks, which may develop 14 cognitive domains: awareness, inhibition, spatial perception, visual short term memory, working memory, hand-eye coordination, visual scanning, response time, divided attention, time estimation, visual perception, shifting, naming, and planning.
Control-gamesBehavioural
Also called Computerized games program
The program utilizes classic computer games, which may develop cognitive domains. Games will be used over 8 weeks. The participants will use the program 3 days a week, with one rest day between each session. Each session lasts approximately 20 minutes. The participant will use the program for a total number of 24 sessions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Computerized cognitive training | Experimental | Received the Computerized cognitive training program, CogniFit™ Receives: Behavioral: CogniFit™ |
| Control-games | Active comparator | Received the Computerized games program Receives: Behavioral: Control-games |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Global Cognition Composite
Memory, Immediate recall; Word List Memory, Delayed recall; Word List Memory, Recognition; Logical Memory Story A, Immediate recall; Logical Memory Story A, Delayed recall; Logical Memory Story A, Recognition, Target Cancellation Tests (diamond and TMX); Trail Making Test (Parts A and B); Digit Symbol Substitution Test; Digit Span tests (Forward and Backward), Similarities; Boston Naming Test; and Category Fluency and Letter Fluency tests at completion of program as compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in Memory Function
A 10-item word list is presented over 3 trials (at the rate of 1 every 2 seconds) with a different word order each trial. The participant reads each word aloud as it is presented and then asked to recall as many words as possible. The range is 0 - 10 for each trial, with a Trial Total of 30. After a short delay the participant is asked to recall as many of the 10 words as they can. Word List Recognition: Immediately after the Delayed Recall task, the participant is asked to identify the 10 words from the list of target words and ten distractor words. There is a max of 10 correct 'Yes' responses and 10 correct 'No' responses. To adjust for chance, the score is calculated as the total number of correct answers minus 10. A Savings score is calculated to reflect the ability to recall learned information after a delay; this score is obtained by dividing the number of words recalled after the delay by the total number correct on Trial 3 and compared at completion of program to baseline.
Measured: Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Change in Logical Memory Story A
The LM subtest of the WMS-R is a standardized assessment of narrative episodic memory. A short story is orally presented, and the examinee is asked to recall the story verbatim (immediate recall). Approximately 20 or 30 min later, free recall of the story is again elicited (delayed recall). at completion of program as compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Change in Attention/Executive function score
Attention/Executive function score - composite of Target Cancellation Tests (diamond and TMX); Trail Making Test (Parts A and B); Digit Symbol Substitution Test; and Digit Span tests (Forward and Backward) at completion of program as compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Change in Language function score
Language function score - composite of Similarities; Boston Naming Test; and Category Fluency and Letter Fluency tests at completion of program as compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jan 2018
- Study start10 Mar 2011
- Primary completion16 Dec 2014
- Study completion16 Dec 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CognitionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michal Schnaider-Beeri, PhD, Principal investigator, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03397498
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GCO 09-2339
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 12 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Computerized Cognitive Intervention in the Oldest-Old: A Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03397498
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GCO 09-2339
- Keywords
- computerized cognitive training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Mar 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Little is known about preventive strategies with immediate public health impact for cognitive functioning in the oldest-old (OO). Cognitive training improves cognitive functioning in the young-old (YO; 60 to 84), yet has not been examined in the OO.
Clinical trials are needed to determine if computerized cognitive training is effective at preventing or delaying cognitive decline in the OO. In order to develop such trials, information regarding use of computers and internet by the OO, and the ability and interest in such a program, must be determined.
This study will examine the effects of a computerized cognitive training program, CogniFit™, with a "classic" computerized games program, on cognitive functioning in cognitively healthy OO subjects. Information regarding use of computers and internet by the OO will be collected. Interest in and ability to complete a computerized cognitive training program will be examined, along with the cognitive, demographic, biological, and lifestyle characteristics related to this interest and ability.
Efficacy of the CogniFit™ and games programs will be assessed immediately following the training and four months after completing the training. The researchers expect that those who use the CogniFit™ program will have greater improvements than those using the games program. Finally, the participants' characteristics related to the efficacy of the programs will be examined.
Subjects recruited for this project will include those already participating in several studies of aging and cognition at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Recruiting from this pool of subjects will provide this program with baseline information regarding numerous subject characteristics, including cognition, family history, lifestyle, and cardiovascular information.
This study will inform future large-scale clinical trials of computerized cognitive training programs in the elderly, as well as provide information regarding the efficacy of such training in the OO. In addition, the study will identify characteristics affecting efficacy of computerized training, and thus, may suggest mechanisms through which cognitive training improves cognitive functioning in the most senior citizens of our society.
Detailed description
Specific Aim 1- To estimate, in cognitively normal OO, rates of 1) computer and internet use, 2) willingness to participate in a computerized cognitive training program, 3) ability to comply with the program to its completion.
Specific Aim 1a- To explore the relationships of baseline global cognition, sociodemographic, ADL/IADL, lifestyle, and biological characteristics with willingness to participate in, and with completion of a computerized cognitive training program.
Specific aim 2 - To compare the effectiveness of the CogniFit. and games programs 2 months after initiation of the intervention (corresponding to the time to complete the intervention).
Specific aim 2a - To compare the effectiveness of the CogniFit. and games programs 6 months after initiation of intervention Specific aim 3- To explore the relevance of the wide range of already available sociodemographic, lifestyle, ADL/IADL, and biological characteristics of subjects with the differential effectiveness of the programs.
Results of this study will provide essential information for planning a large-scale trial of computerized cognitive training program for the OO.
The current lack of disease modifying treatment to delay onset of slow progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD), and the robust epidemiologic evidence suggesting modifiable protective life-style factors (eg. cognitive and physical activity have led to particular interest in life-style interventions that delay the onset or slow the progression of cognitive decline.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Computerized cognitive training | Experimental | Behavioral: CogniFit™Received the Computerized cognitive training program, CogniFit™ |
| Control-games | Active comparator | Behavioral: Control-gamesReceived the Computerized games program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 80 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 80+
- Normal cognition by consensus conference, MMSE> 25th percentile norm, CDR=0
- Has computer with internet access that is capable of running the computerized cognitive training program.
- Willing to dedicate the necessary time to the project
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Prior or current participation in another cognitive intervention study
- Medical disease that precludes consistent participation or that affects cognition
- Poor vision
- Poor hearing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CogniFit™Also: Computerized cognitive training programThe program utilizes 21 tasks, which may develop 14 cognitive domains: awareness, inhibition, spatial perception, visual short term memory, working memory, hand-eye coordination, visual scanning, response time, divided attention, time estimation, visual perception, shifting, naming, and planning. | Behavioural | Computerized cognitive training |
| Control-gamesAlso: Computerized games programThe program utilizes classic computer games, which may develop cognitive domains. Games will be used over 8 weeks. The participants will use the program 3 days a week, with one rest day between each session. Each session lasts approximately 20 minutes. The participant will use the program for a total number of 24 sessions. | Behavioural | Control-games |
Primary outcome
Change in Global Cognition Composite
Time frame: Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Memory, Immediate recall; Word List Memory, Delayed recall; Word List Memory, Recognition; Logical Memory Story A, Immediate recall; Logical Memory Story A, Delayed recall; Logical Memory Story A, Recognition, Target Cancellation Tests (diamond and TMX); Trail Making Test (Parts A and B); Digit Symbol Substitution Test; Digit Span tests (Forward and Backward), Similarities; Boston Naming Test; and Category Fluency and Letter Fluency tests at completion of program as compared to baseline.
4 secondary outcomes
Change in Memory Function
Time frame: Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Change in Logical Memory Story A
Time frame: Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Change in Attention/Executive function score
Time frame: Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Change in Language function score
Time frame: Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jan 2018.
Related trials for Cognition
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Effects of Ciprofol on Perioperative Neurocognitive Function in Elderly Patients Undergoing Daytime Surgery
PND, POCD - Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction
Recruiting
The Effects of Successful OSA Treatment on Memory and AD Biomarkers in Older Adults Study
Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Cognitive Decline
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Stroke and Cognitive Impairment in Moyamoya Disease and Moyamoya Syndrome
Moyamoya Disease, Moyamoya Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Health, Imaging, and Cognition Across the Menopausal Transition
Menopause
Recruiting
The Efficacy of an IADL-based Non-immersive Virtual Reality Training Program to Enhance ADL Performance and Cognitive Function for Persons at Risk of Dementia
Cognitive Enhancement, Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michal Schnaider-Beeri, PhD principal investigator
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CogniFit™ in people with Cognition and Dementia, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Global Cognition Composite (time frame: Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2018.