AzTrials
AzTrials

Dry Eye SyndromeNCT03396913

Effectiveness of Intense Pulsed Light for Improving Dry Eye Syndrome

A study testing IPL and MGX in people with Dry Eye Syndrome, run by Lumenis Be Ltd. at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the current study is to examine the contribution of intense pulsed light (IPL) for relieving signs and symptoms of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction. The effect of IPL will be examined in a study designed as a randomized controlled trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Dry Eye Syndrome
What is being tested?
IPL and MGX
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
88 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
10 Jan 2018to 15 Aug 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is able to read, understand and sign an Informed Consent (IC) form
  • 22-85 years of age
  • Subject is able and willing to comply with the treatment/follow-up (FU) schedule and requirements
  • In the study eye, Tear Breakup time (TBUT) ≤ 7 seconds
  • In the study eye, Meibomian Gland Score (MGS) ≤ 12
  • In the study eye, at least 5 non-atrophied meibomian glands in the lower eyelid
  • Symptoms self-assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire ≥ 23

Who cannot join

  • Fitzpatrick skin type V or VI
  • Contact lens wear within the month prior to screening
  • Unwilling to discontinue use of contact lenses for the duration of the study
  • Ocular surgery or eyelid surgery, within 6 months prior to screening
  • Neuro-paralysis in the planned treatment area, within 6 months prior to screening
  • Other uncontrolled eye disorders affecting the ocular surface, for example active allergies
Show all 33Show fewer
  • Current use of punctal plugs
  • Pre-cancerous lesions, skin cancer or pigmented lesions in the planned treatment area
  • Uncontrolled infections or uncontrolled immunosuppressive diseases
  • Subjects with ocular infections, within 6 months prior to screening
  • Prior history of cold sores or rashes in the perioral area or in the planned treatment area that could be stimulated by light at a wavelength of 560 nm to 1200 nm, including: Herpes simplex 1 \& 2, Systemic Lupus erythematosus, and porphyria
  • Within 3 months prior to screening, use of photosensitive medication and/or herbs that may cause sensitivity to 560-1200 nm light exposure, including: Isotretinoin, Tetracycline, Doxycycline, and St. John's Wort
  • Over exposure to sun, within 4 weeks prior to screening
  • Use of prescription eye drops for dry eye, within 7 days prior to screening, excluding artificial tears and glaucoma drops
  • Radiation therapy to the head or neck, within 12 months prior to screening
  • Planned radiation therapy, within 8 weeks after the last treatment session
  • Treatment with chemotherapeutic agent, within 8 weeks prior to screening
  • Planned chemotherapy, within 8 weeks after the last treatment session
  • New topical treatments within the area to be treated, or oral therapies, within 3 months prior to screening- except over-the-counter acetaminophen-based analgesics for pain management, new oral omega 3 fatty acid supplements and topical artificial tears
  • Change in dosage of any systemic medication, within 3 months prior to screening
  • Anticipated relocation or extensive travel outside of the local study area preventing compliance with follow-up over the study period
  • Legally blind in either eye
  • History of migraines, seizures or epilepsy
  • Facial IPL treatment, within 12 months prior to screening
  • Any thermal treatment of the eyelids, including Lipiflow, within 6 months prior to screening
  • Expression of the meibomian glands, within 6 months prior to screening
  • In either eye, moderate to severe (Grade 3-4) inflammation of the conjunctiva, including: allergic, vernal or giant papillary conjunctivitis
  • In either eye, severe (Grade 4) inflammation of the eyelid, including: blepharochalasis, staphylococcal blepharitis or seborrheic blepharitis
  • Ocular surface abnormality that may compromise corneal integrity in either eye (e.g., prior chemical burn, recurrent corneal erosion, corneal epithelial defect, Grade 3 corneal fluorescein staining, or map dot fingerprint dystrophy)
  • Eyelid abnormalities that affect lid function in either eye, including: entropion, ectropion, tumor, edema, blepharospasm, lagophthalmos, severe trichiasis, and severe ptosis
  • Any systemic condition that may cause dry eye disease, including: Stevens-Johnson syndrome, vitamin A deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis, Wegener's granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, leukemia, Riley-Day syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, and Sjögren's syndrome
  • Unwilling or unable to abstain from the use of medications known to cause dryness (e.g., isotretinoin, antihistamines) throughout the study duration. Subjects must discontinue these medications for at least 1 month prior to the baseline visit.
  • Any condition revealed whereby the investigator deems the subject inappropriate for this study

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Dell Laser Consultants

    Austin, Texas, 78746

  • Toyos Clinic

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37215

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Intense Pulsed Light for Improving Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

The aim of the current study is to examine the contribution of intense pulsed light (IPL) for relieving signs and symptoms of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction. The effect of IPL will be examined in a study designed as a randomized controlled trial. In the study arm, subjects will undergo 4 treatment sessions, consisting of IPL pulses immediately followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX). In the control arm, subjects will undergo the same treatments, except that the IPL pulses will be disabled. For each subject, the duration of the study will be 10 weeks, as explained in the detailed description.

Read the detailed description

Outcome measures (tear break-up time,meibography, self-assessed symptoms and close up photos of the lid margins) will be measured at baseline. All subjects will receive 4 treatments at 2 weeks intervals. In each treatment session, a subject allocated to the study group will be treated with intense pulsed light (IPL) administered in the malar region, from tragus to tragus including the nose, 2-3 mm below the lower eyelids. Immediately following the IPL administration, the subject will undergo meibomian gland expression (MGX) in both eyelids of both eyes. Subjects in the control arm will receive exactly the same treatment, except that the IPL administration will be sham. A single follow-up will occur at 10 weeks after the baseline (or 4 weeks after the 4th treatment session). At the follow-up, the changes in the outcome measures will be evaluated, and compared between the two arms.

For each subject, the duration of the study will be 10 weeks: 1st treatment at baseline; 2nd treatment at 2 weeks after baseline; 3rd treatment at 4 weeks after baseline; 4th treatment at 6 weeks after baseline; and a single follow-up at 10 weeks after baseline).

Statistically significant differences between the two arms will support the study hypothesis that IPL treatment itself provides relief to both signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.

Being tested
IPL, Sham IPL, MGX
Keywords
Intense Pulsed Light, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Disease
Medical subject headings
Dry Eye Syndromes, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IPLDevice

    Intense pulsed light (IPL) is a non-invasive and non-laser light treatment that is FDA-approved for various conditions in dermatology. Subjects will receive a total of 4 IPL treatments over the course of the study, at intervals of 2 weeks. Each treatment will include applications of 10-15 IPL pulses in the malar region and close to the lower eyelids, followed by meibomian gland expression.

  • Sham IPLDevice

    Sham intense pulsed light (IPL) will be implemented with an IPL device in which all light is blocked by a filter. Subjects will receive a total of 4 sham treatments over the course of the study, at intervals of 2 weeks. Each treatment will include applications of10-15 sham pulses in the malar region and close to the lower eyelids, followed by meibomian gland expression.

  • MGXProcedure or surgery

    Meibomian gland expression (MGX) will be implemented by squeezing the meibomian glands with the aid of two Q-tips positioned on either side of the meibomian glands, or with a meibomian gland expressor forceps

Study groups in NCT03396913
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IPL followed by Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX)ExperimentalSubjects in the experimental arm with receive IPL followed by MGX: IPL pulses will be administered on the skin of the malar region (both cheeks, from tragus to tragus including the nose) and below the lower eyelids. Following IPL therapy, subjects will undergo MGX of both eyelids in both eyes.
Receives: Device: IPL; Procedure: MGX
Sham IPL followed by MGXSham comparatorSubjects in the sham comparator arm with receive Sham IPL followed by MGX: Sham IPL pulses will be administered on the skin of the malar region (both cheeks, from tragus to tragus including the nose) and below the lower eyelids. Following Sham IPL therapy, subjects will undergo MGX of both eyelids in both eyes.
Receives: Device: Sham IPL; Procedure: MGX

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change of Baseline Tear Breakup Time (TBUT)

    Change of Tear breakup time (TBUT) in the study eye, from baseline to follow-up. TBUT is measured in seconds. Higher values mean better outcome.

    Measured: 10 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change From Baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)

    Change of self-assessed symptoms with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, from baseline to follow-up. OSDI was collected per patient (one number per patient). The minimal number is 0 and the maximal number is 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome. A score of 0-12 is considered normal. A score of 13-22 is consistent with mild dry eye. A score of 23 to 32 is consistent with moderate dry eye. A score from 33 to 100 is consistent with severe dry eye.

    Measured: 10 weeks

  2. Change From Baseline Eye Dryness Score (EDS)

    Change of self-assessed symptoms on a visual analog scale (VAS) , from baseline to follow-up, in both eyes. Values were collected separately for each eye. Correlation between eyes was removed by statistical methods. Scores were 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Higher scores = worse outcome. VAS scores are not validated for dry eye. Hence, it is not known how to correlate VAS values to severity levels of dry eye. However, one can make estimations from the literature of VAS in other conditions. For example, in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, in a VAS scale of 0 to 10 scores below 3.4 corresponded to mild pain, scores between 3.5 and 7.4 corresponded to moderate pain, and scores above 7.5 corresponded to severe pain. Using such results from other conditions, it is *estimated* that values between 0 and 34 correspond to mild symptoms, scores between 35 and 74 correspond to moderate symptoms, and scores above 75 correspond to severe symptoms.

    Measured: 10 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jan 2018
  2. Study start10 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion15 Aug 2019
  4. Study completion15 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to a study arm and a control arm. Subjects in the study arm will be treated with IPL and meibomian gland expression. Subjects in the control arm will be treated with sham and meibomian gland expression.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
88 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03396913
Sponsor's protocol ID
LUM-VBU-M22-IPL-17-01
Status last verified
Sep 2020
First submitted
28 Dec 2017
Last updated
9 Dec 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing IPL and MGX in people with Dry Eye Syndrome, run by Lumenis Be Ltd. at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 33 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change of Baseline Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) (time frame: 10 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in