Neovascular Age-related Macular DegenerationPhase 3NCT03386474
Study of Safety and Efficacy of Brolucizumab 6 mg Drug Product Intended for Commercialization in Patients With nAMD
A Phase 3 study testing Brolucizumab 6 mg and Aflibercept 2 mg in people with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 65 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this extension study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the new formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg ophthalmic solution when given to the same patients who received brolucizumab in the core trial CRTH258A2301 (also known as CRTH258-C002). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- Brolucizumab 6 mg and Aflibercept 2 mg
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 151 participants
- Where
- 65 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2018to 6 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Sign written informed consent
- Completed the core study, CRTH258A2301, also known as CRTH258-C002 as defined by assessments at Visit 26/Week 96 within ≤12 weeks of the baseline.
Who cannot join
- Patient discontinued the treatment or the core study prematurely at any time
- Patient received standard of care treatment for nAMD after completion of the core study
- Pregnant or nursing women and women of child-bearing potential
- Stroke or MI (myocardial infarction) within 3 months of the baseline extension visit
Trial locations and contacts
65 sites in 2 countries.
65 sites in 2 countries
United States63 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Abilene, Texas, 79606
Novartis Investigative Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Novartis Investigative Site
Altamonte Springs, Florida, 32701
Novartis Investigative Site
Arcadia, California, 91006
Novartis Investigative Site
Austin, Texas, 78731
Novartis Investigative Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237-4350
Novartis Investigative Site
Bloomington, Illinois, 61704
Novartis Investigative Site
Boise, Idaho, 83713
Novartis Investigative Site
Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06606
Novartis Investigative Site
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, 17011
Novartis Investigative Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Novartis Investigative Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
Novartis Investigative Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Novartis Investigative Site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
Novartis Investigative Site
Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33064
Novartis Investigative Site
Dublin, Ohio, 43016
Novartis Investigative Site
Fairfield, Ohio, 45014
Novartis Investigative Site
Fort Myers, Florida, 33912-7125
Novartis Investigative Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Novartis Investigative Site
Golden, Colorado, 80401
Novartis Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, 77025
Novartis Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Novartis Investigative Site
Huntington Beach, California, 92647
Novartis Investigative Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46280
Novartis Investigative Site
La Jolla, California, 92093
Novartis Investigative Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89144
Novartis Investigative Site
Leawood, Kansas, 66211
Novartis Investigative Site
Loma Linda, California, 92354
Novartis Investigative Site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Novartis Investigative Site
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Novartis Investigative Site
Mountain View, California, 94040
Novartis Investigative Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Novartis Investigative Site
New London, Connecticut, 06320
Novartis Investigative Site
Oakland, California, 94609
Novartis Investigative Site
Ocala, Florida, 34474
Novartis Investigative Site
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33410
Novartis Investigative Site
Pensacola, Florida, 32503
Novartis Investigative Site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
Novartis Investigative Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85014
Novartis Investigative Site
Plano, Texas, 75093
Novartis Investigative Site
Portland, Maine, 04102
Novartis Investigative Site
Redlands, California, 92374
Novartis Investigative Site
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Novartis Investigative Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23235
Novartis Investigative Site
Rochester, New York, 14620
Novartis Investigative Site
Rochester, New York, 14642
Novartis Investigative Site
Sacramento, California, 95841
Novartis Investigative Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
Novartis Investigative Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78240
Novartis Investigative Site
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Novartis Investigative Site
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66204
Novartis Investigative Site
Shirley, New York, 11967
Novartis Investigative Site
Silverdale, Washington, 98383
Novartis Investigative Site
Southern Pines, North Carolina, 28387
Novartis Investigative Site
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Novartis Investigative Site
Syracuse, New York, 13224
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Novartis Investigative Site
Toms River, New Jersey, 08755
Novartis Investigative Site
University Place, Washington, 98467
Novartis Investigative Site
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960
Novartis Investigative Site
Waldorf, Maryland, 20602
Novartis Investigative Site
Warrenton, Virginia, 20186
Novartis Investigative Site
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880
Puerto Rico2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Arecibo, 00612
Novartis Investigative Site
San Juan, 00907
About this study
Official title: A 24-week, Double-masked, Multicenter, Two-arm Extension Study to Collect Safety and Efficacy Data on Brolucizumab 6 mg Drug Product Intended for Commercialization in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration Who Have Completed the CRTH258A2301 Study
The purpose of this extension study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the new formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg ophthalmic solution when given to the same patients who received brolucizumab in the core trial CRTH258A2301 (also known as CRTH258-C002). The medical condition treated in the core and extension trials was neo-vascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
Read the detailed description
Subjects in the United States who had completed the 96 week core trial, CRTH258A2301 (also referred as CRTH258-C002), were eligible to participate in the extension trial provided the core trial Visit 26 at week 96, was less than or equal to 12 weeks from the Baseline Visit in the extension trial, CRTH258A2301E1.
Subjects who were treated with aflibercept during the core trial and met the eligibility requirements of this extension trial continued to receive aflibercept in this extension trial in order to maintain the masking during the extension trial. No hypothesis testing or descriptive analyses were planned.
Subjects who were treated in the core trial with brolucizumab 3mg or brolucizumab 6 mg, and met the eligibility requirements of this extension trial, received the new formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg solution in the extension trial.
Enrolled subjects were to receive three intravitreal (IVT) ophthalmic injections. The study eye was the same eye that received the treatment in the core study. The extension trial consisted of 7 study visits at 4 week intervals over a period of 24 weeks.
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab 6 mg was based on a within-patient comparison with the last 6 months of corresponding core-study efficacy and safety data serving as the reference. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned.
- Being tested
- Brolucizumab 6 mg, Aflibercept 2 mg
- Keywords
- double-masked, extension study, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, intravitreal injection, brolucizumab, aflibercept
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brolucizumab 6 mgDrug
Also called RTH258
Administered as opthalmic solution for an intravitreal injection to the study eye
Aflibercept 2 mgDrug
Also called EYELEA
Administered as an opthalmic solution for intravitreal injection to the study eye
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Brolucizumab | Experimental | Brolucizumab 6 mg solution for IVT injection, single injection at Day 1 (baseline), Week 8, and Week 16 or Week 20 Receives: Drug: Brolucizumab 6 mg |
| Aflibercept | Other | Aflibercept 2 mg solution for IVT injection, single injection at Day 1 (baseline), Week 8 and Week 16 to maintain the masking of the extension trial only. Receives: Drug: Aflibercept 2 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Ocular and Non-Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
Number of participants with ocular and non-ocular treatment emergent events with the new formulation brolucizumab 6 mg in this extension trial up to week 24 vs. the corresponding last 6 months of brolucizumab treatment in the Core trial >= 2%. Safety assessment of the new formulation brolucizumab 6 mg was based on a within-patient comparison with the last 6 months of corresponding Core safety data. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Measured: Up to Week 24
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change of Loss in BCVA of 15 Letters or More From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit
Best-corrected visual acuity for the study eye was tested at all study visits in a sitting position using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing protocol at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Measured: Extension Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24
Change in BCVA From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit
Best-corrected visual acuity for the study eye was tested at all study visits in a sitting position using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing protocol at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Measured: Extension baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24
Patients With Positive q12w Treatment Status at Week 20
The estimate for the proportion of patients with a positive q12w treatment status at Week 24 was derived from Kaplan Meier time-to-event analyses for the event 'first q8w-need'. The outcome of the Kaplan-Meier analysis was estimated probability for maintaining on q12w up to the Disease Activity Assessment (DAA) at exWeek 20. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Measured: Week 20
Change in Central Sub-Field Thickness (CSFT) From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit
Measurement of the central subfield thickness of the retina was assessed using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at each visit for the study eye. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Measured: Extension Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24
Percentage of Subjects With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status for Brolucuzumab 6 mg in Extension
Positive integrated anti-drug antibodies (ADA) status is defined as induced ADA status with ADA negative at pre-dose and a post-dose titer value of greater than or equal to 30 at any time point or boosted ADA status with ADA positive at pre-dose and a post-dose titer value increase by more than 3-fold (1 dilution) at any time point. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Measured: Extension Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Dec 2017
- Study start15 Jan 2018
- Primary completion6 Sep 2018
- Study completion6 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Neovascular Age-related Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 151 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03386474
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRTH258A2301E1
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 24-week, Double-masked, Multicenter, Two-arm Extension Study to Collect Safety and Efficacy Data on Brolucizumab 6 mg Drug Product Intended for Commercialization in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration Who Have Completed the CRTH258A2301 Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03386474
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRTH258A2301E1
- Keywords
- double-masked, extension study, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, intravitreal injection, brolucizumab, aflibercept
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 151 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 30 Apr 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this extension study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the new formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg ophthalmic solution when given to the same patients who received brolucizumab in the core trial CRTH258A2301 (also known as CRTH258-C002). The medical condition treated in the core and extension trials was neo-vascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
Detailed description
Subjects in the United States who had completed the 96 week core trial, CRTH258A2301 (also referred as CRTH258-C002), were eligible to participate in the extension trial provided the core trial Visit 26 at week 96, was less than or equal to 12 weeks from the Baseline Visit in the extension trial, CRTH258A2301E1.
Subjects who were treated with aflibercept during the core trial and met the eligibility requirements of this extension trial continued to receive aflibercept in this extension trial in order to maintain the masking during the extension trial. No hypothesis testing or descriptive analyses were planned.
Subjects who were treated in the core trial with brolucizumab 3mg or brolucizumab 6 mg, and met the eligibility requirements of this extension trial, received the new formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg solution in the extension trial.
Enrolled subjects were to receive three intravitreal (IVT) ophthalmic injections. The study eye was the same eye that received the treatment in the core study. The extension trial consisted of 7 study visits at 4 week intervals over a period of 24 weeks.
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab 6 mg was based on a within-patient comparison with the last 6 months of corresponding core-study efficacy and safety data serving as the reference. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Brolucizumab | Experimental | Drug: Brolucizumab 6 mgBrolucizumab 6 mg solution for IVT injection, single injection at Day 1 (baseline), Week 8, and Week 16 or Week 20 |
| Aflibercept | Other | Drug: Aflibercept 2 mgAflibercept 2 mg solution for IVT injection, single injection at Day 1 (baseline), Week 8 and Week 16 to maintain the masking of the extension trial only. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Sign written informed consent
- Completed the core study, CRTH258A2301, also known as CRTH258-C002 as defined by assessments at Visit 26/Week 96 within ≤12 weeks of the baseline.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient discontinued the treatment or the core study prematurely at any time
- Patient received standard of care treatment for nAMD after completion of the core study
- Pregnant or nursing women and women of child-bearing potential
- Stroke or MI (myocardial infarction) within 3 months of the baseline extension visit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brolucizumab 6 mgAlso: RTH258Administered as opthalmic solution for an intravitreal injection to the study eye | Drug | Brolucizumab |
| Aflibercept 2 mgAlso: EYELEAAdministered as an opthalmic solution for intravitreal injection to the study eye | Drug | Aflibercept |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Ocular and Non-Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of participants with ocular and non-ocular treatment emergent events with the new formulation brolucizumab 6 mg in this extension trial up to week 24 vs. the corresponding last 6 months of brolucizumab treatment in the Core trial >= 2%. Safety assessment of the new formulation brolucizumab 6 mg was based on a within-patient comparison with the last 6 months of corresponding Core safety data. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
5 secondary outcomes
Change of Loss in BCVA of 15 Letters or More From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit
Time frame: Extension Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24
Change in BCVA From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit
Time frame: Extension baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24
Patients With Positive q12w Treatment Status at Week 20
Time frame: Week 20
Change in Central Sub-Field Thickness (CSFT) From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit
Time frame: Extension Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24
Percentage of Subjects With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status for Brolucuzumab 6 mg in Extension
Time frame: Extension Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on novartisclinicatrials.comLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of 36-Week Refill Exchanges of Port Delivery System (PDS) With Ranibizumab in nAMD
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase 1/2 Study of VOY-101 in Patients With Advanced Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tarcocimab Tedromer and Tabirafusp Tedromer Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD) - DAYBREAK
Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VIS-101 in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration(nAMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
65 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Brolucizumab 6 mg and Aflibercept 2 mg in people with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 65 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 65 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Apr 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Ocular and Non-Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (time frame: Up to Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2021.