AzTrials
AzTrials

Physical ActivityNCT03384550

Can a Smartphone App That Includes a Chatbot-based Coaching and Incentives Increase Physical Activity in Healthy Adults?

A study testing Self-regulation coaching, Planning and Financial Incentives in people with Physical Activity, run by University of St.Gallen at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators conduct a micro-randomized trial to test main effects and moderators of three different intervention components of Ally, a mHealth intervention to promote physical activity that is offered to customers of a large Swiss health insurance. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Physical Activity
What is being tested?
Self-regulation coaching, Planning and Financial Incentives
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
274 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
24 Oct 2017to 31 Jan 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Possession of iPhone (5s or newer) or Android smartphone (Android 4.0 or higher)

Who cannot join

  • not enrolled in a complementary health insurance plan
  • actively using an activity tracker or comparable smartphone app
  • working night shifts
  • presence of medical condition(s) that prohibit increased levels of physical activity

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Center for Digital Health Interventions

    Sankt Gallen, 9000

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Investigating Different Intervention Components of a Smartphone App to Promote Physical Activity: The ALLY Micro-Randomized Trial

The investigators conduct a micro-randomized trial to test main effects and moderators of three different intervention components of Ally, a mHealth intervention to promote physical activity that is offered to customers of a large Swiss health insurance. Interventions include the use of different incentive strategies, a weekly planning intervention and daily message prompts to support self-regulation. The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) as well as principles from behavioral economics were used to guide the development of interventions. Further, sensor data is collected in order to enable prediction of latent contextual variables. These data can be used to build prediction models for the user's state of receptivity, i.e. points in time where the user is able and/or willing to receive, process and utilize the support provided. The results of this study enable the evidence-based development of a just-in-time adaptive intervention for physical activity.

Read the detailed description

Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) have recently been proposed as framework for health interventions that exploit the potential of mobile health information and sensing technologies. By obtaining contextual information for example from smartphone sensors (e.g. location, time of day), a JITAI adapts the provision of interventions over time with the goal to deliver support when the person needs it most (state of vulnerability) and is most likely to be receptive (state of receptivity).

To facilitate the development of a JITAI for physical activity, the present study has the following objectives:

  1. To quantify main effects and interactions of three intervention components of Ally, a mHealth intervention for physical activity.
  2. To identify moderators for these intervention components to formulate evidence-based decision rules.
  3. To train machine learning models that predict the user's state of receptivity

A micro-randomized trial design is used to meet the objectives of the study. Customers of a large Swiss health insurance company will use Ally over a 10-day baseline and a 6-week study period. During the baseline period, participants only have access to the dashboard of the app and no interventions are administered. During the intervention period, Ally provides daily personalized step goals and different interventions via an interactive chatbot interface based on the MobileCoach system (www.mobile-coach.eu). We investigate the following intervention components as between-subject or within-subject experimental factors during the intervention period: daily self-regulation coaching (two levels, within-subjects), a weekly planning intervention (3 levels, within-subjects) and different incentive strategies (3 levels, between-subjects).

Primary outcome will be the difference in achievement of the daily personalized step goal between intervention and control conditions for all intervention components. We expect all intervention components to increase the probability of goal achievement. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted for per protocol analysis and adjustment for covariates. Moderators of intervention components will be investigated exploratively.

To reach objective 3, we will collect a wide range of smartphone sensor data as well as usage logs of the Ally app throughout the study.

Being tested
Self-regulation coaching, Planning, Financial Incentives, Charity Incentives
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Self-regulation coachingBehavioural

    Short (2-5 min.) dialogue with the digital coach who provides information relevant for behavioral self-regulation, such as a goal reminder, the distance between the current step count and the goal and strategies to increase daily steps. Participants are randomized to self-regulation coaching or control (no coaching) on a daily basis.

  • PlanningBehavioural

    A dialogue with the digital coach who prompts the participant to either formulate action plans (when and where the participant can go for a walk) or coping plans (strategies to respond to barriers for increasing daily steps) for the upcoming week. Participants are randomized on a weekly basis to action planning, coping planning or control (no planning).

  • Financial IncentivesBehavioural

    Participants receive CHF 1 ($1) for each day they meet a personalized adaptive step goal.

  • Charity IncentivesBehavioural

    Participants donate CHF 1 ($1) to a charity of choice for each day they meet a personalized adaptive step goal.

Study groups in NCT03384550
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlActive comparatorParticipants in this arm receive no incentives. As all participants, participants in this arm receive self-regulation coaching on 50% of the days during the intervention period. For each participant, days during the intervention period are randomly allocated to a coaching or a no coaching condition using an allocation ratio of 1:1. As all participants, participants in this arm also receive either an action planning, a coping planning or no planning condition each Sunday during the intervention period. Participants are randomized to one out of nine sequences of planning interventions according to a uniform and strongly balanced intervention schedule
Receives: Behavioral: Self-regulation coaching; Behavioral: Planning
Financial IncentivesExperimentalParticipants in this arm receive financial incentives. As all participants, participants in this arm receive self-regulation coaching on 50% of the days during the intervention period. For each participant, days during the intervention period are randomly allocated to a coaching or a no coaching condition using an allocation ratio of 1:1. As all participants, participants in this arm also receive either an action planning, a coping planning or no planning condition each Sunday during the intervention period. Participants are randomized to one out of nine sequences of planning interventions according to a uniform and strongly balanced intervention schedule
Receives: Behavioral: Self-regulation coaching; Behavioral: Planning; Behavioral: Financial Incentives
Charity IncentivesExperimentalParticipants in this receive charity incentives. As all participants, participants in this arm receive self-regulation coaching on 50% of the days during the intervention period. For each participant, days during the intervention period are randomly allocated to a coaching or a no coaching condition using an allocation ratio of 1:1. As all participants, participants in this arm also receive either an action planning, a coping planning or no planning condition each Sunday during the intervention period. Participants are randomized to one out of nine sequences of planning interventions according to a uniform and strongly balanced intervention schedule
Receives: Behavioral: Self-regulation coaching; Behavioral: Planning; Behavioral: Charity Incentives

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Daily goal achievement

    Goal achievement will be assessed daily by comparing participants daily step count to the respective individualized step goal

    Measured: seven weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Steps per day

    Steps will be measured daily via the GoogleFit or Apple Health application using the smartphone's built-in accelerometer

    Measured: seven weeks

  2. Behavioral regulation in physical activity

    Behavioral regulation in physical activity will be measured using the second version of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2). The BREQ-2 consists of five subscales which represent different forms of regulation along the extrinisc-intrinsic continuum of motivation. Because the external regulation subscale in the BREQ-2 exclusively relates to external regulation by other people, it is substituted by the corresponding sub-scale of the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Scores will be reported for each subscale separately. Answers are given on a five-point likert scale with the endpoints 0-not true for me and 4-very true for me.

    Scores range from 0 to 16 for the subscales amotivation, external regulation, identified regulation and intrinsic regulation and from 0-12 for the subscale introjected regulation with higher scores representing a stronger manifestation of the respective form of regulation.

    Measured: seven weeks

  3. Engagement

    App engagement is measured using the number and length of app launch sessions per day. An app launch session is defined as any interaction of the user with the Ally app, separated by five minutes between events. If a user left the app open and did not take action for 5 minutes or more, then the next interaction with the app counts as a new session.

    Measured: seven weeks

  4. Non-usage attrition

    Non-usage attrition is measured using the proportion of users that have stopped using the app for at least 7 days (i.e. there are >7 days between their last session and the end of the study,

    Measured: seven weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Dec 2017
  2. Study start24 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion17 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
274 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03384550
Sponsor's protocol ID
001-Ally
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
14 Dec 2017
Last updated
27 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All collected data will be irreversibly anonymized and made available in a public non-profit data repository. Data that can potentially identify participants will be deleted (e.g. e-mail addresses) or altered in a way that prevents identification (e.g. global positioning system (GPS) data will be converted to abstract features, such as "at home/not at home"). Consent to publish anonymized data is obtained from all participants.

Publications

  • Kramer JN, Kunzler F, Mishra V, Smith SN, Kotz D, Scholz U, Fleisch E, Kowatsch T. Which Components of a Smartphone Walking App Help Users to Reach Personalized Step Goals? Results From an Optimization Trial. Ann Behav Med. 2020 Jun 12;54(7):518-528. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa002.

    PubMed 32182353
  • Kramer JN, Kunzler F, Mishra V, Presset B, Kotz D, Smith S, Scholz U, Kowatsch T. Investigating Intervention Components and Exploring States of Receptivity for a Smartphone App to Promote Physical Activity: Protocol of a Microrandomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 31;8(1):e11540. doi: 10.2196/11540.

    PubMed 30702430

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Self-regulation coaching, Planning and Financial Incentives in people with Physical Activity, run by University of St.Gallen at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Daily goal achievement (time frame: seven weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03384550, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in