AzTrials
AzTrials

Polycystic Ovary SyndromeNCT03383484

Use of Osteopathic Principles for Nonpharmacologic, Therapeutic Interventions in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

A study testing OMT and Yoga in people with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, run by Diana Speelman, Ph.D..

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall goals of this project are to assess the efficacy of non-pharmacological, complementary therapies to improve outcomes in the treatment of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 44 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
What is being tested?
OMT and Yoga
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2016to Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 44 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Females between the ages of 20-44, with a body mass index (BMI) of 20-48, who had a confirmed diagnosis of PCOS from their provider, and exhibited the 2003 Rotterdam criteria for PCOS diagnosis, defined as at least two out of the following three features: clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism (moderate acne or a modified Ferriman-Gallwey score > 6 or free testosterone > 5 pg/mL), polycystic ovaries (> 12 cysts on one ovary by ultrasound or ovarian volume > 10 mL for one ovary), and menstrual irregularity (defined as < 8 menstrual periods per year or cycles averaging > 35 days in length).

Who cannot join

  • Females who were smokers, had used hormone-based medications within the last 3 months (hormonal contraception, ovulation inducers, anti-androgens) or who were on insulin-sensitizing agents, had another endocrine disorder diagnosis, were pregnant or breastfed within the last 6 months, were diagnosed with a major psychiatric disorder or were on anti-psychotic medication, or who were currently practicing yoga or receiving osteopathic manipulative treatment or acupuncture on a regular basis.

About this study

The overall goals of this project are to assess the efficacy of non-pharmacological, complementary therapies to improve outcomes in the treatment of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The studies proposed herein are designed to assess the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) in the assessment of sympathetic tone in these women, and the effectiveness of non-pharmacologic therapeutic interventions in improving participant metabolic, endocrine, reproductive, and psychological health.

Read the detailed description

Question 1: Can osteopathic structural assessment identify increased sympathetic tone in women with PCOS? Specific Aim 1: To use palpation of Chapman points and spinal viscerosomatic reflex regions to assess the presence and degree of increased sympathetic tone in women with PCOS.

Chapman points and viscerosomatic reflexes reflect visceral dysfunction and are mediated by the sympathetic nervous system, and can be a very useful clinical diagnostic tool. There is increased sympathetic tone in women with PCOS as well as in obese individuals, as previously determined by physiologic measures. Increased sympathetic tone in the study population will be assessed by osteopathic structural assessment and confirmed by physiologic measures of heart rate, heart rate variability, resting blood pressure, and blood pressure and heart rate recovery following exercise.

Hypothesis: Chapman points will be palpable at regions for the heart, adrenal glands, and ovaries to indicate hyperactivity of the sympathetic nervous system and will correlate with physiologic evidence of increased sympathetic tone.

Hypothesis: Alterations of viscerosomatic reflexes associated with the heart, adrenal glands, and ovaries will reflect hyperactivity of the sympathetic nervous system and will correlate with physiologic evidence of increased sympathetic tone.

Question 2: Can regular, sympathetic nervous system-targeted osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) improve endocrine and reproductive parameters, and sympathetic tone, in women with PCOS? Specific Aim 2: To use weekly manipulation of Chapman points and spinal regions associated with viscerosomatic reflexes in women with PCOS for improvement of endocrine and reproductive parameters, and sympathetic tone, after 3 months of treatment.

Chapman points and viscerosomatic reflexes are useful in diagnosis, and may be manipulated to restore somatovisceral health.

Hypothesis: Completion of 3 months of weekly manipulation of Chapman points and viscerosomatic reflexes will improve sympathetic tone (as assessed by both osteopathic structural assessment and physiologic parameters), androgen levels, and menstrual cycle length compared to women with PCOS and no intervention.

Question 3: Can regular yoga improve metabolic, endocrine, reproductive, and psychological parameters in women with PCOS? Specific Aim 3: To use thrice-weekly yoga practice with mindfulness techniques in women with PCOS to improve metabolic, endocrine, reproductive, and psychological parameters after 3 months of intervention.

The benefits of moderate and high-intensity aerobic activity on metabolic and overall health for women with PCOS have been reported, but the effects of low-impact exercise are less studied. Women with PCOS will participate in a yoga class with integrated mindfulness techniques 3 times per week for 3 months.

Hypothesis: Thrice weekly yoga intervention for 3 months will result in an improvement in androgen levels, fasting blood glucose, menstrual cycle length, and patient-reported anxiety, compared to women with PCOS and no intervention.

Being tested
OMT, Yoga
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, hyperandrogenism, nonpharmacological, yoga, osteopathic manipulative medicine
Medical subject headings
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Hyperandrogenism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OMTOther

    Weekly manipulation of Chapman points and rib raising techniques (osteopathic manipulative treatment)

  • YogaOther

    Yoga practice 3 times per week for 1 hour each time; hatha yoga poses, asanas, and breathing techniques

Study groups in NCT03383484
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
No interventionNo interventionNo OMT, yoga, acupuncture, or other interventions.
OMT interventionExperimentalWeekly OMT for 3 months
Receives: Other: OMT
Yoga interventionExperimentalYoga 3 times per week for 3 months
Receives: Other: Yoga

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in androgens

    Change in serum androgen levels with intervention

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Change in menstrual cycle length

    Change in average time between day 1 of consecutive menstrual cycles after intervention

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

  2. Change in acne

    Acne score after intervention (none, mild, moderate, severe)

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

  3. Change in BMI

    BMI value after intervention

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

  4. Change in waist:hip ratio

    Waist:hip ratio after intervention

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

  5. Change in fasting blood glucose

    Serum glucose levels after intervention

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

  6. Change in fasting insulin

    Serum insulin levels after intervention

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

  7. Change in depression score

    Beck Depression Index II score after intervention (total score 0 to 63, lower score means better outcome)

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

  8. Change in anxiety

    Beck Anxiety index score after intervention (total score 0 to 63, lower score means better outcome)

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

  9. Change in blood pressure

    Blood pressure after intervention

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

  10. Change in heart rate recovery

    Heart rate recovery from exercise after intervention

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

  11. Change in heart rate variability

    Heart rate variability measured by EKG after intervention

    Measured: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Dec 2017
  2. Study startOct 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2017
  4. Study completionDec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03383484
Sponsor's protocol ID
23-156
Other IDs
181627705
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
12 Dec 2017
Last updated
26 Dec 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Davis SE, Hendryx J, Menezes C, Bouwer S, Menezes H, Patel V, Bostick Smith CA, Speelman DL. Weekly Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment to Improve Measures of Sympathetic Tone in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020 May 1;120(5):310-321. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.051.

    PubMed 32337566
  • Patel V, Menezes H, Menezes C, Bouwer S, Bostick-Smith CA, Speelman DL. Regular Mindful Yoga Practice as a Method to Improve Androgen Levels in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020 Apr 14. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.050. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 32285088
  • Davis SE, Hendryx J, Bouwer S, Menezes C, Menezes H, Patel V, Speelman DL. Correlation Between Physiologic and Osteopathic Measures of Sympathetic Activity in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2019 Jan 1;119(1):7-17. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2019.004.

    PubMed 30615047

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing OMT and Yoga in people with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, run by Diana Speelman, Ph.D..

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in androgens (time frame: After 3 month intervention (immediately after 3 month intervention) compared with pre intervention (initial = 0 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03383484, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Dec 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in