AzTrials
AzTrials

Intracranial PressureNCT03382860

Estimation of Intracranial Pressure Using Non-invasive Fundus Videos

An observational study of Intracranial Pressure, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to assess whether the intracranial pressure (ICP) can be detected by using a non-invasive retinal fundus scanner, recording the vessels of the eye entering from the optic disc. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Intracranial Pressure
What is being tested?
Fundus videos
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
1 Jun 2017to 1 Aug 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All conscious and able patients of 18 years and older admitted for intracranial pressure monitoring in the department of neurosurgery (Camino, Integra, Switzerland)

Who may be able to join

  • Adults 18 years or older with indication for intraparenchymal or intraventricular ICP monitoring
  • Conscious and able
  • Admission to the Department of Neurosurgery or Department of Neurology at Odense University Hospital

Who cannot join

  • Disabled and unconscious
  • No intraparenchymal or intraventricular ICP monitoring

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital

    Odense C, Danmark, 5000

    Frantz R Poulsen, MD, PhD, 65411835 ext. 0045, frantz.r.poulsen@rsyd.dk

    Mikkel S Andersen, MD, 25618181 ext. 0045, mikkel.c.schou.andersen@rsyd.dk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

The purpose of this pilot study is to assess whether the intracranial pressure (ICP) can be detected by using a non-invasive retinal fundus scanner, recording the vessels of the eye entering from the optic disc. The artery's diameter (A) is measured and compared to the vein's diameter (V) thereby a ratio A/V can be calculated. This ratio is compared to the values obtained from conventional fiberoptic intraparenchymal, intraventricular ICP monitoring using external ventricular drain (EVD) or lumbar pressure monitoring.

Valid non-invasive techniques for objective measurements of the intracranial pressure do not exist at the given time now and this study could prove to help the development of monitoring patients ICP without surgical intervention.

Read the detailed description

Intracranial pressure (ICP) is based on the simple principle of Monroe-Kellie Doctrine. Since the volume of the cranial cavity is constant and the brain, CSF and blood can only compensate for a certain change in volume, pressure will increase at a critical increase in volume. An increase in pressure caused by an increase in intracranial volume is distributed throughout the entire brain and spinal canal equally. The normal range of ICP varies with age. Normal values are less than 10-15 mmHg for adults and adolescents, 3-7 mmHg for younger children and 1.5-6 mmHg for newborns even sub-atmospheric ICP has been shown.

The threshold for intracranial hypertension varies in the literature, which is reflected in the clinical use. Generally, ICP above 20 mmHg is defined intracranial hypertension. ICP higher than 20-25 may require treatment, and continuous ICP above 40 mmHg indicates severe, lethal intracranial hypertension.

Some forms of measurements, e.g. 1. Intraparenchymal strain gauge or fiber optics or 2. Intraventricular ICP monitoring via external ventricular drain (EVD). EVD is considered golden standard, but in the daily clinic there is often no or limited difference between 1. and 2. The issue regarding invasive methods are the same as for any surgical procedure, e.g. bleeding and infection. Risk of bleeding is 2-10% for EVD and 2.5% for intraparenchymal monitors. The consequences of such a bleed can be severe and result in disability. EVD has a higher risk of infection (5-20%) compared to intraparenchymal monitors (0-0.1%).

Non-invasive methods such as transcranial doppler ultrasound pulsation index and optic nerve sheath diameter has been used in studies, which seemed promising, but has not yet been validated for routine clinical use. Also, in non-invasive methods there are significant inter observational variation.

Studies of the eye's fundus have shown a correlation between ICP and ratio between artery and vein diameter (A/V ratio, unpublished data) Currently, there are no published work that has considered the correlation between A/V ratio and ICP, however there is a study with a theoretical prediction of such a correlation (Babbs CF 2016. Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering Faculty Working Papers. Paper 1 http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/bmewp/1).

This study investigates the correlation between non-invasive fundus ICP estimation and intracranial pressure monitoring.

In practice, all conscious and able adults admitted to Odense University Hospital for intracranial pressure monitoring/measurements by either an EVD, intraparenchymal ICP monitor or lumbar spinal fluid pressure assessment are enrolled.

Being tested
Fundus videos
Keywords
Intracranial Hypertension, Intracranial pressure monitoring, Non-invasive point-of-care device, Normal pressure hydrocephalus
Medical subject headings
Intracranial Hypertension, Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fundus videosDiagnostic test

    Recordings of fundus videos

Study groups in NCT03382860
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ventriculoperitoneal dysfunctionPatients with suspected ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt dysfunction are admitted to the neurosurgical department for intracranial pressure monitoring for 24 hours. The patients are approached within this time frame.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Fundus videos
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH)Patients with suspected NPH (triad of cognitive dysfunction, urine incontinence of urge type, abnormal gait) are admitted to the neurosurgical department for intracranial pressure monitoring for 24 hours. The following day an infusiontest is performed, where data is collected.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Fundus videos

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Absolute A/V ratio value to conventional intracranial pressure monitors

    Comparison of A/V ratio values from the fundus video analysis and conventional intraparenchymal intracranial pressure (ICP), intraventricular ICP monitoring or lumbar pressure monitoring.

    Measured: 2025

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in A/V ratio value compared to increased intracranial pressure monitor during infusion test.

    Assessment of the use of the fundus videos in patients undergoing a lumbar infusion test for 20 minutes for assessment of normal intracranial pressure compared to a conventional intraparenchymal ICP monitor.

    Measured: 2025

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Dec 2017
  2. Study start1 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03382860
Sponsor's protocol ID
S-20170038
Other IDs
2012-58-0018
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
19 Dec 2017
Last updated
2 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: We wish to share all data of individual intracranial pressure values and A/V ratio.

Publications

  • Andersen MS, Pedersen CB, Poulsen FR. A new novel method for assessing intracranial pressure using non-invasive fundus images: a pilot study. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 3;10(1):13062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70084-0.

    PubMed 32747697

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Intracranial Pressure, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Absolute A/V ratio value to conventional intracranial pressure monitors (time frame: 2025). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03382860, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in