AzTrials
AzTrials

Cystic FibrosisNCT03381157

Fidgety Movements in Cystic Fibrosis

An observational study of Cystic Fibrosis, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Very low birth weight infants who are at risk for chronic lung diseases may also be at risk for brain anomalies such as increased echogenicity, leukomalacia and intracranial hemorrhage. Infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia have been reported to have worse neurodevelopmental outcomes than healthy infants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 5 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cystic Fibrosis
What is being tested?
Observational General Movements Assessments
How many people
38 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
2 Oct 2017to 2 Feb 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 5 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: Postterm 3-5 months of cystic fibrosis diagnosed and postterm 3-5 months healthy infants will be included to the study. The number of individuals to be included in the cystic fibrosis group was determined as 19 according to the power analysis at α = 0.05 and β = 0.20 (for 80% power). Within the scope of our study, the control group, which will be formed from postpartum 3-5 month healthy infants, will be composed of our patients who have been taken to the rehabilitation sessions of our clinic on the given days as well as our patients who have been in control for a certain period of time at Hacettepe University Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Early Physiotherapy Unit, relatives.

Who may be able to join

  • Being diagnosed with cystic fibrosis
  • Being between the postterm 3rd and 5th months

Who cannot join

  • Having congenital anomalies,
  • Having an ongoing infection,
  • Risk of high or low neurological impairment due to perinatal stroke, perinatal asphyxia, intra / peri-ventricular hemorrhage (IVH / PVL), bronchopulmonary dysplasia,
  • Fidgety movements evaluation results; being abnormal (AF), sporadic (F +/-) or non-F (F-)
  • Baby's family does not want to be involved in the work

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Departmant of Pyhsiotherapy and Rehabilitation

    Ankara

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Fidgety Movements Analysis in Infants With Cystic Fibrosis

Very low birth weight infants who are at risk for chronic lung diseases may also be at risk for brain anomalies such as increased echogenicity, leukomalacia and intracranial hemorrhage. Infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia have been reported to have worse neurodevelopmental outcomes than healthy infants. It has also been pointed out that babies with prolonged and recurrent apneas during sleep may have weak General Movements (GMs) repertoire.

It has been mentioned that motor development retardation may also occur in neurodevelopmental diseases, genetic diseases and chronic lung diseases, as well as in cystic fibrosis. In infants with cystic fibrosis, motor development may be affected by increased incidence of hospitalization, previous infections, malnutrition, respiratory and digestive system disorders. There is no research done with GMs assessment to determine motor dysfunction in infants with cystic fibrosis and this topic is open to research.

Read more

Having more information about the motor development of babies by determining the motor characteristics and motor performance of infants with cystic fibrosis, it may be possible to start the disease-specific physiotherapy and rehabilitation programs as early as possible. For this reasons, in the study the investigators aimed to investigate the characteristics of GMs in the "Fidgety" period of 3-5 month term infants diagnosed with cystic fibrosis, to determine the motor performances and to investigate the relation between the GMs characteristics and the features of the disease.

The hypotheses the investigators have set for this study are listed below;

Ho: Spontaneous movements of the "Fidgety" period of infants diagnosed with 3-5 months of cystic fibrosis are not different from normal infants.

H1: Spontaneous movements of "Fidgety" period of infants diagnosed with cystic fibrosis between 3-5 months are different from normal infants.

Conditions
Cystic Fibrosis
Being tested
Observational General Movements Assessments
Keywords
general movements, fidgety movements, motor optimality score
Medical subject headings
Cystic Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Observational General Movements AssessmentsOther

    GMs assessment has been increasingly used to predict motor dysfunction, especially the Cerebral Palsy (SP), since its introduction 25 years ago. The GMs assessment is based on the visual holistic perception of normal and abnormal movements of the body. This approach focuses on spontaneous movements of the baby rather than reflexes, tonus, and reactions

Study groups in NCT03381157
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cystic Fibrosis GroupNot described
Receives: Other: Observational General Movements Assessments
Control GroupNot described
Receives: Other: Observational General Movements Assessments

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Motor Optimality Score (MOS)

    The MOS has a max. value of 28 (for the best possible performance) and a min. value of 5. The score sheet comprises the following five sub-categories: fidgety movements, age-adequacy of motor repertoire, quality of movement patterns other than fidgety movements, posture, and overall quality of the motor repertoire.

    1. Fidgety Movements; normal fidgety: 12 points, abnormal fidgety: 4 points and sporadic fidgety: 1 points
    2. Age-adequacy of motor repertoire; normal motor repertoire: 4 points, decreased motor repertoire: 2 points, non age-adequacy of motor repertoire: 1 points
    3. Quality of movement patterns other than fidgety movements; normal movement patterns: 4 points, equal normal and abnormal movement patterns: 2 points, abnormal movement patterns: 1 points
    4. Posture; normal posture: 4 points, equal normal and abnormal posture: 2 points, abnormal posture: 1 points
    5. Overall quality of the motor repertoire; normal: 4 points, abnormal: 2 points, cramped-synchronized: 1 points

    Measured: 45 minute for each patient

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Dec 2017
  2. Study start2 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion2 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion2 Feb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
38 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03381157
Sponsor's protocol ID
AkmerMutlu
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
18 Dec 2017
Last updated
23 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Herrero D, Einspieler C, Panvequio Aizawa CY, Mutlu A, Yang H, Nogolova A, Pansy J, Nielsen-Saines K, Marschik PB; GenGM Study Group. The motor repertoire in 3- to 5-month old infants with Down syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Aug;67:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 3.

    PubMed 28586709
  • Einspieler C, Peharz R, Marschik PB. Fidgety movements - tiny in appearance, but huge in impact. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2016 May-Jun;92(3 Suppl 1):S64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

    PubMed 26997356

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cystic Fibrosis, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Motor Optimality Score (MOS) (time frame: 45 minute for each patient). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03381157, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in