AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck CancerNCT03377270

Clinical Impact of Respiratory-Swallow Training on Refractory Dysphagia in Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer

A study testing Respiratory Swallow Training in people with Head and Neck Cancer and Dysphagia, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Veterans following treatment of head and neck cancer can be left with lasting swallowing impairment that may require diet alterations, need for feeding tubes, and risk of pneumonia. The investigators' previous trial tested a new swallowing treatment approach to target respiratory-swallow coordination. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Head and Neck Cancer, Dysphagia
What is being tested?
Respiratory Swallow Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
49 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Oct 2018to 31 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Veteran and non Veterans
  • have undergone treatment for a primary diagnosis of head and neck cancer (oral cavity, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal)
  • are 21 years of age
  • 6 months post head and neck cancer treatment
  • 6 months post-traditional swallowing treatment with continued dysphagia
  • English speaking
Show all 9Show fewer
  • pass a cognitive screening (score 26 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
  • do not present with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on pulmonary function testing (PFT)
  • drink less than 2 alcoholic beverages per day

Who cannot join

  • if they have known allergy or dietary restriction for contrast materials or liquids used during the MBSS or training
  • currently drinking greater than two drinks per day
  • severe COPD
  • are unable to swallow one liquid consistency without the use of a compensatory strategy or swallow maneuver without aspiration
  • history of aspiration pneumonia within the past 12 months

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL

    Hines, Illinois, 60141-3030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Clinical Impact of Respiratory-Swallow Training on Refractory Dysphagia in OP HNC

Veterans following treatment of head and neck cancer can be left with lasting swallowing impairment that may require diet alterations, need for feeding tubes, and risk of pneumonia. The investigators' previous trial tested a new swallowing treatment approach to target respiratory-swallow coordination. The results revealed improvements in respiratory-swallow coordination and swallowing function. The goal of this study is to determine the impact and durability of respiratory-swallow training (RST) on clinical outcomes necessary for eating, drinking, health, and quality-of-life in Veterans with swallowing impairment following treatment for head and neck cancer. A total of 50 participants will be recruited with a goal of 40 randomly assigned to immediate RST or delayed RST.

Read the detailed description

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a significant health issue in Veterans. In fact, Veterans have up to a two-fold increase in the incidence of HNC when compared to the general population. Further, they often suffer profound functional deficits associated with surgical ablation and toxicity from medical treatments used to cure or control local disease. Dysphagia (swallowing impairment) is common after such treatments, and has life-altering consequences [on health, quality-of-life, the ability to eat and drink normally, cost, and burden of care]. Despite important advancements in medical and surgical treatments that prolong survival, many Veterans with HNC, are faced with chronic, intractable dysphagia resulting in persistent drastic alterations in diet, the need for feeding tubes, and increased risk for aspiration pneumonia - a life threatening infection. The investigators must devote research and clinical efforts to mitigate these devastating impairments because the investigators' current rehabilitative intervention options are severely limited. As such, and in keeping with the VHA's Blueprint for Excellence Transformative Actions, the need for the development of effective swallowing interventions that show potential for rapid translation to clinical practice is imperative.

Coordination of respiration and swallowing is an essential element of airway protection during swallowing and facilitates many critical aspects of swallowing physiology. This key, coordinative event is significantly disrupted in patients with dysphagia following medical and surgical treatments for HNC. The investigators' previous trial in patients with severe and resistant dysphagia after cancer treatment and traditional swallowing therapy showed that targeting and recalibrating respiratory-swallow phase patterning directly through an innovative respiratory-swallow training (RST) method significantly improved aspects of swallowing physiology crucial for airway protection and clearance of ingested materials through the pharynx. These exciting new results led us to consider an expanded study with refined methods and a home practice (HP) component that will extend beyond physiologic efficacy and include more rigorous assessments of the clinical impact of RST. As with the investigators' preliminary trial, the investigators' prediction is that these innovative intervention methods will not only improve swallowing physiology and quality-of-life, but will also result in significant functional improvements in every day eating and drinking in Veterans with chronic, severe dysphagia that has been otherwise refractory to traditional swallowing intervention(s). The benefit of RST training is that it is a simple, straightforward method for patients to easily learn, and, when combined with the HP program, it is designed to facilitate patient compliance and maintenance of intervention effects. The investigators are also using commercially available and simple to use recording and analysis hardware and software that can easily be expanded to mobile technology for more widespread application to the many thousands of patients with dysphagia consequent to HNC.

A total of 50 participants will be recruited with the goal of 40 participants enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to either immediate RST (intervention arm) or delayed RST (control arm). The participants in the control arm will have no active treatment for 4 weeks and will then participate in RST as a cross-over design. Data obtained will be used to evaluate clinical efficacy and durability The primary efficacy endpoint is physiologic function metrics of the oropharyngeal swallow, and the secondary endpoints are airway invasion and patient reported outcomes. We will use reproducible, reliable, and validated metrics that include the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile and Penetration-Aspiration Scale to distinguish the mechanistic effects of RST.

The goal of this current study is to extend the investigator's preliminary trial that yielded compelling physiologic changes with potential to improve the impact and durability of RST on clinical outcomes essential for eating, drinking, health, and quality-of-life. The investigators' overarching goal is to provide two parallel tracks of knowledge generation: 1) provide immediate clinical translation of experimental findings to improve the lives of Veterans, and 2) drive model generation on fundamental mechanisms of motor coordination. Basic knowledge will drive clinical application and vice-a-versa. As such, this is an ideal experimental and clinical context that will fuel knowledge generation in this highly significant area of science and clinical practice.

Being tested
Respiratory Swallow Training
Keywords
Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer, dysphagia, Respiratory Swallow Training
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms, Deglutition Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Respiratory Swallow TrainingBehavioural

    Training in the Optimal Respiratory Swallow Pattern and Lung Volume at Swallow Initiation

Study groups in NCT03377270
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingExperimentalDescription: Participants receive Respiratory-Swallow Training (RST) immediately after baseline evaluation. RST retrains swallowing initiation to occur during exhalation at mid-to-low lung volumes. Intervention Schedule: Begins within 1 week of baseline evaluation and continues for 4 weeks (two 1-hour sessions per week). Post-RST Assessment: Conducted within 1-week post-intervention and at 1-, 3-, and 6-months to assess efficacy and durability.
Receives: Behavioral: Respiratory Swallow Training
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingOtherDescription: Participants receive no active intervention for the first 4 weeks post-baseline, then begin Respiratory-Swallow Training (RST) using the same protocol as Arm 1. Intervention Schedule: Begins 4 weeks after baseline evaluation and continues for 4 weeks (two 1-hour sessions per week). Post-RST Assessment: Conducted within 1-week post-intervention and at 1-, 3-, and 6-months to assess efficacy and durability.
Receives: Behavioral: Respiratory Swallow Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) Score

    The MBSImP is a standardized outcome measure that evaluates swallowing physiology using 17 distinct component scores across the oral (components 1-6), pharyngeal (components 7-16), and esophageal (component 17) domains. Each component is rated on an ordinal scale based on specific physiologic impairments. Scores range from a minimum of 0 (no impairment) to a maximum of 2, 3, or 4, depending on the component. Higher scores indicate greater swallowing dysfunction, reflecting worse outcomes. For this analysis, the pharyngeal total (PT) score was used as a primary outcome measure. The PT score provides a comprehensive measure of overall pharyngeal function and is a sum of components 7 through 16. The PT Score ranges from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater severity of impairment in pharyngeal swallowing function. A score of 0 represents no impairment, while a score of 32 represents the most severe impairment.

    Measured: Baseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Maximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) Score

    Measures the presence, depth, and reaction to penetration and aspiration during swallowing as observed through videofluoroscopy. The PAS is scored on an 8-point ordinal scale, with values ranging from 1 (no airway entry) to 8 (silent aspiration, with material passing below the vocal folds and no response). Higher scores indicate greater severity of airway compromise, reflecting worse outcomes in terms of swallowing safety.

    Measured: Baseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 days

  2. MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score

    A patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the impact of dysphagia on quality of life in individuals with head and neck cancer. The MDADI includes 20 items scored across three subscales: Emotional, Functional, and Physical. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree), with lower scores indicating worse quality of life related to dysphagia. The Composite Score is calculated by summing the scores from the Emotional, Functional, and Physical subscales. A score of 20 indicates the worst possible quality of life related to dysphagia, while a score of 100 indicates the best possible quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 days

  3. Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Score

    Assesses the level of oral intake in individuals with dysphagia. The FOIS is scored on a 7-point ordinal scale, ranging from 1 (nothing by mouth) to 7 (full oral intake with no restrictions). Higher scores indicate better functional oral intake and less dependence on alternative feeding methods.

    Measured: Baseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 days

  4. Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores

    Evaluates the functional impact of head and neck cancer on patients' ability to eat and communicate. The PSS-HN includes three subscales: Normalcy of Diet, Understandability of Speech, and Eating in Public, each scored on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better performance and less functional impairment.

    Measured: Baseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2017
  2. Study start1 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Randomized-controlled trial with 2 arms (intervention and control)
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
49 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03377270
Sponsor's protocol ID
F2352-R
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
8 Dec 2017
Last updated
6 May 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: All participants' data will be de-identified and aggregated for analysis

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Respiratory Swallow Training in people with Head and Neck Cancer and Dysphagia, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) Score (time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in