AzTrials
AzTrials

PainNCT03376178

Catheter Orifice Configuration (Six-hole Versus End-hole) on Post-operative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

A study testing lidocaine and ropivacaine injection through catheters in people with Pain, run by University Hospital, Geneva at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Multiorifice catheters have been shown to provide superior analgesia and significantly reduce local anesthetic consumption compared with end-hole catheters in epidural studies. This prospective, blinded, randomized study tested the hypothesis that, in continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) under ultrasound guidance… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pain
What is being tested?
lidocaine and ropivacaine injection through catheters
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
May 2014to Apr 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • every patient accepting a conitnuous femoral nerve catheter

Who cannot join

  • pregnancy,
  • any contraindication to peripheral nerve blockade,
  • pre-existing peripheral nerve neuropathy,
  • allergy to LA (study medications),
  • ASA score ≥4,
  • neurologic or neuromuscular disease,
Show all 15Show fewer
  • psychiatric disease,
  • renal failure,
  • hepatic failure,
  • chronic opioid therapy,
  • NSAID contraindication,
  • inability to use a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device, g
  • enu valgum,
  • infection at the injection site or
  • withdrawal of consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • University hospitals of Geneva

    Geneva, 1211

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Ultrasound-guided Continuous Femoral Nerve Block: The Influence of Catheter Orifice Configuration (Six-hole Versus End-hole) on Post-operative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Randomized Trial.

Multiorifice catheters have been shown to provide superior analgesia and significantly reduce local anesthetic consumption compared with end-hole catheters in epidural studies. This prospective, blinded, randomized study tested the hypothesis that, in continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) under ultrasound guidance, multiorifice catheter would reduce local anesthetic consumption at 24h compared with end-hole catheter.

Read the detailed description

Eighty adult patients (aged ≥18 years) scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty under a combination of continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB), sciatic nerve block and general anesthesia were randomized to CFNB using either a 3-pair micro-hole (Contiplex, BRAUN®, 20G - 400 mm) or an end-hole (Silverstim VYGON®, 20G - 500 mm) catheter. Once the femoral catheter was sited, a bolus of 20 mL lidocaine 1% was injected. An electronic pump then delivered an automated 5 mL bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% hourly, with 10 mL self-administered patient controlled analgesia boluses.

Conditions
Pain
Being tested
lidocaine and ropivacaine injection through catheters
Keywords
multiorifice or endhole femoral nerve catheter
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • lidocaine and ropivacaine injection through cathetersCombination product

    injection of local anesthetic through an endhole or a sixhole femoral nerve catheter in the context of total knee replacement. Analgesic properties at 24 and 48h of both groups registered.

Study groups in NCT03376178
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
six-hole groupExperimentallidocaine and ropivacaine injection through catheters
Receives: Combination Product: lidocaine and ropivacaine injection through catheters
end-hole groupActive comparatorlidocaine and ropivacaine injection through catheters
Receives: Combination Product: lidocaine and ropivacaine injection through catheters

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. total LA consumption at 24h

    total ropivacaine consumption at 24h in mL

    Measured: 24h after connecting PCA to the femoral nerve catheter

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. total LA consumption at 48h

    total ropivacaine consumption at 48h in mL

    Measured: 48h after connecting PCA to the femoral nerve catheter

  2. number of boluses of ropivacaine at 24h

    total ropivacaine boluses received at 24h in numbers

    Measured: 24h after connecting PCA to the femoral nerve catheter

  3. number of boluses of ropivacaine at 48 h

    total ropivacaine boluses received at 48h in numbers

    Measured: 48h after connecting PCA to the femoral nerve catheter

  4. quadriceps strength before surgery and 24h and 48h after surgery

    quadriceps strength measured with with an electronic dynamometer in N.m and percentage of preblock value of MVIC

    Measured: quadriceps strenght before performing femoral nerve block and 24 and 48h after performing the block

  5. morphine requirements at 24h and 48h

    rescue morphine 24h and 48h in mg

    Measured: morphine consumption at 24h and 48h after completion of surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Dec 2017
  2. Study startMay 2014
  3. Primary completionApr 2015
  4. Study completionApr 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Eighty adult patients (aged ≥18 years) scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty under a combination of CFNB, sciatic nerve block and general anesthesia were randomized to CFNB using either a 3-pair micro-hole (Contiplex, BRAUN®, 20G - 400 mm) or an end-hole (Silverstim VYGON®, 20G - 500 mm) catheter. Once the femoral catheter was sited, a bolus of 20 mL lidocaine 1% was injected. An electronic pump then delivered an automated 5 mL bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% hourly, with 10 mL self-administered patient controlled analgesia boluses.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
72 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03376178
Sponsor's protocol ID
FROXANE
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
12 Dec 2017
Last updated
18 Dec 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Paul JE, Arya A, Hurlburt L, Cheng J, Thabane L, Tidy A, Murthy Y. Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1144-62. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f4b18.

    PubMed 20966667
  • Lang SA. Postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: a study comparing spinal anesthesia and combined sciatic femoral 3-in-1 block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999 Jan-Feb;24(1):97. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(99)90176-1. No abstract available.

    PubMed 9952105
  • Farr J, Jaggers R, Lewis H, Plackis A, Sim SB, Sherman SL. Evidence-based approach of treatment options for postoperative knee pain. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 May;42(2):58-70. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.05.2058.

    PubMed 24875973
  • Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L. Altered loading during walking and sit-to-stand is affected by quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005 Sep;23(5):1083-90. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.021. Epub 2005 Mar 28.

    PubMed 16140191
  • Ilfeld BM, Duke KB, Donohue MC. The association between lower extremity continuous peripheral nerve blocks and patient falls after knee and hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2010 Dec;111(6):1552-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fb9507. Epub 2010 Oct 1.

    PubMed 20889937
  • Brodner G, Buerkle H, Van Aken H, Lambert R, Schweppe-Hartenauer ML, Wempe C, Gogarten W. Postoperative analgesia after knee surgery: a comparison of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for continuous femoral nerve blockade. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):256-62. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000265552.43299.2b.

    PubMed 17578984
  • Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo C. A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Anesth Analg. 2007 Mar;104(3):673-8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000253236.89376.60.

    PubMed 17312228
  • Fredrickson MJ, Abeysekera A, Price DJ, Wong AC. Patient-initiated mandatory boluses for ambulatory continuous interscalene analgesia: an effective strategy for optimizing analgesia and minimizing side-effects. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;106(2):239-45. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq320. Epub 2010 Nov 25.

    PubMed 21112881
  • Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ. Catheter orifice configuration influences the effectiveness of continuous peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;36(5):470-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318228d4ce.

    PubMed 21857268
  • Michael S, Richmond MN, Birks RJ. A comparison between open-end (single hole) and closed-end (three lateral holes) epidural catheters. Complications and quality of sensory blockade. Anaesthesia. 1989 Jul;44(7):578-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11446.x.

    PubMed 2774123
  • Novello-Siegenthaler A, Hamdani M, Iselin-Chaves I, Fournier R. Ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block: a randomized trial on the influence of femoral nerve catheter orifice configuration (six-hole versus end-hole) on post-operative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Dec 19;18(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0648-8.

    PubMed 30567487

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing lidocaine and ropivacaine injection through catheters in people with Pain, run by University Hospital, Geneva at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

total LA consumption at 24h (time frame: 24h after connecting PCA to the femoral nerve catheter). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03376178, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in