AzTrials
AzTrials

UltrasoundNCT03375333

How Point-of-Care Ultrasound Affects the Diagnostic Process in General Practice.

An observational study of Ultrasound and Diagnostics, run by Aalborg University at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study explores how Point of Care Ultrasound (POC-US) is used in general practice in Denmark and how it affects the diagnostic process and treatment of patients. Twenty general practitioners (GPs) will register information each time they use POC-US during a one month period. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Ultrasound, Diagnostics, General Practice
How many people
579 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
15 Jan 2018to 1 Jul 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: The participating GP practices will be selected purposively aiming at a difference in organisation, geography, and equipment. GPs will be selected to vary in experience both regarding seniority as GPs and experience of using POC-US. Thus we will include partnerships and solo practices, urban and rural practices as well as practices with variable number of probes and type of ultrasound scanner.

Who may be able to join

  • Broad use of ultrasound
  • Working week of minimum four days
  • A minimum of 1400 patients listed
  • A minimum of two scanning probes
  • Previous participation in formal education in the use of ultrasound
  • Minimum six months experience with ultrasound in general practice.
  • Estimated use of ultrasound on a daily basis (average)
  • All patients who consult the participating GP for conditions relevant for a POC-US examination will be offered to participate in the study. Patients are excluded if they do not wish to participate or if they are not able to give an informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Ultrasound device more than 10 years old
  • Conflict of interest, e.g. if the GP is part of the research group or if the GP has direct financial interest in selling US devices.
  • If less than five patients have been enrolled.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Research unit for general practice in Aalborg,department of clinical medicine Aalborg university

    Aalborg

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: How Point-of-Care Ultrasound Affects the Diagnostic Process in General Practice. A Prospective Follow-up Study.

This study explores how Point of Care Ultrasound (POC-US) is used in general practice in Denmark and how it affects the diagnostic process and treatment of patients.

Twenty general practitioners (GPs) will register information each time they use POC-US during a one month period. The information will include indications and frequencies of the performed POC-US examinations, change in tentative diagnosis, plan, and treatment before and after the use of POC-US in relation to confidence in the tentative diagnosis, findings and quality of the POC-US examination.

This is an observational study without any intervention.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, observational study aiming to describe: How general practitioners use POC-US in their daily practice, how POC-US influences the diagnostic process, and how POC-US affects the treatment of the patients.

The Use of POC-US will be explored through indication, frequency, time consumption, modification, and findings in order to describe:

  • Which organs the GPs scan, when using POC-US?
  • Which tentative diagnoses entail the use of POC-US?
  • If GPs intend to rule-in/rule-out or explore, when using POC-US?
  • How often the GPs use POC-US?
  • How often are the GPs able to produce POC-US pictures of relevant structures?
  • How much time POC-US adds to the consultation?
  • How often a difference in what the GP intends to scan and what POC-US is actually used for occurs (modification of the performed POC-US)?
  • How often POC-US leads to a specific finding?

The influences of the diagnostic process will be explored through change in the tentative diagnosis and change in the GP's confidence in the tentative diagnosis. The aim is to describe:

  • If POC-US changes the patient's tentative diagnosis
  • If POC-US increases the GP's confidence in the tentative diagnosis
  • The relationship between the GP's expression of confidence and change in the number of tentative diagnoses
  • The relationship between change from symptom diagnoses to disease diagnoses and the GP's expression of confidence in the tentative diagnosis
  • The relationship between specific organs scanned and the GP's expression of confidence in the tentative diagnosis

The effects on the treatment of patients will be explored through changes in the plan or treatment for the patient. The aim is to describe:

  • If POC-US changes the GP's plan for the patient
  • If POC-US changes the treatment for the patient
  • The relationship between findings and change in the plan or treatment for the patient.

Study setting:

The study will take place in 20 different general practices in Denmark where the GPs use POC-US.

Interventions

There is no intervention in this study since the GPs are already using POC-US in their examination of patients.

Sample size

There are around 75 GPs in Denmark, who use POC-US. Of those 20 GPs will be included in this study.

It is estimated that the GPs will use POC-US 2-3 times a day, and assuming a participation rate of 80%, there will be 640-960 US scan during the study period of one month.

Recruitment

Participating GPs:

GPs using POC-US will be recruited through the continuous medical educations small-groups program, US networks, conferences, through teaching sessions, and through contacts via the Danish general practice research units. Interested GPs will be asked to register and answer a questionnaire including background information concerning demography,education and use of ultrasound. The participating GPs will be selected randomly among these registrations after considering in-and exclusion criteria.

Participating patients:

Each time the participating GP use POC-US, he/she will ask the patient for informed consent. No restrictions are made regarding age or gender.

Base-line assessment of GPs

The GPs' technical skills will be evaluated at baseline using a standardized protocol (OSAUS).

Data collection

The registration tool will be developed as a questionnaire to be used before and after the GP uses POC-US in the consultation. The questionnaire will include a time log to ensure the before and after registration. Several pilot tests will be performed both in the research group and with GPs using POC-US in order to ensure comprehension, feasibility and compliance.

The GPs will be asked to access a questionnaire in the online database SurveyXact each time they use their ultrasound device during their daily work. The GPs can access the questionnaire on their mobile phone, iPad or computer, using a unique link (respondent link) allocated each participating GP. A key file, connecting each participating GP with the respondent link in Surveyxact (link), will be safely stored at the Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg.

The GPs will give each patient a unique ID-number A Key file connecting this ID-number and the patients CPR-number (Danish national social security number) will be safely stored at the GP's clinic.

Before questions:

  • GP ID number
  • Patient ID number
  • Date
  • Patient gender
  • Patient Age
  • What is the main reason to use POC-US in this patient? (Rule-in/Rule-out or Explore)
  • Which organs/positions is expected to be scanned? (organs on list)
  • What is the main tentative diagnosis for this patient? (ICPC2 codes)
  • Are there any other possible tentative diagnoses in this case? (ICPC2 codes)
  • What is the overall plan for this patient? (Acute admission to hospital, Subacute referral to hospital, Elective referral hospital, Subacute referral to specialist, Elective referral to specialist, Referral to radiology, Other referral e.g. physiotherapist, Follow-up in the clinic, No plan for follow-up, Other)
  • Which treatment will be initiated at this stage? (medical treatment, referral for treatment, initiated other treatment, None, Other)

After questions:

  • time used on the POC-US examination? (minutes)
  • Which organs/positions were scanned? (organs on list)
  • Was the GP able to produce ultrasound images of the relevant structures of (inserted text) ? (yes, no - please specify)
  • What did the GP find? (Certain positive findings, Uncertain positive findings, Certain negative findings, Uncertain negative findings, Incidental findings - please specify in free text)
  • Before POC-US the following tentative diagnoses were registered (inserted text) Has this changed? (yes but the ICPC2 code is unchanged, Yes both diagnosis and ICPC2 code have changed, no)
  • What is the tentative diagnosis for this patient now? (ICPC2 codes)
  • Are there any other possible tentative diagnoses for this patient (please specify)? (ICPC2 codes)
  • How is the GPs confidence in their main tentative diagnosis, after POC-US? (Highly increased confidence, More confident, unchanged confidence, Less confident, Highly reduced confidence)
  • Before POC-US the following plan was registered (inserted text) for the patient. Has this plan changed? (yes, no)
  • What is the overall plan for this patient, now? (Acute admission to hospital, Subacute referral to hospital, Elective referral hospital, Subacute referral to specialist, Elective referral to specialist, Referral to radiology, Other referral e.g. physiotherapist, Follow-up in the clinic, No plan for follow-up, Other)
  • Before POC-US the following treatment was registered (inserted text) for the patient. Has the treatment changed? (yes, no)
  • Which treatment will be initiated at this stage? (medical treatment, referral for treatment, initiated other treatment, None, Other)

Patient experience:

After the consultation, patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire about their experience with POC-US in the consultation. (This questionnaire will be described in detail in a separate protocol).

Follow-up

The GPs will be asked to save patient information on the included patients (Key file) in order to identify the patient for an additional follow-up after six months (described in a separate protocol).

Statistics

Descriptive statistics will be used. A prospective statistical analysis plan will be uploaded to clinical trials before datacollection begins.

Research ethics approval

The study is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Committee of Multipractice Studies in General Practice.

Since the study is an observational study and does not include any intervention, approval by the Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics have been exempted.

Protocol amendments

Will be declared and all editions and changes of the protocol will be saved.

For further information a full protocol is uploaded to clinical trials.

Keywords
ultrasound, diagnostics, general practice, family medicine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03375333
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
20GPs20 general practitioners, who use ultrasound in the examination of patients.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. How general practitioners use POC-US in their daily practice:

    The GP's indication for using POC-US will be described through the frequencies of the GP's intention to rule-in/ rule-out or explore when using POC-US and through frequencies of the tentative diagnoses that entail the use of POC-US.

    POC-US frequency is calculated as the number of consultations with POC-US (numerator) relative to all GP face-to-face consultations (denominator) during the study period. The frequency of each POC-US examination (numerator) will be compared to all types of POC-US scans (denominator).

    The GPs will measure the time used for the POC-US examination. By the before and after registration of the organs intended to scan and the organ actually scanned, the extent of modification of POC-US to include e.g. opportunistic screening, can be estimated.

    The findings in POC-US are measured through the categorical variables: Certain positive findings, uncertain positive findings, certain negative findings, uncertain negative findings, and incidental findings.

    Measured: 2018

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. How POC-US influences the diagnostic process

    The GPs are asked to declare the tentative diagnoses as one main tentative diagnosis and other possible diagnoses before the use of POC-US. After the use of POC-US the GPs will be shown their "Before-US" tentative diagnoses and asked if these diagnoses have changed. If the diagnoses have changed, they will be asked to specify this.

    The tentative diagnoses are registered as ICPC-2 codes in the questionnaire. The GPs are asked to register any change in their confidence in the tentative diagnoses after the use of POC-US by choosing one of the following variables on an ordinal scale: Increased confidence, more confident, unchanged confidence, less confident, reduced confidence.

    To test the reliability of the GPs' declaration of confidence, we will examine if an increased confidence is correlated to specific organs scanned (Q2.2), a reduction in the total number of diagnoses (Q1.3, Q1.4, Q2.6 and Q2.7), or a change from symptom diagnosis to disease diagnosis.

    Measured: 2018

  2. How POC-US affects the treatment of the patients:

    The GPs register their plan for the patient by choosing one or more of the following categorical variables before using POC-US: Acute admission to hospital, subacute referral to hospital, normal referral to hospital, subacute referral to specialist, normal referral to specialist, referral for radiology, other referral e.g. to physiotherapist, follow-up in the clinic, no plan for follow-up, other.

    After using POC-US the GP is shown the "before POC-US plan for the patient" and asked if this plan has changed. If the plan has changed, the GP is asked to specify.

    The GPs register their initiated treatment before POC-US by choosing one or more of the following categorical variables: Referral for treatment in the secondary sector, medication, other treatment, no treatment, other. After using POC-US the GP is shown the "before POC-US planned treatment for the patient" and asked if this planned treatment has changed. If the planned treatment has changed, the GP is asked to specify.

    Measured: 2018

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Dec 2017
  2. Study start15 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
579 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03375333
Sponsor's protocol ID
RUGPAalborg GULD projektet
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
12 Dec 2017
Last updated
5 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Andersen CA, Brodersen JB, Mainz J, Thomsen JL, Graumann O, Lokkegaard T, Jensen MB. Does point-of-care ultrasound examination by the general practitioner lead to inappropriate care? A follow-up study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Sep;43(3):613-625. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2025.2487095. Epub 2025 Apr 10.

    PubMed 40207775
  • Aakjaer Andersen C, Brodersen J, Davidsen AS, Graumann O, Jensen MBB. Use and impact of point-of-care ultrasonography in general practice: a prospective observational study. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e037664. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037664.

    PubMed 32948563

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ultrasound and Diagnostics, run by Aalborg University at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

How general practitioners use POC-US in their daily practice: (time frame: 2018). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03375333, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in