Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNCT03372525
Invasive Ventilation Strategies for Neonates With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Syndrome (ARDS)
A study testing HFOV and CMV in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in neonates has been defined in 2017.The death rate is over 50%. HFOV and CMV are two main invasive ventilation strategies. However, which one is better needing to be further elucidated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 minute to 12 hours
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation
- What is being tested?
- HFOV and CMV
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2018to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 minute to 12 hours
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- For a neonate to be included, the following four criteria must be fulfilled: (1)gestational age (GA) between 26+0 and 32+0 weeks (estimated on the postmenstrual date and early gestation ultrasonographic findings); (2)Birth weight less than 2000g; (3) assisted with CMV within 12 h after birth; (4)diagnosis with ARDS and/or RDS. (5)stabilization before randomization within 12 h after birth: FiO2<=0.30, pH>7.20, PaCO2<=60 mmHg, Paw <=7-8 cmH2O;
Who cannot join
- neonates with at least one of the following criteria are not eligible for the study: (1) Neonates who only needed noninvasive ventilation; (2) major congenital anomalies or chromosomal abnormalities; (3) neuromuscular diseases; (4) upper respiratory tract abnormalities; (5) need for surgery known before the first extubation; (6) Grade Ⅲ-IV-intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH); (7) congenital lung diseases or malformations or pulmonary hypoplasia.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400042
Long Chen, MD, 8613883559467, neuroclong@126.com
Shi Yuan, PhD,MD
About this study
Official title: Selective High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation(HFOV) vs Conventional Mechanical Ventilation(CMV) for Neonates With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and/or RDS : a Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in neonates has been defined in 2017.The death rate is over 50%. HFOV and CMV are two main invasive ventilation strategies. However, which one is better needing to be further elucidated.
Read the detailed description
Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the serious complications in critically ill neonates. It can result in severe hypoxemia refractory to mechanical ventilation. Usually, invasive ventilation with low parameters is enough for neonates with mild and moderate ARDS. And extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is used to neonates with severe ARDS. However, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can also lead to high death rate and need more technique and conditions. Mechanical ventilation with higher parameters was a substitute for such situations, but the death rate, complications and injuries of higher parameters is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to compare HFOV with CMV as invasive respiratory support strategies on decrease the mortality and morbidities in neonate with ARDS.
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation
- Being tested
- HFOV, CMV
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HFOVDevice
Infants were randomized to HFOV
CMVDevice
Infants were randomized to CMV
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HFOV | Experimental | Ventilated infants were randomized to HFOV. Receives: Device: HFOV |
| CMV | Active comparator | Ventilated infants were randomized to CMV. Receives: Device: CMV |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
neonate was diagnosed with BPD
Measured: 28 days after birth or 36 weeks'gestational age or before discharge
death
the included preterm infants were dead
Measured: 28 days after birth or 36 weeks'gestational age or before discharge
Secondary outcomes (3)
air leak
the included preterm infants were diagnosed with air leak
Measured: 28 days after birth or 36 weeks'gestational age or before discharge
the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity(ROP)
the included preterm infants were diagnosed with ROP
Measured: 28 days after birth or 36 weeks'gestational age or before discharge
the incidence of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)
the included preterm infants were diagnosed with NEC
Measured: 28 days after birth or 36 weeks'gestational age or before discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Dec 2017
- Study start1 Dec 2018
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- When the neonate had fulfilled the included criteria, selective HFOV or CMV were started immediately on the basis of the group assignment.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chen Long,MD, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03372525
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MV for ARDS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 9 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 14 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Selective High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation(HFOV) vs Conventional Mechanical Ventilation(CMV) for Neonates With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and/or RDS : a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03372525
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MV for ARDS
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in neonates has been defined in 2017.The death rate is over 50%. HFOV and CMV are two main invasive ventilation strategies. However, which one is better needing to be further elucidated.
Detailed description
Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the serious complications in critically ill neonates. It can result in severe hypoxemia refractory to mechanical ventilation. Usually, invasive ventilation with low parameters is enough for neonates with mild and moderate ARDS. And extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is used to neonates with severe ARDS. However, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can also lead to high death rate and need more technique and conditions. Mechanical ventilation with higher parameters was a substitute for such situations, but the death rate, complications and injuries of higher parameters is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to compare HFOV with CMV as invasive respiratory support strategies on decrease the mortality and morbidities in neonate with ARDS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- When the neonate had fulfilled the included criteria, selective HFOV or CMV were started immediately on the basis of the group assignment.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HFOV | Experimental | Device: HFOVVentilated infants were randomized to HFOV. |
| CMV | Active comparator | Device: CMVVentilated infants were randomized to CMV. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 minute to 12 hours
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- For a neonate to be included, the following four criteria must be fulfilled: (1)gestational age (GA) between 26+0 and 32+0 weeks (estimated on the postmenstrual date and early gestation ultrasonographic findings); (2)Birth weight less than 2000g; (3) assisted with CMV within 12 h after birth; (4)diagnosis with ARDS and/or RDS. (5)stabilization before randomization within 12 h after birth: FiO2<=0.30, pH>7.20, PaCO2<=60 mmHg, Paw <=7-8 cmH2O;
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- neonates with at least one of the following criteria are not eligible for the study: (1) Neonates who only needed noninvasive ventilation; (2) major congenital anomalies or chromosomal abnormalities; (3) neuromuscular diseases; (4) upper respiratory tract abnormalities; (5) need for surgery known before the first extubation; (6) Grade Ⅲ-IV-intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH); (7) congenital lung diseases or malformations or pulmonary hypoplasia.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HFOVInfants were randomized to HFOV | Device | HFOV |
| CMVInfants were randomized to CMV | Device | CMV |
Primary outcome
bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
Time frame: 28 days after birth or 36 weeks'gestational age or before discharge
neonate was diagnosed with BPD
death
Time frame: 28 days after birth or 36 weeks'gestational age or before discharge
the included preterm infants were dead
3 secondary outcomes
air leak
Time frame: 28 days after birth or 36 weeks'gestational age or before discharge
the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity(ROP)
Time frame: 28 days after birth or 36 weeks'gestational age or before discharge
the incidence of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)
Time frame: 28 days after birth or 36 weeks'gestational age or before discharge
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Oct 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HFOV and CMV in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (time frame: 28 days after birth or 36 weeks'gestational age or before discharge). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2022.