Chronic Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3BE VIVIDNCT03370133
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab Compared to Placebo and an Active Comparator in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab and Ustekinumab in people with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis and Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 105 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
This is a study to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab versus placebo and an active comparator in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Bimekizumab and Ustekinumab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 567 participants
- Where
- 105 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 6 Dec 2017to 13 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be at least 18 years of age
- Chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO) for at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit
- Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) >=12 and body surface area (BSA) affected by PSO >=10% and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score >=3 on a 5-point scale
- Subject is a candidate for systemic PSO therapy and/or phototherapy
- Female subject of child bearing potential must be willing to use highly effective method of contraception
Who cannot join
- Subject has an active infection (except common cold), a recent serious infection, or a history of opportunistic or recurrent chronic infections
- Subject has concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
- Subject has any other condition, including medical or psychiatric, which, in the Investigator's judgment, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
- Presence of active suicidal ideation or positive suicide behavior
- Presence of moderately severe major depression or severe major depression
- Subject has any active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, or in situ cervical cancer
Trial locations and contacts
105 sites in 11 countries.
105 sites in 11 countries
Japan30 sites
Ps0009 629
Asahikawa
Ps0009 605
Bunkyō City
Ps0009 607
Chiyoda City
Ps0009 610
Chūōku
Ps0009 601
Fukuoka
Ps0009 619
Gifu
Ps0009 620
Hamamatsu
Ps0009 609
Kobe
Ps0009 600
Kurume
Ps0009 622
Matsumoto
Ps0009 604
Minatoku
Ps0009 623
Morioka
Ps0009 621
Nagoya
Ps0009 625
Nankoku
Ps0009 624
Obihiro
Ps0009 611
Osaka
Ps0009 614
Osaka
Ps0009 603
Sapporo
Ps0009 617
Sendai
Ps0009 613
Shimotsuke
Ps0009 602
Shinagawa-Ku
Ps0009 612
Shinjuku-Ku
Ps0009 618
Shinjuku-Ku
Ps0009 626
Shinjuku-Ku
Ps0009 628
Shinjuku-Ku
Ps0009 615
Sumida City
Ps0009 608
tabashi City
Ps0009 627
tabashi City
Ps0009 606
Takaoka
Ps0009 616
Tsu
United States25 sites
Ps0009 923
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
Ps0009 941
Alpharetta, Georgia, 30022
Ps0009 910
Bakersfield, California, 93309
Ps0009 922
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Ps0009 906
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Ps0009 909
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33437
Ps0009 912
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134
Ps0009 908
East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520
Ps0009 924
Houston, Texas, 77004
Ps0009 907
Miami, Florida, 33144
Ps0009 913
New York, New York, 10029-65
Ps0009 903
Ocala, Florida, 34471
Ps0009 958
Omaha, Nebraska, 68144
Ps0009 921
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Ps0009 905
Overland Park, Kansas, 66215
Ps0009 946
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Ps0009 911
Plainfield, Indiana, 46168
Ps0009 920
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Ps0009 901
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801
Ps0009 914
San Antonio, Texas, 78213
Ps0009 919
San Diego, California, 92103
Ps0009 915
St Louis, Missouri, 63117
Ps0009 918
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Ps0009 917
Troy, Michigan, 48084
Ps0009 900
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265
Poland11 sites
Ps0009 362
Bialystok
Ps0009 369
Bialystok
Ps0009 371
Bydgoszcz
Ps0009 358
Katowice
Ps0009 357
Kielce
Ps0009 372
Lodz
Ps0009 374
Poznan
Ps0009 350
Warsaw
Ps0009 351
Warsaw
Ps0009 367
Wroclaw
Ps0009 370
Wroclaw
Germany10 sites
Ps0009 218
Bonn
Ps0009 209
Darmstadt
Ps0009 214
Erlangen
Ps0009 208
Frankfurt am Main
Ps0009 210
Friedrichshafen
Ps0009 211
Hamburg
Ps0009 212
Heidelberg
Ps0009 213
Mahlow
Ps0009 205
Osnabrück
Ps0009 217
Schweinfurt
Canada6 sites
Ps0009 673
Halifax
Ps0009 652
Oakville
Ps0009 651
Richmond Hill
Ps0009 650
Surrey
Ps0009 653
Toronto
Ps0009 657
Waterloo
United Kingdom6 sites
Ps0009 556
Cardiff
Ps0009 551
Dundee
Ps0009 553
Edgbaston
Ps0009 552
Liverpool
Ps0009 550
Manchester
Ps0009 555
Salford
Australia4 sites
Ps0009 004
Fremantle
Ps0009 005
Phillip
Ps0009 002
Westmead
Ps0009 009
Woolloongabba
Hungary4 sites
Ps0009 254
Budapest
Ps0009 255
Budapest
Ps0009 253
Orosháza
Ps0009 259
Szekszárd
Russia4 sites
Ps0009 400
Moscow
Ps0009 402
Moscow
Ps0009 403
Moscow
Ps0009 404
Saint Petersburg
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
This is a study to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab versus placebo and an active comparator in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO).
- Conditions
- Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis
- Being tested
- Bimekizumab, Ustekinumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Bimekizumab, PSO, Psoriasis
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Psoriatic, Psoriasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BimekizumabDrug
Also called UCB4940
Bimekizumab will be provided at pre-specified time intervals.
UstekinumabDrug
Also called Stelara®
Ustekinumab will be provided as dose 1 for subjects weighing <=100 kg and as dose 2 for subjects weighing >100 kg at pre-specified time intervals.
PlaceboOther
Also called PBO
Subjects will receive Placebo at pre-specified time points.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bimekizumab cohort | Experimental | Subjects will receive bimekizumab for 52 weeks. Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab |
| Ustekinumab cohort | Active comparator | Subjects will receive ustekinumab (dose 1 or dose 2 depending on subjects weight) for 52 weeks. Placebo will be administered at pre-specified time points to maintain the blinding. Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab; Other: Placebo |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Subjects will receive placebo up to week 16 and bimekizumab starting at week 16 through week 52. Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab; Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16
The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 16
The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear [0] or almost clear [1] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 16.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (17)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 16
The PASI100 response assessments are based on a 100% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an IGA 0 Response at Week 16
The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear [0] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 16.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 4
The PASI75 response assessments are based on at least 75% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Measured: Week 4
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Pain at Week 16
As Patient-Reported-Outcome (PRO) measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit.
PSD pain item was assessed daily on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain). PSD score for pain at a given visit was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in pain score higher than the prespecified 1.98 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with PSD pain response.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Itch at Week 16
A PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit.
PSD itch item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no itch) to 10 (very severe itch). PSD score for itch was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in itch score higher than the prespecified 2.39 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD itch response.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Scaling at Week 16
As PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit. PSD scaling item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no scaling) to 10 (very severe scaling). PSD score for scaling was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in scaling score higher than the prespecified 2.86 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD scaling response.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Scalp IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at Week 16 for Participants With Scalp Psoriasis (PSO) >=2 at Baseline
Only participants with scalp involvement at Baseline completed the scalp IGA. Participants with scalp involvement at Baseline were defined as those with a scalp IGA score >0 at Baseline. Scalp lesions were assessed in terms of clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness using a 5-point scale (0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4= Severe). Scalp IGA 0/1 response at Week 16 was defined as clear (0) or almost clear (1) with at least a 2-category improvement from Baseline to Week 16.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 12
The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 52
The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 12
The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear [0] or almost clear [1] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 12.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 52
The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear [0] or almost clear [1] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 52.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period
The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the Adverse Event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Measured: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period
The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Measured: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)
Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period
The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Measured: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period
The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the Adverse Event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Measured: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period
The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Measured: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)
Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period
The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Measured: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2017
- Study start6 Dec 2017
- Primary completion8 Jan 2019
- Study completion13 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Plaque PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UCB Biopharma SRLThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 567 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRL
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Cares, Study director, 001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03370133
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PS0009
- Other IDs
- 2016-003425-42, 2016
- Acronym
- BE VIVID
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Asahina A, Okubo Y, Morita A, Tada Y, Igarashi A, Langley RG, Deherder D, Matano M, Vanvoorden V, Wang M, Ohtsuki M, Nakagawa H. Bimekizumab Efficacy and Safety in Japanese Patients with Plaque Psoriasis in BE VIVID: A Phase 3, Ustekinumab and Placebo-Controlled Study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Mar;13(3):751-768. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00883-y. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
PubMed 36648594Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Stein Gold L, Merola JF, Peterson L, Wixted K, Cross N, Deherder D, Thaci D. Bimekizumab Safety in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Pooled Results From Phase 2 and Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Jul 1;158(7):735-744. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.1185.
PubMed 35544084Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Rosmarin D, Lebwohl M, Peterson L, Madden C, de Cuyper D, Davies O, Thaci D. Bimekizumab safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled data from up to 3 years of treatment in randomized phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2024 Mar 15;190(4):477-485. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad429.
PubMed 37950894Strober B, Boehncke WH, Krueger JG, Magnolo N, Vender R, Warren RB, Lopez Pinto JM, Kavanagh S, Hoepken B, Gisondi P. Bimekizumab Efficacy in Psoriasis by Subgroups: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3/3b Clinical Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Dec;15(12):3633-3650. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01557-1. Epub 2025 Oct 8.
PubMed 41060492Armstrong A, Papp KA, Lebwohl M, Savage LJ, Yamanaka K, Vlase DE, Warham R, Lambert J, Lopez Pinto JM, Wixted K, Thaci D. Bimekizumab Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Plaque Psoriasis: 4-Year Results from BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY, and BE BRIGHT. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jan;16(1):585-603. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01595-9. Epub 2025 Dec 8.
PubMed 41359217Krueger JG, Cutcutache I, Lebwohl M, Gudjonsson JE, Pinter A, Langley RG, Merola J, Tada Y, Skelton A, Rastrick J, Ferecsko AS, Page M, Davies O, Lopez Pinto JM, Warham R, Shaw S, Warren RB. Bimekizumab long-term response in psoriasis: Mechanistic insights into efficacy level and durability. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026 Apr;157(4):905-916. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2025.12.1013. Epub 2026 Jan 22.
PubMed 41580158Gisondi P, Elewski B, Pinter A, Yamaguchi Y, Gooderham M, Kavanagh S, Wixted K, Cross N, Szilagyi B, Merola JF. Bimekizumab efficacy in scalp, nail and palmoplantar psoriasis versus comparators and over 4 years. J Dermatolog Treat. 2026 Dec;37(1):2637344. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2026.2637344. Epub 2026 Mar 9.
PubMed 41800601Merola JF, Warren RB, Thaci D, Gordon KB, Nishida E, Strober B, Conrad C, Kavanagh S, Lopez Pinto JM, Hoepken B, Gisondi P. Bimekizumab Complete Clearance of Both Skin and Nail Psoriasis: Comparative Efficacy in Phase III/IIIb Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Nov;26(6):967-979. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00968-2. Epub 2025 Aug 31.
PubMed 40886218Blauvelt A, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, Strober B, Warren RB, Puig L, Morita A, Gordon KB, Fernandez-Penas P, Kavanagh S, Lopez Pinto JM, Lambert J, Hoepken B, Deherder D, Cross N, Thaci D. Bimekizumab durability of efficacy through 196 weeks and safety through 4 years in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from the BE BRIGHT open-label extension trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Sep;93(3):644-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.04.038. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
PubMed 40286813Merola JF, Gottlieb AB, Pinter A, Elewski B, Gooderham M, Warren RB, Piaserico S, Wixted K, Cross N, Tilt N, Wiegratz S, Mrowietz U. Bimekizumab Efficacy in High-Impact Areas: Pooled 2-Year Analysis in Scalp, Nail, and Palmoplantar Psoriasis from Phase 3/3b Randomized Controlled Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;14(12):3291-3306. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01295-w. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
PubMed 39578348Kokolakis G, Warren RB, Strober B, Blauvelt A, Puig L, Morita A, Gooderham M, Korber A, Vanvoorden V, Wang M, de Cuyper D, Madden C, Nunez Gomez N, Lebwohl M. Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who switched from adalimumab, ustekinumab or secukinumab: results from phase III/IIIb trials. Br J Dermatol. 2023 Feb 22;188(3):330-340. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac089.
PubMed 36751950Warren RB, Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Garcia L, Cioffi C, Peterson L, Pelligra C, Ciaravino V. Psychometric Validation of the Psoriasis Symptoms and Impacts Measure (P-SIM), a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Patients with Plaque Psoriasis, Using Data from the BE VIVID and BE READY Phase 3 Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Oct;11(5):1551-1569. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00570-4. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
PubMed 34260044Reich K, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Langley RG, Armstrong A, Warren RB, Gordon KB, Merola JF, Okubo Y, Madden C, Wang M, Cioffi C, Vanvoorden V, Lebwohl M. Bimekizumab versus ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE VIVID): efficacy and safety from a 52-week, multicentre, double-blind, active comparator and placebo controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021 Feb 6;397(10273):487-498. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00125-2.
PubMed 33549193
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03370133
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BE VIVID / PS0009
- Conditions
- Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis
- Keywords
- Bimekizumab, PSO, Psoriasis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 567 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRLIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 6 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 3 Feb 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a study to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab versus placebo and an active comparator in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bimekizumab cohort | Experimental | Drug: BimekizumabSubjects will receive bimekizumab for 52 weeks. |
| Ustekinumab cohort | Active comparator | Drug: Ustekinumab, Other: PlaceboSubjects will receive ustekinumab (dose 1 or dose 2 depending on subjects weight) for 52 weeks. Placebo will be administered at pre-specified time points to maintain the blinding. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Bimekizumab, Other: PlaceboSubjects will receive placebo up to week 16 and bimekizumab starting at week 16 through week 52. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Must be at least 18 years of age
- Chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO) for at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit
- Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) >=12 and body surface area (BSA) affected by PSO >=10% and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score >=3 on a 5-point scale
- Subject is a candidate for systemic PSO therapy and/or phototherapy
- Female subject of child bearing potential must be willing to use highly effective method of contraception
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subject has an active infection (except common cold), a recent serious infection, or a history of opportunistic or recurrent chronic infections
- Subject has concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
- Subject has any other condition, including medical or psychiatric, which, in the Investigator's judgment, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
- Presence of active suicidal ideation or positive suicide behavior
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BimekizumabAlso: UCB4940Bimekizumab will be provided at pre-specified time intervals. | Drug | Bimekizumab cohort, Placebo |
| UstekinumabAlso: Stelara®Ustekinumab will be provided as dose 1 for subjects weighing <=100 kg and as dose 2 for subjects weighing >100 kg at pre-specified time intervals. | Drug | Ustekinumab cohort |
| PlaceboAlso: PBOSubjects will receive Placebo at pre-specified time points. | Other | Placebo, Ustekinumab cohort |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear [0] or almost clear [1] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 16.
17 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an IGA 0 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Pain at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Itch at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Scaling at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Scalp IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at Week 16 for Participants With Scalp Psoriasis (PSO) >=2 at Baseline
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period
Time frame: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period
Time frame: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)
Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period
Time frame: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period
Time frame: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period
Time frame: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)
Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period
Time frame: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Apr 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 36648594Asahina A, Okubo Y, Morita A, Tada Y, Igarashi A, Langley RG, Deherder D, Matano M, Vanvoorden V, Wang M, Ohtsuki M, Nakagawa H. Bimekizumab Efficacy and Safety in Japanese Patients with Plaque Psoriasis in BE VIVID: A Phase 3, Ustekinumab and Placebo-Controlled Study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Mar;13(3):751-768. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00883-y. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 35544084Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Stein Gold L, Merola JF, Peterson L, Wixted K, Cross N, Deherder D, Thaci D. Bimekizumab Safety in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Pooled Results From Phase 2 and Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Jul 1;158(7):735-744. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.1185.
- Results publication: PubMed 37950894Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Rosmarin D, Lebwohl M, Peterson L, Madden C, de Cuyper D, Davies O, Thaci D. Bimekizumab safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled data from up to 3 years of treatment in randomized phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2024 Mar 15;190(4):477-485. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad429.
- Results publication: PubMed 41060492Strober B, Boehncke WH, Krueger JG, Magnolo N, Vender R, Warren RB, Lopez Pinto JM, Kavanagh S, Hoepken B, Gisondi P. Bimekizumab Efficacy in Psoriasis by Subgroups: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3/3b Clinical Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Dec;15(12):3633-3650. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01557-1. Epub 2025 Oct 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 41359217Armstrong A, Papp KA, Lebwohl M, Savage LJ, Yamanaka K, Vlase DE, Warham R, Lambert J, Lopez Pinto JM, Wixted K, Thaci D. Bimekizumab Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Plaque Psoriasis: 4-Year Results from BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY, and BE BRIGHT. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jan;16(1):585-603. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01595-9. Epub 2025 Dec 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 41580158Krueger JG, Cutcutache I, Lebwohl M, Gudjonsson JE, Pinter A, Langley RG, Merola J, Tada Y, Skelton A, Rastrick J, Ferecsko AS, Page M, Davies O, Lopez Pinto JM, Warham R, Shaw S, Warren RB. Bimekizumab long-term response in psoriasis: Mechanistic insights into efficacy level and durability. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026 Apr;157(4):905-916. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2025.12.1013. Epub 2026 Jan 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 41800601Gisondi P, Elewski B, Pinter A, Yamaguchi Y, Gooderham M, Kavanagh S, Wixted K, Cross N, Szilagyi B, Merola JF. Bimekizumab efficacy in scalp, nail and palmoplantar psoriasis versus comparators and over 4 years. J Dermatolog Treat. 2026 Dec;37(1):2637344. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2026.2637344. Epub 2026 Mar 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40886218Merola JF, Warren RB, Thaci D, Gordon KB, Nishida E, Strober B, Conrad C, Kavanagh S, Lopez Pinto JM, Hoepken B, Gisondi P. Bimekizumab Complete Clearance of Both Skin and Nail Psoriasis: Comparative Efficacy in Phase III/IIIb Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Nov;26(6):967-979. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00968-2. Epub 2025 Aug 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40286813Blauvelt A, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, Strober B, Warren RB, Puig L, Morita A, Gordon KB, Fernandez-Penas P, Kavanagh S, Lopez Pinto JM, Lambert J, Hoepken B, Deherder D, Cross N, Thaci D. Bimekizumab durability of efficacy through 196 weeks and safety through 4 years in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from the BE BRIGHT open-label extension trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Sep;93(3):644-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.04.038. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39578348Merola JF, Gottlieb AB, Pinter A, Elewski B, Gooderham M, Warren RB, Piaserico S, Wixted K, Cross N, Tilt N, Wiegratz S, Mrowietz U. Bimekizumab Efficacy in High-Impact Areas: Pooled 2-Year Analysis in Scalp, Nail, and Palmoplantar Psoriasis from Phase 3/3b Randomized Controlled Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;14(12):3291-3306. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01295-w. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36751950Kokolakis G, Warren RB, Strober B, Blauvelt A, Puig L, Morita A, Gooderham M, Korber A, Vanvoorden V, Wang M, de Cuyper D, Madden C, Nunez Gomez N, Lebwohl M. Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who switched from adalimumab, ustekinumab or secukinumab: results from phase III/IIIb trials. Br J Dermatol. 2023 Feb 22;188(3):330-340. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac089.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34260044Warren RB, Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Garcia L, Cioffi C, Peterson L, Pelligra C, Ciaravino V. Psychometric Validation of the Psoriasis Symptoms and Impacts Measure (P-SIM), a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Patients with Plaque Psoriasis, Using Data from the BE VIVID and BE READY Phase 3 Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Oct;11(5):1551-1569. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00570-4. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Administered Guselkumab for the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis in Pediatric Participants
Psoriasis
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Samples From Subjects With Various Skin Conditions and Healthy Volunteers
Acne, Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 4
An Open Label Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Roflumilast 0.3% Cream for Chronic Plaque and Nail Psoriasis
Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Nail Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 2
Early Intervention in Plaque Psoriasis: is Bimekizumab Able to Delay Chronic Inflammation?
Psoriasis
RecruitingObservational study
Serum Substance P, Neuropathic Pain, and Central Sensitization Across Treatment Groups in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
UCB Cares study director
001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
105 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab and Ustekinumab in people with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis and Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 105 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 105 sites in Japan, United States, Poland, Germany, Canada and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Feb 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03370133, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2026.