AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3BE VIVIDNCT03370133

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab Compared to Placebo and an Active Comparator in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab and Ustekinumab in people with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis and Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 105 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab versus placebo and an active comparator in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Bimekizumab and Ustekinumab
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
567 participants
Where
105 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
6 Dec 2017to 13 Dec 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Must be at least 18 years of age
  • Chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO) for at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit
  • Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) >=12 and body surface area (BSA) affected by PSO >=10% and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score >=3 on a 5-point scale
  • Subject is a candidate for systemic PSO therapy and/or phototherapy
  • Female subject of child bearing potential must be willing to use highly effective method of contraception

Who cannot join

  • Subject has an active infection (except common cold), a recent serious infection, or a history of opportunistic or recurrent chronic infections
  • Subject has concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
  • Subject has any other condition, including medical or psychiatric, which, in the Investigator's judgment, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
  • Presence of active suicidal ideation or positive suicide behavior
  • Presence of moderately severe major depression or severe major depression
  • Subject has any active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, or in situ cervical cancer

Trial locations and contacts

105 sites in 11 countries.

105 sites in 11 countries

Japan30 sites
  • Ps0009 629

    Asahikawa

  • Ps0009 605

    Bunkyō City

  • Ps0009 607

    Chiyoda City

  • Ps0009 610

    Chūōku

  • Ps0009 601

    Fukuoka

  • Ps0009 619

    Gifu

  • Ps0009 620

    Hamamatsu

  • Ps0009 609

    Kobe

  • Ps0009 600

    Kurume

  • Ps0009 622

    Matsumoto

  • Ps0009 604

    Minatoku

  • Ps0009 623

    Morioka

  • Ps0009 621

    Nagoya

  • Ps0009 625

    Nankoku

  • Ps0009 624

    Obihiro

  • Ps0009 611

    Osaka

  • Ps0009 614

    Osaka

  • Ps0009 603

    Sapporo

  • Ps0009 617

    Sendai

  • Ps0009 613

    Shimotsuke

  • Ps0009 602

    Shinagawa-Ku

  • Ps0009 612

    Shinjuku-Ku

  • Ps0009 618

    Shinjuku-Ku

  • Ps0009 626

    Shinjuku-Ku

  • Ps0009 628

    Shinjuku-Ku

  • Ps0009 615

    Sumida City

  • Ps0009 608

    tabashi City

  • Ps0009 627

    tabashi City

  • Ps0009 606

    Takaoka

  • Ps0009 616

    Tsu

Other trials in Japan

United States25 sites
  • Ps0009 923

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106

  • Ps0009 941

    Alpharetta, Georgia, 30022

  • Ps0009 910

    Bakersfield, California, 93309

  • Ps0009 922

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809

  • Ps0009 906

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • Ps0009 909

    Boynton Beach, Florida, 33437

  • Ps0009 912

    Coral Gables, Florida, 33134

  • Ps0009 908

    East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520

  • Ps0009 924

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Ps0009 907

    Miami, Florida, 33144

  • Ps0009 913

    New York, New York, 10029-65

  • Ps0009 903

    Ocala, Florida, 34471

  • Ps0009 958

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68144

  • Ps0009 921

    Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174

  • Ps0009 905

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66215

  • Ps0009 946

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85032

  • Ps0009 911

    Plainfield, Indiana, 46168

  • Ps0009 920

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Ps0009 901

    Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801

  • Ps0009 914

    San Antonio, Texas, 78213

  • Ps0009 919

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • Ps0009 915

    St Louis, Missouri, 63117

  • Ps0009 918

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • Ps0009 917

    Troy, Michigan, 48084

  • Ps0009 900

    West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265

Other trials in United States

Poland11 sites
  • Ps0009 362

    Bialystok

  • Ps0009 369

    Bialystok

  • Ps0009 371

    Bydgoszcz

  • Ps0009 358

    Katowice

  • Ps0009 357

    Kielce

  • Ps0009 372

    Lodz

  • Ps0009 374

    Poznan

  • Ps0009 350

    Warsaw

  • Ps0009 351

    Warsaw

  • Ps0009 367

    Wroclaw

  • Ps0009 370

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Germany10 sites
  • Ps0009 218

    Bonn

  • Ps0009 209

    Darmstadt

  • Ps0009 214

    Erlangen

  • Ps0009 208

    Frankfurt am Main

  • Ps0009 210

    Friedrichshafen

  • Ps0009 211

    Hamburg

  • Ps0009 212

    Heidelberg

  • Ps0009 213

    Mahlow

  • Ps0009 205

    Osnabrück

  • Ps0009 217

    Schweinfurt

Other trials in Germany

Canada6 sites
  • Ps0009 673

    Halifax

  • Ps0009 652

    Oakville

  • Ps0009 651

    Richmond Hill

  • Ps0009 650

    Surrey

  • Ps0009 653

    Toronto

  • Ps0009 657

    Waterloo

Other trials in Canada

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Ps0009 556

    Cardiff

  • Ps0009 551

    Dundee

  • Ps0009 553

    Edgbaston

  • Ps0009 552

    Liverpool

  • Ps0009 550

    Manchester

  • Ps0009 555

    Salford

Other trials in United Kingdom

Australia4 sites
  • Ps0009 004

    Fremantle

  • Ps0009 005

    Phillip

  • Ps0009 002

    Westmead

  • Ps0009 009

    Woolloongabba

Other trials in Australia

Hungary4 sites
  • Ps0009 254

    Budapest

  • Ps0009 255

    Budapest

  • Ps0009 253

    Orosháza

  • Ps0009 259

    Szekszárd

Other trials in Hungary

Russia4 sites
  • Ps0009 400

    Moscow

  • Ps0009 402

    Moscow

  • Ps0009 403

    Moscow

  • Ps0009 404

    Saint Petersburg

Other trials in Russia

Belgium3 sites
  • Ps0009 050

    Brussels

  • Ps0009 052

    Liège

  • Ps0009 051

    Loverval

Other trials in Belgium

Italy2 sites
  • Ps0009 300

    Roma

  • Ps0009 303

    Roma

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

This is a study to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab versus placebo and an active comparator in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO).

Being tested
Bimekizumab, Ustekinumab, Placebo
Keywords
Bimekizumab, PSO, Psoriasis
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic, Psoriasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BimekizumabDrug

    Also called UCB4940

    Bimekizumab will be provided at pre-specified time intervals.

  • UstekinumabDrug

    Also called Stelara®

    Ustekinumab will be provided as dose 1 for subjects weighing <=100 kg and as dose 2 for subjects weighing >100 kg at pre-specified time intervals.

  • PlaceboOther

    Also called PBO

    Subjects will receive Placebo at pre-specified time points.

Study groups in NCT03370133
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bimekizumab cohortExperimentalSubjects will receive bimekizumab for 52 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab
Ustekinumab cohortActive comparatorSubjects will receive ustekinumab (dose 1 or dose 2 depending on subjects weight) for 52 weeks. Placebo will be administered at pre-specified time points to maintain the blinding.
Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab; Other: Placebo
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorSubjects will receive placebo up to week 16 and bimekizumab starting at week 16 through week 52.
Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab; Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16

    The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 16

    The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear [0] or almost clear [1] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 16.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 16

    The PASI100 response assessments are based on a 100% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants With an IGA 0 Response at Week 16

    The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear [0] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 16.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 4

    The PASI75 response assessments are based on at least 75% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Measured: Week 4

  4. Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Pain at Week 16

    As Patient-Reported-Outcome (PRO) measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit.

    PSD pain item was assessed daily on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain). PSD score for pain at a given visit was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in pain score higher than the prespecified 1.98 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with PSD pain response.

    Measured: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Itch at Week 16

    A PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit.

    PSD itch item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no itch) to 10 (very severe itch). PSD score for itch was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in itch score higher than the prespecified 2.39 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD itch response.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Scaling at Week 16

    As PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit. PSD scaling item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no scaling) to 10 (very severe scaling). PSD score for scaling was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in scaling score higher than the prespecified 2.86 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD scaling response.

    Measured: Week 16

  7. Percentage of Participants With a Scalp IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at Week 16 for Participants With Scalp Psoriasis (PSO) >=2 at Baseline

    Only participants with scalp involvement at Baseline completed the scalp IGA. Participants with scalp involvement at Baseline were defined as those with a scalp IGA score >0 at Baseline. Scalp lesions were assessed in terms of clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness using a 5-point scale (0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4= Severe). Scalp IGA 0/1 response at Week 16 was defined as clear (0) or almost clear (1) with at least a 2-category improvement from Baseline to Week 16.

    Measured: Week 16

  8. Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 12

    The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Measured: Week 12

  9. Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 52

    The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Measured: Week 52

  10. Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 12

    The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear [0] or almost clear [1] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 12.

    Measured: Week 12

  11. Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 52

    The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear [0] or almost clear [1] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 52.

    Measured: Week 52

  12. Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period

    The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the Adverse Event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)

  13. Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period

    The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)

  14. Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period

    The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)

  15. Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period

    The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the Adverse Event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)

  16. Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period

    The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)

  17. Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period

    The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

    Measured: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2017
  2. Study start6 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion8 Jan 2019
  4. Study completion13 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
567 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03370133
Sponsor's protocol ID
PS0009
Other IDs
2016-003425-42, 2016
Acronym
BE VIVID
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
7 Dec 2017
Last updated
15 Apr 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Asahina A, Okubo Y, Morita A, Tada Y, Igarashi A, Langley RG, Deherder D, Matano M, Vanvoorden V, Wang M, Ohtsuki M, Nakagawa H. Bimekizumab Efficacy and Safety in Japanese Patients with Plaque Psoriasis in BE VIVID: A Phase 3, Ustekinumab and Placebo-Controlled Study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Mar;13(3):751-768. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00883-y. Epub 2023 Jan 17.

    PubMed 36648594
  • Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Stein Gold L, Merola JF, Peterson L, Wixted K, Cross N, Deherder D, Thaci D. Bimekizumab Safety in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Pooled Results From Phase 2 and Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Jul 1;158(7):735-744. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.1185.

    PubMed 35544084
  • Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Rosmarin D, Lebwohl M, Peterson L, Madden C, de Cuyper D, Davies O, Thaci D. Bimekizumab safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled data from up to 3 years of treatment in randomized phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2024 Mar 15;190(4):477-485. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad429.

    PubMed 37950894
  • Strober B, Boehncke WH, Krueger JG, Magnolo N, Vender R, Warren RB, Lopez Pinto JM, Kavanagh S, Hoepken B, Gisondi P. Bimekizumab Efficacy in Psoriasis by Subgroups: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3/3b Clinical Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Dec;15(12):3633-3650. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01557-1. Epub 2025 Oct 8.

    PubMed 41060492
  • Armstrong A, Papp KA, Lebwohl M, Savage LJ, Yamanaka K, Vlase DE, Warham R, Lambert J, Lopez Pinto JM, Wixted K, Thaci D. Bimekizumab Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Plaque Psoriasis: 4-Year Results from BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY, and BE BRIGHT. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jan;16(1):585-603. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01595-9. Epub 2025 Dec 8.

    PubMed 41359217
  • Krueger JG, Cutcutache I, Lebwohl M, Gudjonsson JE, Pinter A, Langley RG, Merola J, Tada Y, Skelton A, Rastrick J, Ferecsko AS, Page M, Davies O, Lopez Pinto JM, Warham R, Shaw S, Warren RB. Bimekizumab long-term response in psoriasis: Mechanistic insights into efficacy level and durability. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026 Apr;157(4):905-916. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2025.12.1013. Epub 2026 Jan 22.

    PubMed 41580158
  • Gisondi P, Elewski B, Pinter A, Yamaguchi Y, Gooderham M, Kavanagh S, Wixted K, Cross N, Szilagyi B, Merola JF. Bimekizumab efficacy in scalp, nail and palmoplantar psoriasis versus comparators and over 4 years. J Dermatolog Treat. 2026 Dec;37(1):2637344. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2026.2637344. Epub 2026 Mar 9.

    PubMed 41800601
  • Merola JF, Warren RB, Thaci D, Gordon KB, Nishida E, Strober B, Conrad C, Kavanagh S, Lopez Pinto JM, Hoepken B, Gisondi P. Bimekizumab Complete Clearance of Both Skin and Nail Psoriasis: Comparative Efficacy in Phase III/IIIb Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Nov;26(6):967-979. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00968-2. Epub 2025 Aug 31.

    PubMed 40886218
  • Blauvelt A, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, Strober B, Warren RB, Puig L, Morita A, Gordon KB, Fernandez-Penas P, Kavanagh S, Lopez Pinto JM, Lambert J, Hoepken B, Deherder D, Cross N, Thaci D. Bimekizumab durability of efficacy through 196 weeks and safety through 4 years in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from the BE BRIGHT open-label extension trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Sep;93(3):644-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.04.038. Epub 2025 Apr 24.

    PubMed 40286813
  • Merola JF, Gottlieb AB, Pinter A, Elewski B, Gooderham M, Warren RB, Piaserico S, Wixted K, Cross N, Tilt N, Wiegratz S, Mrowietz U. Bimekizumab Efficacy in High-Impact Areas: Pooled 2-Year Analysis in Scalp, Nail, and Palmoplantar Psoriasis from Phase 3/3b Randomized Controlled Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;14(12):3291-3306. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01295-w. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

    PubMed 39578348
  • Kokolakis G, Warren RB, Strober B, Blauvelt A, Puig L, Morita A, Gooderham M, Korber A, Vanvoorden V, Wang M, de Cuyper D, Madden C, Nunez Gomez N, Lebwohl M. Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who switched from adalimumab, ustekinumab or secukinumab: results from phase III/IIIb trials. Br J Dermatol. 2023 Feb 22;188(3):330-340. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac089.

    PubMed 36751950
  • Warren RB, Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Garcia L, Cioffi C, Peterson L, Pelligra C, Ciaravino V. Psychometric Validation of the Psoriasis Symptoms and Impacts Measure (P-SIM), a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Patients with Plaque Psoriasis, Using Data from the BE VIVID and BE READY Phase 3 Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Oct;11(5):1551-1569. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00570-4. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

    PubMed 34260044
  • Reich K, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Langley RG, Armstrong A, Warren RB, Gordon KB, Merola JF, Okubo Y, Madden C, Wang M, Cioffi C, Vanvoorden V, Lebwohl M. Bimekizumab versus ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE VIVID): efficacy and safety from a 52-week, multicentre, double-blind, active comparator and placebo controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021 Feb 6;397(10273):487-498. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00125-2.

    PubMed 33549193

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab and Ustekinumab in people with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis and Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 105 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 105 sites in Japan, United States, Poland, Germany, Canada and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Feb 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03370133, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in