Heavy Menstrual BleedingNCT03368898
Quality of Life in Premenopausal Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
An observational study of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, run by Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Heavy menstrual bleeding or menorrhagia, is a common problem on women's lives and can burden both patients and health care systems. HMB is defined as cyclic heavy vaginal bleeding. Hormonal treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is also endorsed as the first line treatment in several international guidelines. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 50 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
- How many people
- 104 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2017to 30 Dec 2019
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 50 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Study population: Women who were admitted to our outpatient clinic with heavy menstrual bleeding aged 40 to 50 years old and treated with e2v/dng, lng-ıud or oral micronized progesterone.
Who may be able to join
- women who self described heavy menstrual bleeding
- women who completed their family
- have cyclic menstruation
- 40 to 50 years old
Who cannot join
- ultrasound abnormalities (submucosal fibroids, intramural fibroids greater than 3 cm in diameter, large subserosal fibroids, endometrial polyps);
- laboratory abnormalities (follicle-stimulating hormone level higher than 40 iu/l, adverse endometrial histology)
- hysteroscopic abnormalities (submucosal fibroids, endometrial polyps),
- incidental adnexal abnormality on ultrasound,
- severe intermenstrual bleeding, severe dysmenorrhoea, severe premenstrual pain, chronic pelvic pain,
- medical contraindications to either study treatment,
Show all 13Show fewer
- previous endometrial ablation or resection,
- uninvestigated postcoital bleeding
- untreated abnormal cervical cytology.
- pregnancy; lactation; occurrence of <3 menstrual cycles following childbirth, abortion or lactation;
- current use of an intrauterine device; hypersensitivity to any of the study drug ingredients and known or suspected malignant or premalignant disease.
- systemic diseases like hypertension, diabetes, thyroid diseases or coronary artery diseases; and history of previous medication for menorrhagia
- using anticoagulant drugs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 34147
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Estradiol Valerate (E2V), Levonorgestrel- Intrauterine Device (LNG-IUD) and Oral Micronized Progesterone Therapy on Health-related Quality of Life in Premenopausal Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
Heavy menstrual bleeding or menorrhagia, is a common problem on women's lives and can burden both patients and health care systems. HMB is defined as cyclic heavy vaginal bleeding. Hormonal treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is also endorsed as the first line treatment in several international guidelines. The effects of these therapies on bleeding related quality of life are not well known. The aim of the present study is compare the effect of Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (E2V/DNG), Levonorgestrel-Intrauterine Device (LNG-IUD) and oral micronized progesterone treatment on bleeding pattern, cycle control, menopausal symptoms and patient satisfaction of women with HMB.
Read the detailed description
Women who were admitted and treated for HMB were asked to participate in this comparative study. Women were eligible for entry if they had self-described heavy menstrual bleeding, had a regular cycle, had completed their family and were 40-50 years old at initial assessment.
After a thorough physical examination and ultrasonographic evaluation, all women underwent endometrial biopsy before the study by using a Pipelle endometrial suction curette to rule out any organic endometrial pathology. Blood samples were analysed to test for hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), ferritin, serum iron and iron-binding capacity and coagulation tests such as prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time.
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Local Ethics Committee. After they gave written informed consent, patients who fulfilled eligibility criteria were recruited to one of the following 3 groups:
Group 1: Women who were treated with estradiol valerate/dienogest regimen for heavy menstrual bleeding. 28 days of E2V/DNG was administered using a dynamic dosing regimen. (E2V 3 mg on days 1-2, E2V 2 mg/DNG 2 mg on days 3-7, E2V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg on days 8-24, E2V 1 mg on days 25-26 and placebo on days 27-28).
Group 2: Women who were treated with LNG-IUD for heavy menstrual bleeding. LNG-IUD is containing 52 mg levonorgestrel at initial placement and releases 20 microgram levonorgestrel per day. This is approved for 5 years of use by the US FDA for treatment of HMB.
Group 3: Women who were treated with oral Micronized Progesterone 200 mg for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cyclic, luteal-phase administration of progestin remained a widely used but little research treatment strategy for HMB for several decades.
None of the recruited patients were not prescribed oral iron preparations and patients who were symptomatic because of anemia (hb<10 mg/dl) were excluded.
Baseline characteristics of women are age (years), body mass index, parity, current smoker, days of bleeding, length of cycle (days), number of days of heavy bleeding, number of days of painful bleeding, unable to leave house on heaviest days, number of days housebound, number of nights disturbed, Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Chart (PBAC) score (A monthly score of 100 or more on this chart is significantly associated with heavy menstrual bleeding of more than 80 ml per cycle, as measured by the alkaline haematin method), endometrial thickness at time of treatment (mm), uterine size (length x width).
The Exclusion criteria are
- ultrasound abnormalities (submucosal fibroids, intramural fibroids greater than 3 cm in diameter, large subserosal fibroids, endometrial polyps);
- laboratory abnormalities (follicle stimulating hormone level higher than 40 iu/l, adverse endometrial histology)
- hysteroscopic abnormalities (submucosal fibroids, endometrial polyps),
- incidental adnexal abnormality on ultrasound,
- severe intermenstrual bleeding, severe dysmenorrhoea, severe premenstrual pain, chronic pelvic pain,
- medical contraindications to either study treatment,
- previous endometrial ablation or resection,
- uninvestigated postcoital bleeding
- untreated abnormal cervical cytology.
- pregnancy; lactation; occurrence of <3 menstrual cycles following childbirth, abortion or lactation;
- current use of an intrauterine device; hypersensitivity to any of the study drug ingredients and known or suspected malignant or premalignant disease.
- systemic diseases like hypertension, diabetes, thyroid diseases or coronary artery diseases; and history of previous medication for menorrhagia
- using anticoagulant drugs
Women who were recruited the study will be assessed at 1,3 and 6 months with Hot Flush Rating Scale (HFRS), Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MM-AS), pictorial bleeding assessment chart and blood sample analysis.
The primary outcomes assessed
- Hot flush rating scale: Measures included the HFRS, a self-report measure of frequency and problem rating of Hot Flushes/Night Sweats over the past week. Problem rating is calculated as the mean of the scores on three ten-point scales assessing the extent to which Hot Flushes/Night Sweats are problematic, distressing and causing interference in daily life. Scores for the problem rating range between 1 and 10, with higher scores indicating more problematic Hot Flushes/Night Sweats. The HFRS has been found to have reasonable test-retest reliability and good concurrent validity.
- Menopause rating scale: The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) is a questionnaire that assesses the presence and intensity of 11 menopausal symptoms. These are grouped into three subscales: the somatic subscale: assessing hot flushes/sweating, heart discomfort, sleeping problems, and muscle and joint discomfort (items 1-3 and 4 respectively); the psychological subscale: assessing depressive mood, irritability, anxiety, and physical and mental exhaustion (items 4-7 respectively); and the urogenital subscale: assessing sexual problems, bladder problems and vaginal dryness (items 8- 10, respectively). Each of the 11 items can be rated by the participant from 0 (not present) to 4 (1 ¼ mild, 2 ¼ moderate, 3 ¼ severe and 4 ¼ very severe). The scores obtained for each individual item are summed to provide the corresponding total subscale score. The sum of subscales scores provide the total MRS score. Higher scores are indicative of more severe symptoms. Indeed values above 8 (somatic), 6 (psychological), 3 (urogenital) and 16 (total MRS) were defined as severe.
The secondary outcomes assessed
- Quality of life as measured by menorrhagia multi-attribute scale: which is designed to measure the effect of menorrhagia on six domains of daily life (practical difficulties, social life, psychological health, physical health, work and daily routine, and family life and relationships). Summary scores, which range from 0 (severely affected) to 100 (not affected)
- Menstruation, by pictorial bleeding assessment chart
- Haemoglobin levels were also measured at pre-treatment,1, 3 and 6 months.
- Adverse event (Breast pain, Headache, Acne, Alopecia, Migraine, Increase in body weight…)
- Conditions
- Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
- Medical subject headings
- Menorrhagia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Estradiol valerate | Women who were treated with E2V for HMB for 3 months. | |
| LNG-IUD | Women who were treated with LNG-IUD for HMB for 4 years. | |
| Micronized Progesterone | Women who were treated with Micronized Progesterone for HMB for 3 months. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hot Flush Frequency Total Score (HFRS) Change
Hot flush rating scale (HFRS) is a 5 items subjective tool. The first and second items of this scale are for Hot Flush Frequency Score. Women were asked to provide ratings of the frequency of hot flushes and night sweats in the first and second items. The number of the frequency in the first and second item is summed and this score is the total hot flush frequency score. The minimum Hot Flush Frequency Score is 0 and there is no maximum score to provide. However, the higher scores represent worse outcome. In this study, the Hot Flush Frequency Score is measured and recorded at initial of the treatment and six months of treatment. The change between the initial and six months score is our first primer outcome.
Measured: change from initial hot flush frequency score at 6 months
Total Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) Score Change
Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) is a questionnaire that assesses the presence and intensity of 11 menopausal symptoms. These are grouped into three subscales: the somatic subscale, the psychological subscale and the urogenital subscale. Each of the 11 items can be rated by the participant from 0 (not present) to 4 (very severe). The scores obtained for each individual item are summed to provide the corresponding total subscale score. The sum of subscales scores provide the total MRS score. Higher scores are indicative of more severe symptoms. Minimum total MRS score is 0 and maximum total MRS score is 44.
Measured: change from initial menopause rating scale score at 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Menopause Multi-Attribute Score Change on Menopause Multi-Attribute Scale.
This is measured by menorrhagia multi-attribute scale; which is designed to measure the effect of menorrhagia on six domains of daily life (practical difficulties, social life, psychological health, physical health, work and daily routine, and family life and relationships). Scores range from 0 (severely affected) to 100 (not affected). Higher scores represent a better outcome.
Measured: change from initial menopause multi-attribute score at 6 months
Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Score Change
The pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) consists of a series of diagrams representing lightly, moderately, and heavily soiled towels and tampons. The numbers at the top of the chart represent the day of menstruation. The women are instructed to insert a mark in the appropriate box at the time each towel and/or tampon is discarded. After completion, the woman returns the chart during her next appointment to the clinic. The chart is scored using the scoring system. A baseline score is established and then at six months of treatment, the score is assessed again. Change from the initial score at 6 months of treatment is recorded as a secondary outcome. Decreasing values are considered to be a better outcome.
Measured: change from initial Pictorial bleeding assessment score at 6 months
Hemoglobin Value Change
Blood sample analysis for hemoglobin values is performed before the treatment and at six months of treatment.
Measured: change from initial hemoglobin values at 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2017
- Study start1 Jan 2017
- Primary completion30 Jun 2018
- Study completion30 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Heavy Menstrual BleedingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ismail Alay, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital
- Investigators
- cihan kaya, Study director, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03368898
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HMBSYMPTOM
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 29 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Estradiol Valerate (E2V), Levonorgestrel- Intrauterine Device (LNG-IUD) and Oral Micronized Progesterone Therapy on Health-related Quality of Life in Premenopausal Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03368898
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HMBSYMPTOM
- Conditions
- Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalOther government
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 3 Sep 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Heavy menstrual bleeding or menorrhagia, is a common problem on women's lives and can burden both patients and health care systems. HMB is defined as cyclic heavy vaginal bleeding. Hormonal treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is also endorsed as the first line treatment in several international guidelines. The effects of these therapies on bleeding related quality of life are not well known. The aim of the present study is compare the effect of Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (E2V/DNG), Levonorgestrel-Intrauterine Device (LNG-IUD) and oral micronized progesterone treatment on bleeding pattern, cycle control, menopausal symptoms and patient satisfaction of women with HMB.
Detailed description
Women who were admitted and treated for HMB were asked to participate in this comparative study. Women were eligible for entry if they had self-described heavy menstrual bleeding, had a regular cycle, had completed their family and were 40-50 years old at initial assessment.
After a thorough physical examination and ultrasonographic evaluation, all women underwent endometrial biopsy before the study by using a Pipelle endometrial suction curette to rule out any organic endometrial pathology. Blood samples were analysed to test for hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), ferritin, serum iron and iron-binding capacity and coagulation tests such as prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time.
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Local Ethics Committee. After they gave written informed consent, patients who fulfilled eligibility criteria were recruited to one of the following 3 groups:
Group 1: Women who were treated with estradiol valerate/dienogest regimen for heavy menstrual bleeding. 28 days of E2V/DNG was administered using a dynamic dosing regimen. (E2V 3 mg on days 1-2, E2V 2 mg/DNG 2 mg on days 3-7, E2V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg on days 8-24, E2V 1 mg on days 25-26 and placebo on days 27-28).
Group 2: Women who were treated with LNG-IUD for heavy menstrual bleeding. LNG-IUD is containing 52 mg levonorgestrel at initial placement and releases 20 microgram levonorgestrel per day. This is approved for 5 years of use by the US FDA for treatment of HMB.
Group 3: Women who were treated with oral Micronized Progesterone 200 mg for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cyclic, luteal-phase administration of progestin remained a widely used but little research treatment strategy for HMB for several decades.
None of the recruited patients were not prescribed oral iron preparations and patients who were symptomatic because of anemia (hb<10 mg/dl) were excluded.
Baseline characteristics of women are age (years), body mass index, parity, current smoker, days of bleeding, length of cycle (days), number of days of heavy bleeding, number of days of painful bleeding, unable to leave house on heaviest days, number of days housebound, number of nights disturbed, Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Chart (PBAC) score (A monthly score of 100 or more on this chart is significantly associated with heavy menstrual bleeding of more than 80 ml per cycle, as measured by the alkaline haematin method), endometrial thickness at time of treatment (mm), uterine size (length x width).
The Exclusion criteria are
- ultrasound abnormalities (submucosal fibroids, intramural fibroids greater than 3 cm in diameter, large subserosal fibroids, endometrial polyps);
- laboratory abnormalities (follicle stimulating hormone level higher than 40 iu/l, adverse endometrial histology)
- hysteroscopic abnormalities (submucosal fibroids, endometrial polyps),
- incidental adnexal abnormality on ultrasound,
- severe intermenstrual bleeding, severe dysmenorrhoea, severe premenstrual pain, chronic pelvic pain,
- medical contraindications to either study treatment,
- previous endometrial ablation or resection,
- uninvestigated postcoital bleeding
- untreated abnormal cervical cytology.
- pregnancy; lactation; occurrence of <3 menstrual cycles following childbirth, abortion or lactation;
- current use of an intrauterine device; hypersensitivity to any of the study drug ingredients and known or suspected malignant or premalignant disease.
- systemic diseases like hypertension, diabetes, thyroid diseases or coronary artery diseases; and history of previous medication for menorrhagia
- using anticoagulant drugs
Women who were recruited the study will be assessed at 1,3 and 6 months with Hot Flush Rating Scale (HFRS), Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MM-AS), pictorial bleeding assessment chart and blood sample analysis.
The primary outcomes assessed
- Hot flush rating scale: Measures included the HFRS, a self-report measure of frequency and problem rating of Hot Flushes/Night Sweats over the past week. Problem rating is calculated as the mean of the scores on three ten-point scales assessing the extent to which Hot Flushes/Night Sweats are problematic, distressing and causing interference in daily life. Scores for the problem rating range between 1 and 10, with higher scores indicating more problematic Hot Flushes/Night Sweats. The HFRS has been found to have reasonable test-retest reliability and good concurrent validity.
- Menopause rating scale: The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) is a questionnaire that assesses the presence and intensity of 11 menopausal symptoms. These are grouped into three subscales: the somatic subscale: assessing hot flushes/sweating, heart discomfort, sleeping problems, and muscle and joint discomfort (items 1-3 and 4 respectively); the psychological subscale: assessing depressive mood, irritability, anxiety, and physical and mental exhaustion (items 4-7 respectively); and the urogenital subscale: assessing sexual problems, bladder problems and vaginal dryness (items 8- 10, respectively). Each of the 11 items can be rated by the participant from 0 (not present) to 4 (1 ¼ mild, 2 ¼ moderate, 3 ¼ severe and 4 ¼ very severe). The scores obtained for each individual item are summed to provide the corresponding total subscale score. The sum of subscales scores provide the total MRS score. Higher scores are indicative of more severe symptoms. Indeed values above 8 (somatic), 6 (psychological), 3 (urogenital) and 16 (total MRS) were defined as severe.
The secondary outcomes assessed
- Quality of life as measured by menorrhagia multi-attribute scale: which is designed to measure the effect of menorrhagia on six domains of daily life (practical difficulties, social life, psychological health, physical health, work and daily routine, and family life and relationships). Summary scores, which range from 0 (severely affected) to 100 (not affected)
- Menstruation, by pictorial bleeding assessment chart
- Haemoglobin levels were also measured at pre-treatment,1, 3 and 6 months.
- Adverse event (Breast pain, Headache, Acne, Alopecia, Migraine, Increase in body weight…)
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Estradiol valerate | – | –Women who were treated with E2V for HMB for 3 months. |
| LNG-IUD | – | –Women who were treated with LNG-IUD for HMB for 4 years. |
| Micronized Progesterone | – | –Women who were treated with Micronized Progesterone for HMB for 3 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Women who were admitted to our outpatient clinic with heavy menstrual bleeding aged 40 to 50 years old and treated with e2v/dng, lng-ıud or oral micronized progesterone.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- women who self described heavy menstrual bleeding
- women who completed their family
- have cyclic menstruation
- 40 to 50 years old
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- ultrasound abnormalities (submucosal fibroids, intramural fibroids greater than 3 cm in diameter, large subserosal fibroids, endometrial polyps);
- laboratory abnormalities (follicle-stimulating hormone level higher than 40 iu/l, adverse endometrial histology)
- hysteroscopic abnormalities (submucosal fibroids, endometrial polyps),
- incidental adnexal abnormality on ultrasound,
- severe intermenstrual bleeding, severe dysmenorrhoea, severe premenstrual pain, chronic pelvic pain,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Hot Flush Frequency Total Score (HFRS) Change
Time frame: change from initial hot flush frequency score at 6 months
Hot flush rating scale (HFRS) is a 5 items subjective tool. The first and second items of this scale are for Hot Flush Frequency Score. Women were asked to provide ratings of the frequency of hot flushes and night sweats in the first and second items. The number of the frequency in the first and second item is summed and this score is the total hot flush frequency score. The minimum Hot Flush Frequency Score is 0 and there is no maximum score to provide. However, the higher scores represent worse outcome. In this study, the Hot Flush Frequency Score is measured and recorded at initial of the treatment and six months of treatment. The change between the initial and six months score is our first primer outcome.
Total Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) Score Change
Time frame: change from initial menopause rating scale score at 6 months
Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) is a questionnaire that assesses the presence and intensity of 11 menopausal symptoms. These are grouped into three subscales: the somatic subscale, the psychological subscale and the urogenital subscale. Each of the 11 items can be rated by the participant from 0 (not present) to 4 (very severe). The scores obtained for each individual item are summed to provide the corresponding total subscale score. The sum of subscales scores provide the total MRS score. Higher scores are indicative of more severe symptoms. Minimum total MRS score is 0 and maximum total MRS score is 44.
3 secondary outcomes
Menopause Multi-Attribute Score Change on Menopause Multi-Attribute Scale.
Time frame: change from initial menopause multi-attribute score at 6 months
Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Score Change
Time frame: change from initial Pictorial bleeding assessment score at 6 months
Hemoglobin Value Change
Time frame: change from initial hemoglobin values at 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
RecruitingObservational study
Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Progestin Treatment in Bleeding Disorders Study
Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, Bleeding Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Focal Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis, Adenomyoma of Uterus
Recruiting
A Clinical Study of the Aqua Therapeutics Thermal Therapy Vapor Ablation System in Premenopausal Women With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
Menorrhagia
RecruitingPhase 2
HMBeacon: A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate ALN-6400 in Adult and Adolescent Female Patients With VWD and HMB
Von Willebrand Disease (VWD), Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB)
Recruiting
Delivering tAN to Reduce HMB: The LUNA Study
Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
cihan kaya study director
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, run by Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hot Flush Frequency Total Score (HFRS) Change (time frame: change from initial hot flush frequency score at 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2020.