Stage II Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7Phase 3NCT03367702
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy or Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage IIA-B Prostate Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Quality-of-Life Assessment and Questionnaire Administration in people with Stage II Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7, run by NRG Oncology at 293 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
This randomized phase III trial studies how well stereotactic body radiation therapy works compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy in treating patients with stage IIA-B prostate cancer. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Stage II Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7
- What is being tested?
- Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Quality-of-Life Assessment and Questionnaire Administration
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 698 participants
- Where
- 293 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2018to 1 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Previously untreated (no local therapy such as surgery, radiation cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound [HIFU], etc.) localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate with the following clinical findings:
- Clinical stage by digital rectal exam of either T1c or T2a/b (limited to one side of the gland); (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC], version 7) or cT1a-c or 2a or 2b
- Stages T1a-T1b are eligible if patient underwent transurethral prostatic resection (TURP)
- The patient must meet one of the following 3 criteria: 1) Gleason score must be Gleason 7(3+4) with a PSA < 20 ng/mL, or 2) Gleason 6 (3+3) with a PSA > 10 ng/mL and < 20 ng/mL which is considered intermediate risk and eligible for the study (AJCC, version 7), or 3) Group Grade 1 with a PSA > 10 ng/mL and < 20 ng/mL or 2 with a PSA < 20 ng/mL
- If patient is receiving a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor at the time of enrollment, the baseline PSA value may be double the initial value and the medication should be discontinued but a washout period is not required; to be eligible, a PSA drawn while still on the medicine must be:
- < 10 ng/mL if Gleason 7(3+4) (note this patient would be on stratification level 1 if PSA < 5 ng/mL and stratification level 2 if less than 10 ng/mL)
Show all 20Show fewer
- > 5 ng/mL and less than 10 ng/mL for Gleason 6(3+3) (note this patient would be on stratification level 3)
- The prostate volume must be < 70 cc as reported at time of biopsy or by separate measure with ultrasound or other imaging modalities including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan
- Patients in active surveillance who elect to be treated are eligible if they meet protocol requirements
- Age >= 18
- History and physical including a digital rectal exam 60 days prior to registration
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 60 days prior to registration
- MRI of the prostate and pelvis (per institutional standard of care [SOC] - should be compliant with PIRADSv2.1 guidelines) within 1 year prior to registration
- Bone scan as clinically indicated within 120 days prior to registration
- Charlson modified co-morbidity score =< 4 for patients under 60 and =< 5 for patients 60 and over 21 days prior to registration
- International prostate symptom score (IPSS) of < 15 21 days prior to registration
- The patient must provide study-specific informed consent prior to study entry
- Willingness and ability to complete the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire
- Completion of all items of the EPIC-26 which will be data entered at registration 60 days prior to registration
- Only English, Spanish, and French-speaking patients are eligible to participate as these are the only languages EPIC-26 has been validated in
Who cannot join
- Definitive clinical or radiologic evidence of metastatic disease; no nodal involvement or evidence of metastatic disease allowed as defined by screening of the pelvis
- Definitive T3 disease on MRI
- Prior or current invasive malignancy with current evidence of active disease within the past 2 years
- Exceptions: Non-melanomatous skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the male breast, penis, oral cavity, or stage Ta of the bladder, or stage I completely resected melanoma
- Prior systemic chemotherapy for the study cancer; note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable; must be off treatment for at least 3 years
- Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields
Show all 13Show fewer
- The use of hormonal therapy is not allowed; if the patient is on a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, then they should be stopped prior to treatment once enrolled onto the study; no washout period is required for this study to participate
- Severe, active co-morbidity defined as follows:
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive with CD4 count < 200 cells/microliter; Note that patients who are HIV positive are eligible, provided they are under treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and have a CD4 count >= 200 cells/microliter within 30 days prior to registration; Note also that HIV testing is not required for eligibility for this protocol; this exclusion criterion is necessary because the treatments involved in this protocol may be significantly immunosuppressive
- Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects; note, however, that laboratory tests for liver function and coagulation parameters are not required for entry into this protocol; (patients on Coumadin or other blood thinning agents are eligible for this study)
- Contraindication to MRI
- Cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator
- Surgically implanted electrical devices such as spinal stimulation devices or intracranial stimulation devices, cochlear implants, the presence of metallic foreign bodies in the orbits, and incompatible old mechanical heart valves and aneurysm clips
Trial locations and contacts
293 sites in 6 countries.
293 sites in 6 countries
United States276 sites
Texas Cancer Center
Abilene, Texas, 79606
Cleveland Clinic Akron General
Akron, Ohio, 44307
Saint Peter's Health Partners
Albany, New York, 12208
University of New Mexico Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
Lovelace Radiation Oncology
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109
New Mexico Oncology Hematology Consultants
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109
Lehigh Valley Hospital-Cedar Crest
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103
Kaiser Permanente-Anaheim
Anaheim, California, 92806
Trinity Health Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Ascension Saint Elizabeth Hospital
Appleton, Wisconsin, 54915
Grady Health System
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
Emory University Hospital Midtown
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Piedmont Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Emory Saint Joseph's Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
John Fitzgerald Kennedy Medical Center
Atlantis, Florida, 33462
UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Rush-Copley Medical Center
Aurora, Illinois, 60504
Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center at Aventura
Aventura, Florida, 33180
University of Maryland/Greenebaum Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Saint Agnes Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21229
MaineHealth Coastal Cancer Treatment Center
Bath, Maine, 04530
McLaren Cancer Institute-Bay City
Bay City, Michigan, 48706
UHHS-Chagrin Highlands Medical Center
Beachwood, Ohio, 44122
Sanford Joe Lueken Cancer Center
Bemidji, Minnesota, 56601
Alta Bates Summit Medical Center-Herrick Campus
Berkeley, California, 94704
Central Vermont Medical Center/National Life Cancer Treatment
Berlin Corners, Vermont, 05602
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20889-5600
Billings Clinic Cancer Center
Billings, Montana, 59101
Sanford Bismarck Medical Center
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Spartanburg
Boiling Springs, South Carolina, 29316
Saint Alphonsus Cancer Care Center-Boise
Boise, Idaho, 83706
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Bozeman Health Deaconess Hospital
Bozeman, Montana, 59715
Ascension Southeast Wisconsin Hospital - Elmbrook Campus
Brookfield, Wisconsin, 53045
New York-Presbyterian/Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11215
Bryn Mawr Hospital
Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, 19010
University of Vermont Medical Center
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Saint James Community Hospital and Cancer Treatment Center
Butte, Montana, 59701
Sands Cancer Center
Canandiaqua, New York, 14424
Mercy Cancer Center - Cape Girardeau
Cape Girardeau, Missouri, 63703
Saint Francis Medical Center
Cape Girardeau, Missouri, 63703
Mercy Cancer Center - Carmichael
Carmichael, California, 95608
Mercy San Juan Medical Center
Carmichael, California, 95608
Christiana Care Health System-Concord Health Center
Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, 19317
Geauga Hospital
Chardon, Ohio, 44024
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
West Virginia University Charleston Division
Charleston, West Virginia, 25304
The Christ Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Siteman Cancer Center at Saint Peters Hospital
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376
McLaren Cancer Institute-Clarkston
Clarkston, Michigan, 48346
Michigan Healthcare Professionals Clarkston
Clarkston, Michigan, 48346
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center/Fairview Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, 44111
UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
Memorial Hospital North
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80920
Central Maryland Radiation Oncology in Howard County
Columbia, Maryland, 21044
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital
Cooperstown, New York, 13326
Siteman Cancer Center at West County Hospital
Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141
Mass General/North Shore Cancer Center
Danvers, Massachusetts, 01923
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822
Corewell Health Dearborn Hospital
Dearborn, Michigan, 48124
Decatur Memorial Hospital
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
Broward Health North
Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33064
AdventHealth Porter
Denver, Colorado, 80210
Mercy Medical Center - Des Moines
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Delaware County Memorial Hospital
Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania, 19026
Kaiser Permanente Dublin
Dublin, California, 94568
Durham VA Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Fox Chase Cancer Center - East Norriton Hospital Outpatient Center
East Norriton, Pennsylvania, 19401
University of Maryland Shore Medical Center at Easton
Easton, Maryland, 21601
Crossroads Cancer Center
Effingham, Illinois, 62401
Mercy Cancer Center - Elk Grove
Elk Grove, California, 95758
Mercy Cancer Center-Elyria
Elyria, Ohio, 44035
Exeter Hospital
Exeter, New Hampshire, 03833
Sanford Roger Maris Cancer Center
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Michigan Healthcare Professionals Farmington
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334
Weisberg Cancer Treatment Center
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334
Corewell Health Farmington Hills Hospital
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48336
Piedmont Fayette Hospital
Fayetteville, Georgia, 30214
Genesys Hurley Cancer Institute
Flint, Michigan, 48503
McLaren Cancer Institute-Flint
Flint, Michigan, 48532
Poudre Valley Hospital
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524
Broward Health Medical Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316
Parkview Hospital Randallia
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46805
Parkview Regional Medical Center
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46845
Ascension Saint Francis - Reiman Cancer Center
Franklin, Wisconsin, 53132
Fresno Cancer Center
Fresno, California, 93720
Fox Chase Cancer Center Buckingham
Furlong, Pennsylvania, 18925
Adams Cancer Center
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, 17325
Arizona Center for Cancer Care - Gilbert
Gilbert, Arizona, 85297
UM Baltimore Washington Medical Center/Tate Cancer Center
Glen Burnie, Maryland, 21061
Valley View Hospital Cancer Center
Glenwood Springs, Colorado, 81601
Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals - Butterworth Hospital
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Benefis Sletten Cancer Institute
Great Falls, Montana, 59405
Aurora BayCare Medical Center
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54311
Marin General Hospital
Greenbrae, California, 94904
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Faris
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Saint Francis Cancer Center
Greenville, South Carolina, 29607
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Eastside
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Self Regional Healthcare
Greenwood, South Carolina, 29646
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Greer
Greer, South Carolina, 29650
Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center
Gresham, Oregon, 97030
Smilow Cancer Hospital Care Center - Guilford
Guilford, Connecticut, 06437
Sentara Cancer Institute at Sentara CarePlex Hospital
Hampton, Virginia, 23666
Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-0850
The Radiation Oncology Center-Hilton Head/Bluffton
Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, 29926
Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital
Hines, Illinois, 60141
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center Independence
Independence, Ohio, 44131
Franciscan Health Indianapolis
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237
West Michigan Cancer Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007
Logan Health Medical Center
Kalispell, Montana, 59901
University of Kansas Cancer Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
GenesisCare USA - Key West
Key West, Florida, 33040
Covenant Health Cancer Centers
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37916
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093
GenesisCare USA - Lakewood Ranch
Lakewood Rch, Florida, 34202
Karmanos Cancer Institute at McLaren Greater Lansing
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
University of Michigan Health - Sparrow Lansing
Lansing, Michigan, 48912
Scotland Memorial Hospital-Laurinburg Cancer Center
Laurinburg, North Carolina, 28352
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center/Dartmouth Cancer Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Geisinger Medical Oncology-Lewisburg
Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, 17837
Lewistown Hospital
Lewistown, Pennsylvania, 17044
University of Kentucky/Markey Cancer Center
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
AdventHealth Littleton
Littleton, Colorado, 80122
Logan Regional Hospital
Logan, Utah, 84321
Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Los Angeles General Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
The James Graham Brown Cancer Center at University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Michigan Healthcare Professionals Macomb
Macomb, Michigan, 48044
Michigan Healthcare Professionals Madison Heights
Madison Heights, Michigan, 48071
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center Mansfield
Mansfield, Ohio, 44906
Saint John's Hospital - Healtheast
Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109
Hillcrest Hospital Cancer Center
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Texas Oncology-McKinney
McKinney, Texas, 75071
Froedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital
Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, 53051
UH Seidman Cancer Center at Lake Health Mentor Campus
Mentor, Ohio, 44060
Ascension Columbia Saint Mary's Hospital Ozaukee
Mequon, Wisconsin, 53097
East Jefferson General Hospital
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
LSU Healthcare Network / Metairie Multi-Specialty Clinic
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Garnet Health Medical Center
Middletown, New York, 10940
Beebe South Coastal Health Campus
Millville, Delaware, 19967
Ascension Columbia Saint Mary's Hospital - Milwaukee
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53211
Aurora Saint Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Zablocki Veterans Administration Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53295
Community Medical Center
Missoula, Montana, 59804
Mobile Infirmary Medical Center
Mobile, Alabama, 36607
Memorial Medical Center
Modesto, California, 95355
Franciscan Health Mooresville
Mooresville, Indiana, 46158
West Virginia University Healthcare
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
McLaren Cancer Institute-Macomb
Mount Clemens, Michigan, 48043
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, 84107
Carolina Regional Cancer Center
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29577
Saint Alphonsus Cancer Care Center-Nampa
Nampa, Idaho, 83687
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
Tulane University School of Medicine
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone
New York, New York, 10016
Helen F Graham Cancer Center
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Christiana Care Health System-Christiana Hospital
Newark, Delaware, 19718
Bon Secours DePaul Medical Center
Norfolk, Virginia, 23505
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Drexel Town Square Health Center
Oak Creek, Wisconsin, 53154
Kaiser Permanente Oakland-Broadway
Oakland, California, 94611
TidalHealth Richard A Henson Cancer Institute
Ocean Pines, Maryland, 21811
McKay-Dee Hospital Center
Ogden, Utah, 84403
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
Saint Joseph Hospital - Orange
Orange, California, 92868
Ascension Mercy Hospital
Oshkosh, Wisconsin, 54904
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic - Oshkosh
Oshkosh, Wisconsin, 54904
University of Kansas Cancer Center-Overland Park
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210
Stanford Cancer Institute Palo Alto
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Paoli Memorial Hospital
Paoli, Pennsylvania, 19301
The Valley Hospital - Luckow Pavilion
Paramus, New Jersey, 07652
AdventHealth Parker
Parker, Colorado, 80138
Capital Health Medical Center-Hopewell
Pennington, New Jersey, 08534
Arizona Center for Cancer Care-Peoria
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
Methodist Medical Center of Illinois
Peoria, Illinois, 61636
OSF Saint Francis Medical Center
Peoria, Illinois, 61637
McLaren Cancer Institute-Northern Michigan
Petoskey, Michigan, 49770
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
Jefferson Torresdale Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114
Temple University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Texas Oncology-Plano West
Plano, Texas, 75093
GenesisCare USA - Plantation
Plantation, Florida, 33324
McLaren-Port Huron
Port Huron, Michigan, 48060
MaineHealth Maine Medical Center - Portland
Portland, Maine, 04102
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Geisinger Cancer Services-Pottsville
Pottsville, Pennsylvania, 17901
Utah Valley Regional Medical Center
Provo, Utah, 84604
Ascension All Saints Hospital
Racine, Wisconsin, 53405
Duke Cancer Center Raleigh
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
Kaiser Permanente-Rancho Cordova Cancer Center
Rancho Cordova, California, 95670
University Hospitals Portage Medical Center
Ravenna, Ohio, 44266
Beebe Health Campus
Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, 19971
Bon Secours Cancer Institute at Reynolds Crossing
Richmond, Virginia, 23230
Oncology and Hematology Associates of Southwest Virginia
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014
Highland Hospital
Rochester, New York, 14620
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642
Mercy Cancer Center - Rocklin
Rocklin, California, 95765
Rohnert Park Cancer Center
Rohnert Park, California, 94928
Phelps Health Delbert Day Cancer Institute
Rolla, Missouri, 65401
The Permanente Medical Group-Roseville Radiation Oncology
Roseville, California, 95678
Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Mercy Cancer Center - Sacramento
Sacramento, California, 95816
Sutter Medical Center Sacramento
Sacramento, California, 95816
University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
Dartmouth Cancer Center - North
Saint Johnsbury, Vermont, 05819
Park Nicollet Clinic - Saint Louis Park
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
Regions Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101
Salinas Valley Memorial
Salinas, California, 93901
TidalHealth Peninsula Regional
Salisbury, Maryland, 21801
Stanford Cancer Center South Bay
San Jose, California, 95124
North Coast Cancer Care
Sandusky, Ohio, 44870
MaineHealth Cancer Care Center of York County
Sanford, Maine, 04073
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Santa Clara
Santa Clara, California, 95051
Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion at Saint Joseph's/Candler
Savannah, Georgia, 31405
MaineHealth Maine Medical Center- Scarborough
Scarborough, Maine, 04074
Arizona Center for Cancer Care - Scottsdale
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Seneca
Seneca, South Carolina, 29672
Sanford USD Medical Center - Sioux Falls
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57117-5134
Kaiser Permanente Cancer Treatment Center
South San Francisco, California, 94080
Springfield Memorial Hospital
Springfield, Illinois, 62781
Mercy Hospital Springfield
Springfield, Missouri, 65804
SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63104
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Siteman Cancer Center-South County
St Louis, Missouri, 63129
Missouri Baptist Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63131
Saint George Regional Medical Center
St. George, Utah, 84770
Sentara Obici Hospital
Suffolk, Virginia, 23434
Texas Oncology Cancer Center Sugar Land
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
Aurora Medical Center in Summit
Summit, Wisconsin, 53066
Novant Cancer Institute Radiation Oncology - Supply
Supply, North Carolina, 28462
Arizona Center for Cancer Care-Surprise
Surprise, Arizona, 85374
ProMedica Flower Hospital
Sylvania, Ohio, 43560
State University of New York Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Corewell Health Beaumont Troy Hospital
Troy, Michigan, 48085
Michigan Healthcare Professionals Troy
Troy, Michigan, 48098
Gene Upshaw Memorial Tahoe Forest Cancer Center
Truckee, California, 96161
Smilow Cancer Hospital Care Center-Trumbull
Trumbull, Connecticut, 06611
Arizona Oncology Associates-West Orange Grove
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Lewis and Faye Manderson Cancer Center
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35401
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic-Two Rivers
Two Rivers, Wisconsin, 54241
Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital
Vancouver, Washington, 98686
Providence Saint Mary Regional Cancer Center
Walla Walla, Washington, 99362
Smilow Cancer Hospital Care Center - Waterford
Waterford, Connecticut, 06385
Deke Slayton Cancer Center
Webster, Texas, 77598
Froedtert West Bend Hospital/Kraemer Cancer Center
West Bend, Wisconsin, 53095
Reading Hospital
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611
UHHS-Westlake Medical Center
Westlake, Ohio, 44145
Ascension Via Christi Hospitals Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, 67214
Geisinger Wyoming Valley/Henry Cancer Center
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, 18711
Asplundh Cancer Pavilion
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090
Novant Health Cancer Institute Radiation Oncology - Wilmington
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Woodland Memorial Hospital
Woodland, California, 95695
Cleveland Clinic Wooster Family Health and Surgery Center
Wooster, Ohio, 44691
Lankenau Medical Center
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
University of Michigan Health - West
Wyoming, Michigan, 49519
WellSpan Health-York Cancer Center
York, Pennsylvania, 17403
Midwestern Regional Medical Center
Zion, Illinois, 60099
Canada12 sites
Arthur J E Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 5G2
Centre De Sante Et De Services Sociaux De Chicoutimi
Chicoutimi, Quebec, G7H 5H6
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
CIUSSSEMTL-Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4
The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC)
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 2R9
Ottawa Hospital and Cancer Center-General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
CHU de Quebec-L'Hotel-Dieu de Quebec (HDQ)
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6
Allan Blair Cancer Centre
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1
Saskatoon Cancer Centre
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke-Fleurimont
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4
Ireland2 sites
Beacon Hospital
Dublin, Co Dublin, 18
Saint Lukes Hospital
Dublin, Co Dublin, 6
About this study
Official title: Phase III IGRT and SBRT vs IGRT and Hypofractionated IMRT for Localized Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
This randomized phase III trial studies how well stereotactic body radiation therapy works compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy in treating patients with stage IIA-B prostate cancer. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Stereotactic body radiation therapy uses special equipment to position a patient and deliver radiation to tumors with high precision. This method can kill tumor cells with fewer doses over a shorter period and cause less damage to normal tissue. Stereotactic body radiation therapy may work better in treating patients with prostate cancer.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can be shown to be superior to hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in terms of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity by having fewer patients that experience a minimal important decline (MID) in urinary irritation/obstructive and bowel Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) as measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 at 24 months post completion of therapy.
II. To determine if SBRT (5 fractions of 7.25 Gy) is superior to hypofractionated IMRT (28 fractions of 2.5 Gy or 20 fractions of 3 Gy) as measured by disease free survival (DFS).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether SBRT can be shown to be superior to hypofractionated IMRT at 12 and 24 months post completion of therapy in terms of HRQOL by having fewer patients that experience a minimal important decline (MID) bowel (12 months only) sexual, hormonal, urinary irritation/obstructive (12 months only) and in urinary incontinence HRQOL as measured by EPIC-26.
II. To determine if SBRT (5 fractions of 7.25 Gy) is superior to hypofractionated IMRT (28 fractions of 2.5 Gy or 20 fractions of 3 Gy) as measured by biochemical failure, overall survival, local failure, prostate cancer specific survival, and distant metastases.
III. To determine the correspondence between the diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biopsy.
IV. To determine if prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PIRADS)version (v)2.1 = 4/5 disease is prognostic for biochemical failure.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether a potentially more expensive therapy, SBRT, would be cost-effective than standard hypofractionated IMRT as measured by the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).
II. To determine if disease characteristics captured on baseline and follow-up MRI can be used to predict which patients will respond to SBRT versus hypofractionated IMRT.
III. To validate autosegmentation tools for the prostate and tumors. IV. Collect specimens for future translational research analyses.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo IMRT once daily for 5 fractions per week for 20 or 28 fractions over less than 32 business days.
ARM II: Patients undergo SBRT at least every other day for 2-3 fractions per week over less than 17 business days.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
- Conditions
- Stage II Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7
- Being tested
- Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intensity-Modulated Radiation TherapyRadiation
Also called IMRT, Intensity modulated radiation therapy (procedure), Intensity Modulated RT, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Undergo IMRT
Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther
Also called Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire AdministrationOther
Ancillary studies
Stereotactic Body Radiation TherapyRadiation
Also called SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Undergo SBRT
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (IMRT) | Active comparator | Patients undergo IMRT once daily for 5 fractions per week for 20 or 28 fractions over less than 32 business days. Receives: Radiation: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration |
| Arm II (SBRT) | Experimental | Patients undergo SBRT at least every other day for 2-3 fractions per week over less than 17 business days. Receives: Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration; Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥4 Points in the EPIC-26 Bowel Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at Two Years
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Measured: Baseline and two years
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥5 Points in the EPIC-26 Urinary Irritation Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at Two Years
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Measured: Baseline and two years
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Disease (Disease-free Survival [DSF])
Disease is defined as biochemical failure (Phoenix definition), local failure, regional failure, distant metastasis, or death from any cause. Disease-free survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring participants alive at time of analysis.
Measured: Randomization to biochemical failure, local failure, regional failure, distant metastasis, death, or last follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years. Two-year estimates are reported.
Secondary outcomes (17)
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure
Biochemical failure is defined as a rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of ≥2.0 ng/mL above the post-treatment PSA nadir following radiation therapy for prostate cancer (Phoenix definition). Biochemical failure rates were estimated using the cumulative incidence method, treating death as a competing risk, and otherwise censoring participants alive at time of analysis,
Measured: Randomization to biochemical failure, death, or last follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years. Two-year estimates are reported.
Percentage of Participants With Local Failure
Local failure rates were estimated using the cumulative incidence method, treating death as a competing risk, and otherwise censoring participants alive at time of analysis,
Measured: Randomization to local failure, death, or last known follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years. Two-year estimates are reported.
Percentage of Participants With Regional Failure
Regional failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method, treating death as a competing risk, and otherwise censoring participants alive at time of analysis, but for endpoints with ≤ 10 events overall, such as this one, only the count and raw percentage of participants with the event are provided.
Measured: From randomization to regional failure, death, or last known follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years.
Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis
Distant metastasis rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method, treating death as a competing risk, and otherwise censoring participants alive at time of analysis, but for endpoints with ≤ 10 events overall, such as this one, only the count and raw percentage of participants with the event are provided.
Measured: Randomization to distant metastasis, death, or last known follow-up date, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up time at time of analysis was 3.2 years.
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer death rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method, treating death due to other causes as a competing risk, and otherwise censoring participants alive at time of analysis, but for endpoints with ≤ 10 events overall, such as this one, only the count and raw percentage of participants with the event are provided.
Measured: Randomization to death or last follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years.
Percentage of Particpants Alive (Overall Survival)
Survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring participants alive at time of analysis.
Measured: Randomization to death or last follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years. Two-year estimates are reported.
Number of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Event
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0) grades adverse event severity as follows: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life-threatening, 5 = death related to adverse event. Adverse events reported as possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment are considered to be treatment-related adverse events. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data.
Measured: Randomization to death or last follow-up. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years.
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥4 Points in the EPIC-26 Bowel Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at One Year
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Measured: Baseline and one year
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥4 Points in the EPIC-26 Urinary Irritation Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at One Year
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Measured: Baseline and one year
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥6 Points in the EPIC-26 Urinary Incontinence Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at One Year
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Measured: Baseline and one year
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥6 Points in the EPIC-26 Urinary Incontinence Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at Two Years
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Measured: Baseline and two years
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥4 Points in the EPIC-26 Hormonal Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at One Year
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Measured: Baseline and one year
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥4 Points in the EPIC-26 Hormonal Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at Two Years
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Measured: Baseline and two years
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥10 Points in the EPIC-26 Sexual Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at One Year
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Measured: Baseline and one year
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥10 Points in the EPIC-26 Sexual Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at Two Years
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Measured: Baseline and two years
Presence of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version (PIRADSv) 2 = 4/5 Disease
Will be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Measured: Baseline
Predictive Value of PIRADSv2 = 4/5 Disease for Biochemical Failure
Predictive value of PIRADSv2 = 4/5 disease for biochemical failure
Measured: Up to 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2017
- Study start1 Feb 2018
- Primary completion15 Jan 2025
- Study completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stage II Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by NRG OncologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 698 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NRG Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rodney J Ellis, Principal investigator, NRG Oncology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03367702
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NRG-GU005
- Other IDs
- NCI-2017-01398, NRG-GU005, NRG-GU005, U10CA180868
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: NCI is committed to sharing data in accordance with NIH policy. For more details on how clinical trial data is shared, access the link to the NIH data sharing policy page.
Publications
Ellis RJ, Pugh SL, Yu JB, Feng FY, Konski AA, Grubb RL 3rd, Wallace RE, Gladstone DJ, Menard C, Miccio JA, Frazier AJ, Pennington JD, Michalski JM, Spratt DE, Martinez A, Morgan SC, Mihai A, Solanki AA, Amjad A, Straza MW, Delouya G, Schroeder TM, Marshall DT, Kapadia N, Patel AN, Cescon TP, El-Gayed A, Yoon HA, Paulus R, Sandler HM; NRG-GU005 Collaborative Authors. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Moderately Hypofractionated IMRT for Localized Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2026 Aug 13:e2612627. doi: 10.1001/jama.2026.12627. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42593775Alley S, Tonneau M, Olivie D, Tempany-Afdhal CM, Choyke PL, Turkbey IB, van der Heide UA, Ellis RJ, Kadoury S, Boike TP, Pennington JD, Frazier A, Lawton CAF, Leong N, Mihai AM, Morgan SC, Solanki AA, Michalski JM, Feng FY, Sandler HM, Menard C. Assessing Quality and Adherence to PI-RADSv2.1 Minimum Technical Standards of Prostate MRI in NRG-GU005. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2026 Feb;63(2):464-474. doi: 10.1002/jmri.70142. Epub 2025 Oct 8.
PubMed 41063518Alley S, Jackson E, Olivie D, Van der Heide UA, Menard C, Kadoury S. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging pre-processing on the performance of model-based prostate tumor probability mapping. Phys Med Biol. 2022 Dec 13;67(24). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac99b4.
PubMed 36223780
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III IGRT and SBRT vs IGRT and Hypofractionated IMRT for Localized Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03367702
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NRG-GU005
- Conditions
- Stage II Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 698 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NRG OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 29 Oct 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized phase III trial studies how well stereotactic body radiation therapy works compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy in treating patients with stage IIA-B prostate cancer. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Stereotactic body radiation therapy uses special equipment to position a patient and deliver radiation to tumors with high precision. This method can kill tumor cells with fewer doses over a shorter period and cause less damage to normal tissue. Stereotactic body radiation therapy may work better in treating patients with prostate cancer.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can be shown to be superior to hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in terms of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity by having fewer patients that experience a minimal important decline (MID) in urinary irritation/obstructive and bowel Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) as measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 at 24 months post completion of therapy.
II. To determine if SBRT (5 fractions of 7.25 Gy) is superior to hypofractionated IMRT (28 fractions of 2.5 Gy or 20 fractions of 3 Gy) as measured by disease free survival (DFS).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether SBRT can be shown to be superior to hypofractionated IMRT at 12 and 24 months post completion of therapy in terms of HRQOL by having fewer patients that experience a minimal important decline (MID) bowel (12 months only) sexual, hormonal, urinary irritation/obstructive (12 months only) and in urinary incontinence HRQOL as measured by EPIC-26.
II. To determine if SBRT (5 fractions of 7.25 Gy) is superior to hypofractionated IMRT (28 fractions of 2.5 Gy or 20 fractions of 3 Gy) as measured by biochemical failure, overall survival, local failure, prostate cancer specific survival, and distant metastases.
III. To determine the correspondence between the diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biopsy.
IV. To determine if prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PIRADS)version (v)2.1 = 4/5 disease is prognostic for biochemical failure.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether a potentially more expensive therapy, SBRT, would be cost-effective than standard hypofractionated IMRT as measured by the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).
II. To determine if disease characteristics captured on baseline and follow-up MRI can be used to predict which patients will respond to SBRT versus hypofractionated IMRT.
III. To validate autosegmentation tools for the prostate and tumors. IV. Collect specimens for future translational research analyses.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo IMRT once daily for 5 fractions per week for 20 or 28 fractions over less than 32 business days.
ARM II: Patients undergo SBRT at least every other day for 2-3 fractions per week over less than 17 business days.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (IMRT) | Active comparator | Radiation: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment, Other: Questionnaire AdministrationPatients undergo IMRT once daily for 5 fractions per week for 20 or 28 fractions over less than 32 business days. |
| Arm II (SBRT) | Experimental | Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment, Other: Questionnaire Administration, Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation TherapyPatients undergo SBRT at least every other day for 2-3 fractions per week over less than 17 business days. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Previously untreated (no local therapy such as surgery, radiation cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound [HIFU], etc.) localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate with the following clinical findings:
- Age >= 18
- History and physical including a digital rectal exam 60 days prior to registration
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 60 days prior to registration
- MRI of the prostate and pelvis (per institutional standard of care [SOC] - should be compliant with PIRADSv2.1 guidelines) within 1 year prior to registration
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Definitive clinical or radiologic evidence of metastatic disease; no nodal involvement or evidence of metastatic disease allowed as defined by screening of the pelvis
- Definitive T3 disease on MRI
- Prior or current invasive malignancy with current evidence of active disease within the past 2 years
- Prior systemic chemotherapy for the study cancer; note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable; must be off treatment for at least 3 years
- Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intensity-Modulated Radiation TherapyAlso: IMRT, Intensity modulated radiation therapy (procedure), Intensity Modulated RT, Intensity-Modulated RadiotherapyUndergo IMRT | Radiation | Arm I (IMRT) |
| Quality-of-Life AssessmentAlso: Quality of Life AssessmentAncillary studies | Other | Arm I (IMRT), Arm II (SBRT) |
| Questionnaire AdministrationAncillary studies | Other | Arm I (IMRT), Arm II (SBRT) |
| Stereotactic Body Radiation TherapyAlso: SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation TherapyUndergo SBRT | Radiation | Arm II (SBRT) |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥4 Points in the EPIC-26 Bowel Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at Two Years
Time frame: Baseline and two years
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥5 Points in the EPIC-26 Urinary Irritation Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at Two Years
Time frame: Baseline and two years
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer across urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change is defined as the time point score minus the baseline score, where positive values indicate improvement and negative values indicate decline.
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Disease (Disease-free Survival [DSF])
Time frame: Randomization to biochemical failure, local failure, regional failure, distant metastasis, death, or last follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years. Two-year estimates are reported.
Disease is defined as biochemical failure (Phoenix definition), local failure, regional failure, distant metastasis, or death from any cause. Disease-free survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring participants alive at time of analysis.
17 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure
Time frame: Randomization to biochemical failure, death, or last follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years. Two-year estimates are reported.
Percentage of Participants With Local Failure
Time frame: Randomization to local failure, death, or last known follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years. Two-year estimates are reported.
Percentage of Participants With Regional Failure
Time frame: From randomization to regional failure, death, or last known follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years.
Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis
Time frame: Randomization to distant metastasis, death, or last known follow-up date, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up time at time of analysis was 3.2 years.
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer
Time frame: Randomization to death or last follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years.
Percentage of Particpants Alive (Overall Survival)
Time frame: Randomization to death or last follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years. Two-year estimates are reported.
Number of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Event
Time frame: Randomization to death or last follow-up. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 3.2 years.
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥4 Points in the EPIC-26 Bowel Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at One Year
Time frame: Baseline and one year
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥4 Points in the EPIC-26 Urinary Irritation Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at One Year
Time frame: Baseline and one year
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥6 Points in the EPIC-26 Urinary Incontinence Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at One Year
Time frame: Baseline and one year
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥6 Points in the EPIC-26 Urinary Incontinence Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at Two Years
Time frame: Baseline and two years
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥4 Points in the EPIC-26 Hormonal Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at One Year
Time frame: Baseline and one year
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥4 Points in the EPIC-26 Hormonal Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at Two Years
Time frame: Baseline and two years
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥10 Points in the EPIC-26 Sexual Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at One Year
Time frame: Baseline and one year
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥10 Points in the EPIC-26 Sexual Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at Two Years
Time frame: Baseline and two years
Presence of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version (PIRADSv) 2 = 4/5 Disease
Time frame: Baseline
Predictive Value of PIRADSv2 = 4/5 Disease for Biochemical Failure
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42593775Ellis RJ, Pugh SL, Yu JB, Feng FY, Konski AA, Grubb RL 3rd, Wallace RE, Gladstone DJ, Menard C, Miccio JA, Frazier AJ, Pennington JD, Michalski JM, Spratt DE, Martinez A, Morgan SC, Mihai A, Solanki AA, Amjad A, Straza MW, Delouya G, Schroeder TM, Marshall DT, Kapadia N, Patel AN, Cescon TP, El-Gayed A, Yoon HA, Paulus R, Sandler HM; NRG-GU005 Collaborative Authors. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Moderately Hypofractionated IMRT for Localized Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2026 Aug 13:e2612627. doi: 10.1001/jama.2026.12627. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41063518Alley S, Tonneau M, Olivie D, Tempany-Afdhal CM, Choyke PL, Turkbey IB, van der Heide UA, Ellis RJ, Kadoury S, Boike TP, Pennington JD, Frazier A, Lawton CAF, Leong N, Mihai AM, Morgan SC, Solanki AA, Michalski JM, Feng FY, Sandler HM, Menard C. Assessing Quality and Adherence to PI-RADSv2.1 Minimum Technical Standards of Prostate MRI in NRG-GU005. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2026 Feb;63(2):464-474. doi: 10.1002/jmri.70142. Epub 2025 Oct 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36223780Alley S, Jackson E, Olivie D, Van der Heide UA, Menard C, Kadoury S. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging pre-processing on the performance of model-based prostate tumor probability mapping. Phys Med Biol. 2022 Dec 13;67(24). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac99b4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. NCI is committed to sharing data in accordance with NIH policy. For more details on how clinical trial data is shared, access the link to the NIH data sharing policy page.
Related trials for Stage II Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Thermal Ablation and Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Treating Patients With Spine Metastases at Risk for Compressing the Spinal Cord
Malignant Digestive System Neoplasm, Metastatic Head and Neck Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Radiation Therapy With or Without Apalutamide in Treating Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer, the BALANCE Trial
Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma, Stage III Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Antiandrogen Therapy and Radiation Therapy With or Without Docetaxel in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer That Has Been Removed by Surgery
Stage I Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7, Stage II Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Androgen Receptor Antagonist ARN-509 With or Without Abiraterone Acetate, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analog, and Prednisone in Treating Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Surgery
Stage II Prostate Adenocarcinoma, Stage III Prostate Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rodney J Ellis principal investigator
NRG Oncology
293 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Quality-of-Life Assessment and Questionnaire Administration in people with Stage II Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7, run by NRG Oncology at 293 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 293 sites in United States, Canada, Ireland, Hong Kong, India and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With a Decline of ≥4 Points in the EPIC-26 Bowel Domain (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) at Two Years (time frame: Baseline and two years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03367702, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2026.