Plastic SurgeryDRAINAGENCT03364569
Usefullness of Peri-operative Tranexamic Acid in Primary Breast Augmentation With Implants.
An observational study of Plastic Surgery, run by Hôpital NOVO at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Tranexamic acid (TXA), as an antifibrinolytic agent, has shown a tremendous interest in surgery by reducing blood loss ; but only few articles have been reported in the plastic surgery scope. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Plastic Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Tranexamic acid
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2014to 1 Apr 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Study population: Breast augmentation with placement of prosthetic implants.
Who may be able to join
- Woman with Primary Breast Augmentation
Who cannot join
- Past History of Thromboembolism
- Use of anticoagulant or platelet-inhibiting drugs
- Severe Co-morbidity (ASA III)
- Pre-pectoral Implant Pocket Location
- Breast lipofecting
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Tranexamic acid (TXA), as an antifibrinolytic agent, has shown a tremendous interest in surgery by reducing blood loss ; but only few articles have been reported in the plastic surgery scope. The aim of this study was to investigate whether oral administration of TXA reduces surgical drainage in primary breast augmentation using implants.
Read the detailed description
A total of forty participants were included in this case-control study over a fifteen months period. The participants were divided in two equal groups. The case group (TXA group) was treated with a daily oral administration of two grams of tranexamic acid whereas the control group (noTXA group) was not treated. The data that has been recorded is the gender, the age, the implant volume (cc), the shape of the implant (round or anatomical), the type of surgical pocket (pre-muscular or retro-muscular), the texture of the implant (textured or smooth), the operating time (in minutes), the blood pressure operative average during surgery, volume of fluid daily (right and left) and complications (hematoma, infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, anaphylaxis and early exposure to implants).
Three investigators were enrolled in the study, including the corresponding author. Two investigators performed the intervention, operating one breast each.
At the end of the surgical procedure, a drain was put in the retro-pectoral space on each breast side. A compressive garment was immediately fitted before the exit of the participant. The participants received oral analgesics according to the hospital guidelines and no thromboprophylaxis was given, as it is a standard recommendation of the French Society of Anaesthesiologists (SFAR).
Oral administration of the TXA had never been tested in breast augmentation indications, and the investigators followed the recommendations of one gram, two times a day, starting at the end of the surgery so as to avoid any adverse effects. The participants received two grams of Spotof ® (C.C.D laboratory, Portugal) as an oral liquid solution during three days.
All participants were interviewed by a nurse every four hours starting at the end of the post-operative recovery room till the exit of their hospital stay. Drain fluid volume in the vacuum devices was recorded every twenty four hours. The drains were removed when production was below forty milliliter per twenty four hours, according to hospital routine. Any early (less than seven days) or late (better than thirty days) post-operative complications were also listed. All participants had a consultation seven days and two months after the surgery according to the department guidelines. A hotline telephone number has been given to participants to facilitate contact if any inconvenient consequences have occurred.
In each sub-group (no TXA and TXA), the main outcome was the drain fluid production during the study which was registered for each breast every twenty four hours after the surgery and at the exit of the participant. Volume were stored and collected in milli-liters (mL) without consistency or color analysis. The age (in years), the implant volume (in milliliters), the shape (round or anatomic) and the texture (smooth or textured), the mean operative time (in minutes), the mean operative arterial pressure (in mmHg) were also recorded as well as the length of the hospital stay (in days). Any surgical complications and any side effects associated to the TXA drug were also listed.
- Conditions
- Plastic Surgery
- Being tested
- Tranexamic acid
- Keywords
- Drainage, Breast augmentation, Tranexamic acid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tranexamic acidProcedure or surgery
Participants with taking tranexamic acid (2 x 1g per day) as a preventive and without adjuvant treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Participant with tranexamic acid. | The investigators followed the recommendations of one gram, two times a day, starting at the end of the surgery so as to avoid any adverse effects. The participants received two grams of Spotof ® (C.C.D laboratory, Portugal) as an oral liquid solution during three days. Receives: Procedure: Tranexamic acid | |
| Participant without tranexamic acid. | This group concerns participants followed without acid tranexamic treatment. Investigators will observe the postoperative practices and complications observed, according to the surgical habits. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post-operative drainage volume
At the end of the surgical procedure, a drain was put in the retro-pectoral space on each breast side. A compressive garment was immediately fitted before the exit of the patient. The participants received oral analgesics according to the hospital guidelines and no thromboprophylaxis was given, as it is a standard recommendation of the French Society of Anaesthesiologists (SFAR). Drain fluid volume in the vacuum devices was recorded every 24 hours. The drains were removed when production was below 40 mL per 24h, according to hospital routine. Volume were stored and collected in milli-liters (mL) without consistency or color analysis. Age (in Years), Implant Volume (in milli-liters), Shape (Round or Anatomic) and Texture (Smooth or Textured), Mean Operative Time (in minutes), Mean Operative Arterial Pressure (in mmHg) were also recorded as well as the length of the Hospital Stay (in Days).
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Post-operative complications
The investigators observed postoperative complications. All participant were interviewed by a nurse every 4 hours starting at the end of the post-operative recovery room till the exit of their hospital stay. Any early (< 7 days) or late (> 30 days) post-operative complications were also listed. All the participants had a consultation 7 days and 2 months after the surgery according to the department guidelines. A Hotline phone number was given to the patients to ease contact if any inconvenient aftermath occured. Any surgical complications and any side effects associated to the TXA drug were also listed.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Dec 2017
- Study start1 Nov 2014
- Primary completion1 Apr 2016
- Study completion1 Apr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Plastic SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hôpital NOVO
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thomas COLSON, Principal investigator, Hôpital NOVO
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03364569
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHRD2315
- Acronym
- DRAINAGE
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 24 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 9 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Usefullness of Peri-operative Tranexamic Acid in Primary Breast Augmentation With Implants.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03364569
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DRAINAGE / CHRD2315
- Conditions
- Plastic Surgery
- Keywords
- Drainage, Breast augmentation, Tranexamic acid
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hôpital NOVOUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Tranexamic acid (TXA), as an antifibrinolytic agent, has shown a tremendous interest in surgery by reducing blood loss ; but only few articles have been reported in the plastic surgery scope. The aim of this study was to investigate whether oral administration of TXA reduces surgical drainage in primary breast augmentation using implants.
Detailed description
A total of forty participants were included in this case-control study over a fifteen months period. The participants were divided in two equal groups. The case group (TXA group) was treated with a daily oral administration of two grams of tranexamic acid whereas the control group (noTXA group) was not treated. The data that has been recorded is the gender, the age, the implant volume (cc), the shape of the implant (round or anatomical), the type of surgical pocket (pre-muscular or retro-muscular), the texture of the implant (textured or smooth), the operating time (in minutes), the blood pressure operative average during surgery, volume of fluid daily (right and left) and complications (hematoma, infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, anaphylaxis and early exposure to implants).
Three investigators were enrolled in the study, including the corresponding author. Two investigators performed the intervention, operating one breast each.
At the end of the surgical procedure, a drain was put in the retro-pectoral space on each breast side. A compressive garment was immediately fitted before the exit of the participant. The participants received oral analgesics according to the hospital guidelines and no thromboprophylaxis was given, as it is a standard recommendation of the French Society of Anaesthesiologists (SFAR).
Oral administration of the TXA had never been tested in breast augmentation indications, and the investigators followed the recommendations of one gram, two times a day, starting at the end of the surgery so as to avoid any adverse effects. The participants received two grams of Spotof ® (C.C.D laboratory, Portugal) as an oral liquid solution during three days.
All participants were interviewed by a nurse every four hours starting at the end of the post-operative recovery room till the exit of their hospital stay. Drain fluid volume in the vacuum devices was recorded every twenty four hours. The drains were removed when production was below forty milliliter per twenty four hours, according to hospital routine. Any early (less than seven days) or late (better than thirty days) post-operative complications were also listed. All participants had a consultation seven days and two months after the surgery according to the department guidelines. A hotline telephone number has been given to participants to facilitate contact if any inconvenient consequences have occurred.
In each sub-group (no TXA and TXA), the main outcome was the drain fluid production during the study which was registered for each breast every twenty four hours after the surgery and at the exit of the participant. Volume were stored and collected in milli-liters (mL) without consistency or color analysis. The age (in years), the implant volume (in milliliters), the shape (round or anatomic) and the texture (smooth or textured), the mean operative time (in minutes), the mean operative arterial pressure (in mmHg) were also recorded as well as the length of the hospital stay (in days). Any surgical complications and any side effects associated to the TXA drug were also listed.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Participant with tranexamic acid. | – | Procedure: Tranexamic acidThe investigators followed the recommendations of one gram, two times a day, starting at the end of the surgery so as to avoid any adverse effects. The participants received two grams of Spotof ® (C.C.D laboratory, Portugal) as an oral liquid solution during three days. |
| Participant without tranexamic acid. | – | –This group concerns participants followed without acid tranexamic treatment. Investigators will observe the postoperative practices and complications observed, according to the surgical habits. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Breast augmentation with placement of prosthetic implants.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Woman with Primary Breast Augmentation
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Past History of Thromboembolism
- Use of anticoagulant or platelet-inhibiting drugs
- Severe Co-morbidity (ASA III)
- Pre-pectoral Implant Pocket Location
- Breast lipofecting
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tranexamic acidParticipants with taking tranexamic acid (2 x 1g per day) as a preventive and without adjuvant treatment. | Procedure or surgery | Participant with tranexamic acid. |
Primary outcome
Post-operative drainage volume
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
At the end of the surgical procedure, a drain was put in the retro-pectoral space on each breast side. A compressive garment was immediately fitted before the exit of the patient. The participants received oral analgesics according to the hospital guidelines and no thromboprophylaxis was given, as it is a standard recommendation of the French Society of Anaesthesiologists (SFAR). Drain fluid volume in the vacuum devices was recorded every 24 hours. The drains were removed when production was below 40 mL per 24h, according to hospital routine. Volume were stored and collected in milli-liters (mL) without consistency or color analysis. Age (in Years), Implant Volume (in milli-liters), Shape (Round or Anatomic) and Texture (Smooth or Textured), Mean Operative Time (in minutes), Mean Operative Arterial Pressure (in mmHg) were also recorded as well as the length of the Hospital Stay (in Days).
1 secondary outcome
Post-operative complications
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Plastic Surgery
RecruitingObservational study
Leica Microsystems Sponsored Study to Collect and Confirm Clinical Data on the Performance of the GLOW800 Device When Used in Accordance With Its Intended Use.
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures, Plastic Surgery
Active, not recruiting
ELIXIR MDTM Satisfaction Clinical Trial
Postoperative Complications, Plastic Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Study of Regional Nerve Blocks in Primary Cleft Palate Repair
Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate +/- Lip
RecruitingPhase 2
Cleft Lip Scarring After Botox
Cleft Lip, Cleft Lip Scar
Not yet recruiting
Surgical Dressing Study Comparing SYLKE vs Other Common Incisional Dressings Following Abdominoplasty/Panniculectomy Patients
Hypertrophic Surgical Scar, Medical Adhesive Related Skin Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas COLSON principal investigator
Hôpital NOVO
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Plastic Surgery, run by Hôpital NOVO at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post-operative drainage volume (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2026.