Peptic Ulcer HemorrhagePhase 2NCT03362268
IIaprazole for the Treatment and Prevention of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding in Chinese Patients
A Phase 2 study testing Ilaprazole and omeprazole in people with Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage, run by Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc..
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole and omeprazole in the treatment and prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding. Patients with endoscopically diagnosed peptic ulcer bleeding were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel and positive-controlled trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage
- What is being tested?
- Ilaprazole and omeprazole
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Feb 2014to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- were 18-65 years of age, male or female.
- had symptoms of hematemesis, hematochezia, melena within 24 hours and clinically diagnosed as peptic ulcer bleeding.
- had endoscopically diagnosed gastric or duodenal ulcer bleeding (multiple ulcers was judged by the higher Forrest level).
- were patients of Forrest Ⅰa-Ⅱb level and had successful endoscopic surgery to stop bleeding (bleeding was cured and the blood vessels were flat or became into the lumen). Ⅱc-Ⅲ grade patients did not receive endoscopic hemostasis.
- voluntarily sign informed consent.
Who cannot join
- had hemorrhagic shock (systolic blood pressure<90mmHg) or require surgery.
- were non-ulcer bleeding and gastric ulcer biopsy proved malignant.
- had gastrectomy and gastrointestinal anastomosis.
- were suffering from serious heart, liver, brain, lung, kidney and other serious diseases.
- had coagulation disorders (laboratory tests showed that platelets <80 × 109 / L, PT abnormal and exceed the normal control for 3 seconds, APTT than the normal control for 10 seconds).
- had hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to ilaprazole, omeprazole, esomeprazole or any other benzimidazole.
Show all 11Show fewer
- had positive result of urine pregnancy test.
- used the same kind of drugs within 48 hours before entering the group.
- need to continue the combination of the following drugs that have an effect on treatment during the study: NSAIDs, corticosteroids, heparin, warfarin and vitamin K, platelet antagonists or other hemostatic agents.
- participated in a clinical trial with an investigational drug or device within the past three months.
- had alcoholic intemperance, drug addiction or other factors that researchers think it unfit for drug clinical trials.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous IIaprazole for Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Omeprazole-Controlled, Multicenter, and Phase 2 Trail in China
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole and omeprazole in the treatment and prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding. Patients with endoscopically diagnosed peptic ulcer bleeding were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel and positive-controlled trial. They were randomly assigned into two groups, ilaprazole and omeprazole, to be treated for up to 30 days and be seen at day 3, 4, 7, 14 and 30. The primary endpoint was the hemostasis rate (hemostatic groups with endoscopy check ) and re-bleeding rate ( bleeding groups with endoscopy check) within 72 hours. Secondary end points include effective rate of hemostasis, mean volume of blood transfusion, the length of stay and re-bleeding rate, etc.
Read the detailed description
Patients with endoscopically diagnosed gastric and duodenal ulcer bleeding were randomly assigned into two groups, ilaprazole and omeprazole. 120 patients were administrated 10 mg ilaprazole daily (at day 1-3) through intravenous infusion within 30min with first dose doubling. Since 4th day, those patients were changed to oral administration. Other 60 patients were administrated 40 mg omeprazole twice daily (at day 1-3) through intravenous infusion within 30min. Since 4th day, those patients were changed to oral administration. The efficacy of ilaprazole and omeprazole was evaluated by the primary endpoint including the hemostasis rate (hemostatic groups with endoscopy check ) and re-bleeding rate (bleeding groups with endoscopy check) within 72 hours and secondary end points including effective rate of hemostasis, average blood transfusion, the need to switch to other treatments (endoscopic treatment or surgery, etc.), hospital stay and re-bleeding rate at day 7, 14 and 30. Safety assessments based mainly on the occurrence, frequency, and severity of adverse events, which were monitored throughout the duration of the study, and also based on comprehensive indexes,including physical examination, electrocardiography, and routine laboratory investigations, which were performed at baseline and repeated at the end of the treatment period. For all adverse events, where necessary, patients were withdrawn from the study.This phase Ⅱ clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole and omeprazole in the treatment and prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding.
- Conditions
- Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage
- Being tested
- Ilaprazole, omeprazole
- Medical subject headings
- Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IlaprazoleDrug
10 mg ilaprazole daily (at day 1-3) through intravenous infusion within 30min with first dose doubling. Since 4th day, those patients were changed to take oral ilaprazole tablets 10mg each day till 30th day
omeprazoleDrug
40 mg omeprazole twice daily (at day 1-3) through intravenous infusion within 30min,Since 4th day, those patients were changed to take oral omeprazole tablets 20mg each day till 30th day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ilaprazole | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Ilaprazole |
| omeprazole | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: omeprazole |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The rate of hemostasis peptic ulcer hemorrhage patients
Measure: The hemostasis rate checked by endoscopy within 72 hours
Measured: 72 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2017
- Study startFeb 2014
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionJul 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peptic Ulcer HemorrhageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03362268
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Livzon-IYI-Ⅱ
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Dec 2017
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Dec 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous IIaprazole for Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Omeprazole-Controlled, Multicenter, and Phase 2 Trail in China
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03362268
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Livzon-IYI-Ⅱ
- Conditions
- Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole and omeprazole in the treatment and prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding. Patients with endoscopically diagnosed peptic ulcer bleeding were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel and positive-controlled trial. They were randomly assigned into two groups, ilaprazole and omeprazole, to be treated for up to 30 days and be seen at day 3, 4, 7, 14 and 30. The primary endpoint was the hemostasis rate (hemostatic groups with endoscopy check ) and re-bleeding rate ( bleeding groups with endoscopy check) within 72 hours. Secondary end points include effective rate of hemostasis, mean volume of blood transfusion, the length of stay and re-bleeding rate, etc.
Detailed description
Patients with endoscopically diagnosed gastric and duodenal ulcer bleeding were randomly assigned into two groups, ilaprazole and omeprazole. 120 patients were administrated 10 mg ilaprazole daily (at day 1-3) through intravenous infusion within 30min with first dose doubling. Since 4th day, those patients were changed to oral administration. Other 60 patients were administrated 40 mg omeprazole twice daily (at day 1-3) through intravenous infusion within 30min. Since 4th day, those patients were changed to oral administration. The efficacy of ilaprazole and omeprazole was evaluated by the primary endpoint including the hemostasis rate (hemostatic groups with endoscopy check ) and re-bleeding rate (bleeding groups with endoscopy check) within 72 hours and secondary end points including effective rate of hemostasis, average blood transfusion, the need to switch to other treatments (endoscopic treatment or surgery, etc.), hospital stay and re-bleeding rate at day 7, 14 and 30. Safety assessments based mainly on the occurrence, frequency, and severity of adverse events, which were monitored throughout the duration of the study, and also based on comprehensive indexes,including physical examination, electrocardiography, and routine laboratory investigations, which were performed at baseline and repeated at the end of the treatment period. For all adverse events, where necessary, patients were withdrawn from the study.This phase Ⅱ clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole and omeprazole in the treatment and prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ilaprazole | Experimental | Drug: Ilaprazole |
| omeprazole | Active comparator | Drug: omeprazole |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- were 18-65 years of age, male or female.
- had symptoms of hematemesis, hematochezia, melena within 24 hours and clinically diagnosed as peptic ulcer bleeding.
- had endoscopically diagnosed gastric or duodenal ulcer bleeding (multiple ulcers was judged by the higher Forrest level).
- were patients of Forrest Ⅰa-Ⅱb level and had successful endoscopic surgery to stop bleeding (bleeding was cured and the blood vessels were flat or became into the lumen). Ⅱc-Ⅲ grade patients did not receive endoscopic hemostasis.
- voluntarily sign informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- had hemorrhagic shock (systolic blood pressure<90mmHg) or require surgery.
- were non-ulcer bleeding and gastric ulcer biopsy proved malignant.
- had gastrectomy and gastrointestinal anastomosis.
- were suffering from serious heart, liver, brain, lung, kidney and other serious diseases.
- had coagulation disorders (laboratory tests showed that platelets <80 × 109 / L, PT abnormal and exceed the normal control for 3 seconds, APTT than the normal control for 10 seconds).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ilaprazole10 mg ilaprazole daily (at day 1-3) through intravenous infusion within 30min with first dose doubling. Since 4th day, those patients were changed to take oral ilaprazole tablets 10mg each day till 30th day | Drug | Ilaprazole |
| omeprazole40 mg omeprazole twice daily (at day 1-3) through intravenous infusion within 30min,Since 4th day, those patients were changed to take oral omeprazole tablets 20mg each day till 30th day | Drug | omeprazole |
Primary outcome
The rate of hemostasis peptic ulcer hemorrhage patients
Time frame: 72 hours
Measure: The hemostasis rate checked by endoscopy within 72 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Dec 2017.
Related trials for Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage
RecruitingPhase 4
Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Versus pROton-Pump Inhibitor for GastroproTECTion Strategies In Patients at High Gastro-Intestinal Bleeding Risk Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy
Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
RecruitingPhase 2
Tegoprazan Versus Lansoprazole for Endoscopic Ulcer Healing in Bleeding Peptic Ulcers
Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
Not yet recruiting
Potassium-competitive Acid Blocker Versus Double Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in High High-risk Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
Bleeding
Recruiting
Marginal Ulcer Healing With Low-Thermal Argon Plasma Endoscopic Treatment
Roux-en-y Anastomosis Site, Marginal Ulcer
Recruiting
Randomized Trial of UI-EWD vs. Conventional Endoscopic Therapy for Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Ilaprazole and omeprazole in people with Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage, run by Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc..
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The rate of hemostasis peptic ulcer hemorrhage patients (time frame: 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2017.