AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)RCNCT03352219

Reality Check: An HIV Risk Reduction Serial Drama

A study testing Reality Check in people with HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

African Americans have considerably higher rates of HIV infections than do White, Hispanic, Asian, and Native Americans. African Americans accounted for 59% of all diagnoses of HIV infection among youth (13-24 years of age) in the United States. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 24 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Reality Check
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
203 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Sep 2016to 31 Mar 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 24 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Self-identified as black or African American, had a Facebook ID, had a smartphone with access to the Internet, and reported having sexual intercourse in the previous 90 days

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Reality Check: Evaluation of an HIV Risk Reduction Serial Drama for Black Youth

African Americans have considerably higher rates of HIV infections than do White, Hispanic, Asian, and Native Americans. African Americans accounted for 59% of all diagnoses of HIV infection among youth (13-24 years of age) in the United States. Young African Americans also have disproportionately high rates of other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Therefore, the broad, long-term objective of this research is to identify interventions to reduce the risk of HIV and other STIs among young African Americans. Entertainment-education refers to narrative interventions designed to change behavior while providing entertainment. Several studies have evaluated the impact of media content on HIV risk behavior. One study found that exposure to an entertainment-education based HIV testing campaign was associated with increases in HIV testing among sexually active teens 12 months post exposure. Similarly, a radio soap opera called "Twende na Wakati" became the most popular television show in Tanzania and was highly successful in reducing the number of sexual partners and increasing condom use. A narrative video intervention study in STI clinic waiting rooms in three U.S. cities found a significant reduction in STI re-infection among patients visiting during months when the video was shown compared with patients visiting during months when it was not shown. Although these studies show that entertainment-education can be a promising medium for behavior change, none of them evaluated the efficacy of a tailored online entertainment-education intervention specifically designed for African American youth. To address this gap in the literature, this study tested the preliminary efficacy of an innovative, theory-based HIV risk-reduction serial drama intervention, Reality Check, specifically tailored to young African Americans. We used a randomized controlled trial, allocating African Americans 18 to 24 years of age to Reality Check, or an attention-control intervention promoting physical activity. Each intervention was delivered as a series of videos streamed online and accessible via any Internet-capable device. Participants completed surveys online at baseline, immediately post intervention, and 3 months post intervention. We hypothesized that, Reality Check would reduce condomless sex during the 3-month post-intervention period compared with the attention-matched control group, adjusting for baseline of the criterion.

Read the detailed description

African Americans have considerably higher rates of HIV infections than do White, Hispanic, Asian, and Native Americans. African Americans accounted for 59% of all diagnoses of HIV infection among youth (13-24 years of age) in the United States. Young African Americans also have disproportionately high rates of other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Therefore, the broad, long-term objective of this research is to identify interventions to reduce the risk of HIV and other STIs among young African Americans. Entertainment-education refers to narrative interventions designed to change behavior while providing entertainment. Several studies have evaluated the impact of media content on HIV risk behavior. One study found that exposure to an entertainment-education based HIV testing campaign was associated with increases in HIV testing among sexually active teens 12 months post exposure. Sabido and colleagues used "telenovelas" in Mexico to increase participation in a national literacy campaign and promote birth control use. Similarly, a radio soap opera called "Twende na Wakati" became the most popular television show in Tanzania and was highly successful in reducing the number of sexual partners and increasing condom use. A narrative video intervention study in STI clinic waiting rooms in three U.S. cities found a significant reduction in STI re-infection among patients visiting during months when the video was shown compared with patients visiting during months when it was not shown. Although these studies show that entertainment-education can be a promising medium for behavior change, none of them evaluated the efficacy of a tailored online entertainment-education intervention specifically designed for African American youth. To address this gap in the literature, this study tested the preliminary efficacy of an innovative, theory-based HIV risk-reduction serial drama intervention, Reality Check, specifically tailored to young African Americans and aimed at decreasing the frequency of condomless sex and promoting HIV testing among young adult African Americans. We used a randomized controlled trial, allocating African Americans 18 to 24 years of age to Reality Check, or an attention-control intervention promoting physical activity. Each intervention was delivered as a series of videos streamed online and accessible via any Internet-capable device (e.g., smartphone, laptop or tablet). This mode of delivery was well suited to young African Americans because high percentages of young African Americans own and use Internet enabled mobile phones as their primary way to consume online content. We recruited participants through Facebook and Instagram, flyers posted on college campuses, college mailing lists, and referrals from participants. Participants completed surveys online at baseline, immediately post intervention, and 3 months post intervention. We hypothesized that, Reality Check would reduce the frequency of condomless sex during the 3-month post-intervention period compared with the attention-matched control group, adjusting for baseline of the criterion.

Being tested
Reality Check, Physical Activity Attention Control
Keywords
Human immunodeficiency virus, Sexually transmitted disease, African Americans, Young adults, Behavioral intervention, Entertainment-Education, Serial drama, Sexual behavior, HIV testing, Homophobia, Social cognitive theory
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Sexual Behavior, Homophobia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Reality CheckBehavioural

  • Physical Activity Attention ControlBehavioural

Study groups in NCT03352219
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Reality CheckExperimentalReceived streamed 13-episode HIV risk reduction serial drama, Reality Check, developed based on Social Cognitive Theory integrated with findings from focus groups and community advisory boards. Each character has a behavioral trajectory related to HIV. For example, one character modeled negotiating condom use with his partner when she was against it. Messages in the serial drama showed that the characters had normative support for HIV testing and condom use. One character modeled a mastery experience when she overcame her fear and got tested for HIV. Homophobia is addressed when a mother discovers that her son is gay. Over the course of the episodes, the interweaving storylines play out, with all the characters eventually achieving their positive goals.
Receives: Behavioral: Reality Check
Physical Activity Attention ControlPlacebo comparatorReceived streamed physical activity promotion videos designed to control for Hawthorne effects, including special attention, consisting of a series of 13 videos from YouTube on physical activity and exercise. The videos, selected to be appropriate for African Americans 18 to 24 years of age, were tailored to be gender specific and hence varied between men and women. The videos focused on the importance of physical activity, coping strategies for lack of motivation to engage in physical activity, and other challenges faced in becoming more physically active, provided specific knowledge and skills regarding how to engage in aerobic and muscle-strengthening exercises, and model aerobic and muscle-strengthening exercises in a variety of settings.
Receives: Behavioral: Physical Activity Attention Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Frequency of condomless sexual intercourse

    The number of times the participant had sex without using a condom in the past 90 days

    Measured: 3 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Frequency of condom use

    Rated frequency of condom use in the past 90 days

    Measured: 3 months post-intervention

  2. Consistent (100%) condom use

    A binary variable indicating whether the participants used a condom 100% of the time during sex in the past 90 days

    Measured: 3 months post-intervention

  3. Frequency of sexual intercourse

    The number of times the participant had sexual intercourse in the past 90 days

    Measured: 3 months post-intervention

  4. HIV testing

    A binary variable indicating whether the participant reported being tested for HIV in the past 3 months

    Measured: 3 months post-intervention

  5. Homophobia

    Negative attitude toward homosexuals

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention

  6. Homophobia

    Negative attitude toward homosexuals

    Measured: 3 months post-intervention

  7. AIDS-related stigma

    Negative attitudes toward AIDS

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention

  8. AIDS-related stigma

    Negative attitudes toward AIDS

    Measured: 3 months post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Nov 2017
  2. Study start1 Sep 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2017
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
203 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03352219
Sponsor's protocol ID
822007
Other IDs
R34MH094207
Acronym
RC
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
17 Nov 2017
Last updated
24 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Reality Check in people with HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Frequency of condomless sexual intercourse (time frame: 3 months post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in