AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatic Heart Disease in ChildrenPhase 2GOALNCT03346525

Determining the Impact of Penicillin in Latent RHD: The GOAL Trial

A Phase 2 study testing intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis in people with Rheumatic Heart Disease in Children and Latent Rheumatic Heart Disease, run by Children's National Research Institute at 1 site in Uganda.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) affects at least 32.9 million people, mostly children living in low-resource settings. Long-term intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis is proven to prevent progression of chronic valve changes in patients with established rheumatic heart disease (RHD) and to allow… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 17 years
What is being tested?
intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
807 participants
Where
1 siteUganda
Study dates
26 Jun 2018to 30 Nov 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children will be eligible for study participation if they are (1) between the ages of 5-17 years and (2) have a new diagnosis of latent RHD detected through primary school echo screening and confirmed by blinded consensus review. All children will be recruited from schools in Gulu District in Uganda.

Who cannot join

  • Patients will be excluded from the study for the following reasons:
  • Known history of ARF or RHD
  • Newly diagnosed RHD by echo screening consider to be "missed clinical RHD" as compared to true latent RHD including: > mild pathological valvular regurgitation at the mitral valve or aortic valve, mitral stenosis (mean MV gradient ≥ 5mmHg) (WHF, definite B), aortic stenosis (mean AV gradient ≥ 20mmHg)
  • Structural or functional cardiac defects, other than those consistent with RHD, that were known prior to or detected through echo screening (except patent foramen ovale, small atrial septal defect, small ventricular septal defect, small patent ductus arteriosus).
  • Prior allergic reaction to penicillin
  • Any known conditions predisposing to thrombocytopenia or hypercoagulability, or other contraindications to intramuscular injection
  • Any known co-morbid conditions (HIV, renal deficiencies, severe malnutrition among others) that have resulted in prescription of regular antibiotic prophylaxis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Uganda1 site
  • GOAL Office

    Gulu, 20010

Other trials in Uganda

About this study

Official title: The GOAL (GwokO Adunu pa Lutino) Trial: Determining the Impact of Penicillin on Latent Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Uganda

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) affects at least 32.9 million people, mostly children living in low-resource settings. Long-term intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis is proven to prevent progression of chronic valve changes in patients with established rheumatic heart disease (RHD) and to allow regression of valve changes in patients with a history of acute rheumatic fever (ARF) with mild RHD. However, in low-resource settings ARF is an elusive diagnosis, and most patients (85%) are diagnosed only when RHD is severe and irreversible, medications ineffective, and surgical intervention is expensive and/or unavailable.

Identification of latent RHD might be an opportunity to substantially reduce RHD morbidity and mortality. However, detection of latent RHD is only important if outcomes are improved. The appropriate management of children with latent RHD is unknown and no formal recommendations exist. While some clinicians prescribe penicillin prophylaxis for children with latent RHD, clinical equipoise exists regarding the best practice.

Read more

To fill this gap, the investigators propose a randomized controlled trial in children with latent RHD to evaluate the efficacy of BPG prophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis. Our primary outcome measure is progression of valvular changes on echocardiogram at 2 years. A sample size of 916 children is needed to detect a 50% reduction of progression (expected range 7.5-12.5% progression in BPG-arm vs. 15%-25% progression in control-arm) with 90% power.

AIM 1: To compare the proportion of children (aged 5-17 years) with latent RHD receiving BPG prophylaxis who progress to worse valvular disease at 2-years compared to children not receiving BPG prophylaxis.

Hypothesis 1: Prophylaxis with BPG will result in fewer children with latent RHD showing progression of echocardiographic valve changes at 2 years compared to children with latent RHD not receiving BPG prophylaxis. (The investigators expect at least a 50% relative reduction in progression in the BPG arm: range 15%-25% control arm vs. 7.5-12.5% BPG-arm.)

AIM 2: To compare the proportion of children (aged 5-17 years) with latent RHD receiving BPG prophylaxis who regress to improved valvular disease at 2-years compared to children not receiving BPG prophylaxis.

Hypothesis 2: Prophylaxis with BPG will result in more children with latent RHD showing regression of echocardiographic valve changes by 2 years compared to children with latent RHD not receiving BPG prophylaxis. (The investigators expect at least a 50% relative increase in regression in the BPG arm: range 10-20% control arm vs. 20-40% BPG arm.)

This study is highly significant because it will establish if BPG prophylaxis improves outcomes for children with latent RHD. Feasibility will be ensured through the experience, resources, community support, and accessible patient population of our investigational team. The results of our study will have high impact, immediately informing international policy on the standard of care for children diagnosed with latent RHD and shaping, over 2-3 years, practical and scalable programs that could substantially decrease the global burden of RHD.

Being tested
intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis
Keywords
echocardiography, penicillin prophylaxis, intramuscular benzathine penicillin G, benzathine penicillin G, low-resource setting
Medical subject headings
Rheumatic Heart Disease, Heart Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylaxisDrug

    Also called benzathine penicillin G, BPG, penicillin prophylaxis

    Intramuscular BPG prophylaxis (600,000 IU for children <30kg, 1.2 million IU for children ≥30kg), every 28 days.

Study groups in NCT03346525
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BPG ArmExperimentalIntramuscular BPG prophylaxis (600,000 IU for children <30kg, 1.2 million IU for children ≥30kg), every 28 days
Receives: Drug: intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis
Control ArmNo interventionNo prophylaxis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. progression of valvular changes on echocardiogram at 2 years

    To compare the proportion of children (aged 5-17 years) with latent RHD receiving BPG prophylaxis who progress to worse valvular disease at 2-years compared to children not receiving BPG prophylaxis

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. regression of vavular changes on electrocardiogram at 2 years

    To compare the proportion of children (aged 5-17 years) with latent RHD receiving BPG prophylaxis who regress to improved valvular disease at 2-years compared to children not receiving BPG prophylaxis

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2017
  2. Study start26 Jun 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
807 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03346525
Sponsor's protocol ID
GOAL: RHD RCT
Other IDs
E.W. "Al" Thrasher Award
Acronym
GOAL
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
15 Nov 2017
Last updated
1 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • WHO - Global Burden of Disease. 2015;2015.

  • Lue HC, Wu MH, Wang JK, Wu FF, Wu YN. Long-term outcome of patients with rheumatic fever receiving benzathine penicillin G prophylaxis every three weeks versus every four weeks. J Pediatr. 1994 Nov;125(5 Pt 1):812-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70082-6.

    PubMed 7965439
  • Tompkins DG, Boxerbaum B, Liebman J. Long-term prognosis of rheumatic fever patients receiving regular intramuscular benzathine penicillin. Circulation. 1972 Mar;45(3):543-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.45.3.543. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5012243
  • Zhang W, Mondo C, Okello E, Musoke C, Kakande B, Nyakoojo W, Kayima J, Freers J. Presenting features of newly diagnosed rheumatic heart disease patients in Mulago Hospital: a pilot study. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2013 Mar;24(2):28-33. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2012-076.

    PubMed 23612950
  • Okello E, Wanzhu Z, Musoke C, Twalib A, Kakande B, Lwabi P, Wilson NB, Mondo CK, Odoi-Adome R, Freers J. Cardiovascular complications in newly diagnosed rheumatic heart disease patients at Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2013 Apr;24(3):80-5. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2013-004.

    PubMed 23736132
  • Beaton A, Okello E, Lwabi P, Mondo C, McCarter R, Sable C. Echocardiography screening for rheumatic heart disease in Ugandan schoolchildren. Circulation. 2012 Jun 26;125(25):3127-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.092312. Epub 2012 May 24.

    PubMed 22626741
  • Steer AC, Kado J, Wilson N, Tuiketei T, Batzloff M, Waqatakirewa L, Mulholland EK, Carapetis JR. High prevalence of rheumatic heart disease by clinical and echocardiographic screening among children in Fiji. J Heart Valve Dis. 2009 May;18(3):327-35; discussion 336.

    PubMed 19557993
  • Engel ME, Haileamlak A, Zuhlke L, Lemmer CE, Nkepu S, van de Wall M, Daniel W, Shung King M, Mayosi BM. Prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in 4720 asymptomatic scholars from South Africa and Ethiopia. Heart. 2015 Sep;101(17):1389-94. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307444. Epub 2015 Jun 15.

    PubMed 26076935
  • Zuhlke LJ, Beaton A, Engel ME, Hugo-Hamman CT, Karthikeyan G, Katzenellenbogen JM, Ntusi N, Ralph AP, Saxena A, Smeesters PR, Watkins D, Zilla P, Carapetis J. Group A Streptococcus, Acute Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease: Epidemiology and Clinical Considerations. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Feb;19(2):15. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0513-y.

    PubMed 28285457
  • Remenyi B, Wilson N, Steer A, Ferreira B, Kado J, Kumar K, Lawrenson J, Maguire G, Marijon E, Mirabel M, Mocumbi AO, Mota C, Paar J, Saxena A, Scheel J, Stirling J, Viali S, Balekundri VI, Wheaton G, Zuhlke L, Carapetis J. World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease--an evidence-based guideline. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012 Feb 28;9(5):297-309. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.7.

    PubMed 22371105
  • Beaton A, Lu JC, Aliku T, Dean P, Gaur L, Weinberg J, Godown J, Lwabi P, Mirembe G, Okello E, Reese A, Shrestha-Astudillo A, Bradley-Hewitt T, Scheel J, Webb C, McCarter R, Ensing G, Sable C. The utility of handheld echocardiography for early rheumatic heart disease diagnosis: a field study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 May;16(5):475-82. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu296. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

    PubMed 25564396
  • Weinberg J, Beaton A, Aliku T, Lwabi P, Sable C. Prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in African school-aged population: Extrapolation from echocardiography screening using the 2012 World Heart Federation Guidelines. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 1;202:238-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.08.128. Epub 2015 Sep 12. No abstract available.

    PubMed 26402451
  • Roberts K, Colquhoun S, Steer A, Remenyi B, Carapetis J. Screening for rheumatic heart disease: current approaches and controversies. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Jan;10(1):49-58. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.157. Epub 2012 Nov 13.

    PubMed 23149830
  • Karthikeyan G. Measuring and reporting disease progression in subclinical rheumatic heart disease. Heart Asia. 2016 Nov 28;8(2):74-75. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2016-010857. eCollection 2016. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27942046
  • Nascimento BR, Nunes MC, Lopes EL, Rezende VM, Landay T, Ribeiro AL, Sable C, Beaton AZ. Rheumatic heart disease echocardiographic screening: approaching practical and affordable solutions. Heart. 2016 May;102(9):658-64. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308635. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

    PubMed 26891757

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis in people with Rheumatic Heart Disease in Children and Latent Rheumatic Heart Disease, run by Children's National Research Institute at 1 site in Uganda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Uganda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

progression of valvular changes on echocardiogram at 2 years (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03346525, which also lists 27 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in