Liver LesionsPhase 3NCT03335566
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in Participants With Focal Liver Lesions, Undergoing Pre- and Post-Contrast Ultrasound Imaging
A Phase 3 study testing Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in people with Liver Lesions, run by GE Healthcare at 18 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in participants with focal liver lesions (FLLs), by comparing pre-and post-contrast ultrasound examination findings with regard to various aspects of lesion diagnosis including diagnosis as benign versus malignant, specific lesion… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Lesions
- What is being tested?
- Sonazoid™ and SonoVue®
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 424 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 11 May 2014to 9 Apr 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- The participant has an acute clinically fatal condition (i.e., not expected to survive for at least 6 months)
- The participant has previously received Sonazoid™ or has received SonoVue® within the past 30 days
- The participant has undergone or is undergoing systemic or loco-regional chemotherapy, or radiation therapy
- The participant is participating in another clinical trial with an unregistered medicinal product, or less than 30 days have passed since completing participation in such a trial
- The participant has a history of allergies to eggs or egg products (i.e., manifested by full body rash, respiratory difficulty, oral or laryngeal swelling, hypotension or shock)
- The participant has known hypersensitivity to sulphur hexafluoride or to any of the components of SonoVue®
Show all 13Show fewer
- The participant has undergone or plans to undergo liver biopsy or surgery within the 24 hours before or after this examination
- The participant has undergone or plans to undergo an examination with a contrast agent (i.e., iodinated x-ray contrast agent, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent or another ultrasound contrast agent) within the 24 hours before or after this examination
- The participant is considered to be unsuitable to participate in the study by the investigator
- The participant is known to have a right-to-left shunt, severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure >90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or uncontrolled systemic hypertension
- The participant has a recent acute coronary syndrome or clinically unstable ischaemic cardiac disease, including: evolving or ongoing myocardial infarction, typical angina at rest within the last 7 days, significant worsening of cardiac symptoms within the last 7 days, recent coronary artery intervention or other factors suggesting clinical instability (e.g., recent deterioration of electrocardiogram [ECG], laboratory or clinical findings), acute cardiac failure, Class III/IV cardiac failure, or severe rhythm disorders
- The participant has adult respiratory distress syndrome, severe emphysema, pulmonary vasculitis, or a history of pulmonary emboli
- The participant has known thrombosis within the liver, portal, or mesenteric veins
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 3 countries.
18 sites in 3 countries
China11 sites
Peking Union Medical College Hospital, East Campus: No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing
Dongcheng, Beijing Municipality, 100730
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun-Yat sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Second Road
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University, No. 107 Yanjiang West Road
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120
Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road
Haidan, Beijing Municipality, 100853
Shanghai First Hospital, North Campus: No. 100 Haining Road
Hongkou, Shanghai Municipality, 200080
Shanghai First Hospital, South Campus: No.650 New Songjiang Road
Songjiang, Shanghai Municipality, 201620
Peking Union Medical College Hospital, West Campus: No. 41 Damucang Hutong
Xicheng, Beijing Municipality, 100032
Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road
Xuhui, Shanghai Municipality, 200032
Shanghai Hua Shan Hospital, No. 12 Wulumuqi Middle Road
Xuhui, Shanghai Municipality, 200040
Shanghai Sixth Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road
Xuhui, Shanghai Municipality, 200233
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, No. 301 Yanchang Middle Road
Zhabei, Shanghai Municipality, 200072
Taiwan5 sites
National Taiwan University Hospital - Yunlin Branch, No. 579, Sec. 2 Yunlin Road
Douliu, Yunlin County
National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road
Taipei, 100
Mackay Memorial Hospital, No. 92, Sec. 2 Zhongshan N. Road
Taipei, 10449
Cathay General Hospital, No. 280 Jen-Ai Road, Sec. 4
Taipei, 10650
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201 Shih-Pai Road, Sec. 2
Taipei, 112
South Korea2 sites
Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu
Seoul, 110-744
Seoul St Mary's Hospital, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu
Seoul, 137-701
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Multicentre, Randomised, Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the Ultrasound Contrast Agents Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in Subjects With Focal Liver Lesions Undergoing Pre- and Post-Contrast Ultrasound Imaging
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in participants with focal liver lesions (FLLs), by comparing pre-and post-contrast ultrasound examination findings with regard to various aspects of lesion diagnosis including diagnosis as benign versus malignant, specific lesion diagnosis, confidence in diagnosis, and quality of delineation of lesion-related blood vessels (from images obtained during vascular imaging) and detection of lesion presence and quality of delineation of the whole liver (from images obtained during whole liver imaging).
- Conditions
- Liver Lesions
- Being tested
- Sonazoid™, SonoVue®
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sonazoid™Drug
Single Dose of Sonazoid™ 0.12 µL MB/kg as I.V. injection.
SonoVue®Drug
Single Dose of SonoVue® 2.4 mL as I.V. injection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sonazoid™ | Experimental | Participants will receive single intravenous (I.V) bolus injection of Sonazoid™ 0.12 microliter (µL) microbubbles (MB)/kilogram (kg) body weight. Receives: Drug: Sonazoid™ |
| SonoVue® | Active comparator | Participants will receive single I.V bolus injection of SonoVue® 2.4 milliliter (mL). Receives: Drug: SonoVue® |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Accuracy Improvement in Post-Contrast Versus Pre-Contrast Ultrasound (US) Examination for Diagnosis of the Target Lesion as Malignant or Benign Against the Reference Diagnosis (RD)/Standard of Truth
Accuracy improvement was calculated by the number of participants with improved diagnoses from the pre-contrast diagnosis to the post-contrast diagnosis divided by the total number of participants, multiplied by 100. Assessments were done by 3 blinded readers. Efficacy population which included all participants who received Sonazoid™ or SonoVue®, for whom pre-contrast \& post-contrast images were recorded, \& for whom there was a reference standard contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT)/contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) examination or biopsy.
Measured: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
Secondary outcomes (3)
Number of Lesions Detected by Post-Contrast US Relative to Number of Lesions Detected by Pre-Contrast US (Both by Blinded Readers[BR]) and Number of Lesions Detected by Post-Contrast US (by BR) Relative to Number of Lesions Detected by RD (Investigators)
For the cases that can be assessed by the blinded readers both pre- and post-contrast, differences were calculated between the Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® groups in the number of lesions detected during whole-liver imaging (post-contrast minus pre-contrast). The differences were also calculated between the Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® groups in the number of lesions (post-contrast minus reference diagnosis) detected during whole-liver imaging.
Measured: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
Number of Participants With Diagnostic Confidence (Evaluated by Blinded Readers) in Pre-Contrast and Post-Contrast Ultrasound Examination Results
Confidence in diagnoses from the pre- and post-contrast ultrasound examinations was evaluated based on 4-point scale: 0-Unknown (cannot make a judgement on level of confidence), 1- Not confident (another examination was required), 2- Probable (Would have more confidence if another diagnostic imaging test such as MRI or CT was performed), 3- Definite (Sufficient confidence to the extent that another diagnostic imaging test such as MRI or CT was unnecessary).
Measured: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
Percentage of Participants With Accuracy Improvement in Post-contrast Versus Pre-contrast Ultrasound Examination for Lesion-Specific Diagnoses of the Target Lesion Against the Reference Diagnosis/Standard of Truth
The accuracy improvement was calculated by the number of participants with improved diagnoses from the pre-contrast diagnosis to the post-contrast diagnosis divided by the total number of participants, multiplied by 100. Assessment was performed by 3 blinded readers.
Measured: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2017
- Study start11 May 2014
- Primary completion9 Apr 2015
- Study completion9 Apr 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Liver LesionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GE HealthcareThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 424 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GE Healthcare
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Francois Tranquart, MD, PhD, Study chair, GE Healthcare
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03335566
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GE-045-002
- Other IDs
- GE-045-002
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 3 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Multicentre, Randomised, Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the Ultrasound Contrast Agents Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in Subjects With Focal Liver Lesions Undergoing Pre- and Post-Contrast Ultrasound Imaging
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03335566
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GE-045-002
- Conditions
- Liver Lesions
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 424 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GE HealthcareIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 11 May 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Apr 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 27 Aug 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in participants with focal liver lesions (FLLs), by comparing pre-and post-contrast ultrasound examination findings with regard to various aspects of lesion diagnosis including diagnosis as benign versus malignant, specific lesion diagnosis, confidence in diagnosis, and quality of delineation of lesion-related blood vessels (from images obtained during vascular imaging) and detection of lesion presence and quality of delineation of the whole liver (from images obtained during whole liver imaging).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sonazoid™ | Experimental | Drug: Sonazoid™Participants will receive single intravenous (I.V) bolus injection of Sonazoid™ 0.12 microliter (µL) microbubbles (MB)/kilogram (kg) body weight. |
| SonoVue® | Active comparator | Drug: SonoVue®Participants will receive single I.V bolus injection of SonoVue® 2.4 milliliter (mL). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- The participant has an acute clinically fatal condition (i.e., not expected to survive for at least 6 months)
- The participant has previously received Sonazoid™ or has received SonoVue® within the past 30 days
- The participant has undergone or is undergoing systemic or loco-regional chemotherapy, or radiation therapy
- The participant is participating in another clinical trial with an unregistered medicinal product, or less than 30 days have passed since completing participation in such a trial
- The participant has a history of allergies to eggs or egg products (i.e., manifested by full body rash, respiratory difficulty, oral or laryngeal swelling, hypotension or shock)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sonazoid™Single Dose of Sonazoid™ 0.12 µL MB/kg as I.V. injection. | Drug | Sonazoid™ |
| SonoVue®Single Dose of SonoVue® 2.4 mL as I.V. injection. | Drug | SonoVue® |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Accuracy Improvement in Post-Contrast Versus Pre-Contrast Ultrasound (US) Examination for Diagnosis of the Target Lesion as Malignant or Benign Against the Reference Diagnosis (RD)/Standard of Truth
Time frame: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
Accuracy improvement was calculated by the number of participants with improved diagnoses from the pre-contrast diagnosis to the post-contrast diagnosis divided by the total number of participants, multiplied by 100. Assessments were done by 3 blinded readers. Efficacy population which included all participants who received Sonazoid™ or SonoVue®, for whom pre-contrast \& post-contrast images were recorded, \& for whom there was a reference standard contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT)/contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) examination or biopsy.
3 secondary outcomes
Number of Lesions Detected by Post-Contrast US Relative to Number of Lesions Detected by Pre-Contrast US (Both by Blinded Readers[BR]) and Number of Lesions Detected by Post-Contrast US (by BR) Relative to Number of Lesions Detected by RD (Investigators)
Time frame: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
Number of Participants With Diagnostic Confidence (Evaluated by Blinded Readers) in Pre-Contrast and Post-Contrast Ultrasound Examination Results
Time frame: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
Percentage of Participants With Accuracy Improvement in Post-contrast Versus Pre-contrast Ultrasound Examination for Lesion-Specific Diagnoses of the Target Lesion Against the Reference Diagnosis/Standard of Truth
Time frame: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Liver Lesions
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Software-Aided Imaging (Morfeus) for Confirming Tumor Coverage With Ablation in Patients With Liver Tumors, the COVER-ALL Study
Malignant Liver Neoplasm
Recruiting
Prevention of Bile Leakage After Liver Resection in Children
Postoperative Bile Leak, Focal Liver Lesions
Active, not recruiting
Lesion Detection Assessment in the Liver: Standard vs Low Radiation Dose Using Varied Post-Processing Techniques
Diseases of Liver, Colon Carcinoma
Not yet recruiting
Pragmatic RCT of AI-Assisted Reading for Malignant Hepatic Lesions on CE-CT
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (Icc)
RecruitingObservational study
InAdvance: Surveillance, Prevention, and Interception in a Population at Risk for Cancer
Cancer Risk, Cancer Predisposition Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francois Tranquart, MD, PhD study chair
GE Healthcare
18 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in people with Liver Lesions, run by GE Healthcare at 18 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in China, Taiwan, South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Aug 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Accuracy Improvement in Post-Contrast Versus Pre-Contrast Ultrasound (US) Examination for Diagnosis of the Target Lesion as Malignant or Benign Against the Reference Diagnosis (RD)/Standard of Truth (time frame: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2018.