Bone Marrow FibrosisPhase 2NCT03333187
Ruxolitinib vs Allogeneic SCT for Patients With Myelofibrosis According to Donor Availability
A Phase 2 study testing Allogeneic stem cell transplantation and Ruxolitinib continuous therapy in people with Bone Marrow Fibrosis, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 14 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The present study will be a multicenter, prospective phase II-study comparing efficacy of allogeneic SCT for patients with myelofibrosis who have a suitable stem cell donor after a 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy with patients who lack a suitable stem cell donor and will continue to receive Ruxolitinib. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Marrow Fibrosis
- What is being tested?
- Allogeneic stem cell transplantation and Ruxolitinib continuous therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 87 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 21 Dec 2016to 7 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Symptomatic primary myelofibrosis or myelofibrosis post polycythaemia vera or essential thrombocythemia stage intermediate 2- or high-risk according to IPSS or DIPSS [46] or intermediate 1-risk with high risk cytogenetics, other than normal karyotype, sole del 20q, del 13q, or sole+9, or transfusion-dependency
- Patients age: 18 - 70 years at time of inclusion (female and male)
- Patients understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
- Platelet count ≥ 50 x 109/L
- No prior Ruxolitinib treatment
- ECOG ≤ 2
Who cannot join
- Severe renal, hepatic, pulmonary or cardiac disease, such as:
- Total bilirubin, SGPT or SGOT > 3 times upper the normal level
- Left ventricular ejection fraction < 30 %
- Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min
- DLCO < 35 % and/or receiving supplementary continuous oxygen
- Positive serology for HIV
Show all 12Show fewer
- Pregnant or lactating women (positive serum pregnancy test)
- Age < 18 and ≥ 71 years.
- Uncontrolled invasive fungal infection at time of screening (baseline)
- Serious psychiatric or psychological disorders
- Participation in another study with ongoing use of unlicensed investigational product from 28 days before study enrollment
- Transformation to AML
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
Germany14 sites
Universitätsklinkum Aachen
Aachen, 52074
HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch
Berlin, 13125
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, 53105
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, 40225
Universitätsklinkum Halle
Halle, 06120
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
Universitätsklinikum Jena
Jena, 07747
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Mainz, 55131
Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden
Minden, 32429
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, 48149
Klinikum Nürnberg
Nuremberg, 90419
Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus Stuttgart
Stuttgart, 70376
Universitätsmedizin Tübingen
Tübingen, 72076
Universitätsklinkum Ulm
Ulm, 89081
About this study
Official title: Ruxolitinib Versus Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Myelofibrosis According to Donor Availability: A Prospective Phase II Trial (MMM 02 Study)
The present study will be a multicenter, prospective phase II-study comparing efficacy of allogeneic SCT for patients with myelofibrosis who have a suitable stem cell donor after a 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy with patients who lack a suitable stem cell donor and will continue to receive Ruxolitinib.
Read the detailed description
This study is a multicenter, prospective phase II-study compares efficacy of allogeneic SCT for patients with myelofibrosis who have a suitable stem cell donor after a 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy with patients who lack a suitable stem cell donor and will continue to receive Ruxolitinib.
In this study will further assess and compare the safety and efficacy of study treatments/ induction therapy in both study arms on spleen reduction, improvement of constitutional symptoms, QOL, toxicity, fibrosis regression, development of GvHD as well as chimerism, engraftment, relapse incidence, disease related mortality, outcome and overall survival.
- Conditions
- Bone Marrow Fibrosis
- Being tested
- Allogeneic stem cell transplantation, Ruxolitinib continuous therapy
- Keywords
- Myelofibrosis, Myeloproliferative Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Primary Myelofibrosis, Myeloproliferative Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Allogeneic stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery
Ruxolitinib continuous therapyDrug
Also called Jakavi
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Treatment with Allogeneic Stem cell Transplantation after 3 months of Ruxolitinib induction therapy Receives: Procedure: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation |
| Arm B | Active comparator | Treatment with Ruxolitinib continuous therapy Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib continuous therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Event free survival
Compare to event free survival of patients at 3 years after allogeneic SCT and in Ruxolitinib continuous therapy in patients without a suitable donor
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (20)
Spleen reduction
Ultrasound measurement Spleen size, reduction of Spleen size after 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy
Measured: 3 months
Improvement of constitutional symptoms
Improvement of constitutional symptoms (Loose of weight and night sweat) after 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy, questionnaire, medical history
Measured: 3 months
Improvement of bone marrow fibrosis
bone marrow histology, Improvement of bone marrow fibrosis after 3 months of Ruxolitinib induction therapy
Measured: 3 months
Acute graft-versus-host disease
Incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease on Day +100 after allogeneic SCT according to the Glucksberg scale revised by Przepiorka
Measured: Day +100 after allogeneic SCT
Chronic graft-versus-host disease
Incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease according to the NIH consensus criteria of Filipovich et al. at 1, 2 and 3 years after allogeneic SCT
Measured: 1, 2 and 3 years after allogeneic SCT
Toxicity of Ruxolitinib
Toxicity of Ruxolitinib scored according to NCI CTCAE, Version 4.0
Measured: till 3 years
Toxicity of conditioning therapy
Toxicity of conditioning therapy scored according to NCI CTCAE, Version 4.0
Measured: till 3 years
Relapse
Cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years after allogeneic SCT
Measured: 3 years
Disease-related mortality
Disease-related mortality at 3 years after allogeneic SCT and Ruxolitinib continuous therapies
Measured: 3 years
Non-relapsed mortality
Non-relapsed mortality at 1 and 3 years after allogeneic SCT and Ruxolitinib continuous therapy
Measured: 1 and 3 years
Discontinuation rate
Discontinuation rate at 3 years after Ruxolitinib continuous therapy (End of study)
Measured: 3 years
Evaluation of Sorror Risk Score
Evaluation of Sorror Risk Score on outcome after allogeneic SCT
Measured: at baseline
Chimerism on relapse
Chimerism Analyse, Impact of chimerism on relapse incidence after allogeneic SCT
Measured: 30d, 100d, 180 d, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Bone marrow fibrosis regression
bone marrow histology, Evaluation of bone marrow fibrosis regression after allogeneic SCT at 30d, 100d, 1 year, and 3 years
Measured: 30d, 100d, 1 year, and 3 years
Bone marrow fibrosis regression
bone marrow histology, Evaluation of bone marrow fibrosis regression after Ruxolitinib continuous therapy at 30d, 100d, 1 year and 3 years
Measured: 30d, 100d, 1 year and 3 years
Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT)
Questionnaire, Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT) before Ruxolitinib induction therapy (= baseline), at transplantation, and after transplantation at 6m, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Measured: baseline, at transplantation, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS)
Questionaire, Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS) before Ruxolitinib induction therapy (= baseline), at transplantation, and after transplantation at 6m, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Measured: baseline, at transplantation, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT)
Questionnaire, Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT) before Ruxolitinib induction therapy (= baseline), at confinement to Ruxolitinib continuous therapy and after confinement at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Measured: baseline, confinement to Ruxolitinib continous therapy, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS)
Questionnaire, Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS) before Ruxolitinib induction therapy (= baseline), at confinement to Ruxolitinib continuous therapy and after confinement at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Measured: baseline, confinement to Ruxolitinib continous therapy, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Overall Survival
Overall survival at 3 years after allogeneic SCT compared to Ruxolitinib continuous therapy in patients without a suit-able donor
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Nov 2017
- Study start21 Dec 2016
- Primary completion7 Oct 2024
- Study completion7 Oct 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bone Marrow FibrosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Treatment A (only with a suitable stem cell donor): Allogeneic SCT after 3 months of Ruxolitinib induction therapy Treatment B: Ruxolitinib continuous therapy
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Novartis, Clinical Trial Center North (CTC North GmbH & Co. KG)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nicolaus Kröger, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03333187
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MMM 02 study / RuxoAlloStudy
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ruxolitinib Versus Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Myelofibrosis According to Donor Availability: A Prospective Phase II Trial (MMM 02 Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03333187
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MMM 02 study / RuxoAlloStudy
- Conditions
- Bone Marrow Fibrosis
- Keywords
- Myelofibrosis, Myeloproliferative Disease
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Novartis, Clinical Trial Center North (CTC North GmbH & Co. KG)
- Study start
- 21 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present study will be a multicenter, prospective phase II-study comparing efficacy of allogeneic SCT for patients with myelofibrosis who have a suitable stem cell donor after a 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy with patients who lack a suitable stem cell donor and will continue to receive Ruxolitinib.
Detailed description
This study is a multicenter, prospective phase II-study compares efficacy of allogeneic SCT for patients with myelofibrosis who have a suitable stem cell donor after a 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy with patients who lack a suitable stem cell donor and will continue to receive Ruxolitinib.
In this study will further assess and compare the safety and efficacy of study treatments/ induction therapy in both study arms on spleen reduction, improvement of constitutional symptoms, QOL, toxicity, fibrosis regression, development of GvHD as well as chimerism, engraftment, relapse incidence, disease related mortality, outcome and overall survival.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Treatment A (only with a suitable stem cell donor): Allogeneic SCT after 3 months of Ruxolitinib induction therapy Treatment B: Ruxolitinib continuous therapy
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Procedure: Allogeneic stem cell transplantationTreatment with Allogeneic Stem cell Transplantation after 3 months of Ruxolitinib induction therapy |
| Arm B | Active comparator | Drug: Ruxolitinib continuous therapyTreatment with Ruxolitinib continuous therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Symptomatic primary myelofibrosis or myelofibrosis post polycythaemia vera or essential thrombocythemia stage intermediate 2- or high-risk according to IPSS or DIPSS [46] or intermediate 1-risk with high risk cytogenetics, other than normal karyotype, sole del 20q, del 13q, or sole+9, or transfusion-dependency
- Patients age: 18 - 70 years at time of inclusion (female and male)
- Patients understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
- Platelet count ≥ 50 x 109/L
- No prior Ruxolitinib treatment
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Severe renal, hepatic, pulmonary or cardiac disease, such as:
- Positive serology for HIV
- Pregnant or lactating women (positive serum pregnancy test)
- Age < 18 and ≥ 71 years.
- Uncontrolled invasive fungal infection at time of screening (baseline)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Allogeneic stem cell transplantation | Procedure or surgery | Arm A |
| Ruxolitinib continuous therapyAlso: Jakavi | Drug | Arm B |
Primary outcome
Event free survival
Time frame: 3 years
Compare to event free survival of patients at 3 years after allogeneic SCT and in Ruxolitinib continuous therapy in patients without a suitable donor
20 secondary outcomes
Spleen reduction
Time frame: 3 months
Improvement of constitutional symptoms
Time frame: 3 months
Improvement of bone marrow fibrosis
Time frame: 3 months
Acute graft-versus-host disease
Time frame: Day +100 after allogeneic SCT
Chronic graft-versus-host disease
Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 years after allogeneic SCT
Toxicity of Ruxolitinib
Time frame: till 3 years
Toxicity of conditioning therapy
Time frame: till 3 years
Relapse
Time frame: 3 years
Disease-related mortality
Time frame: 3 years
Non-relapsed mortality
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Discontinuation rate
Time frame: 3 years
Evaluation of Sorror Risk Score
Time frame: at baseline
Chimerism on relapse
Time frame: 30d, 100d, 180 d, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Bone marrow fibrosis regression
Time frame: 30d, 100d, 1 year, and 3 years
Bone marrow fibrosis regression
Time frame: 30d, 100d, 1 year and 3 years
Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT)
Time frame: baseline, at transplantation, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS)
Time frame: baseline, at transplantation, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT)
Time frame: baseline, confinement to Ruxolitinib continous therapy, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS)
Time frame: baseline, confinement to Ruxolitinib continous therapy, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Overall Survival
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bone Marrow Fibrosis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study of Pelabresib (DAK539) and Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis (MF)
Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV-MF)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare Elritercept to Placebo in Adults With Myelofibrosis and Anemia Who Are Taking Ruxolitinib
Myelofibrosis, Anemia
RecruitingObservational study
Motor Development and Early Predictors of Psychomotor Outcomes in Preterm and Term Infants Assessed by MOS-R and Caregiver Questionnaire at 18 and 36 Months
Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Motor Skills Disorders
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Study of Selinexor in Combination With Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis
Myelofibrosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Momelotinib in Combination With Luspatercept in Participants With Transfusion Dependent Myelofibrosis
Primary Myelofibrosis, Myelofibrosis; Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nicolaus Kröger, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Allogeneic stem cell transplantation and Ruxolitinib continuous therapy in people with Bone Marrow Fibrosis, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 14 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Event free survival (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2025.