Neoplasm NeckPhase 2NCT03326947
Phage II Trial of Stathmin as Predictive Biomarker for TPF Induction Chemotherapy in OSCC
A Phase 2 study testing docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in people with Neoplasm Neck, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
To investigate the predictive value of stathmin expression as a predictive biomarker in OSCC patients, who treated with TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil ) induction chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neoplasm Neck
- What is being tested?
- docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2018to 1 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pathological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (tongue, gingiva, buccal mucosa, floor of mouth, palate, and retromolar region).
- Age: 18 to 75 years old. Sex: both males and females. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >70. Low grade of Stathmin 1 expression by immunohistochemistry. Clinical stage III/IVA. White blood cell >3,000/mm3, hemoglobin>8g/L, platelet count>80,000/mm3. Hepatic function: ALAT(alanine aminotransferase )/ASAT(aspartate transaminase ) <2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), bilirubin <1.5 times ULN.
- Serum creatinine <1.5 times ULN. Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Distant metastatic disease and other cancers. Previous surgical procedure of the primary tumors or lymph nodes (except diagnostic biopsy).
- Previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Other previous malignancies within 5 years. Sever systematic diseases such as severe pulmonary or cardiac diseases. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity. Creatinine clearance <30ml/min. Pregnancy (confirmed by serum or urine β-HCG) or lactation period
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011
Lai-ping Zhong, MD, PhD, +86-21-23271699 ext. 5160, zhonglaiping@163.com
Lai-ping Zhong, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Low Stathmin Expression as a Predictive Biomarker for OSCC Patients Receiving TPF Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery and Radiotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy
To investigate the predictive value of stathmin expression as a predictive biomarker in OSCC patients, who treated with TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil ) induction chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy.
Read the detailed description
Induction chemotherapy is regarded as an effective way to reduce or downgrade the locally advanced or aggressive cancers, and to improve the chance of eradication of the locoregional lesions by radical surgery and/or radiotherapy. However, there are still debates on the clinical value of induction chemotherapy for patients with advanced and resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma(OSCC). A prospective, open label, parallel, interventional, randomized control trial on TPF induction chemotherapy indicate there is no difference in overall survival, disease free survival, local regional recurrence free survival and metastasis free survival between experimental group and control group (Zhong et al, Randomized Phase III Trial of Induction Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil Followed by Surgery Versus Up-Front Surgery in Locally Advanced Resectable Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, J Clin Oncol 2013); however, the subgroup analysis proves that the induction chemotherapy of TPF protocol could benefit the patients with low stathmin expression.The previous study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov website with NCT01542931 identification number.
This prospective, interventional, randomized control trial was to evaluate the TPF induction chemotherapy have a better effects in the OSCC patients with low stathmin expression. The patients would receive TPF induction chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy (the experimental group) or radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy (the control group).
The study had a power of 80% on the basis of an assumed 5-year survival rate of 93% in the experiment group and 52% in the control group, with use of a two-sided log-rank test at a level of significance of 0.05. The recruitment period would be 2 years, and the follow-up period would be 5 years, and 10% of patients would drop out early or be lost to follow-up. A total number of 60 patients were to be recruited with stplan 4.5 software calculation. (Department of Biostatics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas,USA) The patients in the experimental group received the TPF induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles followed by radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. The palpable edges of the primary lesion (both the longest and shortest axis) were marked before induction chemotherapy by at least four points, which were 0.5cm away. The patients in the control group received the radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy.
Induction chemotherapy: For the patients who were randomly assigned to receive TPF induction chemotherapy, peripherally inserted central catheter was firstly inserted before intravenous infusion, docetaxel(at a dose of 75mg/m2 of body surface area) was administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, followed by intravenous cisplatin(75 mg/m2), administered during a period of 2 to 3 hours. Then, 5-Fu(750 mg/m2/day) was administered as a 120-hour continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days. Induction chemotherapy was given every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, unless there was disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent by the patients. Dexamethasone was given before docetaxel infusion to prevent docetaxel-related hypersensitivity reactions, skin toxic effects, and fluid retention; prophylactic antibiotics were also given starting on day 5 of each cycle for 3 days. Hydration with diuretic and antiemetic treatment was also performed. Primary prophylaxis with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was not suggested. Chemotherapy dose reductions were allowed for grade 3/4 toxicities occurring after cycle 1: 25% and 50% dose reductions of the three chemotherapy agents were suggested for grade 3 and grade 4 hematologic toxicities or gastrointestinal toxicities, respectively; 25% and 50% cisplatin dose reductions were suggested for grade 3 and grade 4 renal toxicities, respectively. Surgery was performed at least 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy.
Surgery: Radical resection of the primary lesion and full neck dissection(functional or radical) with proper reconstruction(pedicle or free flap) were performed. The safety margins of the primary lesion were 1.0-1.5cm far away from the palpable margins of the lesion; for patients who received induction chemotherapy, the safety margins were 1.0cm away from the marks that were placed before induction chemotherapy, to ensure the same extent surgery in both arms. Frozen sections during surgery were performed to confirm adequate margins.
Post-operative radiotherapy: Radiotherapy was arranged 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. Routine external beam radiotherapy, such as conformal or intensity modulated radiotherapy was performed, and the dose was 1.8-2 Gy/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks, and totally 54-60 Gy, in the patient with high risk features, such as positive surgical margin, extra capsular nodal spread, vascular embolism, concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin of 80mg/m2 was suggested.
A complete medical history was obtained and tumor assessment was performed at baseline. Clinical tumor response was assessed by clinical evaluation and imaging study and was characterized according to the criteria of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (version 1.1) before surgery. Post-operative pathologic response was assessed by post-operative pathologic examination as good and bad response. A good response was defined as absence of any tumor cells (pathologic complete response) or presence of scattered foci of a few tumor cells (minimal residual disease with <10% viable tumor cells); otherwise, a bad pathologic response was defined. Toxic effects were assessed weekly during and after completion of induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (version 3.0).
Overall survival was calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death; disease free survival was calculated from the date of randomization to tumor recurrence or distant metastasis or death from any cause; locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis free survival was calculated from the date of randomization to locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis of tumor or death from any cause. Time to locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis was calculated from the date of finishing treatment to tumor locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis. Patients were monitored by every three months in the first two years, every six months in the next 2 years, and once a year thereafter until death or data censoring
- Conditions
- Neoplasm Neck
- Being tested
- docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil
- Keywords
- TPF induction chemotherapy, randomized, trial,OSCC
- Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracilDrug
Drug: TPF induction chemotherapy TPF induction chemotherapy: 2 cycles; docetaxel(75mg/m^2), cisplatin(75 mg/m^2), 5-Fu(750 mg/m^2/day) for 5 days; 16 days later, the 2nd cycle. 2 weeks later, surgery.
Surgery: radical resection and full neck dissection with reconstruction. Radiotherapy: 4-6 weeks after surgery, 1.8-2Gy/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks, and totally 54-60Gy, for high risk factors, concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin of 80mg/m2.
Other Names:
TPF protocol group Procedure/Surgery: surgery In the TPF group,surgery was performed at least 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy.Surgery group includes radical resection of the primary lesion and full neck dissection(functional or radical) with proper reconstruction(pedicle or free flap) were performed.
Radiation: radiotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TPF group | Experimental | The patients in the experimental group received the TPF induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles followed with surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy.
docetaxel:75mg/m2 cisplatin:75 mg/m2 5-Fu:750 mg/m2/day Receives: Drug: docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil |
| Control group | No intervention | The patients in the control group received the radical surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
Overall survival was calculated from the date of randomization to death from any cause
Measured: 12 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Disease free survival
Disease free survival was calculated from the date of randomization to recurrence, locoregional recurrence, or death from any cause
Measured: 12 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2017
- Study start1 Jan 2018
- Primary completion1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neoplasm NeckStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lai-ping Zhong, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03326947
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Stathmin for TPF in OSCC
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 20 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase II Trial of Low Stathmin Expression as a Predictive Biomarker for OSCC Patients Receiving TPF Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery and Radiotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03326947
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Stathmin for TPF in OSCC
- Conditions
- Neoplasm Neck
- Keywords
- TPF induction chemotherapy, randomized, trial,OSCC
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To investigate the predictive value of stathmin expression as a predictive biomarker in OSCC patients, who treated with TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil ) induction chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy.
Detailed description
Induction chemotherapy is regarded as an effective way to reduce or downgrade the locally advanced or aggressive cancers, and to improve the chance of eradication of the locoregional lesions by radical surgery and/or radiotherapy. However, there are still debates on the clinical value of induction chemotherapy for patients with advanced and resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma(OSCC). A prospective, open label, parallel, interventional, randomized control trial on TPF induction chemotherapy indicate there is no difference in overall survival, disease free survival, local regional recurrence free survival and metastasis free survival between experimental group and control group (Zhong et al, Randomized Phase III Trial of Induction Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil Followed by Surgery Versus Up-Front Surgery in Locally Advanced Resectable Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, J Clin Oncol 2013); however, the subgroup analysis proves that the induction chemotherapy of TPF protocol could benefit the patients with low stathmin expression.The previous study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov website with NCT01542931 identification number.
This prospective, interventional, randomized control trial was to evaluate the TPF induction chemotherapy have a better effects in the OSCC patients with low stathmin expression. The patients would receive TPF induction chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy (the experimental group) or radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy (the control group).
The study had a power of 80% on the basis of an assumed 5-year survival rate of 93% in the experiment group and 52% in the control group, with use of a two-sided log-rank test at a level of significance of 0.05. The recruitment period would be 2 years, and the follow-up period would be 5 years, and 10% of patients would drop out early or be lost to follow-up. A total number of 60 patients were to be recruited with stplan 4.5 software calculation. (Department of Biostatics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas,USA) The patients in the experimental group received the TPF induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles followed by radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. The palpable edges of the primary lesion (both the longest and shortest axis) were marked before induction chemotherapy by at least four points, which were 0.5cm away. The patients in the control group received the radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy.
Induction chemotherapy: For the patients who were randomly assigned to receive TPF induction chemotherapy, peripherally inserted central catheter was firstly inserted before intravenous infusion, docetaxel(at a dose of 75mg/m2 of body surface area) was administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, followed by intravenous cisplatin(75 mg/m2), administered during a period of 2 to 3 hours. Then, 5-Fu(750 mg/m2/day) was administered as a 120-hour continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days. Induction chemotherapy was given every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, unless there was disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent by the patients. Dexamethasone was given before docetaxel infusion to prevent docetaxel-related hypersensitivity reactions, skin toxic effects, and fluid retention; prophylactic antibiotics were also given starting on day 5 of each cycle for 3 days. Hydration with diuretic and antiemetic treatment was also performed. Primary prophylaxis with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was not suggested. Chemotherapy dose reductions were allowed for grade 3/4 toxicities occurring after cycle 1: 25% and 50% dose reductions of the three chemotherapy agents were suggested for grade 3 and grade 4 hematologic toxicities or gastrointestinal toxicities, respectively; 25% and 50% cisplatin dose reductions were suggested for grade 3 and grade 4 renal toxicities, respectively. Surgery was performed at least 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy.
Surgery: Radical resection of the primary lesion and full neck dissection(functional or radical) with proper reconstruction(pedicle or free flap) were performed. The safety margins of the primary lesion were 1.0-1.5cm far away from the palpable margins of the lesion; for patients who received induction chemotherapy, the safety margins were 1.0cm away from the marks that were placed before induction chemotherapy, to ensure the same extent surgery in both arms. Frozen sections during surgery were performed to confirm adequate margins.
Post-operative radiotherapy: Radiotherapy was arranged 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. Routine external beam radiotherapy, such as conformal or intensity modulated radiotherapy was performed, and the dose was 1.8-2 Gy/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks, and totally 54-60 Gy, in the patient with high risk features, such as positive surgical margin, extra capsular nodal spread, vascular embolism, concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin of 80mg/m2 was suggested.
A complete medical history was obtained and tumor assessment was performed at baseline. Clinical tumor response was assessed by clinical evaluation and imaging study and was characterized according to the criteria of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (version 1.1) before surgery. Post-operative pathologic response was assessed by post-operative pathologic examination as good and bad response. A good response was defined as absence of any tumor cells (pathologic complete response) or presence of scattered foci of a few tumor cells (minimal residual disease with <10% viable tumor cells); otherwise, a bad pathologic response was defined. Toxic effects were assessed weekly during and after completion of induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (version 3.0).
Overall survival was calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death; disease free survival was calculated from the date of randomization to tumor recurrence or distant metastasis or death from any cause; locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis free survival was calculated from the date of randomization to locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis of tumor or death from any cause. Time to locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis was calculated from the date of finishing treatment to tumor locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis. Patients were monitored by every three months in the first two years, every six months in the next 2 years, and once a year thereafter until death or data censoring
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TPF group | Experimental | Drug: docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracilThe patients in the experimental group received the TPF induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles followed with surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. docetaxel:75mg/m2 cisplatin:75 mg/m2 5-Fu:750 mg/m2/day |
| Control group | No intervention | –The patients in the control group received the radical surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pathological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (tongue, gingiva, buccal mucosa, floor of mouth, palate, and retromolar region).
- Age: 18 to 75 years old. Sex: both males and females. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >70. Low grade of Stathmin 1 expression by immunohistochemistry. Clinical stage III/IVA. White blood cell >3,000/mm3, hemoglobin>8g/L, platelet count>80,000/mm3. Hepatic function: ALAT(alanine aminotransferase )/ASAT(aspartate transaminase ) <2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), bilirubin <1.5 times ULN.
- Serum creatinine <1.5 times ULN. Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Distant metastatic disease and other cancers. Previous surgical procedure of the primary tumors or lymph nodes (except diagnostic biopsy).
- Previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Other previous malignancies within 5 years. Sever systematic diseases such as severe pulmonary or cardiac diseases. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity. Creatinine clearance <30ml/min. Pregnancy (confirmed by serum or urine β-HCG) or lactation period
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracilDrug: TPF induction chemotherapy TPF induction chemotherapy: 2 cycles; docetaxel(75mg/m^2), cisplatin(75 mg/m^2), 5-Fu(750 mg/m^2/day) for 5 days; 16 days later, the 2nd cycle. 2 weeks later, surgery. Surgery: radical resection and full neck dissection with reconstruction. Radiotherapy: 4-6 weeks after surgery, 1.8-2Gy/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks, and totally 54-60Gy, for high risk factors, concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin of 80mg/m2. Other Names: TPF protocol group Procedure/Surgery: surgery In the TPF group,surgery was performed at least 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy.Surgery group includes radical resection of the primary lesion and full neck dissection(functional or radical) with proper reconstruction(pedicle or free flap) were performed. Radiation: radiotherapy | Drug | TPF group |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: 12 weeks.
Overall survival was calculated from the date of randomization to death from any cause
1 secondary outcome
Disease free survival
Time frame: 12 weeks.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Neoplasm Neck
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, China
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in people with Neoplasm Neck, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (time frame: 12 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2024.