AzTrials
AzTrials

Dry Eye SyndromesPhase 4NCT03318874

Optimization of the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease Caused by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

A Phase 4 study testing Blephasteam, THERA°PEARL Eye Mask and Hylo-comod in people with Dry Eye Syndromes and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

An open label, randomized controlled study in a Norwegian population with meibomian gland dysfunction. Patients will be randomized to one of two groups: THERA°PEARL Eye Mask (Bausch \& Lomb Inc., New York, USA) or Blephasteam® (Spectrum Thea Pharmaceuticals LTD, Macclesfield, UK). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Blephasteam, THERA°PEARL Eye Mask and Hylo-comod
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
19 Oct 2017to 17 Nov 2021
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
  • Eligible for heat treatment
  • Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) >12
  • Quality or expressibility score ≤20 years old: >1 or >20 years old: ≥1
  • Non-invasive tear film break-up time (NITBUT) <10 s in at least one eye
  • Schirmer-1 test >5 mm after 5 min

Who cannot join

  • Glaucoma,
  • Ocular allergy
  • Autoimmune disease
  • Contact lens-wear during study
  • Current punctal plugging
  • Pregnant/lactating
  • Candidate for topical anti-inflammatory
  • Cicatricial meibomian gland dysfunction

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • The Norwegian Dry Eye Clinic

    Oslo, 0369

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Comparing the Effects of THERA°PEARL Eye Mask (Bausch & Lomb Inc., New York, USA) With the Use of Blephasteam® (Spectrum Thea Pharmaceuticals LTD, Macclesfield, UK).

An open label, randomized controlled study in a Norwegian population with meibomian gland dysfunction. Patients will be randomized to one of two groups: THERA°PEARL Eye Mask (Bausch \& Lomb Inc., New York, USA) or Blephasteam® (Spectrum Thea Pharmaceuticals LTD, Macclesfield, UK). All patients will receive Hylo-comod (URSAPHARM Arzneimittel GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany).

Being tested
Blephasteam, THERA°PEARL Eye Mask, Hylo-comod
Keywords
Dry Eye Disease, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Blephasteam, THERA°PEARL Eye Mask
Medical subject headings
Dry Eye Syndromes, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BlephasteamDevice

    Steam delivery goggles, once daily

  • THERA°PEARL Eye MaskDevice

    Heat delivery device, delivering heat to the eyelids, once daily

  • Hylo-comodDrug

    Also called Sodium hyaluronate

    Tear substitute containing hyaluronic acid, four times daily

Study groups in NCT03318874
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BlephasteamExperimentalHeat delivery device, to be used according to guidelines from manufacturer.
Receives: Device: Blephasteam; Drug: Hylo-comod
THERA°PEARL Eye MaskActive comparatorHeat delivery device, to be used according to guidelines from manufacturer.
Receives: Device: THERA°PEARL Eye Mask; Drug: Hylo-comod

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Tear film break-up time

    Fluorescein applied to tear film, time measured until tear film breaks up after blink. Range of scale from 1 second and higher, where higher values are considered preferable for the patients. Values under 10 seconds are indicative for dry eye disease.

    Measured: Change from baseline at three and six months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Ocular Surface Disease Index

    Dry Eye Self reported Questionnaire, score ranging from 0-100, where lower values are considered preferable for the patients, indicating less symptoms. Values over 12 are indicative for dry eye disease.

    Measured: Change from baseline at three and six months

  2. McMonnies Questionnaire

    Dry Eye Self reported Questionnaire. Index ranges from 0 to 45, where a higher score is regarded as more indicative of dry eye disease. A cut-point of greater than 14.5 is recommended for a dry eye diagnosis.

    Measured: Change from baseline at three and six months

  3. Ocular surface staining Ocular surface staining

    Fluorescein applied to tear film, staining scored after the Oxford staining scheme, values ranging from 0-15, lower values are considered better for the patient.

    Measured: Change from baseline at three and six months

  4. Tear cytokine levels

    Multiplex analysis of tear fluid

    Measured: Change from baseline at three and six months

  5. Schirmer's test

    Measurement of 5 minutes of tear production, values ranging from 0 and higher, where lower values are considered worse for the patient. Values under 5 mm are indicative for dry eye disease.

    Measured: Change from baseline at three and six months

  6. Meibum Quality

    Guidelines based on MGD-report of 2011, values ranging from 0-24, where lower values are considered better for the patient, indicating the quality of the meibum secretion.

    Measured: Change from baseline at three and six months

  7. Meibum Expressibility

    Guidelines based on MGD-report of 2011, values ranging from 0-3, where lower values are considered better for the patient, indicating open meibomian glands.

    Measured: Change from baseline at three and six months

  8. Tear osmolarity

    Osmolarity measured with TearLab, where values under 300 mOsml/L are considered normal.

    Measured: Change from baseline at three and six months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Oct 2017
  2. Study start19 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2020
  4. Study completion17 Nov 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03318874
Sponsor's protocol ID
2014/1983
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
4 Oct 2017
Last updated
22 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Olafsson J, Lai X, Landsend ECS, Olafsson S, Parissi E, Utheim OA, Raeder S, Badian RA, Lagali N, Dartt DA, Utheim TP. TheraPearl Eye Mask and Blephasteam for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized, comparative clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 17;11(1):22386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01899-8.

    PubMed 34789807

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Blephasteam, THERA°PEARL Eye Mask and Hylo-comod in people with Dry Eye Syndromes and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Tear film break-up time (time frame: Change from baseline at three and six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03318874, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in