Sexual ViolenceMKitNCT03316911
A Pilot Study Testing a Life Skills Application to Address Interpersonal Relationships in College
A study testing MKit in people with Sexual Violence and Primary Prevention, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study utilizes implementation science principles to culturally adapt a pre-existing web-based application (WebApp) for use with college students. The ADAPT-ITT process will be utilized to adapt the WebApp to a diverse (race, ethnicity, gender/sexual identity) college population with a focus on life skills and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sexual Violence, Primary Prevention
- What is being tested?
- MKit
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 261 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Oct 2017to 28 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Currently enrolled as a student at the participating university (University of Michigan)
- Age 18 or older
- Willing to participate in the study
- Able to speak and read English
- Participated in Relationship Remix at Alice Lloyd Hall or Mosher-Jordan Hall during the Fall of 2017. These residence halls were selected due to their similar sizes and demographic populations to allow for "approximate matching" between the control and intervention group.
Who cannot join
- 1. Did not complete the Relationship Remix session
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: MKit: A Pilot Study Testing a Life Skills Application to Address Interpersonal Relationships in College
This study utilizes implementation science principles to culturally adapt a pre-existing web-based application (WebApp) for use with college students. The ADAPT-ITT process will be utilized to adapt the WebApp to a diverse (race, ethnicity, gender/sexual identity) college population with a focus on life skills and holistic self-care as reinforcement to currently available primary prevention programming available to incoming students. The study hypothesis is that the adapted WebApp will be usable, acceptable, and students will be willing to use it as a reinforcement to current university primary prevention programming. The study team will also monitor retention of participants over the academic year.
- Conditions
- Sexual Violence, Primary Prevention
- Being tested
- MKit
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MKitBehavioural
MKit is a web-based application that uses a life-skills approach to address healthy relationships and sexual violence. It includes 14 tiles which incorporate information, goal setting, and resources.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MKit WebApp Intervention | Experimental | The intervention arm will receive the usual standard of care training package for incoming students at the University of Michigan which includes: 1) Haven, an online module about healthy relationships and sexual violence completed before coming to campus; 2) Relationship Remix, an interactive peer-delivered program on healthy relationships and sexual violence; and 3) Change it Up, a bystander intervention educational theater performance delivered by student actors. In addition, they will receive access the MKit WebApp, which will give them access to content, goal setting, and resources for 14 topic areas. Receives: Behavioral: MKit |
| Standard of Care | No intervention | The control arm will receive the usual standard of care training package for incoming students at the University of Michigan which includes: 1) Haven, an online module about healthy relationships and sexual violence completed before coming to campus; 2) Relationship Remix, an interactive peer-delivered program on healthy relationships and sexual violence; and 3) Change it Up, a bystander intervention educational theater performance delivered by student actors. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
3-Month Usability
The 10-item System Usability Scale will be used to evaluate the usability of WebApp in the intervention group only. The System Usability Scale (Brook, 1996) includes 10 items that are rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). To get a final score the: 1) First, one is subtracted from the score of the odd items; 2) Second, the responses are subtracted from 5 for the even-numbered items; 3) Then the responses are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to get a range of 0-100. A score above 68 is considered above average.
Measured: 3-months
5-Month Usability
The 10-item System Usability Scale will be used to evaluate the usability of WebApp in the intervention group only. The System Usability Scale (Brook, 1996) includes 10 items that are rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). To get a final score the: 1) First, one is subtracted from the score of the odd items; 2) Second, the responses are subtracted from 5 for the even-numbered items; 3) Then the responses are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to get a range of 0-100. A score above 68 is considered above average.
Measured: 5-months
3-Month Acceptability
The 5-item System Acceptability Scale (investigator created) will be used to evaluate the acceptability of the WebApp in the intervention group only. An investigator-created acceptability scale with 5-items will be used to measure acceptability. Four items are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree/Very Likely) to 5 (Strongly Disagree/Very Unlikely) and will be reverse coded. One item assess the frequency of use of the WebApp from 1 (Never) to 5 (Multiple times a week). All five items will be summed for a total score. Scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
Measured: 3-months
5-Month Acceptability
The 5-item System Acceptability Scale (investigator created) will be used to evaluate the acceptability of the WebApp in the intervention group only. An investigator-created acceptability scale with 5-items will be used to measure acceptability. Four items are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree/Very Likely) to 5 (Strongly Disagree/Very Unlikely) and will be reverse coded. One item assess the frequency of use of the WebApp from 1 (Never) to 5 (Multiple times a week). All five items will be summed for a total score. Scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
Measured: 5-months
Secondary outcomes (2)
3-Month Retention
The retention rate will be calculated based on how many participants in the intervention group have completed the follow-up surveys. A total retention score (those retained/those enrolled) will be computed based on interaction with the WebApp.
Measured: 3-months
5-Month Retention
The retention rate will be calculated based on how many participants in the intervention group have completed the follow-up surveys. A total retention score (those retained/those enrolled) will be computed based on interaction with the WebApp.
Measured: 5-months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2017
- Study start22 Oct 2017
- Primary completion28 Apr 2018
- Study completion28 Apr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Sexual ViolenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 261 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), Michigan Department of State Police
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michelle Munro-Kramer, University of Michigan
- Investigators
- Michelle L Munro-Kramer, PhD,CNM,FNP, Principal investigator, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03316911
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HUM00133004
- Other IDs
- KL2TR000434, KL2TR002241, CSA-16-17
- Acronym
- MKit
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 10 May 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MKit: A Pilot Study Testing a Life Skills Application to Address Interpersonal Relationships in College
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03316911
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MKit / HUM00133004
- Conditions
- Sexual Violence, Primary Prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 261 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), Michigan Department of State Police
- Study start
- 22 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study utilizes implementation science principles to culturally adapt a pre-existing web-based application (WebApp) for use with college students. The ADAPT-ITT process will be utilized to adapt the WebApp to a diverse (race, ethnicity, gender/sexual identity) college population with a focus on life skills and holistic self-care as reinforcement to currently available primary prevention programming available to incoming students. The study hypothesis is that the adapted WebApp will be usable, acceptable, and students will be willing to use it as a reinforcement to current university primary prevention programming. The study team will also monitor retention of participants over the academic year.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MKit WebApp Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: MKitThe intervention arm will receive the usual standard of care training package for incoming students at the University of Michigan which includes: 1) Haven, an online module about healthy relationships and sexual violence completed before coming to campus; 2) Relationship Remix, an interactive peer-delivered program on healthy relationships and sexual violence; and 3) Change it Up, a bystander intervention educational theater performance delivered by student actors. In addition, they will receive access the MKit WebApp, which will give them access to content, goal setting, and resources for 14 topic areas. |
| Standard of Care | No intervention | –The control arm will receive the usual standard of care training package for incoming students at the University of Michigan which includes: 1) Haven, an online module about healthy relationships and sexual violence completed before coming to campus; 2) Relationship Remix, an interactive peer-delivered program on healthy relationships and sexual violence; and 3) Change it Up, a bystander intervention educational theater performance delivered by student actors. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Currently enrolled as a student at the participating university (University of Michigan)
- Age 18 or older
- Willing to participate in the study
- Able to speak and read English
- Participated in Relationship Remix at Alice Lloyd Hall or Mosher-Jordan Hall during the Fall of 2017. These residence halls were selected due to their similar sizes and demographic populations to allow for "approximate matching" between the control and intervention group.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Did not complete the Relationship Remix session
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MKitMKit is a web-based application that uses a life-skills approach to address healthy relationships and sexual violence. It includes 14 tiles which incorporate information, goal setting, and resources. | Behavioural | MKit WebApp Intervention |
Primary outcome
3-Month Usability
Time frame: 3-months
The 10-item System Usability Scale will be used to evaluate the usability of WebApp in the intervention group only. The System Usability Scale (Brook, 1996) includes 10 items that are rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). To get a final score the: 1) First, one is subtracted from the score of the odd items; 2) Second, the responses are subtracted from 5 for the even-numbered items; 3) Then the responses are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to get a range of 0-100. A score above 68 is considered above average.
5-Month Usability
Time frame: 5-months
The 10-item System Usability Scale will be used to evaluate the usability of WebApp in the intervention group only. The System Usability Scale (Brook, 1996) includes 10 items that are rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). To get a final score the: 1) First, one is subtracted from the score of the odd items; 2) Second, the responses are subtracted from 5 for the even-numbered items; 3) Then the responses are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to get a range of 0-100. A score above 68 is considered above average.
3-Month Acceptability
Time frame: 3-months
The 5-item System Acceptability Scale (investigator created) will be used to evaluate the acceptability of the WebApp in the intervention group only. An investigator-created acceptability scale with 5-items will be used to measure acceptability. Four items are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree/Very Likely) to 5 (Strongly Disagree/Very Unlikely) and will be reverse coded. One item assess the frequency of use of the WebApp from 1 (Never) to 5 (Multiple times a week). All five items will be summed for a total score. Scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
5-Month Acceptability
Time frame: 5-months
The 5-item System Acceptability Scale (investigator created) will be used to evaluate the acceptability of the WebApp in the intervention group only. An investigator-created acceptability scale with 5-items will be used to measure acceptability. Four items are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree/Very Likely) to 5 (Strongly Disagree/Very Unlikely) and will be reverse coded. One item assess the frequency of use of the WebApp from 1 (Never) to 5 (Multiple times a week). All five items will be summed for a total score. Scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
2 secondary outcomes
3-Month Retention
Time frame: 3-months
5-Month Retention
Time frame: 5-months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 May 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sexual Violence
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Cross-Cutting E-Health Prevention Approaches
Alcohol Misuse Prevention, Sexual Violence Prevention
Enrolling by invitation
The Effectiveness of a Brief Early Intervention of Acute Stress Syndrome Stabilization Protocol for Victims of Sexual Violence (ASSYST-SV).
Acute Stress Symptoms, Sexual Violence
Recruiting
Centering Gender Affirming Resources in Higher Education
Sexual Violence, Drinking Heavy
Recruiting
SER Familia: A Family-Based Intervention Addressing Syndemic Conditions Among Latino Families
Substance Abuse, Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)
Not yet recruiting
Lakota Family Acceptance Project Pilot RCT
LGBTQ, Racial Disparities
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michelle L Munro-Kramer, PhD,CNM,FNP principal investigator
University of Michigan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MKit in people with Sexual Violence and Primary Prevention, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
3-Month Usability (time frame: 3-months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2019.