AzTrials
AzTrials

NeuralgiaNCT03315598

Evaluation of an Effectiveness and Safety of the Electroacupuncture in the Management of Intractable Neuropathic Pain

A study testing Electroacupuncture in people with Neuralgia and Neuralgia; Postherpetic, run by Seoul National University at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture treatment in refractory neuropathic pain patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Electroacupuncture
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
22 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
15 May 2017to 23 Feb 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who can adequately write a reportable questionnaire
  • Patients who have been diagnosed with one of the following neuropathic pain disease (postherpetic neuralgia, failed back surgery syndrome, diabetic neuropathy, other peripheral neuropathy)
  • Patients who failed conservative treatment at Seoul National University Hospital for more than 3 months.
  • Patients with NRS 5 points or more
  • Patients with painDETECT score 19 points or more

Who cannot join

  • Patients with major mental illness
  • Patients with unstable medical conditions
  • Pregnant
  • Patients who received acupuncture treatment at the site within the past month
  • Patients with bleeding tendency
  • Patients taking immunosuppressive drugs

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of an Effectiveness and Safety of the Electroacupuncture in the Management of Intractable Neuropathic Pain: An Open-labeled, Single-arm, Exploratory Pilot Study

The investigators will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture treatment in refractory neuropathic pain patients.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment in the patients with the following neuropathic pain related syndrome.

  • Postherpetic neuralgia
  • Failed back surgery syndrome
  • Diabetic neuropathy
  • other peripheral neuropathy

Patients with refractory neuropathic pain who do not respond to conservative treatment for more than 3 months should be included. Acupuncture treatment is maintained for 2 months in oriental medicine hospital. The effect is evaluated through the numeric rating score and the validated questionnaire.

Being tested
Electroacupuncture
Keywords
Neuralgia, Acupuncture Treatment
Medical subject headings
Neuralgia, Neuralgia, Postherpetic, Diabetic Neuropathies, Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ElectroacupunctureProcedure or surgery

    lectroacupuncture is a form of acupuncture where a small electric current is passed between pairs of acupuncture needles. According to some acupuncturists, this practice augments the use of regular acupuncture, can restore health and well-being, and is particularly good for treating pain.

Study groups in NCT03315598
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
An open-labeled, single-arm, exploratory pilot studyExperimentalElectroacupunture for 2months
Receives: Procedure: Electroacupuncture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline Numeric rating scale pain score (0-10) at 4 weeks

    The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point scale from 0 to 10 for patient self-reporting of pain. Change from the baseline NRS pain score at 4 weeks will be noted as percentage (%).

    Measured: At 4-week follow-up visit

  2. Change from baseline Numeric rating scale pain score (0-10) at 8 weeks

    The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point scale from 0 to 10 for patient self-reporting of pain. Change from the baseline NRS pain score at 4 weeks will be noted as percentage (%).

    Measured: At 8-week follow-up visit

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change from the score of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire at 8 weeks

    The main component of the SF-MPQ consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. Three pain scores are derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory, affective and total descriptors. The SF-MPQ also includes the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) index of the standard MPQ and a visual analogue scale (VAS).

    Measured: At 8-week follow-up visit

  2. Change from baseline score of Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BFI-SF) at 8 weeks

    The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning.

    Measured: At 8-week follow-up visit

  3. Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale

    The self-report measure Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.

    1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment.

    Measured: At 8-week follow-up visit

  4. 5-pointed patient satisfaction scale

    The 5-pointed patient satisfaction scale is an 5-point scale for patient self-reporting of satisfaction with treatment.

    1. Very satisfied
    2. Satisfied
    3. Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
    4. Dissatisfied
    5. Very dissatisfied

    Measured: At 8-week follow-up visit

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2017
  2. Study start15 May 2017
  3. Primary completion23 Feb 2018
  4. Study completion23 Feb 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03315598
Sponsor's protocol ID
1703-024-836
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
12 Oct 2017
Last updated
14 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Lee S, Lee CS, Moon JY, Song HG, Yoo Y, Kim J, Seo H, Lee SH. Electroacupuncture May Improve Burning and Electric Shock-Like Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective Exploratory Pilot Study. J Altern Complement Med. 2020 Dec;26(12):1136-1143. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0307. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

    PubMed 33074703

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Electroacupuncture in people with Neuralgia and Neuralgia; Postherpetic, run by Seoul National University at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline Numeric rating scale pain score (0-10) at 4 weeks (time frame: At 4-week follow-up visit). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03315598, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in